The Clitoris: A Recent Discovery in Human Anatomy (NSFW)

[Sounder]

Except that jokes told by humorless people do not often work. Trust me I know.

[Nordic]

I'll probably stay out of this one except to say:

Every forum should have a thread on this subject. That's active. All the time.

Carry on!

[sunny]

I renamed the thread because it needed more attention and bumping

[JackRiddler]

Ba- ba- bumping? Am I not getting something? Am I getting too much?!

[Project Willow]

Ba- ba- bumping? Am I not getting something? Am I getting too much?!

[Bruce Dazzling]

[undead]

Thanks Dr. Clitterhouse, for bringing the CIA into everything. I'll bet that's really popular with the ladies. Really arousing, that subject.

It does look exactly like an ankh, that's what I was thinking too. Those ancient Egyptians sure knew their anatomy. Like this symbol and it's correspondence:



And the "egyptologists" that study them are some of the most inept and clueless academics that exist.

[sunny]

^^OH! That's awesome!

[eyeno]

It does look exactly like an ankh, that's what I was thinking too. Those ancient Egyptians sure knew their anatomy. Like this symbol and it's correspondence:

I thought exactly the same the moment I saw the drawing of the female anatomy. I could not remember the name of the "ankh" though and intended to set upon a search for the symbol.

Thank you to who ever brought the ankh to the discussion and thank you project willow for the thread. This is fascinating, and uhhh...titillating...lol...

[Peregrine]

What a great thread. Willow, I couldn't help but think of these Egyptian images, as well.



[quote="Project Willow"]

[Project Willow]

On the other hand...





It can go too far, and perhaps ironically, I don't know, it's probably a source of great humor to some people who understand the role of Egyptian iconography in some abusive pedophilic cult rituals.

I invite anyone who's captivated enough by the ankh idea to cough up some real (rigorously produced) connection or leave it off.

Thanks for your understanding.

[eyeno]

Somehow I anticipated that reply from you willow because I know how you feel about me. I knew better and should have listened to my instincts.

I posted that because of the reasons I wrote at the top of my post. I don't believe in the devil as evil resides in the hearts of humans exclusively. I am into symbols however and I only posted those examples to see if any other forum members may shed light, or none, on the similarity of the symbols.

For some reason the forum software or my computer won't let me delete it at the moment. I'm sure the mods will probably grant my wish to delete it should I ask them later. But honestly i'm not sure why it doesn't fit the theme considering the old bible type themes I mentioned.

I consider this forum a place of exploration and sharing of minds and information. I realize that I don't know anything about MC compared to you and that you don't appreciate my attempts to learn it.

It looks like a butterfly to me, and it also looks like horns. Perhaps i'm insane though.

I sincerely apologize for intruding on your thread. Rest assured i'll never do it again. I appreciate your contributions to the forum and wish you appreciated mine. You probably don't appreciate mine because I have attempted to learn MC in a manner that offends you and I sincerely apologize for that. I knew better than to venture into this thread but I did it anyway because I really appreciated it and it struck a lot of symbols in my mind that are intertwined with old time religion type themes.

If you don't understand my intentions and don't respond in kind i'll ask the mods to delete it. Sorry...

[compared2what?]

To be fair, the frontal view makes it look like it has more of a cross/ankh structure than it does.

But if it's absolutely gotta be shaped like something else, it's really more halo than horns:



Thanks for the post, Willow. I love those pictures, especially the one right above, even though ovaries are still mad creepy looking, yo.

How long do you think it will be before they totally stop using those old-school metal speculums with the screw-thingies every place in the world?

[RobinDaHood]

Search for the G-spot ends in anticlimax
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2088767/G-spot-scientists-60-years.html
Ultrasounds and tissue samples have failed to prove existence of erogenous zone

By Tamara Cohen

Last updated at 12:28 AM on 20th January 2012

It will come as some relief to chaps up and down the country – though perhaps not to their wives.

The elusive female G-spot may not actually exist at all, according to scientists.

After reviewing 100 studies conducted over the past 60 years, experts have concluded that there is no evidence for the fabled centre of female sexual pleasure after all.
Research leader Dr Amichai Kilchevsky, a urologist from the Yale-New Haven Hospital in Connecticut, blamed pornography, magazines and sex therapists for ruthlessly promoting the idea.
While he admitted the concept merited further attention and that ‘modern investigative techniques’ might help, he said he hoped his conclusion would take the pressure off couples who had not located it.

‘Objective measures have failed to provide strong and consistent evidence for the existence of an anatomical site that could be related to the famed G-spot’, he wrote in the Journal of Sexual Medicine.
His findings support those of researchers from King’s College London, who questioned 1,800 women in one of the largest studies on the subject and concluded that there was no evidence for the existence of the G-spot.

The British team suggested in 2010 that the idea made both men and women feel inadequate about their sex lives.

The G-spot is said to be a small area of the female body where nerve endings are concentrated, with the capability to provide intense pleasure.

A separate study in 2008, which used ultrasound imaging to look at the vaginal wall, said women who reported having orgasms had thicker tissue around what is considered the G-spot area than women who didn’t.

However, Dr Kilchevsky’s team said other imaging studies couldn’t confirm this.

He added that results from tissue biopsies were inconclusive, with some studies reporting more nerve endings in the ‘G-spot area’, while others found fewer in the same place.

‘Lots of women feel almost as though it is their fault they can’t find it’, Dr Kilchevsky said. ‘The reality is that it is probably not something, historically or evolutionarily, that should even exist.’

The G-spot was named in honour of German gynaecologist Ernst Grafenberg, who claimed to have discovered the elusive erogenous zone in 1950.

This picture from the article completely omits The Clitoris...

Apparently the lab coats need a new map!

[slomo]

I don't know why I keep coming back to this thread, because really it has nothing at all to do with me. Still, it's fascinating.

I really do think I would need help finding my way around...