Flippant, inappropriate and gross. I thank you for removing it, Wombat.
Jerky
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
by Jerky » Tue Feb 10, 2015 9:37 pm
by Grizzly » Tue Feb 10, 2015 11:20 pm
And now my bitter hands chafe beneath the clouds of what was everything.
Oh, the pictures have all been washed in black, tattooed everything...
I take a walk outside, I'm surrounded by some kids at play
I can feel their laughter, so why do I sear?
Oh, and twisted thoughts that spin round my head, I'm spinning, oh,
I'm spinning, how quick the sun can drop away
And now my bitter hands cradle broken glass of what was everything
All the pictures have all been washed in black, tattooed everything...
by Jerky » Wed Feb 11, 2015 2:28 am
by semper occultus » Wed Feb 11, 2015 5:11 am
by coffin_dodger » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:07 am
by stefano » Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:24 am
A mom without reproach, which after separation from their father had custody of his three children ito a final decision of Family Court Judge issued on 18 November 2005, complained to the police in St-Tropez 10 October 2007, for the rape of her 6 year old daughter by a friend's father.
The next day, after the filmed hearing of his children, the prosecutor of Draguignan (Var), Christian Girard, directed eleven gendarmes to take her 3 children, 6 years, 5 years and 3 years old. She will have no more new for 3 weeks "Order of attorney not to tell you" opposes her everywhere.
Not convened hearings on child Judge, sole custody of his children was given to the father for a year, three weeks after their removal and home placement. She will only see them again the 83 days, a weekend on two and half the school holidays without cause and despite the ruling of the family court judge.
A year later, she learned that it is not only his daughter who was raped, but the three children, since August 2007, every day by their father, and on Wednesdays, Saturdays and Sundays, with other children by many adults, photographed and filmed.
She still learn a lot more serious, the children said they were forced to attend and participate in the torture and murder of children filmed, which is called snuff movies.
After revealing 16 murders of children to their mother, Judge children removed from the mother completely her rights and accommodations. She will not see her children only after 22 months and only 2 hours every 15 days rather publicized.
As soon as Mom learned of the first murder, she immediately alerted, with many supporting documents, on 12 December 2008, the President of the Republic, the Minister of Justice and the Interior Minister who returned the file to the prosecutor of Draguignan.
A preliminary investigation was initiated in February 2009 by the prosecutor of Draguignan which culminated in June 2009, without further trial and in defiance of the law in Article 79 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and 226-10 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, in custody for 36 hours of the children's mother, their grandmother and her companion for false accusation and their referral to the criminal court at the hearing on 30 July 2009, referred to that of 10 December 2009, and that of 30 April 2013 and finally to that of January 9, 2014 at 13:15, 4 and a half years and references that allow not to investigate the facts disclosed by the children and keep them apart from their protective mom.
November 30, 2009, a brave policeman Var, as the AMIDLISA denounced on the Internet and many sites of humanist associations a pedophile network rampant in Saint Tropez region covered by all the institutions including that of Justice, namely quoting some judges involved.
In this letter, we can recognize point by point the case of the "seemingly perfect mother" as she says and her three children! Where are we today?
Despite AMIDLISA letter of 30 November 2009 on the INTERNET, which was taken by many sites, sent to all members of both legislatures to all senators, all European members of the French language, despite DVD summary the case with supporting documents and audio and video recordings of children given to all ministers of the two governments, two Presidents of the Republic, all presidential candidates and their party, the President of the General Council of the Var, the Prefect of the Var, the Commander of the Gendarmerie Var, etc ... all editors of all French local and national newspapers, Belgium and Switzerland, the Superior Council of Magistracy and many personalities besides Interpol Intelligence general, the Legionaries and the many associations defending women and children, religious bodies of three monotheistic religions, Gilles Bernheim, Chief Rabbi of France, Dalil Boubaker, rector of the Great Mosque of France and Pope Benedict XVI, despite complaint of crimes against humanity filed with the European Court of Human Rights, the International Criminal Court, the European Court of Justice in June 2011, etc. nothing moves!
Justice refuses to investigate and prosecute criminal acts despite its legal obligation!
MPs and senators informed refer the matter to the Ministry of Justice.
Ministers refer to the Minister of Justice.
The President of the Republic "by his arbitration which ensures the proper functioning of government" under Article 5 of the Constitution says that he can do anything under the separation of powers.
And the Minister of Justice who is responsible for ensuring the proper functioning of the judicial system refers the case to the prosecutor of the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Draguignan, the very man whose many malfunctions were reported and that is part of his administration!
It turns round ... while a mother and child are in great pain for 6 years and 16 children have been tortured and killed for making films that bring in a lot of money!
by Jerky » Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:21 pm
by Project Willow » Thu Feb 12, 2015 1:40 am
by Tyler Rabbit » Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:20 am
Hi Guys,
I am the father (real father) of the children in these videos.
