National Anarchism & the Far Right

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby Searcher08 » Thu Feb 27, 2014 7:13 pm

American Dream » Thu Feb 27, 2014 9:54 pm wrote:
Searcher08 » Thu Feb 27, 2014 4:49 pm wrote:I wasn't clear on that - I didn't mean about your 'point-of-view' in the sense of an evolving political position, I mean 'point-of-view' in terms of literal perceptual position.
For example, when speaking face to face, are you experiencing being in their body looking back at yourself? Or out of your eyes looking at them Or in a 'movie director' position looking at the whole scene, so you see yourself and the person?

I would tend to be looking out through my eyes 70%, through another persons etc 20% and fly-on-the wall 10% ish

I am asking this in an aim to improve communication and how I structure communication.


I aspire towards Buddhistic compassion but I would be lying if I claimed that I am sustaining perfect compassion when somebody is perpetuating the kinds of ideas that are strongly associated with a racist/fascist milieu. I do often keep compassion for the individual who has been misled and/or is somehow emotionally/mentally "hooked", but I recoil at the ideas and most importantly, I see, feel and know how some of these ideas can hurt other people, in very concrete ways...


Perhaps we can continue this by PM? It seems to be a communication TAZ...
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Sat Mar 01, 2014 11:02 pm

Some of them say pretty words but here's the rub:

If a white man wants to lynch me, that’s his problem. If he’s got the power to lynch me, that’s my problem. Racism is not a question of attitude; it’s a question of power.

— Stokely Carmichael
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby jakell » Sun Mar 02, 2014 7:19 am

Are you sure you've thought the above quote through AD? It's just that it's a lot closer to stuff I've been saying, and seems a bit removed from your own more strict ideology based assertions.

I say 'seems' because your little one liner comments hardly provide any context at all.
" Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism"
User avatar
jakell
 
Posts: 1821
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: North England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:07 am

jakell » Sun Mar 02, 2014 6:19 am wrote:Are you sure you've thought the above quote through AD? It's just that it's a lot closer to stuff I've been saying, and seems a bit removed from your own more strict ideology based assertions.

I say 'seems' because your little one liner comments hardly provide any context at all.


I think it should be obvious- as with the case of Palestine/Israel cited in another thread- that "racial"/ethnic separatism in North America, Europe, South Asia, the Middle East etc. would be far more likely to exaggerate hierarchy and oppression than eliminate them. Of course it's very pie in the sky to say that one is working towards creating heaven on Earth, a living Utopia, but that is a common excuse for doing really bad things in the here and now.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby jakell » Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:44 am

Your remarks above appear completely unrelated to what you quoted of mine. Here's what I said again, but with the context directly inserted this time:

jakell » Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:19 am wrote:
American Dream » Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:02 am wrote:Some of them say pretty words but here's the rub:

If a white man wants to lynch me, that’s his problem. If he’s got the power to lynch me, that’s my problem. Racism is not a question of attitude; it’s a question of power.

— Stokely Carmichael

Are you sure you've thought the above quote through AD? It's just that it's a lot closer to stuff I've been saying, and seems a bit removed from your own more strict ideology based assertions.

I say 'seems' because your little one liner comments hardly provide any context at all.
" Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism"
User avatar
jakell
 
Posts: 1821
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: North England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby 82_28 » Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:53 am

So, cut to the chase AD. What are your immediate reccomendations? Seriously. What are your immediate reccomendations? Not being a dick and certainly not calling you out, just spell out what you think for your fellow members.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:02 am

82_28 » Sun Mar 02, 2014 7:53 am wrote:So, cut to the chase AD. What are your immediate reccomendations? Seriously. What are your immediate reccomendations? Not being a dick and certainly not calling you out, just spell out what you think for your fellow members.


Your point is well taken. It is what it is- that's really the best I can say. Jakell's advocacy of Keith Preston is clearly not in accord with the anti-fascist guidelines of this board, but where do we go from here?

The best thing I can see to do is to get clarity from jakell what further advocacy of fascist/racist types causes he will or will not be doing here. but he has been extremely elusive about these things.

He has had many opportunities to make truly clear comment on the situation but up until now he has- in effect- declined.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby jakell » Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:40 am

Advocacy Advocacy Advocacy.

I did a little summary of some of my initial refutations of this. Each one got ignored so I eventually stopped bothering.
The accustations however carry on.... and on... and on.. :

1) "I have not advocated the above. I'm pretty sure you know this is a misrepresentation, I've been quite clear."

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=37657&start=45#p532809

2) "I have not advocated what you said above though, this is quite clear from what I have said previously."

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=37657&start=45#p532812

3) "I don't align myself with any faction of the far right, neither do I particularly support National Anarchism as I said earlier, it's not really my cup of tea. Neither have I 'promoted' anything here."

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=37657&start=60#p532888

4) "Actually I haven't brought up National Anarchism at all, you did, and I have repeated the term once here in reference to your questions. I'm also not aware of a National Anarchist website to direct anyone to."

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=37657&start=75#p532895

5) "I have not advocated NA, several times you have claimed this, and each time I have refuted it. It should have sunk in by now**. If in doubt, go back and check."

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=37657&start=165#p533069

6) "Sounds good to me, especially as I have expressed no advocation, and in addition have refuted this clearly several times (It's all here in this one thread)"

http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=37657&start=285#p533361




For each refutation above, there was an equal number of identical accusations that I didn't respond to in that thread . it's closed thread, so only links are quoted.
Last edited by jakell on Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
" Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism"
User avatar
jakell
 
Posts: 1821
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: North England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:47 am

The problem with AD is that he does not take credit for his tax dollars at work...
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby Searcher08 » Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:06 am

American Dream » Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:02 pm wrote:
82_28 » Sun Mar 02, 2014 7:53 am wrote:So, cut to the chase AD. What are your immediate reccomendations? Seriously. What are your immediate reccomendations? Not being a dick and certainly not calling you out, just spell out what you think for your fellow members.


Your point is well taken. It is what it is- that's really the best I can say. Jakell's advocacy of Keith Preston is clearly not in accord with the anti-fascist guidelines of this board, but where do we go from here?

The best thing I can see to do is to get clarity from jakell what further advocacy of fascist/racist types causes he will or will not be doing here. but he has been extremely elusive about these things.

He has had many opportunities to make truly clear comment on the situation but up until now he has- in effect- declined.


82, I have always respected you as a guy whose heart is in the right pace and who wants to do the right thing and who listens to people.
So when from my point of view, I see your sincerity answered with something us Brit's refer to as being 'Decidedly economical with the truth..' I need to speak my truth in a forthright manner.

I would like to spell out that question, but as applied to American Dream.

American Dream's posting behaviour is clearly to me not in accord with the first paragraph of the guidelines of this board, but where do we go from here?

When I read this
The best thing I can see to do is to agree a a statement that
get clarity from jakell what further advocacy of fascist/racist types causes he will or will not be doing here. but he has been extremely elusive about these things.


I see an attempt to put jakell in a double bind

Bind Part A
When he DID respond to you and challenge YOU on YOUR ideology AND your Argumentation by CopyPasta', you ran whining to WIllow, who responded by prohibiting jakell from continuing in that way.
In your posts, you constantly try to reframe his behaviour as 'trolling' and 'really negative'.
Those are FRAMING techniques, not objective descriptions.
Bind Part B
Then when jakell had his 'communication hands' tied byu Willow, you launched a large number of consecutive posts: 'well look how evasive his is, oooh he isnt reponding, look he still isnt'

(Personally, I thought the only thing missing was to taunt him by poking him with a pointy stick)

82, you want to see a model RI way of interacting? Observe bph and jakell interacting.
There is no evasion, no disrespect and real rigourous engagement.
Then read AD's exchange with jakell in this thread. Seriously, just skim over it.

82, if a person has binary logic, then what is against what they passionately believe, MUST be their potential enemy.
Not(Not(A)) = A
Please consider this... - I read several posts on Keith Preston's site and think they are lucid and well written and have interesting points. I also thing that they are very poorly thought through as regards their consequences, consequences which would be very negative- and a completely non-viable political philosophy. I gave a detailed post on WHY I came to those conclusions. I knew nothing about NA, having bugger all interest in anarchism of ANY variety. It is on the first page of this thread.

When I posted it, I asked jakell what he thought and he agrees with my take. So THAT is advocating Keith Preston????

As Justin Raimondo coined, that is fucking BizarroWorld.


jakell HAS has made his philosophy REALLY clear and that is he is aligned with John Michael Greer, who is a.. fucking Druid. And who writes great thought provoking anti-fascist articles . :sun:


CODA
Also 82, this is not new.
When I first indicated an interest in Annunaki / Credo Mutwa in some long-gone Icke thread, I was given the third degree - identical to jakell's - OOh Searcher is being *evasive* about his relationship with David Icke, Oooh he is not being clear enough.... Oooh Dont you know Reptilians means... Joooz! (WTF??!!) Searcher you are being 'sketchy' on far right tropes (WTF?!!)

Icke had had as much influence on and significance in my life as copy of National Geographic in a dental surgery waiting room. It was like having a fellow customer stand up and start yelling "YOU cant read THAT HERE, It is YELLOW!!"
Err, whut?!!
"YELLOW! WHY are you READING IT?" etc etc

It was as exasperating as fuck, I felt I enter a 'The TRial by Kafka - ESPECIALLY because AD had been a poster who had brought LOADS of great diverse stuff here!!!

The only practical online anti-fascist strategies I have seen from RI have come from... jakell



What would I do?
I would re-write the posting guidelines. and create a Posting Best Practice.


He has had many opportunities to make truly clear comment on the situation but up until now
he has- in effect- declined.

82, You know about weasel words from critical thinking...

He has had many opportunities-
OPPORTUNITIES? HOW?

to make truly clear -
CLEAR BY WHOSE STANDARD?
PRESUPPOSES: THAT WHAT HAS BEEN PRESENETED UP TO NOW ISNT CLEAR

comment on the situation
"SITUATION" IS LEFT AS A NOMINIALISATION
WHEN IT IS NOT COMMONLY AGREED (Fails the wheelbarrow test - we can agree on what aball is - we can put it in a wheelbarrow - OTOH a nominalisation like 'the situation' cannot be put in a wheelbarrow - AD is assuming his understanding is the only one)

Up until now
(**) Frame what comes after as being true over a time period.

he has - in effect- declined

IN EFFECT, HOW SPECIFICALLY?
DECLINED HOW?
HOW WOULD 'DECLINING' BE DIFFERENT FROM 'IN-EFFECT' DECLINING?

When I have challenged language like this, which is so vague as to be useless for anything except political hypnosis, the response has been to NOT help to get to a clearer description (which could be easily done) but to question my logic skills, thinking ability, sincerity and WUSO-FARRT (where u stand on far right tropes)

Sure RI is about Rigour AND Intuition AND
that EACH of us may have DIFFERENT meanings of those and RESPECT that? The first word on RI is 'Welcome'
- not
"You will be required to pass an public ideological purity inspection. "Where do you stand on far right tropes. ANSWER the question!"

If one person demands everyone else to follow THEIR meanings, that is not a collegial relationship, it is a relationship of trying to dominate another's thinking.
Imposition of ideology for the greater good.... sounds decidedly... fascistic, no?
Enantiodromia - the tendency for a thing to turn into it's opposite

(**)
If I said "Up until now, 82 has farted a lot..."
this creates multiple presuppositions
that not just 82 has been farting,
but has been pooting over a time period to the present.

In fact, 82 may have been quite wind free. :sun:
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:08 am

:clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :clapping:
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:19 am

Jakell surely did recommend readers to Keith Preston's site and indicated his support for that project. I did not report him for that anything.

My only question is whether jakell is going to shill for racist/fascist type causes here, or whether he intends to show respect for R.I as an anti-fascist board, or what.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:22 am

do you pay taxes to the United States government AD? Well your tax dollars are hard at work funding the Fascists/anti-semites in Ukraine right now...what does that make YOU?
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby jakell » Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:32 am

American Dream » Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:19 pm wrote:Jakell surely did recommend readers to Keith Preston's site and indicated his support for that project. I did not report him for that anything.

My only question is whether jakell is going to shill for racist/fascist type causes here, or whether he intends to show respect for R.I as an anti-fascist board, or what.


Ah the 'anti fascist board' line again. I've had a fair bit to say on that, and have worked this into my series in the 'New Europe' thread. I'm going to reinforcing that again soon, because I think I've come up with a useful framework there

It's true, I did recommend that posters go to KP's site and form their own opinions. As to me indicating my 'support', I can only refer back to the six refutations I quoted above.
" Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism"
User avatar
jakell
 
Posts: 1821
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: North England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby Searcher08 » Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:58 am

American Dream » Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:19 pm wrote:Jakell surely did recommend readers to Keith Preston's site and indicated his support for that project. I did not report him for that anything.

My only question is whether jakell is going to shill for racist/fascist type causes here, or whether he intends to show respect for R.I as an anti-fascist board, or what.


I am politely saying YOU are not showing respect for RI by your engagement style.

Again, weasel words and binary logic.
My perception is that jakell flatly rejects YOUR brand of ideology and that is what is unacceptable to you because the only interpretation of the Rules allowed is YOUR one. Or so you think.

He has IMO opinion both debunked Keith Preston's approach... and yours.

A invitation to read is only endorsement in YOUR world. You yourself in the olden days would just post interesting stuff with a proviso: 'this is not what I nec. believe myself at all' .
Nowadays, to me your approach is becoming more and more a Holy Church of St Antifasc and and that the only posts that are acceptable now are those that agree with your Church Edicts.
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Elihu and 146 guests