Wombaticus Rex wrote:we're all on board, fellow traveler.
agreed. what i was trying to drive at, and i think most understand, is the orders of magnitude greater in scope, planning, power, purpose and vectors of influence available to the antagonists.
Wombaticus Rex wrote:Where people disagree with Hugh is merely details and application. And application. And application. And application.
based on the foregoing, how can we judge how and what they do? it's presumptuous to rule anything out. the shenanigans we see are only a glimpse, a part of the whole. imo, every rip-off is connected to every other rip-off. hence the advanced state we're in. if we could see behind the curtain, we would see many things really happening we considered absurd and impossible. for this reason and because i'm cast upon the rocks of intuition and because i'm cynical, i'm inclined to consider hugh's explanations. they are plausible imo.
i don't think it's as simple as a tax-funded secret segment of the military. after all consider my description of the corporation above. what would this say about the owners of said entities? turns out they are all members of interlocking esoteric societies lying about their existence and agendas. suddenly 1+1=3 begins to make more sense to me and something as fantastic as what hugh describes begins to make a macabre kind of sense as well. i don't wish to invalidate anyone's visceral (or other) responses to hugh's material. i don't want it to be true and to be honest i haven't delved deeply into it so maybe i'm speaking out of line. i just appreciate his contribution.