Not the boyfriend who has fled the country!
My name, as some have point out is Ricky Dearman.
The first 2 things I want to say;
1 – Thank you to everyone for your concerns regarding my children, as I am deeply touch, be it negativity towards me somewhat.
2 – I say Thank You, but I also want to say sorry that you have had big hearts having gone through some turmoil while listening to my children on these videos.
Sadly, I am limited to what I can say for legal reasons, at this point! I wished that I could tell you everything I know, because you think that you Guys are angry…well you have no idea what I am sitting on and having to keep inside of me right now!!!
I feel like a 1,000,000 volcano’s about to erupt! You have no idea!!
That said, I want you to know that I am completely innocent of any wrong doing in this! Completely Innocent.
Some have mentioned that the children have been coached to say what they have said? You have no idea and again, I cannot say at this point. These sick Fcuks, and I cannot even tell you who yet. But I promise, you will know the outcome.
You may have questions, as I still do, but I will not be able to answer yet, but as soon as I am legally able, I shall let you know.
I want to thank you again for your concerns and support. This has and is a difficult time for all involved mostly my children.
Best Regards Ricky
Hampstead Abuse Allegations And Online Vigilantism: The Post Savile World
The sharing of a series of videos involving allegations of extreme sexual abuse of at least 2 children, has prompted a form of online vigilantism, the ramifications of which has yet to be fully understood.
The clips of a poor innocent boy and girl being encouraged to discuss so called “satanic ritual abuse” sessions that allegedly took place in Hampstead, London, are currently being paraded around blogs, forums, and social media accounts, by a wave of self-styled justice and truth seekers.
Are the “security services involved?” asks the Aanirfan Blog, which proceeds to list the allegations, before linking them to a string of historical cases that for the most part were shown to be baseless.
Absurd Allegations
Abuse is alleged to have taken place at locations as absurd as an “American fast-food restaurant,” which the children named as “McDonalds,” with UK chain “Pizza Express,” and “all the cafés” lumped in as well. That’s without mentioning “all the shopkeepers,” being involved.
The boss of the “fast food restaurant” allowed child sacrifices to take place in a “secret room”. Here “Babies were prepared and cooked.”
A school where the children attended is said to be a hub of activity. At the nearby church they were allegedly forced to partake in the murder of babies by their teachers and estranged father. They were abused, made to drink the blood of the dead, and danced on decomposed baby skulls.
The videos although shared recently, were taken some time ago and the children have since been taken off the mother, who helped record them with her male partner, who has since believed to have gone walkabouts.
A Change.org petition that seems to have taken the allegations at face value, calls for the children to be returned to the mother and their Russian family.
The Tap Blog agrees, and asserts that “anybody who watches these privately taken videos is convinced,” that a powerful paedophile ring is at work … I’m not!
Misguided Vigilantism
What I am convinced of is that in a post Jimmy Savile world – where justified distrust of state institutions reigns supreme – a void has opened up in to which vigilantism has filled.
Savile was a monster, as are the gambit of celebrities and other high profile people convicted of abuse in the past couple of years. The state and society as a whole, have a lot to answer for – how did they allow this to happen? It’s only natural that the average everyday citizen has less faith in the authorities than they’ve ever had. How are we supposed to feel when psychopaths, liars and spineless head turners, are exposed so overtly?
Congruently, the rise of social media, citizen journalism, or what we might call “alternative media,” has allowed everyone to have a voice. Individuals are more empowered now than they’ve ever been, in their ability to share ideas and information. This is extremely beneficial if one subscribes to concepts of freedom or democracy.
However with our new found power to have our voices heard also comes great responsibility. Comments we may have made flippantly down the pub to a handful of friends and acquaintances, can now be seen by thousands of people on Facebook, Twitter or Youtube.
What’s concerning about this story is not that people wish to help two innocent children who may have been abused, but that they would so blindly believe and share anything and everything written about the case. That they would believe the videos completely and literally. That they would name names, single out locations, and plaster the videos themselves all over the web!
Although there is certainly a debate to be had about the secret family courts and some of the practises of social services in this country, there are legitimate reasons why cases involving children, especially abuse, are restricted from public perusal.
Whatever may have happened to these children, how are they going to feel when in a few years they Google their names and see their faces crudely cropped for dramatic effect on some paranoid and hysterical article? With hordes of people commenting with their armchair expertise?
Clouding Real Abuse
In the aforementioned Aanirfan blog post the author tenuously links to a “satanic ritual abuse” case from the 80s in the US state of Minnesota. Several children made allegations against an unrelated man and their parents. The man confessed and then identified a number of the children’s parents as perpetrators. Ultimately twenty-four adults were charged with child abuse though only three went to trial with two acquittals and one conviction.
What was a sickening but relatively straightforward abuse case, snowballed in to a hysteria about a giant satanic ring. The Attorney General’s Office concluded that the investigation by the local police was so poor and confused, that it had destroyed the opportunity to properly investigate. Judge Antonin Scalia said the coercive techniques used by the investigators damaged the credibility of the allegations and although “some sexual abuse took place … there is no reason to believe it was as widespread as charged.”
(In other words the hysteria clouded the real abuse that took place).
The infamous McMartin preschool case, which ran through the 80s was similarly ruined by the hysterical responses of both the social workers, investigators and the media. Suggestive interview techniques prompted the children to make up absurd stories like seeing witches fly, and accuse people nowhere near the scene of being involved, like celebrity Chuck Norris. Secret tunnels and other locations where the abuse was supposed to have taken place were all ruled out. After a record $15 million trial concluded in 1990, all charges were dropped and at least one victim admitted they made up their story.
Satanic Panic then jumped to the UK in 1990 when five families in Rochdale were wrongly torn apart when it was alleged children were being abused by a satanic ring. Paranoid social workers, in part working from NSCPCC guidelines on unfounded “satanic ritual abuse,” had convinced themselves that satanists were operating in Manchester. Video tapes of interviews that were eventually released showed how the social workers coerced the children to make up the stories, and even with no evidence they ran with the case.
Allegations ranged from the sacrifice of human babies and robed devil worship to locking the children in cages and caves. None of the claims were ever proven, and all of the children were eventually returned to their families, 10 years later in the worst case. Many of the alleged victims later spoke out in a documentary about the very real abuse they suffered when being forced to undergo “medical examinations” after being physically removed from their families by police.
In today’s online world of trutherism the Hollie Greig case is perhaps more well known. This was the story of a down syndrome girl who was allegedly abused for over a decade by a gang of paedophiles, reaching the top levels of the Scottish establishment. Well-meaning internet activists launched the “Google Hollie Greig” campaign and some even took to the streets to protest the stomach churning crimes of the elite.
Names and locations were named (even when they didn’t exist), as were other victims who vehemently denied being abused. The story quickly morphed in to whatever the current alternative media celebrity wanted it to be, including satanism, but ultimately no solid evidence ever emerged.
Some medical records could be interpreted as evidence of abuse in some form, but at this point the case is so clouded in unsubstantiated nonsense that nobody is ever going to take it seriously again.
Another Case Ruined?
We’re entering in to a new world, where cases like that of the two children are going to be blown up on the internet much more regularly, because it’s so easy to do so. Somebody claiming to be the father is posting on the videos to try and clear his name, and the videos themselves were likely put up with the mother’s permission to get people on her side.
Legal steps had already been taken before they were uploaded, suggesting the current hysteria is too late to impact the initial court action itself, as the children are already in care.
That fact alone should suggest that the authorities believe that yes, some form of abuse had taken place. Whether this was from the father, or the mother and her partner, or a combination of the them all – neither you or I are in a position to know or find out. Speculating or literally believing there are baby skulls stacked up in a church in the middle of North London, achieves absolutely nothing.
While on paper I am not opposed to vigilantism or independent research when there is solid grounds to believe the state has failed, this comes with the caveat that the vigilante or researcher has to demonstrate they can tackle the situation with impeccable standards. Shock and awe blog posts, or blindly sharing videos of the poor children on Facebook to spark discussions about how David Icke was right all along, is NOT how it’s done. In fact it’s the perfect excuse for tighter internet regulations and even more secretive court proceedings!
In many ways the internet has made us more free than we’ve ever been before, but are we mature enough to accept the responsibilities that go along with that?
This story suggests we’re not.
by elfismiles » Thu Feb 12, 2015 3:48 pm
Jerky » 12 Feb 2015 01:21 wrote:Okay, after reviewing this woman's Facebook page, can we safely assume that she's bonkers, and that those kids need to be taken away from her immediately?
Personally, I think so.
Jerky
by Wombaticus Rex » Thu Feb 12, 2015 3:56 pm
Jerky » Wed Feb 11, 2015 8:21 pm wrote:Okay, after reviewing this woman's Facebook page, can we safely assume that she's bonkers, and that those kids need to be taken away from her immediately?
Personally, I think so.
Jerky
by Tyler Rabbit » Thu Feb 12, 2015 7:21 pm
by Bryter » Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:39 am
This week the Hampstead primary school sent a letter to parents which said: “In relation to the recent allegations the police and social services were immediately notified. The investigation that was undertaken concluded that there was no substance to the allegations so no further action will be taken. “The school is currently working with the Camden legal team and the police on the difficult task of removing the information from the internet.”
by Jerky » Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:08 pm
by Project Willow » Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:34 pm
Jerky » 13 Feb 2015 16:08 wrote:"Safety in numbers" could also describe her accusation style. If she and her (I think brainwashed) children are to be believed, fully half her hometown are members of this Satanic pedo death-cult.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests