Martian civilisation nuked by Aliens...

[NaturalMystik]

Viking rover moving around

well, that's bullshit then. The Viking was not a rover, it sat still on it's legs and did not move. Also no video, still images only.

Good point. Dang...

[Searcher08]

Both people lost me when they started talking about how Mars is like Earth and you don't need suits.

That question is discussed (entertainingly) here http://cosmoquest.org/forum/archive/index.php/t-36151.html

[slimmouse]

Im a big fan of the "face on mars" theory.- Ive posted previously ( a good while ago) on the Avebury connection with the "face on mars", as proposed by David Percy.

But surely this pales into insignificance compared to the "human- nervous- system- on- earth" theory proposed by Danny Wilten, posited in the following video I previously posted.

I for one am having a hard time debunking this...but i''m sincerely open to genuine persuasion... in fact for the purposes of what follows, I dont want to believe for fear of having missed the con.

Help me please.

[smoking since 1879]

She said that while she was working, she saw two people walking across the Martian surface. She continued that she and six colleagues were watching the footage of the Viking rover moving around on multiple screens when she noticed two men in spacesuits walking to the Viking Explorer from the horizon. She added the men's suits looked protective but unlike what astronauts wore.

The Viking craft were landers, not rovers, there was no "rover moving around".

Just a minor detail, carry on.

peace

[ EDIT: sorry justdrew, just realised you pointed that out already ]

[seemslikeadream]

Im a big fan of the "face on mars" theory.- Ive posted previously ( a good while ago) on the Avebury connection with the "face on mars", as proposed by David Percy.

But surely this pales into insignificance compared to the "human- nervous- system- on- earth" theory proposed by Danny Wilten, posited in the following video I previously posted.

I for one am having a hard time debunking this...but i''m sincerely open to genuine persuasion... in fact for the purposes of what follows, I dont want to believe for fear of having missed the con.

Help me please.

I am absolutely fascinated by this video

yes please somebody debunk it ..waiting

[Iamwhomiam]

Can't wait to see that video, Nordic. I've seen a few different ideas expressed about the layout of our ancient population centers so this interests me. Thanks.

Guys, if they lied about Mars being inhabited now or ever, or if they've long had humans exploring it or interacting with a still unreported populace, couldn't they also lie about the purpose of Viking? Perhaps there were two, or that one was much more than imagined.

[smoking since 1879]

Guys, if they lied about Mars being inhabited now or ever, or if they've long had humans exploring it or interacting with a still unreported populace, couldn't they also lie about the purpose of Viking? Perhaps there were two, or that one was much more than imagined.

So two implausible things make a plausible thing? Neat

There were two Viking landers, designed and launched in the 70's, using 60's technology, the program cost close to a billion dollars (in 70's money).

We had neither the money (thanks congress) nor the expertise for anything other than static landers sending static images (unless we were gifted some exotic tech by the visitors, which kinda makes the whole discussion moot i guess).

It's a nice tale to tell the grandkids tho, eh?

peace

[slimmouse]

So Rover was actually a Stationary?

Perhaps Ive been listening to more than enough Terrence Mckenna lately.

He claims that our basic method of vital interaction ( language) is inbuilt with the capacity to decieve.

[Iamwhomiam]

Guys, if they lied about Mars being inhabited now or ever, or if they've long had humans exploring it or interacting with a still unreported populace, couldn't they also lie about the purpose of Viking? Perhaps there were two, or that one was much more than imagined.

So two implausible things make a plausible thing? Neat

There were two Viking landers, designed and launched in the 70's, using 60's technology, the program cost close to a billion dollars (in 70's money).

We had neither the money (thanks congress) nor the expertise for anything other than static landers sending static images (unless we were gifted some exotic tech by the visitors, which kinda makes the whole discussion moot i guess).

It's a nice tale to tell the grandkids tho, eh?

peace

Yes, it would be a nice tale to tell the grandkids. In time, they might have one to tell us. Who knows? Yes, there were two Viking orbiters and landers.

Maybe they didn't lie to us. Maybe Mars is filled with amazing natural anomalies that just look as though they were built by a civilization, but weren't.

[smoking since 1879]

Guys, if they lied about Mars being inhabited now or ever, or if they've long had humans exploring it or interacting with a still unreported populace, couldn't they also lie about the purpose of Viking? Perhaps there were two, or that one was much more than imagined.

So two implausible things make a plausible thing? Neat

There were two Viking landers, designed and launched in the 70's, using 60's technology, the program cost close to a billion dollars (in 70's money).

We had neither the money (thanks congress) nor the expertise for anything other than static landers sending static images (unless we were gifted some exotic tech by the visitors, which kinda makes the whole discussion moot i guess).

It's a nice tale to tell the grandkids tho, eh?

peace

Yes, it would be a nice tale to tell the grandkids. In time, they might have one to tell us. Who knows? Yes, there were two Viking orbiters and landers.

Maybe they didn't lie to us. Maybe Mars is filled with amazing natural anomalies that just look as though they were built by a civilization, but weren't.

Maybe i should watch that video

peace dude

[Iamwhomiam]

^^^ Good idea. I guess I should too. But save me the chore, if it's beyond Mad Max's wildest projections. I'll check back later for your recommendation.

[Nordic]

Im a big fan of the "face on mars" theory.- Ive posted previously ( a good while ago) on the Avebury connection with the "face on mars", as proposed by David Percy.

But surely this pales into insignificance compared to the "human- nervous- system- on- earth" theory proposed by Danny Wilten, posited in the following video I previously posted.

I for one am having a hard time debunking this...but i''m sincerely open to genuine persuasion... in fact for the purposes of what follows, I dont want to believe for fear of having missed the con.

Help me please.

I am absolutely fascinated by this video

yes please somebody debunk it ..waiting

I would like to be fascinated with it but it's boring the hell out of me so far.

Pet peeve: why are so many people like this compelled to make goddamn videos instead of doing this wonderful ancient thing called WRITING?

Really.

I like to read. I can do it so so so much more quickly and efficiently than wasting my time listening to some long winded guy who doesn't have his thoughts organized into even rough-draft form but thinks mankind should bear with him while he blunders through his earth shattering presentation.

If its so profound take the time to write it down.

Go to reddit/conspiracy and almost everything is a freaking video now. Usually I font even bother. For another thing I am not always sitting somewhere with headphones where I can privately listen to one of these things.

With reading the audio is all in your head! Silent audio! How cool is that.

Ok end of rant. Maybe somebody an watch this video and paraphrase this guy's 38 minutes of boredom into a nice 100 word synopsis.

[Luther Blissett]

There's also no written record / notes, and as of yet no way to query the contents of the video. You would have to take vigorous notes to keep track. That now requires the efforts of two humans using their human time to do the same work.

For the same reasons I'll never know why a colleague or client prefers a phone call over email to discuss minutiae. Is it their way of covering their own asses if they forget something or misspeak?

There's a time and a place for video. Gasland is more persuasive than Eating Animals, perhaps Safran Foer should take a Forks Over Knives approach.

[slimmouse]

@ Nordic.-

Having watched a number of Danny Wiltens videos, I have to say that I have sympathy, since its abundantly clear to me that he's a far better researcher than presenter. Its the only reason I havent posted more - From what ive seen so far this is his best ! I dont in any way wish to knock Danny Wilten for this. Its simplly that some people can present, and others can research.

Before I offer you my understanding of the video in short form, a little perspective might be helpful. Over the last 15 years or so I wouldnt care to calculate how much I have read, watched and heard about Ancient Egypt. Based upon that, its fairly clear to me that among their other talents, the Egyptians were indeed master Mathematicians and Anatomists. This is apparently laid out in very explicit detail in Schwaller De Lubics classic 'work, The temple of man. Unfortunately this is two volumes and a thousand pages or so. Ive onlly read a few excerpts, one of which for instance explains very clearly how the Egyptians knew the vital function played by the fema in generating blood cells.

All of the above is to say that Im already greatly interested, and reasonably well informed about this stuff. I suspect SLAD is much the same, hence her fascination also. All of this obviously means that we''re probably naturally more likely to Grok what Wilten is saying. Which is....

The River Nile replicates the human nervous system in profile form to the point of the Sacrum where it is completed in portrait ( front on)

All of the major temples sit on the Chakra points of the body. Starting at the sacrum where the temple of man is physically located on the Nile, right up to the throat Chakra where the great pyramid is located.

Since the human body is constructed around the mathematical constant of Phi, this is the basis of Wiltens anatomical template that he superimposes on the Google Earth Map. From this it becomes practically chrystal clear what the Nile is actually doing.

When we get into the Nile Delta, this then mimics the human Brain. Sitting at the exact point where the Pineal glland would be is Bhusiris, a temple site, (which we cant find many images for).

The starting point for all of these findings is extracted from a temple wall hieroglyph that wilten also superimposes onto the map.

Watching this extraordinary map unfolding in front of my own eyes held extra poignancy for me, since I remember my old boss telling me almost 10 years ago that the map of Egypt is a map of the human body. My old boss being something of a romantic thinker however, led me to take this contention with a pinch of salt.
Someone else I owe an apology too, were I to meet him again.

Finally, apparently Danny Wilten is indeed intending to put all of this in book form. Whether that will make it more apparent is unclear however, given the way that Danny presents his stuff.

[seemslikeadream]

@ Nordic

I take it that you won't be watching all 10 videos?

Author: Danny Wilten (70.196.11.---)
Date: 07-Jan-13 18:08

I may have some assistance on the pyramid problem, the pineal gland, the soul, and its tie to Orion/Osiris. The Egyptians were masters at correspondence. I believe the pyramids served many purposes and I have some interesting perspectives. Someone passed me the link to this forum. Hopefully you find this enlightening. I believe you will see at each step of the way there are instances of confirmation.

Let us start with the Pineal Gland and the soul. They correspond to the house of Osiris (Busiris/Djedu), where the soul is found according to the ancient texts. It also corresponds to a vortex as well, as you will see and the same vortex I discovered in Orion a year before NASA who just released the news in November of 2012. I have proof of this finding previous to NASA dated 2011 on Youtube and several videos. It was discovered via repeated depictions of the Orion Nebula in cathedrals across Europe.

Some diagrams below help expand:



Note: The flower of life that began at the great pyramids if continued all over Egypt show major intersections right at important temples and areas in Egypt such as Elephantine, Abydos, The Great Pyramids, and Busiris. The Temple of Man and the Nile seem to share correspondence as well.

The image showing the brain in the Nile Delta was first provided by El Greco in 1580 called Mount Sinai where he clearly painted the nervous system and the Nile combined. See below.




The Nile and Nile Delta are a metaphysical representation of the human nervous system:





The Pineal gland and the kings chamber are located where Busiris/Djedu is in the center of the Nile Delta. "The soul of Osiris and Ra embracing in Busiris" is a clue to correspondence. This gives correspondence of the Pineal Gland to the soul.






In the pyramid texts, the construction of the pyramid is Osiris. The Nile Delta positions the pyramids at the same location as the pyramids of the brain in the human nervous system. Using the flower of life starting at the pyramids, we begin the circle encompassing the Nile Delta. This circle as a radius of 216 miles (1/10th the diameter of the moon). Then we place the overlay of the pyramid where its base is at the center stretching the diameter of the circle and we get how the pyramid is supposed to be positioned on the brain.


The Nile Delta corresponds to the Orion Nebula Trapezium. The pyramids are markers to show the importance of the Nile Delta.




Note: The pyramids are only markers. If they were proportional in size they would not even appear on the map. They are an indicator of something even larger (The Nile Delta --> Orion Nebula Trapezium)