I'm surprised at the acrimony that so quickly blossoms here regarding this.
Maybe I've reached the point of "I don't really care anymore", but if the goal is to divide and conquer, this certainly seems indicative of the perp's success at least in this regard.
And yes, everyone who disagrees with me is wrong.
Seriously, something changed in myself, which is why I only blog here now. I just don't give a damn anymore, I'm resigned to what has happened and to what is going to happen, and I am resigned as to my utter powerlessness as to affecting any of it.
It's nice in a way, but coming with that is the truth that I have to simply avoid situations where people act like idiots, or else I just go off on them like nobody's business. Which is why I only hang out here now, because for the most part people here are of fairly like minds, with the exception of the occasional cold stinky breezes that blow through.
While I appreciate Jeff's point of view, mainly because of my profound respect for him, I can't help but see an obstinateness regarding anything other than what he believes should be the pursuit of 9/11 truth. While he has a good point, I don't understand why it has to be all of one, or all of the other. It seems an open mind can appreciate both points of view, and neither has to rule the other out.
I used to think the CD business was a joke, back in the day when Phil Jayan was posting "pod" photos on Democratic Underground. Then one day I saw the WTC7 collapse and I went "holy shit" mainly because I barely remembered that damn thing falling down at all. Then my first question to myself was "why don't I remember that??" Because the whole thing is an orchestrated psyops, so if we don't remember something, there's a damn good reason somewhere .......
So if you believe the whole thing was an orchestrated psyops (and the grandaddy of all such psyops, nothing else even comes close), then you have to (it seems) consider the possibility that every element of the event was staged. Which would include the collapse of the buildings. The psychological impact of those buildings imploding was nail in the coffin of most people's psyches, the breaking point, if you will, for most, to where they were traumatized to the point where they would then believe anything the government and the media told them.
Prior to that, well, we'd all seen plane wrecks, we'd all seen bombings, we'd all seen all sorts of nasty things, but the unthinkable was that the buildings would simply disappear, cease to exist, vanish from sight -- it was quite literally something of a magician's trick (watch this city bus disappear!), and I think that is when the population of most of the earth were ready to accept anything. Because they just HAD accepted something that was very difficult to accept, but they had no choice in the matter, so there was no reference point then, everybody was suddenly in completely unchartered psychological territory, which is where the perps wanted them.
So to assume that the collapse of the buildings
wasn't part of the event seems, well, I don't want to say "foolish", but narrow-minded? Obstinate? I can only assume that those who don't wish to consider that the collapse was part of the planned event should look inward and think about why they believe that. What is keeping you, psychologically, from being open to this rather distinct possibility?
Because most people in the population have an extreme emotional attachment
to what they think happened that day. Imagine if you were a child, told that your parents had died in a car wreck and you were taken away to be raised by foster parents, only to discover, later, that it was a lie -- your parents were alive, and they had conspired with the foster parents to feed you this lie and to change your entire view of life, and the world, so they could do something for themselves. You'd be .... a little angry. You wouldn't want to believe it. It would fuck you up more than you already were. It would shatter your entire universe.
That is, as far as I'm concerened, one of the signs of the wildly victorious success of 9/11. It goes back to having people believe "the Big Lie" instead of the little one. I mean, this psyops shit has been developed by some extremely evil people for 100 years now, and what we're seeing these days is the invisible success of it. We're seeing the PSYOPS version of the i-Phone, of laptop computers, of GPS systems in cars, every bit of technology we look at how that WOWS us, things that are tangible and that we can hold in our hands, these fantastic sci-fi-esque toys that we all are using now, well these things are the result of over 100 years of industrial technology being developed by very bright people. Psyops have developed the same way, at the same time, by equally bright people, so we're being harranged and manipulated and hypnotized by literally the i-Phone and F-35 fighter plane equivalent of media manipulation.
Like your average person taking apart an iPhone and trying to figure out how it works, almost all of us are completely behind whatever they are doing. They are ahead of us. They will remain ahead of us unless we realize that everything they do is psyops. Everything.
That's the main reason I am 99% convinced that the buildings collapsed to dust on purpose, by design.
Because of the psychological impact of it. 9/11 would have been far far less traumatic, and
exploitable, had this not happened.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
