I wrote this post yesterday, just thinking out loud and thought I would share. I polished it up today and decided to go ahead and send it. I hope you don't mind if I post it here.
.
Poll: (not really)
Was the Texas Kamikaze a State sponsored psyop?:
1. No opinion. I don't know enough about it.
2. No. Our government wouldn't do that.
3. I doubt it.
4. 50/50 don't know can't decide.
5. very possibly. I don't know for sure but I think they did.
6. Yes. I was in on it and I could tell you all about it.
-----------------------------------------------
As seen above, Prison Planet's Paul Watson wrote, and Alex Jones reported:
"
A trusted source has told this office that the FBI knew Austin was going to be attacked today and had dispatched officers from its Dallas headquarters yesterday afternoon to be in place for today’s incident.
The source claims that a confidential memo was circulated yesterday detailing that a building in Austin was going to be the target of an attack today. He was told this by an informant who works in the Dallas FBI office.
Four FBI agents hurriedly left the Dallas office yesterday to be ready and on the scene for the aftermath of the incident, according to the informant, who was shaken when he saw events unfolding today and put two and two together.
We cannot confirm the accuracy of the claim but the source is known to us and has no motivation for inventing the story.
The fact that pilot Joe Stack changed his manifesto at least 27 times before the final version suggests that he had been writing it for days, "revising it 27 times", and this could have been what tipped off the FBI in the build up to the attack.
The claim dovetails with reports we are receiving from Austin residents that the FBI were immediately on the scene after the plane crash and were filming both the building and eyewitnesses
A separate witness told KXAN News that there were Hazmat teams and fire trucks in place across the street before the plane struck the building..."
If this is true, then the Texas Kamikaze could have been facilitated by the FBI . It may have been staged. It is possible that the FBI learned what Stack was up to by monitoring the 27 edits to his computer as he was perfecting his manifesto. Then the FBI might have just allowed it to happen. Either way, the event is being used to to bring about a range of desired effects.
Information about the pilot, his manifesto, etc poured out of the mainstream media faster than paint on the carpet. Alex Jones makes the point that when an event is staged, it is generally followed by a media frenzy. We'll see it on all the TV channels, hear it on the radio and read it in the newspaper. The blogosphere is, of course, quite abuzz with all kinds of angles to this event.
Alex Jones points out that most lone nut cases that are really lone nuts, we never hear about - because of the bad publicity or image it might cause; they don't want to let some movement gain momentum or give the copycatter's any ideas. But, with the Texas Kamikaze, the media was practically inciting the public to violence; and then depicting the situation as though there is a "Domestic Terrorism Threat". This could bring violence - followed by stricter security and possibly even martial law. Groups and individuals would be targeted according to some contrived perception that they *may* be prone to violence and *could* be a threat to the homeland.
Why else would the government do this? Briefly, a few possibilities are:
Alex Jones says it was a psyop staged to demonize the 'Constitutionalists and the Liberty movement'; to paint them as violent extremists and to shut them down. He also points out that the federal government wants to tighten rules on private aviation. I think I read here that new rules are soon to go into effect. It has also been mentioned that this is a ploy to either stifle or encourage the desire of more than a few Texans to secede from the United States; or a psyop designed to let some high strung types vicariously vent their frustration with the IRS. At the very least it is a distraction; taking broadcast time away from other, more important news stories.
I would add that in the past these type events always seem to have had multiple agendas, which include inflicting a certain psychological effect upon the citizens. These intricately constructed ops are carried out with the use of massive resources; then quickly covered up, usually by the FBI, who do what they must to maintain the veil. It is basically the same all over the world.
Joe Stack's personal webpage (the one that had his manifesto on it) was reportedly taken down because the FBI insisted; then they told the webmaster(?) not to tell anyone that it was the FBI that made him do it. The FBI has denied this. Apparently, this would have been done so that computer experts wouldn't be able to expose who really typed the manifesto; or reveal who Joe may have been corresponding with, etc. (Of course, the manifesto itself has been reproduced on a number of sites).
I would argue that the best information about these events is that which comes from eyewitnesses at the scene before, during and immediately following the explosion. Journalists and researchers have to go in and document the witnesses who saw what happened before the FBI gets ahold of them; because the FBI is going to tell them not to talk. That is why it is so important for those agents to be there right away to control the crime scene; so that sensitive information about what really happened doesn't get out.
The answer to a few questions, some of which are being discussed on this very blog, would reveal much about what is actually going on. Fill in the blanks, and add some more, if you feel like it. I wish I had the time. For instance:
Who was Joe Stack working for? Oh! Thanks DB! Anybody know who they are and what it means? I don't think I want to know.
Who is his wife?
What else and who else was in that building? Where there some records that needed to be disposed of?
Were explosives on the plane, or in the building?
How was information released and the media blitz generated?
Could his plane have been auto-piloted into the building? I read that Joe Stack worked on that type of project as an engineer. The plane was "really going fast, like he was gunning it" into the building. "The pilot looked almost comatose"
Was it confirmed that it was Joe Shack's body that was was found in the wreckage? Could it have been a double in the pilots seat?
Was the area hit under construction? Is this why there were so few casualties, as compared to how bad it could have been? The only two deaths appear to be that of the pilot , and a 67 year old father of 6 grown children. I also read of one pretty burned up survivor. (one of Sweejak's posts) Was that it? That's a good thing but, was there a warning in the building?
Why were the fire trucks and hazmat teams waiting accross the street before it happened? (At about 3:00 of this video,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gItV-ENkxPY, courtesy elfismiles. BTW. Check out that reporter girls.)
Honestly I cannot figure out Alex Jones's role in this scheme. Is to make people feel wound up, hopeless and scared? A honeypot? All I know is I feel I'm being duped. I would be curious to learn just how he got to be a household name on the Internet (and now on TV). Fact is, just after I wrote the above, I was listening to a replay of his show, and now he says he's leaning back toward the 'lone nut' theory because the corporate media has backed off of the story so much? What happened to that Source? Did I miss something?
I tend think that this story is too hot. The MSM/PTB are very efficient in the way they round up the facts and put the machinery in motion to spin the propaganda to make reality appear a certain way; and then they can take advantage of the Sit-Chee-A-shun.
I don't listen to Alex Jones very often, but when I do, once I get past his bellicosity, I have to agree with most of what I've heard him say. IF what his source says is true... Perhaps there should be an investigation. Hmm.
To me, the Texas Kamikaze just had that mini 9/11, OKC aura about it.
Then again, maybe Joe Stack was distraught and decided to make a firey statement. He has imprinted himself onto our psyche- at least a little - by flying his airplane full throttle into a building full of IRS agents. He'll be remembered by some as a romantic hero. I'll remember him as the Kamikaze Texan.
Sadly though, if he was genuine, he will have accomplished some of his supposed enemy's groundwork against the rest of us. He seemed like a talented, intellligent, well rounded, likeable guy. I hate to say this but, is it more likely that he could have been a mind controlled operative/assassin - because he was an orphan? Was he coerced?
People and the Internet could peel the layers off of this onion and expose it for what it is; but nothin's gonna happen 'til somebody with some Umph decides to parlay some justice. That's gonna take some serious Umph! Does anybody even care?
Please excuse me, as I'm finishing this up, the dog is farting and I'm sitting with a room full of people who, like me, have no idea what I'm doing on the computer.
Adios.
