Nordic wrote:Iamwhomiam wrote:Nordic wrote:
Iamwhomiam wrote:
Personally, I don't twitter. had to draw the line somewhere.
Yeah. Real men don't Tweet. I mean, c'mon.
Nah. Without a smartphone, what's the point? Chiming in a few hours later when online with a pc kinda moots the point, don't you think? Besides, it's extremely distracting and time consuming to engage in, though I imagine some enjoy sharing their brief bits with others. On rare occasions I do text, though.
Well, I meant the words "Tweet" and "Twitter". Not exactly masculine words that I want to own. I mean "Twit" "Twat" "Quitter" "Tit" "Pitter Patter"? And "Tweet"? It's something you picture a baby chick doing.
My problem is with shortform discourse. I don't make arguments that way, and arguably, no one really can. I sense that's what it's not used for popularly, and that's fine. I have an account, but almost all of my posts (under 100 total) were to repost links to longer articles, or to add to the fabric of voices at various Occupy events. I can only imagine how great it would have been to have the tool at the Seattle WTO or the 2000 RNC. The account is simply my real name, but I think it's fine thus far. I've posted nothing that would explicitly cost me my job yet.
In the future, though, I think that a #rigint tag might be useful during downtimes (and isn't there a way to view all posts tagged that way without having an account?). I know that I at least follow Wombat if not one or two others.
And look, I made it through a whole post about the service without using any of those stupid terms.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler