National Anarchism & the Far Right

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby jakell » Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:40 pm

Searcher08 » Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:58 pm wrote:..........My perception is that jakell flatly rejects YOUR brand of ideology and that is what is unacceptable to you because the only interpretation of the Rules allowed is YOUR one. Or so you think.

He has IMO opinion both debunked Keith Preston's approach... and yours...........



I wouldn't say that I reject his ideology, which may be roughly similar, but I sure do reject his methods, I sort of hinted at this in the first of my 'olive branches':

............Sounds like we may be possibly inching towards some common ground.

I think what we have here is that our styles of anti-fascism are diametrically opposed, ie not actually opposed. Also, I suspect you like to read stuff and regurgitate rather stale articles, whereas I like to roll my sleeves up (when I'm not chillin' somewhere like this of course). Like I said, I'm no idealogue.
I also think you need some practice with the real thing.........


http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=37657&start=180#p533128 (closed thread).

His methods though are not 100% unsound, if one has the perpective that all this sort of thing is deadly and evil, then they are ideal for a place that requires a guard dog and gatekeeper rolled onto one. I don't think RI needs that , but you've got one. A side effect it that it repels forum members from the subject in addition.

I can't say I've 'debunked' KP's views as, to me, they seem to represent a desire to ride the way things are going rather than create a revolution, they seem reactive . One thing that I would like to rebuff is the projected idea that 'Attack The System' represent National Anarchism at large, whereas, as far as I can see, that site seems to represent a wider range of viewpoints
Last edited by jakell on Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
" Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism"
User avatar
jakell
 
Posts: 1821
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: North England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:40 pm

Image
Look Who the US Is Siding With in Ukraine, Egypt, and Syria
US quietly partners with neo-Nazis in Ukraine, fascists in Egypt, and al-Qaeda in Syria

by Chris Ernesto, March 01, 2014

Imagine if protesters – supported by Russia – established an encampment in front of the US Capitol, threw Molotov cocktails into government buildings, fired guns at the police, and demanded that the US government relinquish power.

Obviously, the response from the US government would not be peaceful and there would be a loud call for war on Russia.

What if there were demonstrators in front of the White House who announced their events on Facebook by saying that members of congress should be incapacitated by having their knees smashed? Or if those same protesters posted YouTube videos saying that buses going into Washington should be set ablaze by dousing the roads with gas and diesel in the hopes of burning all the passengers inside?

Certainly, every US government official would demand the protesters be immediately arrested and charged with terrorism.

And what would happen if Islamic fundamentalists who had pledged allegiance to al-Qaeda began to bomb police stations and schools across the US?

Clearly, the US government would punish the responsible parties, and probably the countries in which they received training.

These things aren’t happening in the US, but they are occurring in Ukraine, Egypt and Syria by people who are funded, supported, encouraged or tacitly approved by the United States government.

US “guy” now running Ukraine

On Thursday, the Ukrainian parliament accepted Arseniy Yatsenyuk as the country’s new prime minister. Yatsenyuk is the lawmaker from the Fatherland Party who has been Washington’s choice to lead the country, as revealed by the State Department’s Victoria Nuland when she told US Ambassador to Ukraine Jeffrey Pyatt, “Yats [Yatsenyuk] is the guy who’s got the economic experience, the governing experience.”

The now infamous ‘f*ck the EU’ leaked phone conversation between Nuland and Pyatt revealed the role played by the United States in supporting Ukraine’s far-right opposition in its (ultimately successful) attempt to overthrow the left-leaning Yanukovych. “The utter criminality of Washington’s drive to install a pliant regime in Kiev sharply emerges in Nuland and Pyatt’s discussion of Oleh Tyahnybok, the leader of the neo-fascist Svoboda party (who recently met with John McCain in Kiev). Nuland describes Tyahnybok as one of the “big three” within the opposition leadership. These remarks confirm that there is no confusion whatsoever within the Obama administration that it is working in partnership with fascist movements in Ukraine,” wrote Patrick O’Connor.

tyahnybok

Another top Svoboda member, Yuriy Mykhalchyshyn, a deputy in parliament, often quotes Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, as well as other Third Reich luminaries like Ernst Rohm and Gregor Strasser. Among other things, Svoboda seeks to end all immigration and ensure that all civil service jobs are filled by ethnic Ukrainians. The Nation magazine reported that Svoboda also seeks to ban abortions, abolish gun control, “ban the Communist ideology,” and prohibit the adoption of Ukrainian children by foreigners.

“As for the “protesters” who came to Maidan Square in November, not all came simply to protest. Many set up tents and shacks, threw up barricades, seized government buildings, burned the headquarters of the ruling party, battled police and demanded the overthrow of the regime. How many Western countries would permit a planned putsch in their capital city?” asked Pat Buchanan.

“The most aggressive element of the opposition is a group calling itself Pravy Sektor, a right-wing nationalist organization that critics liken to Nazis,” according to the Washington Post.

In teaming up with “armed neo-Nazis, soccer hooligans, a variety of militant separatists, looters, arsonists and cop-killers” the US eventually got what it wanted in Ukraine. And now it will likely play a leading role in reconstructing Ukraine’s economy, National Security Adviser Susan Rice revealed on “Meet the Press” last week. Ms. Rice mapped out how the Obama administrator will be working with the International Monetary Fund to provide ‘financial aid’ to Ukraine.

US once again siding with repressive, “fascist” government in Egypt

Things have gotten so bad in Egypt that the government is now investigating a Muppet-style character that regularly appears on Egyptian television.

“As stupid as it is, it’s very telling,” Ziad Akl, a political analyst said of the puppet case. “It says a lot about the patriotism frenzy we are in. There is definitely a sentiment of fascist nationalism that you either subscribe to, or face being labeled a traitor.”

“The swelling nationalism – fanned by the country’s state- and privately-owned media – has given the army-backed government the legitimacy to quell further dissent in the name of national security. Today, opposition to the government is being suppressed even more brutally than it was under strongman Hosni Mubarak, the longtime ruler who was forced out in the Arab Spring revolt in 2011,” wrote the Washington Post’s Erin Cunningham.

As Egypt spirals out of control, virtually no mention is given to the revelation that the US was squarely behind the military overthrow of the democratically elected government of Mohammed Morsi. According to an Al-Jazeera analysis of documents obtained by the Investigative Reporting Program at UC Berkeley, the US has paid for some of the most unsavory characters in the coup.

“Make a road bump with a broken palm tree to stop the buses going into Cairo, and drench the road around it with gas and diesel. When the bus slows down for the bump, set it all ablaze so it will burn down with all the passengers inside. God bless.” Those were the words of Colonel Omar Afifi Soliman, a U.S.-funded anti-Muslim Brotherhood activist.

Soliman, who served in Egypt’s elite investigative police unit, received funding from the US State Department via the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). IRS documents reveal that the NED paid Soliman $50,000 in 2009, $60,000 in 2010, and $10,000 in 2011.

Through a program created by the US State Department dubbed a “democracy assistance” initiative, the NED has bankrolled numerous ‘activists’ in Egypt, including an anti-Islamist politician who advocated closing mosques and dragging preachers out by force. Al Jazeera points out that such “democracy assistance” may have violated Egyptian law, which prohibits foreign political funding. It may also have broken US government regulations that ban the use of taxpayers’ money to fund foreign politicians, or finance subversive activities that target democratically elected governments. Further, a Congressional mandate is clear in that the NED is only to engage in “peaceful” political change overseas.

The US is teaming with the historically repressive Egyptian military and its leader in waiting, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, who has achieved cult-like status in whipping up nationalistic fervor. The Obama administration is virtually alone in not labeling last year’s ouster of Morsi as a “coup,” and with its support of Egypt’s current military government, the US is once again on the side of the repressive, and what many are now calling fascist leadership of Egypt.

US on same side as al-Qaeda in Syria

It is widely known that the US and al-Qaeda are on the same side in Syria in attempting to oust Syria’s Bashar al-Assad from office.

On February 12, 2012 the leader of al-Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahri, called on Muslims from other countries to support rebels in Syria seeking to overthrow Assad. Two weeks later Hillary Clinton raised serious concerns about calls to arm the Syrian opposition when she said, “we know al Qaeda leader Zawahiri is supporting the opposition in Syria. Are we supporting al Qaeda in Syria? And in July of 2012, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) said that as many as one-quarter of the 300 rebel groups in Syria may be fighting under the banner of al-Qaeda. In fact, one of the leading opposition groups, al-Nusra Front, has been designated a terrorist organization by the United States.

But those warnings didn’t stop the Obama administration from arming the opposition in Syria. One week after Rep. Rogers’ statement, it was revealed that President Obama had authorized covert support for Syrian rebels. And later, one day after al-Qaeda of Iraq announced that it was fighting with rebels in Syria, Obama pledged an additional $10 million in aid to the opposition. The following week, the Obama administration pledged another $123 million to the rebels.

The US attempts to ease people’s worries by claiming that American-provided weapons won’t get into the hands of the ‘bad’ opposition in Syria, but this is clearly unrealistic, particularly in light of the chaos that encompasses cities throughout the war-torn country. In fact, the USA Today reported that US arms were showing up in the hands of pro-Assad militias. The ability of Assad’s allies to obtain US weapons is one of many reasons the United States should not supply Syrian rebels with weapons, said Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., former chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Syria is “already overflowing” with weapons being supplied to the Assad regime and to the rebels “that could one day be turned against the US,” Ros-Lehtinen said. It’s “extremely difficult” to distinguish between friend and foe in Syria, she said, and “no amount of safeguards can guarantee that weapons will not fall into the wrong hands.”

As former congressman Ron Paul warned, "There are a lot of factions out there, why don’t we ask about the Al-Qaeda? Why are we on the side of the al-Qaeda right now? So I think they want the weapons. The rebels want the weapons. There’s a bunch of people in there and Al-Qaeda is part of it and this is the test for us to drop a couple of bombs and then send in weapons."

The US government tries to spin the hypocritical position of working towards a similar goal as al-Qaeda in Syria while at the same time saying they are a threat to US national security in other parts of the world. Regardless of how it attempts to nuance its aid to the opposition, there’s no hiding the fact that the US is on the same side as al-Qaeda in Syria. Just like they are on the same side as neo-Nazis in Ukraine, and fascists in Egypt.




Ride the Worldwide Wave of Transformation
001101000010111000110100001011100011000100110100
#www


Terence McKenna on the #WaveOfAction
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:32 pm

jakell » Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:40 am wrote:
I can't say I've 'debunked' KP's views as, to me, they seem to represent a desire to ride the way things are going rather than create a revolution, they seem reactive . One thing that I would like to rebuff is the projected idea that 'Attack The System' represent National Anarchism at large, whereas, as far as I can see, that site seems to represent a wider range of viewpoints


Sounds like a very indirect way of saying "I do support Keith Preston and I will promote his ideas and his site more at Rigorous Intuition"...

Keith Preston is certainly a "fellow traveler" in National Anarchist/Third Positionist circles and those are clearly racist/fascist in nature.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Tue Mar 04, 2014 12:31 am

Breaking (in English) at Libcom:

Statement and denouncement of the attacks against a member of the KRAS-IWA from the so-called MPST group

18 posts / 0 new Login or register to post comments

#1 Top

Foristaruso
Apr 8 2013 08:59

Statement and denouncement of the attacks against a member of the KRAS-IWA from the so-called MPST group
The comrade was attacked in Moscow on March 28 by a group of National-"Anarchists" from so-called MPST. The MPST is according to our sister organization the KRAS, known with their nationalist etnicist statements and writings; they proclaim the "preservation of ethnic identity", declaim against the mixture of people and against the synthesis of cultures, and declare that the cosmopolitism is a "devil incarnated of capitalism". Moreover, one of the leaders of this group confessed that he agreed during his interrogation in police to
inform the authorities about social movements.

This is not the first time that members of MPST have attacked several political opponents inclusive anarchists physically. In January, they threatened also the libertarian LGBT activists. MPST spoke against
homosexuality and was demanding that LGBT should not raise their "rainbow" flag in anarchist demonstrations. After this "discussions", the LGBT activist were in fact attacked during one libertarian
manifestation.

The International Workers Association (IWA) by its Secretariat denounces the fascist and nationalist aggressors and provocateurs of MPST. The Secretariat and the Sections and Friends of the IWA
worldwide will inform all libertarian organization in the world with whom the MPST have contact, and call for a boycott not only of the MPST, but any group and any libertarian activist from the former "Soviet Union", which don`t condemn this group, such acts and those who perpetrate them!

OSLO, APRIL 3- 2013

IWA- SECRETARIAT



#2
iexist
Apr 9 2013 19:55

Double post


#3 Top
iexist
Apr 9 2013 19:54

Saw some nat ans at the abookfair in NYC, they apparently threatened to "mess it up" for letting pedos in or something. I heard they snuck into the center and bike locked the doors closed the night before the fair


#4 Top
mpst
Mar 2 2014 06:10

The purpose of this statement is to disprove the lies and shed light on the real state of affairs in our organization.

April 8th, 2013 a statement was published on libcom.org website, condemning the activities of our group and calling for boycott MPST and other Russian anarchist organizations and individuals who does not share the position of Russian IWA section KRAS regarding our organization.

Previously, we have been encountered such groundless criticism from KRAS(members of which were in the same organization with some of us before) multiple times. Several years ago, MPST proposed to organize a mediation court because of accusations of MPST members in nationalism and collaboration with the police from the KRAS side. Then, KRAS members refused to carry out the mediation court and declared that all the organizations in Moscow anarchist community, who did not agree with them, were non-anarchist. After that incident, we have not considered KRAS declarations in our address seriously, because we have been sure, that other Russian anarchists would consider them as lies.

However, the fact that the next declaration, containing lies about our group has been published in the name of IWA Secretariat, causes serious concerns among us. We can not put up with the fact that this slander has gone international and could deceive our foreign comrades. Among other things, the fact that some KRAS members have succeeded in deceiving IWA and involuntary have pulled an international anarchist organization in their slanderous campaign, arouses our indignation.

KRAS members, who are spreading the slander about MPST, are skillful at mixing speculations and blatant lie in their declarations. They mention our organization in the context of condemnation of right-wing and national-socialist organizations to present our organization as one of these "national-anarchist" or "right-wing" organizations to the reader.

The main person, who spreads lies and slander about MPST is know as Vadim Graevsky(his real name will be sent with the copy of this letter, addressed to IWA). He has been a participant of anarchist movement for a long time, and has acquired the credit of foreign comrades. However, currently he is busy, mainly, with creating of own "leading anarchist in Russia" reputation, and abusing and slandering of those, who in his opinion, are his "competitors" or who simply does not express "the adequate honor" to him. As a result, currently, in the anarchist circles of Russia (as well as of many in Ukraine and Belarus) Graevsky is considered by all, except several supporters, as a troublemaker, who does not deserve to be believed. Nevertheless, IWA seems to be not aware of this, and Graevsky continues to use IWA's credit, which probably has been the cause of such uncritical perception of his information in the IWA.

We hope that our comrades in IWA will take information from Graevsky more critically and check its authenticity in future. "Authority", according to the principles of anarchism, can not be a criteria of rightness and grant priority in trust.

Our true position

We have wanted to describe the true positions and ideological attitudes of our group. Interprofessional Workers Union (MPST) is an anarcho-communist organization. We stand for creation of anarcho-communist society worldwide. We adhere to the principles of internationalism, i.e. we stand for unity of the workers of all nations in their struggle against capitalism, against imperialist wars, against nationalism, against any forms of racism, chauvinism or apartheid.

In our Manifesto ( http://mpst.org/o_nas/mezhprofessionaln ... n-english/ ) we also affirm that we are not against any particular ethnic cultures, i.e. we do not require all the people to become cosmopolitan. In the same time, we are against the ideas of superiority of some ethnic cultures over others, and against quarrel between the people of different ethnic cultures. We believe that every individual, according to ones own desire, can regard oneself as either cosmopolitan or as man of any ethnic culture. In the last case, we do not condemn such self-identification, except for cases when it is used for maintaining ideas of ethnic enmity or ethnic superiority. Any claims that MPST is a "national-anarchist" should be therefore considered as lies.

Unfortunately, there are some groups in Russia, who belongs to a so-called "national-revolutionary" wing. In the Spring 2012, during our congress, we decided that any collaboration with such groups is intolerable for our organization. Therefore, any claims stating that MPST collaborates with national-"anarchists" should be considered as lies.

In our Manifesto we stand for liquidation of all forms of oppression, including patriarchy and heteronormativity. Some participants of our organization (men and women) collaborate with anarcho-feminist groups and individuals. Therefore, any claims that MPST supports homophobia or misogyny should be considered as lies.



#5 Top

Foristaruso
Mar 2 2014 10:18

It is not the best time for answer to the liars from 3-mens-group calling themselves MPST: we are on the frontier of war and we must spend the biggest time to force contacts with the internationalists in Russia and Ukraine now. But the best answer to this lie are the citations of the members of the same MPST. They are in Russian, and we need time for translate them in English. But first we need to finish our work on anti-war declaration



#6 Top

bozemananarchy
Mar 2 2014 14:22

So this is some weird shit here then innit?



#7 Top

Alf
Mar 2 2014 20:36

I have never heard of the MPST. I do know that there is a dangerous influence of 'national anarchists' and even ethnically separatist 'left communists' in Russia, worming its way inside the proletarian political movement. I also know that the KRAS was the first anarchist group to really convince us (i.e as the ICC, not just as particular comrades) that there could be a genuinely internationalist anarchism. All the statements that that they have produced on Russia's wars since our first meeting in the early 2000s have confirmed their ability to stand up for working class internationalism in a very difficult and dangerous national context. The latest statement, on Ukraine, is probably the most important one they have produced to date. So in general I would 'defend the honour' of the KRAS. I would do the same for Vadim, who comes under for special attack in MPST's statement. I have met him in his home, and I have read his book on the history of anarcho-syndicalism, and I found it to be a very serious work. I also think that Vadim took an active part in the first Praxis conference we attended in Moscow, where we first encountered the KRAS. I don't know about his faults, but what I mentioned above is enough to mark him as a militant of our class.

So my first reaction to this is to state my solidarity with KRAS and with Vadim.



#8 Top

Alf
Mar 2 2014 20:48

PS, I haven't discussed this with other ICC comrades so it's 'in a personal capacity' for the moment.



#9 Top

Foristaruso
Mar 3 2014 08:53

So, I begin with citations of MPST members, and the readers can make their own opinion about:

"Everything that surrounds us in city life, and indeed the capitalist system as a whole, are quite anti-ethnic. Look out the window ... how many ethnic things we see? (...) Nations don`t exist. They are product of capitalism and object of speculations of bourgeois. Ethnos is a quite other thing. And the exploiters inclusive “own native national bourgeois” don`t belong to ethnos. The bourgeois class is anti-ethnic. (...) I do not think that ethnos is a "dead" concept. What is now forgotten (as also the idea of solidarity) is not dead. (...) Long live ethnical anarchism!" (MPST member under pseudonym "Tovarish" - http://eretik.borda.ru/?1-5-0-00000004- ... 1178563171)

«In my opinion, the ethnicity as such doesn`t produce deconsolidation of human beings, as also all other cultural differences not bound with contradiction of interests (f.ex. class interests). The nationalism is the enemy of ethnicity because it castrates ethnicity for Statist interests. For me, it is EXACTLY the problem. (...) I am against militant cosmopolitanism. I consider it a form of phobia, along with xenophobia (...) An interest to any culture is one thing, and the awareness of belonging to it is another thing. By the way, in my opinion, it is not about blood ties. I`m Russian not because my father is Russian, but because this is my PURE cultural (rather than biological) self-determination (...) In my opinion, the term "sympathy" does not fit here, because, again, sympathy and involvement of different concepts, which it is necessary to distinguish at the level of terms. For me, the culture of Australian Aborigines can be “sympathic”, but it does not mean that I will take it as their own. As for cosmopolitanism, then, in my opinion, the fact of constant cultural exchange between different ethnic groups does not give him any foundation, since it does not
cancel ethnic identity (...) For me, the ethnicity is not a subculture, but militant cosmopolitanism is the capitalist devil incarnate” (the same memvers under pseudonym "Sebastjano Ekologo" in the discussion mailing list of KRAS)

"our ancestries weren`t xenophobic. I cite an example from the history of Motherland. In 8th. and 9th. centuries, the Slavic Viatichs confronted aggression from Turk Volga-Bulgarians. As a result of constant wars and captures from both sides, the population from both sides of frontier became mixed, with practically equal share of Turk and Slavic blood. Nevertheless, the division between Slavs and Turks (concerning cultural belonging and SELF-DETERMINATION) not disappeared…" (the same people - http://wap.neopagan.borda.ru/?1-3-0-00000023-000-0-0)

"what really distinguishes one ethnos from another if we recognize presence of the general cultural wealth and deny value of State frontiers and "blood unity"?? It would be strange to speak about such external material displays, as kinds of clothes, the form of dwelling etc. as about something serious... Primitive views about indivisibility of people and an area of its habitation seems true to me. Really, ties between ethnic culture and the surrounding nature (if not approach to this question with snobbish neglect) play a very important role. Probably, it is not smaller, than of role of mutual relations inside of a human society... Also it is necessary to tell about a very soft "spirit of people", proving in a folk music and people`s poetics... However, this spirit does not generate any contradictions to key, perhaps, universal values... Such distinctions (by all its importance) are not connected with forming any walls between representatives of different ethnic cultures..." (the same people - http://anarhia.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=396)

TO BE CONTINUED



#10 Top

Foristaruso
Mar 3 2014 08:53

Thank you, Alf


#11 Top
mpst
Mar 3 2014 11:22

Foristaruso wrote:
we are on the frontier of war

High-School professorial-chair is the "frontier of war" now?



#12 Top
mpst
Mar 3 2014 12:08

Alf,

There are some national-"anarchist" like groups in Russia, but MPST has nothing to do with them. We do neither collaborate with them, nor support or welcome such groups. We see such groups as potentially dangerous.

We support internationalist anarchism, albeit we usually do not produce such loud statements while sitting in comfortable professor chairs as some KRAS members do

Two members from Moscow group participated in Euromaidan events in Kiev among with other Ukrainian and Russian anarchists.

Now we condemn Russia's imperialist aggression against Ukraine, we consider it counter-revolutionary (although it is rather a bourgeois-democratic revolution).

Some seedy KRAS members seems to use the following dirty trick to denigrate our organization: they give some true information about real nationalists, chauvinistic groups (whom we condemn too), and then add their lies to their texts about MPST. For untutored readers, as well as for foreigners who have no ability to check it by seeing the situation in Russia immediately, it might look as the truth about MPST.


#13 Top

Militant Boy
Mar 3 2014 13:05

Oh God, not only that MPST flowed over the entire internet to , so I have to read your lies also in English . I invite members MPST that said cooperation with the nationalists " rewarding experience " threaten objectionable violence, attack the activists working with the new right , and are now trying to fool with lies foreign comrades off the Internet and not be reminded of the existence of a howl . Honestly, you're already tired of hypocrites . Under each article published KRAS you start writing your lies and insults . That this is the same , little brown sect , and the stench from both the SS division



#14
mpst
Mar 3 2014 14:17

I invite members MPST that said cooperation with the nationalists " rewarding experience "
Who, and when
?

Under each article published KRAS you start writing your lies and insults .
Links, please!


KRAS tends to create a good image internationally, but in Moscow anarchist community they have proven to be liars who refused to take part in mediation court regarding their rootless accusations. Then they preferred to blame every Russian anarchist activist and organization who disagree with them as fascists or new-right.

They lie to their Western comrades about situation in Russian anarchist circles. They are not "the only true internationalist anarchist organization" in Russia. They have no tight links with labor movement, newly emerged unions are under heavy influence of authoritarian left and trotskyst organizations, not anarchists. By their scandalous behavior, they destroyed the reputation of IWA and anarcho-syndicalism in Russia.



#15 Top
Caiman del Barrio
Mar 3 2014 14:45

Admin remove name from MPST's original torrent of noxious diarrhorrea. I'm unable to report the post for some reason. Also please agree at exactly what point you're gonna ban this Nazi cunt. If we can't even get the fascists out of the Ukranian/Russian Libcom coverage then we really are fucked.


Continues at: http://libcom.org/forums/news/statement ... p-08042013
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:16 pm

http://roadsandkingdoms.com/2014/the-la ... ruly-free/


THE LAST TIME UKRAINE WAS TRULY FREE

BY CASEY MICHEL

Like its present, Ukraine’s past is often seen in terms of split identity, torn between Europe and Russia, sitting along the fracture of different civilizations. For hundreds of years and for much of the 20th century, the country saw its fortunes determined by powerful outsiders. Russia claimed its birthplace in Kyiv. Those in the western portions, including the great nationalist hero Stepan Bandera—incidentally also a World War II-era Nazi collaborator—kept Ukraine pulled toward Europe.

But a less well-remembered historical figure offered a different vision, one opposed to both sides. Nestor Makhno wanted a radically independent, anarchist future in Ukraine, free from the pull of both east and west. For three years in the wake of World War I, he succeeded in constructing a free state along the banks of the Dnieper River, bridging the divide between Russian-speaking and Ukrainian-speaking peoples. It was an audacious, improbable republic, and though it crested a century ago, Makhno’s country is worth remembering because it was perhaps the last time Ukraine was truly free.


Image
A statue of Makhno in Huliapole.

Makhno’s ideas remain marginal and his legacy localized. When the town of Huliapole in southeastern Ukraine—Makhno’s birthplace—celebrated his 125th birthday in October, it was a relatively muted affair. There was no nationwide remembrance. There was no hero-worship. Makhno’s anarchist dream seemed the relic of a time long past. Scowling under a papakha in the center of town, his statue stood alone.

In the pantheon of Ukrainian freedom fighters, Makhno lies in the shadow of the ur-nationalist Bandera, the default anti-Moscow figure. It is Bandera’s orange-and-black flag that denotes the bloodlands of the Ukrainian west. It is Bandera’s name Russia now invokes when it denounces the supposedly fascist leanings of Kyiv’s new pro-western rulers.

Bandera was a fairly straightforward national hero, and villain. His was an arch-nationalist with a state-first thirst for independence, no matter the means, no matter the allies he took on. Makhno remains a much foggier character. His legacy is less amenable to jingoistic cooption. His political platform was one of fleeting, fiery mayhem—not just against the land-owning class or any imposition of domineering foreign control, but also against the very idea of a state itself.

So instead of just wanting to liberate Ukraine, he wanted to fundamentally re-order the shape of Ukrainian society along anarchist lines, to turn the country’s vast, exploited peasantry into a vibrant network of self-governing communes. In a sense, he wanted true independence for Ukrainians: independence from the Soviet Bolsheviks, from German and Austrian aggressors, and even from the Ukrainian state itself. As such, the people who truly look up to him are not necessarily Ukrainians, but instead the free people of Christiania, or the squatters of Brixton, or the fighters of Revolutionary Catalonia.


Image
Flag of the Free Territory with its motto, “Death to all who stand in the way of freedom for working people!”

Makhno was born into a peasant family in southeastern Ukraine in 1888. His poor upbringing promised a life of livestock and languish—and the early death of his father seemed to seal his fate.

But as Russia blundered into the 20th century, faltering against the Japanese and creating a Potemkin parliament, Makhno’s world began to shift and open. In his teens, he joined an anarchist group called “The Union of Poor Bread Growers.” They robbed from the rich and gave to the poor. Robin Hoods of the Dnieper. The authorities clamped down, and only a forged birth certificate that made him seem younger than he was spared Makhno from being hanged with his comrades.

His continued political agitation eventually landed Makhno in Moscow’s Butyrskaya prison in 1911. In jail, Makhno received the education he had foregone, soaking up political treatises and theories in the company of Pyotr Arshinov, a Russian anarchist who was serving a 20-year sentence. When Makhno was released following the February Revolution in 1917, he returned emboldened to a homeland in total upheaval.

The turmoil of World War I encouraged a ferment of political organizations and ideologies in Ukraine. “The notion of complete self-determination, up to and including a complete break with the Russian State, thus emerged naturally among [Ukrainians],” Makhno later wrote. “Groups of every persuasion sprang up among the Ukrainian population by the dozen.” These included a panoply of factions: separatists, monarchists, Mensheviks, revanchists, German sympathizers—and anarchists, with Makhno at the center.

MAKHNO WAS AS PROTEAN AS NATURE HERSELF.

Makhno’s anarchists, gathered under black banner, played a large role in the Red-White wars that followed the Bolshevik revolution in Russia and uprooted much of Ukraine. His first targets were the garrisons of the occupying Austrian army in the region. His forces launched stealthy guerilla raids and returned captured goods to the peasants, keeping weapons for themselves. Local populations offered their support with food and horses. The charismatic Makhno gained a following and the anarchist revolutionaries soon swelled across much of southeastern Ukraine. Their inventive disguises–as Austrians, as nobility–inspired their supporters. Where authorities saw a mob, those who joined—or who were attacked—saw a wraith, dissolving as quickly as it had appeared.

“Makhno was as protean as nature herself,” an observer from the Red Army noted. “Hay-carts deployed in battle array take towns, a wedding procession approaching the headquarters of a district executive committee suddenly opens a concentrated fire, [and] a little priest, waving above him the black flag of anarchy, orders the authorities to serve up the bourgeoisie, the proletariat, wine, and music.”

Thousands soon lined up behind Makhno. His famous horse-drawn machine guns, called tachanka, grabbed many victories, and his flags soon bore the slogan Svoboda ili smert’, “Liberty or death.” A black wave unfurled through the heart of Ukraine, smothering the Austrians and Germans and their puppet installations, pushing them out as the anarchists expanded.


Image
People celebrating Huliapole Day.


TROTSKY PROMISED TO CLEAR OUT THE MAKHNOVSCHINA ‘WITH AN IRON BROOM.’

The Reds rapidly took notice. In early 1919, the Bolsheviks allied with Makhno and his “Black Army” against the remaining Whites, who were gathered at the time under General Anton Denikin. Makhno cut Denikin’s supply lines and forced the Whites into the Black Sea. Victorious, the Black Army sought to consolidate its gains and secure a “Free State” in southern Ukraine where the principles of anarchist organization would be practiced among the peasantry.

But the Russian Bolsheviks wanted none of this anarchy on their southern flank, and promptly turned on Makhno’s forces. Leon Trotsky was dismissive of the anarchist cause. “[Makhno] was a mixture of fanatic and adventurer… [who led] well-fed peasants who were afraid of losing what they had.” Trotsky promised to clear out the Makhnovschina “with an iron broom.” He outlawed the anarchists, and declared Makhno an enemy of the nascent Bolshevik state.

Makhno survived an assassination attempt by the Cheka–the precursor of the KGB. Heavy fighting and guerilla warfare ensued. Tens of thousands rallied around their bat’ko, or “father” as Makhno was known. The brutal struggle between Bolsheviks and anarchists raged over swaths of Ukraine until 1921, interrupted only briefly when both sides united again to defeat a resurgent White Army. Eventually, however, the Reds came too strong, and too numerous. The inherent contradiction of organized anarchy set in, and the Makhnovschina were scattered. Makhno fled to Romania, then to Paris. He died of tuberculosis in 1935, never seeing the realization of his goal of anarchism in the plains of Ukraine.

The bat’ko’s legacy limps on, still waiting to ossify. Governments are still, and will remain, averse to the anarchy he advocated. But only a month after Huliapole—which has nicknamed itself Makhnograd—honored the memory of Makhno, the EuroMaidan movement began, shaking the country, toppling its pro-Russian president Victor Yanukovych. Russia has invaded Crimea, and is threatening more. The West blusters and threatens in response. A standstill hangs. Makhnograd stands restive. And that anarchy—that black flag under which Makhno fought, and for which his thousands died—looms just beyond.


ImageCasey Michel is a graduate student at Columbia University’s Harriman Institute, and a former Peace Corps Kazakhstan volunteer.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Fri Mar 07, 2014 12:01 am

http://www.stewarthomesociety.org/ga/anaafaorg.htm

ANARCHO-FACISTS ATTEMPT TO ORGANISE: Anarchist Heretics Fair/Beyond Right and Left by Unpopular Books

At first sight this leaflet (*not online) may appear innocuous - a few groups organising a get together outside the stale atmosphere of the "mainstream contemporary anarchist movement.". However the reality is that the organiser is a hard-core national-bolshevik, as he explained in an interview with Wayne John (Sturgeon) of Albion Awake!:

"In the U.K. Anarchy is limited to empty Socialist based groups who have no interest in anything except class war or industrial relations. In France, Italy and Russia there is a long rich, intellectual heritage in the Anarchy milieu which covers the Futurists, symbolists, Surrealists, Decadents, etc, and a belief in nomadic thought beyond left-right and a synthesis of opposites with dynamic flux. In Russia for e.g. there is a big Anarchist underground and the major personality behind this Tsvetlan Tsvetlov author of Anarchy Unlimited has brought this milieu to the great Alexander Dugin the head of the Russian National Bolsheviks."

Other open supporters of Dugin include the National Revolutionary Faction (NRF), an openly antisemitic and racist National Bolshevik organisation in the UK. It has a policy of entryism into other far-right groups. Meanwhile a Christian Anarchist like Wayne John (Sturgeon) tries to appear anti-racist by declaring how pleased he is when Jews become Christian! However he finds it hard to keep up the pretense and moans that "our children grow up apeing imported black rap stars from the USA" (Alternative Green No.21, Autumn 1999)

Simply under the name Wayne John, his 'Christianarchy' article recently appeared in Green Anarchist No.57-58 (Autumn 1999). Whilst making much of their 'disagreements' with Alternative Green (who split from them in 1991), and even denouncing the English National Movement (a former incarnation of the NRF), GA have struggled to maintain some credence in the "mainstream contemporary anarchist movement." This has been despite severe criticism of a series of articles by Steve Booth called "The Irrationalists" which called for bio-chemical and bomb attacks in public places. His blend of existentialist misanthropy is remarkably close to the doctrines of Dugin:

"The national-bolsheviks comprehend the "irrational" not just as "not rational", but as "the aggressive and active destruction of the rational", as fight with the "everyday consciousness" (and the "everyday behaviour"), as submersion into the "new life" element, that is the special magic existence of a "differential human", who has discarded all outer bans and norms." The Metaphysics of National-Bolshevism

Whether covert or overt, our response is the same:
Smash Anarcho-Fascism! Smash National-Bolshevism!
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby justdrew » Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:42 am

well thank goodness it's to have a dynamic flux. I so hate an unchanging flux.

and now... a bit of oppositional synthesis: 1 + -1 = 0

earthshaking revelations.

a train to get on for those late to the last.

awww. never mind.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Fri Mar 21, 2014 2:21 pm

http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_blackshirt.html

Eternal Fascism: Fourteen Ways of Looking at a Blackshirt

By Umberto Eco

Writing in New York Review of Books, 22 June 1995, pp.12-15. Excerpted in Utne Reader, November-December 1995, pp. 57-59.

In spite of some fuzziness regarding the difference between various historical forms of fascism, I think it is possible to outline a list of features that are typical of what I would like to call Ur-Fascism, or Eternal Fascism. These features cannot be organized into a system; many of them contradict each other, and are also typical of other kinds of despotism or fanaticism. But it is enough that one of them be present to allow fascism to coagulate around it.

* * *

1. The first feature of Ur-Fascism is the cult of tradition.


Traditionalism is of course much older than fascism. Not only was it typical of counterrevolutionary Catholic thought after the French revolution, but is was born in the late Hellenistic era, as a reaction to classical Greek rationalism. In the Mediterranean basin, people of different religions (most of the faiths indulgently accepted by the Roman pantheon) started dreaming of a revelation received at the dawn of human history. This revelation, according to the traditionalist mystique, had remained for a long time concealed under the veil of forgotten languages -- in Egyptian hieroglyphs, in the Celtic runes, in the scrolls of the little-known religions of Asia.

This new culture had to be syncretistic. Syncretism is not only, as the dictionary says, "the combination of different forms of belief or practice;" such a combination must tolerate contradictions. Each of the original messages contains a sliver of wisdom, and although they seem to say different or incompatible things, they all are nevertheless alluding, allegorically, to the same primeval truth.

As a consequence, there can be no advancement of learning. Truth already has been spelled out once and for all, and we can only keep interpreting its obscure message.

If you browse in the shelves that, in American bookstores, are labeled New Age, you can find there even Saint Augustine, who, as far as I know, was not a fascist. But combining Saint Augustine and Stonehenge -- that is a symptom of Ur-Fascism.

2. Traditionalism implies the rejection of modernism.

Both Fascists and Nazis worshipped technology, while traditionalist thinkers usually reject it as a negation of traditional spiritual values. However, even though Nazism was proud of its industrial achievements, its praise of modernism was only the surface of an ideology based upon blood and earth (Blut und Boden). The rejection of the modern world was disguised as a rebuttal of the capitalistic way of life. The Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.

3. Irrationalism also depends on the cult of action for action's sake.


Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation. Therefore culture is suspect insofar as it is identified with critical attitudes. Distrust of the intellectual world has always been a symptom of Ur-Fascism, from Hermann Goering's fondness for a phrase from a Hanns Johst play ("When I hear the word 'culture' I reach for my gun") to the frequent use of such expressions as "degenerate intellectuals," "eggheads," "effete snobs," and "universities are nests of reds." The official Fascist intellectuals were mainly engaged in attacking modern culture and the liberal intelligentsia for having betrayed traditional values.

4. The critical spirit makes distinctions, and to distinguish is a sign of modernism.

In modern culture the scientific community praises disagreement as a way to improve knowledge. For Ur-Fascism, disagreement is treason.

5. Besides, disagreement is a sign of diversity.

Ur-Fascism grows up and seeks consensus by exploiting and exacerbating the natural fear of difference. The first appeal of a fascist or prematurely fascist movement is an appeal against the intruders. Thus Ur-Fascism is racist by definition.

6. Ur-Fascism derives from individual or social frustration.

That is why one of the most typical features of the historical fascism was the appeal to a frustrated middle class, a class suffering from an economic crisis or feelings of political humiliation, and frightened by the pressure of lower social groups. In our time, when the old "proletarians" are becoming petty bourgeois (and the lumpen are largely excluded from the political scene), the fascism of tomorrow will find its audience in this new majority.

7. To people who feel deprived of a clear social identity, Ur-Fascism says that their only privilege is the most common one, to be born in the same country.

This is the origin of nationalism. Besides, the only ones who can provide an identity to the nation are its enemies. Thus at the root of the Ur-Fascist psychology there is the obsession with a plot, possibly an international one. The followers must feel besieged. The easiest way to solve the plot is the appeal to xenophobia. But the plot must also come from the inside: Jews are usually the best target because they have the advantage of being at the same time inside and outside. In the United States, a prominent instance of the plot obsession is to be found in Pat Robertson's The New World Order, but, as we have recently seen, there are many others.

8. The followers must feel humiliated by the ostentatious wealth and force of their enemies.

When I was a boy I was taught to think of Englishmen as the five-meal people. They ate more frequently than the poor but sober Italians. Jews are rich and help each other through a secret web of mutual assistance. However, the followers of Ur-Fascism must also be convinced that they can overwhelm the enemies. Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak. Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy.

9. For Ur-Fascism there is no struggle for life but, rather, life is lived for struggle.

Thus pacifism is trafficking with the enemy. It is bad because life is permanent warfare. This, however, brings about an Armageddon complex. Since enemies have to be defeated, there must be a final battle, after which the movement will have control of the world. But such "final solutions" implies a further era of peace, a Golden Age, which contradicts the principle of permanent war. No fascist leader has ever succeeded in solving this predicament.

10. Elitism is a typical aspect of any reactionary ideology, insofar as it is fundamentally aristocratic, and aristocratic and militaristic elitism cruelly implies contempt for the weak.

Ur-Fascism can only advocate a popular elitism. Every citizen belongs to the best people in the world, the members or the party are the best among the citizens, every citizen can (or ought to) become a member of the party. But there cannot be patricians without plebeians. In fact, the Leader, knowing that his power was not delegated to him democratically but was conquered by force, also knows that his force is based upon the weakness of the masses; they are so weak as to need and deserve a ruler.

11. In such a perspective everybody is educated to become a hero.

In every mythology the hero is an exceptional being, but in Ur-Fascist ideology heroism is the norm. This cult of heroism is strictly linked with the cult of death. It is not by chance that a motto of the Spanish Falangists was Viva la Muerte ("Long Live Death!"). In nonfascist societies, the lay public is told that death is unpleasant but must be faced with dignity; believers are told that it is the painful way to reach a supernatural happiness. By contrast, the Ur-Fascist hero craves heroic death, advertised as the best reward for a heroic life. The Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his impatience, he more frequently sends other people to death.

12. Since both permanent war and heroism are difficult games to play, the Ur-Fascist transfers his will to power to sexual matters.

This is the origin of machismo (which implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality). Since even sex is a difficult game to play, the Ur-Fascist hero tends to play with weapons -- doing so becomes an ersatz phallic exercise.

13. Ur-Fascism is based upon a selective populism, a qualitative populism, one might say.

In a democracy, the citizens have individual rights, but the citizens in their entirety have a political impact only from a quantitative point of view -- one follows the decisions of the majority. For Ur-Fascism, however, individuals as individuals have no rights, and the People is conceived as a quality, a monolithic entity expressing the Common Will. Since no large quantity of human beings can have a common will, the Leader pretends to be their interpreter. Having lost their power of delegation, citizens do not act; they are only called on to play the role of the People. Thus the People is only a theatrical fiction. There is in our future a TV or Internet populism, in which the emotional response of a selected group of citizens can be presented and accepted as the Voice of the People.

Because of its qualitative populism, Ur-Fascism must be against "rotten" parliamentary governments. Wherever a politician casts doubt on the legitimacy of a parliament because it no longer represents the Voice of the People, we can smell Ur-Fascism.

14. Ur-Fascism speaks Newspeak.

Newspeak was invented by Orwell, in Nineteen Eighty-Four, as the official language of what he called Ingsoc, English Socialism. But elements of Ur-Fascism are common to different forms of dictatorship. All the Nazi or Fascist schoolbooks made use of an impoverished vocabulary, and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning. But we must be ready to identify other kinds of Newspeak, even if they take the apparently innocent form of a popular talk show.

* * *

Ur-Fascism is still around us, sometimes in plainclothes. It would be so much easier for us if there appeared on the world scene somebody saying, "I want to reopen Auschwitz, I want the Blackshirts to parade again in the Italian squares." Life is not that simple. Ur-Fascism can come back under the most innocent of disguises. Our duty is to uncover it and to point our finger at any of its new instances — every day, in every part of the world. Franklin Roosevelt's words of November 4, 1938, are worth recalling: "If American democracy ceases to move forward as a living force, seeking day and night by peaceful means to better the lot of our citizens, fascism will grow in strength in our land." Freedom and liberation are an unending task.



(emphases in original)
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:17 am

Stormfront morans v Honi Soit

Investigating Stormfront: Whiteness, Demography and Politics

Honi Soit

“Matilda Surtees and Geordie Crawford investigate Australian white supremacy organisations.”
March 27, 2014

Continues at: http://slackbastard.anarchobase.com/?p=35959




American Dream » Wed Feb 26, 2014 9:35 am wrote:
MONDAY, APRIL 21, 2008

The New Right, "national anarchism", and A White Australia

Defend Australian Nationalism!

To begin with, the debate was sparked by the leader of the Australia First Party (NSW), Dr James Saleam, a veteran fascist and ideologue. In essence, Saleam questioned the political implications of the New Right's apparent embrace of Troy Southgate's peculiar notion of 'anarchism' for the future of White Australia. Saleam's concern is justified, as the implications of Southgate's vision of villages full of Whites living -- perhaps slightly uncomfortably -- among other villages composed of Blacks, Browns, Yellows and (presumably) all the other colours of the Homo Rainbow -- whatever they might be now or in the future -- does indeed spell the potential end of a White Australia.

Saleam's essay is titled, with his usual sense of pomp and circumstance, 'An Error In New Right Australia / New Zealand: Is There An Effective Acceptance Of Multiculturalism And Multiracialism In Australia?'. He writes:


A senior person in New Right Australia / New Zealand [Welf Herfurth] addressed a meeting in Sydney on February 15. Around the same time, he also did an interview for a certain magazine ['Doing the New Right thing by people: An interview with a key organiser for the New Right and National Anarchist movements in Australia', Destiny, No.3, February 2008]. A few important statements of position were made (and some strongly implied in the dialogue) that may not only imperil the acceptance of general New Right ideology within the broad Australian nationalist movement, but which could compromise the position of that group itself inside any front for Australian renewal. This situation arises because New Right ideology in Australia has been combined by the speaker and the group with the political philosophy of 'national anarchism'. And there are some ideological-political concepts in current national anarchism which place it in juxtaposition to long-standing Australian nationalist principle.



Destiny is a local, Melbourne publication, launched late last year, and closely allied with the 'Australian Protectionist Party' (APP). The APP emerged as a result of a split in Saleam's AF; this split, in turn, the apparent result of qualms over Saleam's history as a neo-Nazi and convicted criminal (a stick with which the media continues to beat Saleam about the head with, much to his chagrin), continued, close association with other neo-Nazis such as Ross 'The Skull' May, and his autocratic leadership style.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:15 pm

Updates on National Anarchist infiltrations in the New York area

In a recent interview with a fascist Dutch Magazine, NATA‘s commander, Craig Fitzgerald, boasted that despite being rejected by all anarchists in NY for their support of White Nationalism and Holocaust denial, they are “Continuing to collaborate with groups as diverse as We Are Change, Occupy Wall Street, Earth First [Likely untrue, see update], the Libertarian Party and others.”

Here’s some of NATA’s most active faces. If his claims are true, hopefully these collaborators will find this post and kick the scum from their ranks.


http://nycantifa.wordpress.com/2014/03/ ... york-area/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:28 pm

http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/04/01/ ... cal-right/

APRIL 01, 2014

Amerika’s Would-be Pravy Sektor

The New Face of the Radical Right?


by ALEXANDER REID ROSS

Enter the National Anarchists

In 2009, the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Political Research Associates agreed that Anarchist Nationalism “could become the new face of the radical right” in the USA. Attempting to mix subcultural anarchist mores with a cross-cutting class analysis that hinges on racial separatism and ancestral traditions, such as tribalism, Anarchist Nationalism demonstrate a worrying tendency of reactionaries to co-opt radical language in attempts to gain control over large popular fronts.

Although Anarchist Nationalism has been kept at bay in the US, it is growing around the world through the efforts of antifascist organizing, and continues to attempt inroads into radical scenes. In an interview with the fascist Dutch magazine, Green Nationalist, the head of National Anarchist Tribal Alliance (NATA), Craig Fitzgerald, boasts that NATA is “continuing to collaborate with groups as diverse as We Are Change, Occupy Wall Street, Earth First, the Libertarian Party and others.”

NATA is utilizing a long-term strategy, known as Entryism, which the SPLC defines as “the name given to the process of entering or infiltrating bona fide organizations, institutions and political parties with the intention of gaining control of them for our own ends.” According to a pamphlet written by British National Anarchist, Troy Southgate, entitled, "The Case for National-Anarchist Entryism", national anarchists must join political groups and then “misdirect or disrupt them for our own purposes or convert sections of their memberships to our cause.

While Earth First! denies any collaboration with the National Anarchists, both EF! and OWS have seen the white power movement’s attempts to use leftist and ecological movements for its own purposes threaten broader attempts at organizing. The white power movement attempted to intervene in OWS via debates surrounding the potential of Ron Paul’s libertarianism and its connections to de-centralized, anti-statist ideology. EF! has actively struggled against the late JT Ready, Sheriff Arpaio and his police gang, the KKK, and so on. With rising racial tensions and economic stagnation in the US, the integrity of struggle against racism and, more generally, oppression, must be maintained across all social movements.

White Power Anarchism?

Among articles celebrating the rise of fascism in Ukraine, whitepower.us published an article last month called “Ron Paul, Libertarianism, and The Anarchist Connection.” Celebrating an unlikely combination of Murray Bookchin and former speechwriter for Barry Goldwater, Karl Hess, the article proposes an anarchic struggle of the individual against institutions. Ron Paul then becomes a jumping off point for a possible national front under the guise of libertarian promises of freedom.

[W]hether Ron Paul’s campaign machine would now consider an outreach to include a visible left component—perhaps the OCCUPY movement—is probably not in the cards… However, it is tempting to imagine a new fangled party styled on Libertarian lines: principled, but with fresh blood, a refreshed agenda and a something-we-can-all-agree on platform. Down the road this sort of movement might gain some real political traction; especially if we keep racing down the path towards more muscular restraints on personal freedom.


Demurring from a National Front party, these sentiments are virtually interchangeable with the screeds published by National Anarchists. “Internationalists, of every description, have no understanding of the relationship that exists between the people, generations of people, and the land from which they are drawn, i.e. the concept of Blood and Soil,” NATA’s spokesman explains. Referencing Blood and Soil (Blut und Boden)—the German movement of Romantic ultranationalism that spread genocidal hatred of Jews—is a clear hat tip to German Fascism. More broadly, the völkish narrative of the Nation used by NATA marks a close approximation of Hitler’s notion of the Nation as “the living organism—the people.”

As for racial integration, NATA explains, “A fair reflection of our position would be that racial integration is a product of the internationalist ideology of both Capitalists and Marxists, and that loyalty to Race, Nation, Region, Culture and Tradition are natural barriers to the imperialist, globalist tendency and must be encouraged, not destroyed.

Traditional White Supremacy

Aside from attempting to “philosophically unite diverse hyphenated anarchists with one another” under yet another hyphenated label, Fitzgerald declares that “[national anarchism] could manifest as a planned communist economy, a laissez-faire free market, a religious or racially separatist enclave, an environmentalist eco-tribe, or anything else.” The ambiguity behind such fascist ideas is staggering.

Just as under colonialism, the main point of fascism remains the elevation of essentialized understandings of race, family, tribe, religion, culture, and tradition to a semi-mystical idea of the Nation. This atavistic understanding allows National Anarchists the possibility of forming common bonds with naive people and organizations as malleable to their wishes as their own concepts are. The attempt at forging horizontal ties between white supremacist groups under the guise of nationalism explains why National Anarchist articles have been cross-posted at Stormfront.org, the world’s largest white supremacist forum.

The strategic attempts to alienate or co-opt radical groups and commandeer populist movements with racist and nationalist ideology is shared by the right wing opportunists of Ukraine and Greece who are applauded so heavily by the editors of whitepower.us, stormfront.org, and so on. Celebrating the forces of Stepan Bandera, who slaughtered countless Jews and at least 50,000 Catholic Poles, Ukraine’s fascist political party, Svoboda, uses the Nazi “Wolfsangel” symbol and is joined by paramilitary fighters called Pravy Sektor known for their animosity against the EU and Russia, as well as immigrants and Jews. These groups are allied with numerous nationalist groups around Europe, including British National Party and Hungary’s Jobbik—both anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant groups.

In an article written by Panagioti Tsolkas last year, the trend of Entryism within Greek neo-nazi party Golden Dawn reveals ecofascist organizing in the US (Golden Dawn has even implemented their own version of a green fist logo). Panagioti writes, “In times of social upheaval, it seems a given that the far-right elements of an industrial empire will present themselves as a counter force in an attempt to allure some of the righteously indignant and, often painfully ignorant, folks who perceive themselves as a ‘middle class’ in need of protection and salvation.” Such times are at the doorstep of the US.

Craig Fitzgerald, himself, is an apologist for the Greek Nationalist party, Golden Dawn, denying that the organization is, in fact, a fascist political party in spite of all evidence to the contrary (including a much-publicized incident in which their members chanted “Heil Hitler” in Parliament). But the affinity between NATA and such fascist groups runs deeper. The Bay Area National Anarchists harken back to ancestral connections to Confederate paramilitaries, Quantrill’s Raiders, while they praise neo-Confederate groups such as the League of the South. They also organized an alliance with skinhead group, American Front, helping to raise money for an incarcerated member of The Order, a white supremacist paramilitary group.

Another National Anarchist group based in Idaho Falls calls itself Folk and Faith, and is led by Joe Hadenuff (real name: Jeremy T. Wilcox), a former-skinhead who was court marshaled by the army for attending a KKK rally in 2000. For recruits, Hadenuff exhorts National Anarchists to “Try ex-skinheads that have all grown up and are raising families, try ex-reactionary racialists now moving on to folk-centered idealism, try ex-NS’ers [National Socialists] that just got worn out on ‘88’ [code for “Heil Hitler”] and Sieg Heiling cameras as a purported answer to our folk's problems.”

The Public Face of Ecofascism

Publically, NATA insists that they are not fascists, because they count Jews among their members, as well as people of color. And these are not just token friends, like the ones that “respectable racist” David Duke mentions in screeds like “The Talmudic Roots of Jewish Supremacism.” One of NATA’s cofounders, Miguel Peralta, is a person of color—so what if he and other co-founders helped host an event for Holocaust denier David Irving? Peralta’s ignominious record also includes being kicked out of Anarchist People of Color's Facebook group and hosting a screening of the latest Mumia documentary, Long Distance Revolutionary, against the wishes of its distributor (who did not want to be associated with NATA).

Bay Area National Anarchist founder Andrew Yeoman whines, “the Anarchist People of Color had a well-known meeting in Detroit in which they prohibited white people from entering. It was seen as this progressive thing not to allow white people into their meeting so they could pursue their black agenda or whatever. I really saw that as a huge contradiction between behavior that was allowable for certain kinds of people but not people of my descent.” Like Yeoman, NATA refuses to acknowledge the fact that ubiquitous white privilege has made people of color spaces necessarily radical on the one hand, and white people exclusive spaces the hegemonic norm on the other. By insisting on racially separatist white organizing, excluding people of color, NATA simply furthers the white power agenda.

NATA’s attempts to court people of color seem to promise a rekindling of Fred Hampton’s coalition of Young Lords, Black Panthers, and Young Patriots; however, it is more of a revanchist attempt by white right-wingers to generate power towards their own aims than it is a practical approach to popular organizing. It is no surprise that anarchists throughout North America have shunned and excluded NATA. The supporters of the group were kicked out of the Bay Area by antifascists after participating in the xenophobic Minutemen March, among other things, and the New York chapter has been hounded out of most, if not all, radical spaces. As well as turning his back on Yeoman, Fitzgerald attempted to picket ABC NoRio, a last bastion of the radical squatter scene, but again found no traction. NATA currently announces itself as anti-anti-fascist, due to what they see as an “authoritarian witch hunt.”

To forward its “radical” cred, NATA has glommed onto quaint ecological ideas. “We try as much as possible to be involved with and promote a culture of small scale organic family farms and intentional communities,” states Fitzgerald. “Because the natural environment plays such a central role in all of our lives, it should be a local focus for moving forward in a decentralized world. If individual communities can learn how to ecologically protect and nurture their land, the earth will benefit much more than if people continue to rely on governments and large NGO’s to ‘save’ or ‘protect’ the environment, especially when these institutions are in league with polluting corporations. Not only that, but we need food to live, and our sustenance comes from the land. We should not only be working the land to survive, but also to reestablish the harmonious relationship humanity used to have with the earth.”

Through this and other narratives of the supposed historic harmoniousness of white people with the land, NATA is attempting to practice their Entryism by co-opting Marcellus Shale Earth First!’s efforts to put and end to fracking through direct action. It is clear, however, that National Anarchism is, itself, a vehicle of Entryism for the larger white supremacy movement. Their hope is that the US might engage in a kind of revival of the Occupy movement, and that NATA would provide glue between leftists and rightists—white supremacists and black nationalists rising up against the state and generating “National Autonomous Zones” where the "Natural Order" of racism would be allowed to thrive.

In 2012, the number of anti-government white “Patriot” groups rose to the highest ever, while the number of hate groups remained over 1,000, having nearly doubled in the last 12 years. A recent AP poll has also shown marked rises in anti-black and anti-latino sentiment among whites in the US. White nationalists’ involvement with radical movements can only lead to misdirection and disruption, presenting dire consequences for the future of social organizing—just as it has done in Ukraine. Truly radical struggle must break down those racialized boundaries of fear that gentrification, mass incarceration, and community policing engenders. It cannot further romanticize the idea of “racial enclaves,” or, rather, ghettos. In their transparent attempts to capitalize off of both radical, emancipatory sentiment and rising racist reaction, the National Anarchists are about as far away from radical struggle as they come.


Alexander Reid Ross is a contributing moderator of the Earth First! Newswire. He is the editor of Grabbing Back: Essays Against the Global Land Grab (AK Press 2014) and a contributor to Life During Wartime (AK Press 2013). This article is also being published at http://www.earthfirstjournal.org/newswire .
"If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything."
-Malcolm X
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:59 pm

Post-Third Position Fascism

Posted on February 4, 2013 by postthirdpositionfascism

Welcome to Post-Third Position Fascism. The purpose of this blog is to provide resources regarding recent permutations of Third Position and New Right fascist movements, especially in the U.S. – as well as groups that are influenced by these trends or work in alliance with them. These include, but are not limited to, groups like National-Anarchists, Attack the System, New Resistance, and others. We’ll also look at the attempts to appropriate radical left symbols and slogans by European groups like Casa Pound and the Autonomous Nationalists.

Third Position fascism is a lesser-known type of fascism that is anti-capitalist, believes in racial separatism rather than racial supremacy (and therefore can unite white and POC separatist groups in what we call reciprocal ethno-separatism), and is often interested in ecology and animal rights. The origins of the Third Position are in Otto Strasser’s wing of the original Nazi party; Strasser condemned Hitler for being “too moderate.” The term itself arose in the 1970s around the Italian “Nazi-Maoists.” These ideas became influential on British groups like the National Front; Russian groups like the National Bolshevik Party; and later on U.S. groups like the Tom Metzger’s White Aryan Resistance (WAR), the American Front, the White Order of Thule, and the National Alliance.

More recently longtime fascist activists, many of whom were involved in groups like the European Liberation Front, and the associated LCRN, have continued to develop and change their ideology. (As right-wing monitor Chip Berlet points out, these are not just followers of similar ideas, but participants in a close-knit, international network of postwar fascists.) These include far right activists like Britain’s Troy Southgate, America’s James Porrazzo, and Russia’s Alexander Dugin. They have developed in different directions, sometimes embracing a Eurasian superstate in opposition to liberal international capitalism, while at other times endorsing a micronational ethnic separatism and even fusing with racist, antisemitic elements of the Ron Paul-wing of libertarianism. All of them deny being “fascist” – while continuing to promote the same ideas they have held for decades.

We’ll keep track of all of them, and expose their attempts at “entryism” in the left; their promotion of holocaust denial and other conspiracy theories; and their attempts to justify and endorse White Nationalists’ supposed “right” to Jim Crow white racial separatism.

We stand in opposition to white supremacy and white separatism; anti-Muslim and anti-Jewish views and conspiracy theories; patriarchy and homophobia – and to capitalism and all authoritarian forms of statist and religious rule.



http://postthirdpositionfascism.wordpre ... n-fascism/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Sun Apr 13, 2014 10:02 pm

American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Fri May 02, 2014 5:21 pm

http://web.archive.org/web/200407180417 ... ylor1.html

Image


An Interview with Robert N.Taylor (#1)

Conducted by Troy Southgate, for the English publication 'Tribal Resonance', April, 1998.

1. Tell us about your childhood, what actually inspired your development during those early years and made you realise that you had something to offer?

I began to draw a lot as a young child, 4 or 5 years old and on. Mostly copying things from comic books and magazines. Sometimes I would use my toy soldiers as models and draw from them. I was always busy drawing or colouring things.

In grade school the only subjects I liked were art and history. All the rest bored me. When it was an art project I was enthused and worked hard at it. Anything else I simply refused to have anything to do with. I refused to do homework and really didn’t care at all about school and grades and such.

By the third grade I decided I was going to be an artist.. So everything else seemed superfluous if it didn’t help my becoming an artist. I can still visualise a tempera painting I had done in the third or fourth grade. We were supposed to paint a picture of ourselves grown-up and costumed in the manner of what we wanted to be when we were grown. I painted a picture of myself with a beard, a beret and a paint brush in hand at an easel.. Another painting I recall from that same period was one which depicted Vikings standing on a deck of a huge dragon-prowed ship, riding the crest of a wave, which looked straight out of a Hokusai or Hirosige wood-block print.

I always had this creative artistic side to me. In my teens I was painting, drawing, writing poems, keeping journals and such, with no objective purpose or goal in mind. It was just as though I was a doing it all as a natural part of being alive and human. There was no immediate precedent for all of this among my family. No one painted pictures or wrote poems, that I was ever aware of. My father was primarily interested at that time in boxing matches, baseball and football games, politics and things of that sort. The entire world that surrounded me was thoroughly working class in all of it’s values, aptitudes and appetites.

Art aside, I was also a very physical and rigorous child. My favourite sport was boxing. I particularly enjoyed bare-fisted fighting. Two men facing one another in a bare-fisted fight is for me honest courage personified. I also learned at a young age that it turned the girls on as well. It seemed to resonate in some deep primitive redoubt of their psyches. I, of course, exploited such factors to my own advantage at every possible opportunity. I was attracted to girls at a very young age. I was quite precocious in that sense. One summer I fell under the spell of a beautiful blond girl from Germany named Ingra. She was three or four years older than I was. She and several of her girl friends taught me quite a bit about sex at a very early age. Bless her heart wherever she may be.

I addition to boxing I played football and baseball, weight-lifted, and in my later years studied karate and martial arts. I was also the top track and field athlete in my school. I was very fast in running dashes, and pretty good at both high and broad jumping. I always preferred individual sports to team sports.

I also sang a lot as a child. I had a better than average voice, very strong and loud, and I exercised it constantly as I went about my daily affairs. I always loved music as far back as i can recall. I would sing along with the radio with Bing Crosby, the Andrew sisters and all the vocalists’ who came before the advent of rock ‘n roll. I very much liked the early rock ‘n roll music; Bill Haley, Jerry Lee Lewis, Carl Perkins, Pat Boone and of course Elvis. Rock ‘n roll seemed a fresh breeze after the staid and formulaic ballads of the forties. Most of that music was for me, soulless. But even the rock ‘n roll performers were essentially only vocalists. Even Elvis, for all his fame and fortune, never wrote any of the songs he did. But, with the advent of the Beatles and the so called “British Invasion“ music became a creative art again, and the performers were real troubadours, who wrote their own material and performed it as well.

I bought a cheap Stella, orchestral guitar when I was about 14 years old. I think it cost about twenty-five dollars. What I really liked best were drums and other percussion instruments. I started my percussion career using fifty-gallon garbage cans. Using either the flat of my hands or sometimes drum sticks. I would beat out rhythms on the up-side-down cans for hours at a stretch, or until someone in a nearby house stuck their head out of the window and yelled for me to stop or they would call the police.

I was fortunate, in so much as the family home where I grew up, had work benches and vices and all manner of hand tools. I was constantly working on projects in my basement. I built a functioning cross-bow out of a leaf spring when I was about 14 years old. In time I also made zip-guns and other weapons.

During the period I grew up there was a lot of house construction going on, and there was always lots of scrap lumber that we would use to make swords and shields, build forts with and such. My friends and I built lots of rafts that we sailed in nearby quarries, underground hide-outs and such. Our days were filled with endless adventures. The railroad tracks and yards were another favourite place to play.

At about fifteen years old or so my attraction to the girls became my primary interest. Also in my teens I began to run with street gangs on Chicago’s west-side. I never joined gangs so much for the camaraderie or as a group security thing. Gangs served more as a context or vehicle for fighting. I loved the exhilaration of combat. There was always some gang war going on. Between the ages of fourteen and 18 I was in a street gang that is still remembered and talked about by many Chicagoans, The Taylor Street Dukes. They were the most feared White street gang in Chicago at that time. Most of our gang-wars were with black and Puerto Rican gangs of that era; The Vice Lords, The Egyptian Cobras and others. There were generally rumbles every weekend. I seldom missed any of them. They all generally ended with a flying squad of riot police screeching to the scene, from whom we endeavoured to escape. Sometimes we did get caught and were hauled down to the local police station. They seldom charged us with anything serious though. Our parents were called to come down and pick us up. It was always a very sullen trip back home. I spent a good part of my teen years running from and evading the police. Mostly as a result of hooliganism, fighting and vandalism.

Living in this sort of environment, a virtual combat zone, certainly brought grass roots social problems into sharp focus. Everyday became a drama of life and death.Racial tensions flared-up frequently. Armed conflict became a common-day experience.

This all took place in the early period of the 1960s. I was actually a participant of a “White-riot “. That may be hard to believe for members of the current generation of young people. But it was a bonified White-riot. It was generated by mostly Irish and Italian ethnics fighting against the police.

It all began when several old spinsters sold a large apartment building to a black family. The evening that the black family moved in, a mob of neighbourhood people, thousands of them, surrounded the apartment building and started chanting curses. A few moments later bricks and other debris began to bombard the building. All the windows were wiped out in less than a minute.

The mob began to break the doors of the building down battering-ram style - just as riot police arrived from all approaches, screeching to a halt in the middle of the intersection. Then the battle between the riot police ( a special unit of particularly big, burly. mean cops, all brandishing billy clubs the size of baseball bats ) and the white mob raged. The battle surged back and forth.The mob would surge forward en masse - then the police would begin to drive the crowd back with their clubs. It went on and on - it felt as though time itself had expanded itself. The fighting seemed an eternity of time and a crazy dream all rolled into one. I was somewhat near the middle of the mob. The front bodies would surge back into us crushing those behind - then after a few moments crush me again as the mob pushed forward from the rear. I imagine if one had a bird’s-eye-view from above it would have appeared like a minuet movement. A dance of rage.

An enraged mob is a fearful and awesome thing. All is levelled to the lowest common denominator. The mob has a single mind, a single purpose, a single soul. Someone yells out a slogan or command, and the entire mob, mind and body surges forward to effect the command without question or hesitation. In a mob action, even those of lesser courage will oftentimes commit actions they would never dare to commit as lone individuals.

This riot continued for four nights. It would convene each evening, as though a scheduled event at dusk. Word of the riot continued to spread far beyond the neighbourhood in question. The crowds grew larger each night. The fighting and violence spread out from the initial epi-center. Dummies stuffed with rags and painted with black faces were hung from lamp posts and set ablaze in effigy. Roving bands of armed teens moved about the streets and alley ways. By the second night all of the street lights had been broken or shot out.City buses passing through the riot area, who had black drivers, were attacked by the mob. Windshields were smashed out with large chunks of concrete broken from the curbs, many dropped from railroad bridges as the buses or cars drove
under. It was a pretty ugly scene to be sure.

After the initial rioting, and many arrests of people on the streets, a police command-post was set-up in the garage of the apartment building that had been under attack. It was maintained for the next twelve years at tax payers expense. The real estate agent who had sold the building was literally cut in two with a shotgun blast later that year.

Strangest of all for me, was the fact that none of this was reported in the newspapers or other local media. They effectively suppressed information about it. Fearful no doubt, that had they reported it, it would have attracted people from far and wide to join the mob and riot. I'm sure that would have been the case had they done so.

This media “black-out“ confirmed for me that the so-called “free-press“ was less than honest and free in it’s reporting. Obviously there were hidden forces who determined what could and could not be told. Probably some human relations commission in the background.

I was there at the riot, and seen it with my own eyes and had participated in it - so the press couldn’t lie to me by omission. So I learned as a very young boy to trust my own instincts, observations and experiences, above all else. I also learned to test things that I had been told, by a simple comparison of what I had experienced or seen. If I could choose one thing to say to younger folks of today, it would be to trust their own senses and immediate observations rather than anything they read or are told by the system.

I've related this incident so as to give some insight as to the time and place I grew up, as well as to finally tell the story that was suppressed so long ago. The working class people from which I trace my origins seldom have anyone to tell their story or chronicle the events of their lives.

I was also in close proximity to a number of black riots that erupted in the 1960s in Chicago. The area I lived in bordered the area of the riots. I hope to write a detailed account on that sometime. There is much to be learned from it. Official statements, like the Kerner Commission Report on Riots, are so far from the truth as to qualify as fantasy genre literature.

My father was politically to the Right. He very much viewed America’s involvement in the two World Wars as completely bad. To his view, it was Europeans fighting and killing Europeans. He saw the two World Wars as comparable to the classical world’s Peloponnesian war; a self-defeating conflict in which all the participants’ are the ultimate losers. I think he was correct in his analysis, judging from the world I witness around me today. He saw the casualty rates of those two wars as effectively squandering forever some of the best and most valuable genetic material we of the West had. He felt that these loses would lead to general disgenics in the West. It sure seems like that has occurred.

Sit in any international airport and watch the soft, indolent and disgenic pedestrians that limp by.

So, I had my father’s influences politically - but he also inspired my heathenism. His own spiritual life was very much along the lines of what developed in time as Asatru or Odinism. It was not so well formalised as what exists today - but it was about as close as one could get to it, so many decades in advance of it’s actual existence as a movement. So, I was ostensibly raised as a heathen. I never had any burden of guilt or sin insinuated into my life by my parents. I was raised to be brave, honest and proud. They treated most everything in an open, honest and matter of fact manner. My father inspired me to read Nietzsche, Spengler and other important authors.

Between my home life, my life in the streets, and the social unrest of the times, they all compositely pretty much formed my attitudes and social philosophy. These things were paramount in my development and future activities.

2.Who were the Minutemen, and when and why did you choose to become involved with this movement?

Ostensibly The Minutemen were an anti-communist para-military organisation. This was the public face it wore. Behind this mask was a revolutionary underground army.

Though not exactly the same, nor within the exact context of circumstances, I have often detected similitudes between the Minutemen and the post-World War I Free Corps in Germany. At least in the earlier stages of the movement. There were a predominance of disgruntled former military people from World War II and the Korean conflict in the first phase of the movement.

The movement’s origin was of an organic nature. Isolated individuals and groups began to form what they termed “Minutemen bands“. Articles reporting on such activities began to appear in various gun magazines in the late 1950s. I imagine that this facilitated networking between these autonomous groups. Sometime in 1960 Robert Bolivar DePugh, a Missouri bio-chemist and business man began to draw these scattered groups together into a single organisation.

A guerrilla warfare training exercise conducted by DePugh and other Minutemen was reported in the national press. I had already been following the grass roots emergence in the gun magazines from the late 1950s. This was the first time, however, that I heard of a national organisation called the Minutemen. Not long afterwards I noticed a letter in a gun magazine and a reply from DePugh giving an address to contact him at. Several weeks later I was listening to a radio talk show and he was the guest. After hearing what he had to say I was mildly impressed and wrote him. I received a large envelope with Minutemen pamphlets and flyers. I sent in my application and joined. I wasgiven a secret code number to sign my letters with. And so began my association with the group. It was an association that would continue for the next decade.

During this early period I took some mail-order correspondence courses that the group offered. At this same period I had formed a local group composed of teens. We got involved in picketing and street corner leafletting and speech making. I had formed this group of my own before joining the Minutemen. Out of this group of about 50 kids I took 6 or 7 of the best prospects and formed them into the nucleus of my local Minutemen group. I was about 15 years old at this time.

Our youth group “ The Sons Of Patriotism “ had already stirred up a bit of controversy on the west side of Chicago. There had been suggestions that black students be transferred from a nearby over-crowded school to the one in the neighbourhood where I lived.The other option was to install mobile classrooms in the school playground to better accommodate them.We obviously were not enthusiastic about blacks being brought into our area. After all they attacked and tried to maim or kill us every chance they got - and vice versa. The racial tensions in our area were very acute.There would be some main avenue or rail line that effectively demarcated one groups area from the other. It was definitely the front lines of violence. The war-zone.

Our demonstration was a pretty bold stroke. The black school where we went to picket was smack-dab in the middle of the black area. It was warm weather also, lots of people out on their porches drinking and milling about on the streets. So, we marched right down into this area. You can imagine the possible repercussions of all this. No less than thirty police cars with riot gear suddenly surrounded our demonstration. That a full scale riot had not erupted seems a small miracle in retrospect. They (the Police) asked us how long are demonstration would be. I told them about 25 minutes. The officer in charge looked a bit spooked at that. He said, ”how about 15 minutes and we wrap it up and get out of here alive?“ I readily agreed to this. I was beginning to have second thoughts as to the wisdom of this foray into this black neighbourhood.

We did survive it though. We walked the two miles west to our neighbourhood with a line of police cars escorting us. I later heard that a group of young blacks had been arrested along our route back. They had taken up positions with shotguns and were apparently lurking in wait for us. We enjoyed some press coverage as result. So we had projected our thoughts and feelings on the issue at hand.

The real downside of all of these activities was it identified me as a dangerous element in the community. For the next month or so there was an unmarked surveillance car conspicuously parked outside my home. Not long after joining the Minutemen the F.B.I. was making discrete inquiries about me among members of our larger group. Asking if they knew if I had any firearms and such things. Primarily looking for something to get me on.

At this naive stage in my life I actually still believed that there was freedom of speech and expression etc. in America. That’s what they always told us time and again at school. The reverse of course is the reality of it. Such vaunted liberties are more apparent than actual. Once you put it to the test you soon realise that, sure you can say or write most anything you like, but not without consequences and repercussions. You’ll quickly end up in the files of the secret police, epitomized as a trouble maker, kook or an enemy of the state. I speak from experience here. I’ve tested these liberties and have found them to be wanting in their actuality.

Realisation of this state of affairs led me to thinking it would be folly to give-up at that point. I was already marked, so to speak. Once that occurs I guess you are committed to taking it all to it’s logical conclusion - victory or defeat. And that’s the path I took. I became more active and involved in the Minutemen. I was appointed the head of the Chicago organisation. Later I was made State Co-ordinator. Finally I joined the National Headquarters off and on for a number of years. I became the Director of Intelligence. It was something I had a decided aptitude for. In brief I became a member of the inner-circle of the organisation. I pretty much became a confidant of Robert DePugh and played an increasingly active role in the organisations activities.

During the earlier part of the 1960s, The Minutemen were engaged in a lower- spectrum underground war against the communist and other leftists. This took the form of infiltration, sabotage of their activities, identifying their personal etc.. Various underground Minutemen penetrated many radical groups and misdirected their efforts.

In the very early sixties we even formed dummy leftist and anti-war groups. Our members would dress slovenly, act obnoxious with newspaper reporters and generally give the "reds" a bad name by way of these activities.

On the public level we carried on propaganda against the U.S. government and it’s pro-socialist activities. And more or less organised, recruited, trained and employed our members in various areas of our operations. We conducted psychological warfare, black and grey propaganda, disinformation activities among radical leftists, expropriating their records and membership lists and things like that. There was seldom a dull moment.

Some pretty amazing twists of fate often occurred. One Minuteman, George Demerle, an artist and former military vet, managed to infiltrate one of the most radical groups around at the time. The Revolutionary Contingent. This was a group which had direct ties to the Viet Cong and Communist Cuba. He stayed undercover with this faction for over six years, keeping us on top of all of their activities, personal and plans.

At one time George had an art gallery in Flatbush New York. He even volunteered his art gallery as a place to hold Leftist gatherings and events. Unfortunately other Minutemen in the area, unknowing of his true loyalties, fire-bombed his gallery. George’s family, brothers, sisters etc. all disdained him for his communist activities. He never let his guard down or revealed his true beliefs and served the organisation despite all of the problems he encountered.

The Revolutionary Contingent began preparations for guerrilla warfare and terrorism. This did bother George, as he did not want to get involved in their illegal activities. One day he appeared half-way across the country at my door asking my opinion on what he should do at that point when the group wanted his direct involvement. We certainly didn’t want him going to jail for leftist crimes. So, I suggested that he hang in there until the 11th hour and then blow the whistle on them - before he himself was involved in the bombings and other illegal acts they were planning.George had travelled to see me and ask my opinion with literally the shirt on his back. He had spent many hours in downtown Manhattan “dry-cleaning“. This is the term used for making sure no one is tailing you or has you under surveillance, and if you discover that you are being tailed, using methods to shake them. This is generally done by going into a very busy area with shopping crowds and loosing oneself in the crush of crowds, where it is difficult to keep up with you and easy to loose you. Often it requires coursing through large department stores, up and down elevators and escalators, entering on one street and leaving through exits on another street.Utilising store windows, where you can stand looking at merchandise inconspicuously are handy as mirrors to spot possible tails behind you.

At any rate George was satisfied he had shook-off anyone following him and jumped on a plane and contacted me. Within several hours George was flying back to New York. Apparently the group kept close tabs on all of it’s members. George had entered into the leftist underground by-way of first joining the Crazies a leftist group into anarchic actions. One of things required of members in the Revolutionary Contingent was to ingest LSD with the other members. They used acid as a way to lay low the defences of people and sort of interrogated them under it’s influence and effects. George had, quite literally passed “the acid-test“.

The main mover in the RC was a man who called himself Sam Melville. He had his name legally changed to Melville. His actual birth name was Sam Grossman. Melville began a nation-wide campaign of sky-scrapper and Federal building bombings in New York, Milwaukee, Ontario Canada and elsewhere. He operated as a one man bombing spree.

Finally George was requested to prove himself by accompanying Melville and others in an attempt to bomb a National Guard Armoury in Brooklyn. Somehow, George managed to call the FBI and inform them of the up-coming event. The Feds captured them all and put them under arrest. George was incarcerated along with the rest of them. After several weeks he was able to establish that he was the one who had called the Feds, and he was released.

The FBI of course claimed he was their undercover agent etc. and took full credit for George’s activities among the RC. This however was not really the case. About a year later George shared the platform with Senator Buckley of New York at a big fourth of July day parade.I think he was given some commendation or award and was the hero of the day. It never came out, until now as I write this, that George was in fact a member of the Minutemen and not some FBI informant. George was not the only person we had planted deep in the leftist underground. There were many others. One of our members even slept with Bernadine Dorhn the leader of the radical Weathermen faction of the
Students For a Democratic Society.

It was while she was living in an apartment on north Kenmore Avenue in Chicago, during the so-called “ Days of Rage “. A small riot that was instituted by the Weatherman in Chicago’s downtown area and near north side. The group had attempted to befriend various bikers in the area as a source of body-guards and illegal munitions. One of those bikers was actually a Minuteman and had access to both Bernadine, as well as her private 'phone directory and other papers which he delivered to us. Right after this incident, Bernadine and others in the Weathermen went underground. She just surfaced several years ago and surrendered to authorities (as others of the group did also) and was slapped on the hand and freed. We had always thought that her and the Weathermen were ostensibly government agents to begin with. Most of them had links to people in the Federal government and Justice Department by way of relatives. Almost all were from extremely wealthy
backgrounds.

Melville and the other RC members went off to Federal prison for various terms of confinement. Melville was one of the principal agitators of the Attica Prison riot. He was shot dead by a prison guard during that riot. These sort of activities and operations conducted by the Minutemen were many and varied during those years.I’ve mentioned these few incidents so as to give an idea of our general activities and something of a feel about those times.

Eventually Robert DePugh ran afoul of the law, was indicted, and subsequently ran into problems of carrying a gun across state lines while under indictment. A Minuteman headquarters had been raided and a metal lathe and other machine tools were found, all set up as a machine gun making factory. So DePugh had many indictments, but somehow remained out on bail.

In summer of 1967 a special group was set-up within the organisation. It was a small inner corps group called The Defence Survival Force. This force numbered about 50 or 60 people, both men and women. All were expected to have on hand all the necessary equipment and contingency plans for going underground at any moment. This group was trained in various skills; lock-picking, survival skills, orientation, map making, killing, expropriation, a knowledge of various explosives and all manner of special operational skills. I was a member of this group.

January 1968 was to be a pivotal year for the Minutemen. It was the year that guerrilla operations began in earnest. An Infiltrator had tripped up plans for a series of bank expropriations. He had worn a wire (a hidden transmitter) and recorded the meeting where said bank expropriations were discussed and planned. DePugh was implicated, along with others, and rather than face any more charges, went underground along with another longtime member Walter Peyson.

I was dispatched to Minutemen headquarters and began the daily operations of the above ground section of the organisation. Making sure publications were printed and sent out etc..The FBI mounted a vigorous effort to capture DePugh and company. Wanted posters appeared in post offices and were sent to hotels and motels across the country. Those of us at headquarters experienced tight surveillance on us. We had for so long grown accustomed to the tactics of FBI
and other law enforcement agencies attempting to monitor our activities, that we began to sense other forces working against us.


Most probably the National Security Agency. At that time a ultra secret intelligence organisation of the U.S. government. The NSA is concerned mostly, but not exclusively, with communications, codes and such. Unlike the CIA, they often operate inside the U.S. as well as abroad. Their operations are of a much higher order than U.S. investigative agencies. They operate outside the law. I feel they were the group monitoring our movements and activities. They have a work force of about 150,000 employees. Among their many chores is that of monitoring every phone call that is made abroad or from abroad. This is done with computers which are programmed with key-words. If these words come up in conversation the computer records the conversation. (Check out our section on the NSA in another area of this website - webmaster) Their tech' is of the highest order. At any rate we began to notice things that had never occurred before. Illegal entry to motel rooms and other sites where we stayed and such.

Sometime in the Spring of 1968, Robert DePugh’s son John and I were instructed to rendezvous with others who had gone underground. We had to be very careful in shaking anyone who might be following us. We took off late one night and drove for hours down back country roads.We covered about 90 miles that night doing this. We will probably never know how they could have followed us - but eventually we came out of the maze of roads to the Kansas City area.

We went to make a phone call from a telephone booth to some folks who had a car hidden away in their garage. It was one of our emergency cars for get-aways. No sooner had we left the phone booth, and a several individuals quickly went to the phone as though checking something - perhaps tracing our call. As we pulled up to the next stoplight another car pulled up alongside us. We recognised the two men inside as two people we had seen months before as wedrove around a bend in the road just before crossing a bridge. As we slowed on the curve of the road. One individual turned and took our picture. These were the same two people we had seen. We went through a bunch of turns and drove at high speeds down side streets. It was around 1 a.m.

We reached our destination at a residential home and switched cars. Certain equipment was stashed in the car earmarked for the Underground. We headed west to Colorado. Their were no signs of being followed - but after encountering the two agents in the car we felt rather uneasy about it all. We sure didn’t want to lead them to the others who had already gone underground.

We made our contacts and were led up some mountain roads to very high country. Many places in the road only allowed for three wheels of the car to be in contact with the ground as we climbed upwards in a spiralling direction. Sections of the road had eroded away. Finally we got out and climbed on foot way above the tree line. This was in the area of southwestern Colorado, above the town of Creede. We stayed for some days in make shift tents up in the mountains. Eventually we all went down to a safe house in the surrounding area. It was still a pretty high location. I believe there were 8 of us at the time in the mountain hide-out. Later we would hook up with others bringing our numbers to 10 adults.

Life underground was certainly different. We had to check and double check every move we made. Things which had once been simple to do now took on a whole new aspect of caution.

For months to come we would collect at a safe house for a given period of time and then we would all disperse on our own. No one knew where the others were going or staying. If more than one of us were in a given city we would check in with each other at pre-arranged schedules from pay-telephone booths. We would have a month or something and then we would rendevouz in a safe house in another location and stay together as a group making claymore mines and pipe grenades. Often when we would disperse we would have missions to do or things to acquire or take care of. I wrote a short chronicle based on this underground period which appeared in the final, or “Death Issue“ of the Fifth Path Magazine called “Animal Spirit".

One such mission comes to mind. I was sent up to Boulder Colorado to case-out the headquarter’s of Soldier Of Fortune magazine. The plan was that once we had a floor plan, three or four of us would go to their office, get the jump on whoever was on hand and steal the files and take them away in a U-haul van.

So I made my way to Boulder Colorado by bus. I found the office, it was one in a row of second floor office suites above a large liquor mart. Entrance was from the side of the building up a short flight of steps. I knocked on the door and was greeted by a man named Ralph Shafferty. Ralph was a soldier of fortune. He had at one time, I was told, been a top army sniper instructor at Fort Bragg’s Special Warfare School. Shafferty was known as Little Ralph in Miami's Little Havana district. Ralph was a great host. We sat, talked, and shared a few beers for several hours and got on well. We both knew mutual friends in the small world of Soldier’s of Fortune. I had been involved in the Anti-Castro movement for a short time in the early 1960s.

At some point in our conversation I mentioned that i would like some information on who was buying what books. We knew that the Weather-underground had been getting various military and guerrilla warfare books by way of a Chicago bookstore called Solidarity books, which ordered them from Panther Publications (the name was later changed to Paladin Press, because they did not want to be associated in anyone’s mind with the Black Panthers) which was the book section of Soldier of Fortune magazine. We wanted to know just exactly who was buying what. Ralph said: “go ahead and look at the invoices if you want“. I spent most of the evening going through the invoices at my leisure and taking notes. As it turned out there was no real reason to expropriate the files. I had full access to them with permission. Ralph mentioned that he had always been hearing about the Minutemen but never met anyone who was a member. So I was the first Minutemen he had encountered.

Life underground could be a pretty uncomfortable affair. We were a bit crowded at times while living in safe-houses. Various clicks and factions began to form among us. Living under the constant duress of underground existence began to take it’s psychological effects. One member criticised the way DePugh was running the operations, another member rose to his defence by whacking the first party across the head with a rifle butt. DePugh himself was acting a bit paranoid about this person or that. He sort of tried to cast aspersion on various people. It was his way of keeping everyone divided, so that no plots or subterfuge would occur. I could half sympathise with his and Walter Payson’s suspicious and cautious actions and attitudes. After all, they were wanted fugitives and faced a unknown fate if captured.

John and I began to feel that all of us would soon be at one another’s throats before long. John decided he was leaving - he had had enough. I was hesitant to go with him, but he was my good friend, and in the end I suppose he was right in his decision, considering how it all turned out.

So, without notice we took a car and left. A group was dispatched to catch up with us and bring us back - but we took mostly logging roads back through the mountains and made it to Lawrence Kansas. From there we split-up and went our separate ways. Depugh and some of the others attempted to either shoot or kidnap me and bring me back - but their attempt failed. Fate was on my side and I escaped their ambush plans. I later heard that they returned to the underground hide and announced to everyone that they had killed John and I. Meantime I had a barrage of visits from the FBI - repeating the same questions over and over. I was feeling pretty pressed upon between them and DePugh and company trying to shoot me.

They continued on. Got another safe-house near Truth Or Consequence New Mexico. Things did go from bad to worse with the group as John and I both figured it would. Several members, a married couple with a small baby, who fell out of grace with DePugh ended up as prisoners. The lady was chained up in an abandoned mine and the man was kept in a large steel box which had been buried in the ground. DePugh had devised the box with a chemical toilet etc. for holding captives. The baby was taken back and forth for breast feedings and alternately left in the box with the father. It had become a pretty ugly scenario. Now you might be wondering what two people with an infant would be doing underground. They being a young couple with a child facilitated their renting safe-houses for the group and creating something of a domestic scene for cover.

Sometime in late 1969 the FBI had caught up with them and captured DePugh and Payson. They did not immediately raid the house since they were afraid of hidden mines planted around the building. This gave the other occupants a chance to escape. Two of the ladies, Janet Taylor and Joan Gorely escaped with arms and membership records by walking waist deep in the Rio Grande Reservoir until they were well out of the area. They eventually hitch-hiked south and ended up in Houston Texas. Once in Houston they got jobs as topless dancers in some nightclub and survived on the proceeds long enough to find other options.

Depugh was preparing for his trial, which included 9 indictments for various federal crimes. I went to Mexico during this time to avoid the prosecution from supoena-ing me as a witness - yet the defence knew how to contact me in order to subpoena me as a Defence witness. At the trial myself, Joan Gorley (a Depugh mistress) and his son John were the only ones who had been underground to come to his defence. Several others appeared as prosecution witnesses. He acted as his own attorney and lost the case. He received a sentence of 9 ten-year concurrent terms in federal prison. Despite whatever animosities I had towards DePugh at this time, the fact that it was the federal Government trying him transcended my personal feelings. If I had anything to settle with him I would do it personally. I didn’t want to use our mutual enemies to settle any scores for me.

At that time I was made national spokesman for the group and editor of it’s publication On Target. The organisation, and it’s continuance was the important thing to me. Two or three years had elapsed since the organisation was functioning. Support had become minimal. I tried to revive things to no real avail. I did a series of newspaper, radio and television appearances attempting to generate some activity - but things had lain dormant for too long. Many members had drifted off to other groups and activities. On top of all of this the government pulled out all stops to destroy the group. Most of their focus was directed towards those of us at the hub of things. We received information that they planned a raid in which they hoped to kill us and then plant evidence on our premises. This is what occurred with the Chicago Black Panther raid. A joint force of FBI and local police simply broke the doors down and shot people sleeping in their beds.

We had very little defence against such attacks at the time. Our resources had dwindled to almost nothing. I wrote a letter to various Minutemen and groups suggesting that they disperse and work on a local level as militias or vigilante groups. That marked the inception of various para-military groups including the so-called Identity movement and other militia groups of the second phase of the revolutionary right in the U.S.. The legacy of the Minutemen continues on now in various factions of the revolutionary right. We layed the groundwork, provided the basic concepts and more or less pioneered that movement. It brought a new sophistication of tactics and strategy to the Right. I certainly learned much through my long association with the Minutemen in a personal way. Technical skills, far too many things to recount. It was a real graduate course to be sure.

Unfortunate for the current Militias in the U.S. is that they seem to be at a level of sophistication at which the Minutemen were in the early 1960s. Dressing up in cammies and toting rifles off to the range is just a very small repetorie. I doubt that many of those within the Militia movement have any real talents in the areas of intelligence, espionage, subversion, propaganda and such. These are the real basic skills they seem to lack. They seem, from what I have observed of them, to have no real plan or leadership. Lots of first-sergeants who know how to breakdown a rifle in the dark and all the other basic military skills - but no generals with much of an overview or idea of what they are doing in a strategic sense.

The following half-dozen years were bleak ones for me. I turned to art; painting, poetry and music. These mediums were for all practical purposes the only weapons I had left to fight back with against this age of upheaval and decay.

3. What did the 1960s mean to you?

It was a time of rapid change and astounding incidents. Assassinations, political scandals, corruption at every level of society, a no-win war raging in Viet Nam, Cults’ abounding all around, the anti-war movement and so many things happening all at once. Most of what occurred in the 1960s was to set the tome for the remainder of this century and perhaps beyond. The rise of Satanism, paganism, the Manson Family, and much more.It was a defining period for our dying civilisation.

4. Many people associate you with Robert DeGrimston’s Process Church of the Final Judgment, although others have suggested that your role was fairly minimal. Were you ever a participating member of the Process Church?

My association with the Process was indeed minimal. I read their literature. Attended their midnight meditations on many occasions, contributed some art work to their magazine and Changes made it’s public debut playing at their Coffee House in Chicago. I never formerly became a member. I had considered it at the time - but when I returned to Chicago with that in mind they had broken up and re-formed the group as The Foundation: Church of the Millennium. I didn’t find this new approach very appealing - it was quite drab after the original group. I’ve covered much of this in Adam Parfrey’s Apocalypse Culture, 2nd edition, as well as in many interviews; Most especially in the U.S. magazine Great God Pan, and the current issue of Compulsion, an English music ‘zine. I have done two instalments of a series on the Process for Esoterra magazine. I am currently writing the third instalment for the next issue. My only regret is that I did not write it all as a book in the first place. Doing this series has turned into a task comparable to writing a full- length book. To do so now would require re-writing it all again, to do it properly. I’m not sure I want too. I’m pretty burned out on the subject and I think there are more relevant ways in which i can allocate my time and energies.

5. When and Why did you decide to form the group Changes?

About 1971. my cousin Nicholas Tesluk and I began to work on the music in earnest. We had previously written some songs together but had not really practised much. A fellow I sporadically encountered at various coffee houses and such heard us playing one day on Chicago’s lake front and suggested we play at a nearby coffee house called the Kingston Mines Company Store. It was a combined cafe and theatre. We had already been playing for several months off and on at the Process Coffee house. So the night we went for an audition at the the Kingston Mines, we were driving down the street and suddenly one of us thought “ Gee, we don’t have a name for our band.” We had never taken it all that serious to formally think of a name. So I believe it was myself who came up with the name Changes. I thought it had a vitalistic sort of sound to it, and in essence what we were doing was a big change from what folk music was at the time.

The group originally included myself, Nicholas and a lady who worked as secretary at an advertising corporation where I was employed. I was basically writing advertisement for T.V. ads at the time. I somehow got to know her and she played acoustic folk guitar and sang a little. Somehow the feds got to her and she pretty well threw a wrench into all that we were doing. One evening at her home after practice she started spouting off stuff like “do you think someone ought to shoot the president?” This was in response to something we were railing against politically. No sooner had she said that, then we heard a noise at her apartment door, Nicholas and I jumped up and went out into the hallway - a man in a suit and tie was quickly making it down the hall - just short of running. We chased him down the stairs and he jumped into a drab, unmarked vehicle (the type government agents usually drive) and he peeled out of the parking space before we could catch up with him. It became obvious she was trying to set us up for conspiracy charges by proffering leading questions.

After that incident we simply dropped her and never had anything to do with her again. So that’s how Changes first formed. Later my wife Karen and another lady joined the group. The other lady only lasted a year. It was around this time that Changes went dormant and we all moved on to others things.

6. Together with Michael Moynihan, you decided to re-master the bands original recordings and finally released them on CD last year. You are now on the verge of releasing a new CD entitled Legends, so is there a chance that Changes will go on tour sometime in the future?

Actually I didn’t decide to do anything with the old music. That was Michael’s idea. I had sent him some poetry chap books of mine. One of them was composed of lyrics to Changes music. Michael enquired as too if we had any old demo-tapes of the songs. I did have some cassettes that were dubbed off the original reel-to-reel tapes. Apparently Michael like what he heard and asked if we would be interested in doing a CD of some of the better stuff.We worked closely on the re-mastering, on all the graphics and liner notes etc. It was a totally gratifying relationship, on all levels.

As for our next release, it will be “ Legends “ a long single ballad which Nicholas and I wrote around 1969. All the liner notes booklet and cover art are original art done by Nicholas and myself. The entire lyrics will appear in the booklet, all 210 lines done in hand calligraphy by Nicholas. We are finalising the packaging as I write this. Only Nicholas and I are on this piece of music. It was recorded at Absinthe Studio about a year and a half ago, and was engineered by Robert Ferbrache.

We wrote it as a sort of Pan European Chaison. I sent a demo tape in early 1970 or so to Radio Liberty in Lisbon. They actually aired it. The station’s call slogan was: “The West Shall Win “. This was during the day’s of Antonio Sallazar, the brilliant economist who ruled there for many years.

As for Changes doing any tours. I sincerely doubt it at this point. Both Nicholas and myself are both married, have children and many responsibilities and other concerns. But never say never. I’ve lived long enough to witness all sorts of things that “never“ could be. The fall of Soviet communism and the Berlin Wall coming down and things like that, lead me to suspend any final word on anything. We have had no offers to date for touring or appearing anywhere, so I suppose it is a moot point in that regard.

7. What are your views on a) Satanism, and b) Charles Manson?

Satanism has become a sort of generic label. Beyond that it means different things to different people.I’ll try and break it down into types first. There are rock ‘n roll satanists; heavy and black metal artists and fans. This is the most superficial type. It seldom relies on any deep thoughts or convictions. Anyone who wants to don a t-shirt with a inverted pentagram can join this devil’s party. It is most of all a vehicle for testosterone laden rebellion and anti-social behaviour. The worst of this misanthropic and impressionable rebellion end up as Richard Rameriz, or any number of others who say after capture “The Devil made me do it“.

Then there are the philosophical satanists who have intellectual arguments against Christianity and an effete society. Here is where we find artists and people into creative things. This Philosophy of satanism appeals to a more intellectual type and serves as a central focal point for their creativity. For the most part this segment of satanists are principally reactionary - not revolutionary. They are a reaction to the oppressiveness of Christianity. Also, such philosophical Satanism serves as a justification for hedonism, exotic sexual practices and such. It is permeated with a aura of Elitism. When you take a closer look at what it all means in essence and at the people who compose it’s ranks, it’s lacks anything vital or dynamic. In this form satanism breaks down into two further sub groups - a libertarian wing and a Fascist wing. The Libertarians seem content to eat, drink and be happy and “do their own thing“, while the Fascist side tends to mix heavy political content to their philosophy. They as such are far more revolutionary. They generally see satanism as a personification of the Faustian spirit of the West.

Then we move on to what I can only describe as “true“ satanists. These are folks who take all the devil rant in Christianity and the Bible in a literal sense, right down to the prophecies in the book of revelation. They have simply decided to play the heavies in the drama. What makes me label them true Satanists is the diabolical element in their methods and theology. As with the Process who took the Devil and Jesus and compounded them both into something else. The Devil or Satan, if he is to be a devil, must do something more diabolical then to rent his rage against Christianity. He must be a figure of guile and seduction. One who can tell a convincing lie or bait his victims with sophisticated methods that subvert their minds and souls. The Process and Manson fit this type more readily than Anton LaVey and his many imitators do.

To employ your adversaries own doctrines and teachings and twist them in another direction, or antithetical to their literal meaning is indeed diabolical. It clearly shows some sophistication and finesse. Many folks I have said this to I think have had a hard time reconciling what I’ve said or understand what I am getting at when i speak of the diabolical element.

Of course one need not be a satanist to be diabolical. Bankers, politicians, and jive-ass preachers could certainly teach satanists a thing or two about the diabolic.

My only criteria in judging satanists is as to whether or not they are revolutionaries or just simply run of the mill rebels and poseurs. As to whether they are effective or not or not effective.

For many young folks escaping the stifling atmosphere of their Christian parents and homes, satanism often becomes one of the forbidden things. For many it is a first reaction to Christianity. For a large number of people it is only a first stop before they mature somewhat and find more constructive avenues of approach.

As for my views on Charles Manson, I find him and his current popularity and fame quite astounding in one sense, but understandable in another sense. Manson’s life in general is the stuff of tragedy. He really never had a chance in life. He was kicked around from one institution to another. His is the saga of the White underclass in America. There are many Charles Manson’s out there. Victims of the system - what sets him apart from the others most is that he got even with the world in a sense. He has also never repented or caved in psychologically. In that sense he is a sort of personification of the Uber Mensch. He’s still ranting his ideas, composing songs, etc. despite the circumstances he is in.

In many ways he seems to be a personification of several archetypes. The life that the Family lived was very archetypal in an Indo-European sense. It was a tribe of Germanic/Celtic young folks. Surrounded by horses and animals, music, rituals, a life- style close to nature etc.. I think all of this somehow captured a romantic image that resounded with many young folks. All those authors who have made millions off of writing books on him have further helped to keep him in the public eye. Charlie is “The Unforgiven“. He has become a personification of everything the system hates and fears. The savage who has been untouched by their mind-fucking propaganda and indoctrination, and still able to see the world in his own way, and from his own experience and insights. He has certainly payed the piper for his role. They can’t seem to heap enough abuse towards him. Yet he maintains his indivisibility despite all their efforts. He’s a unique individual, much can also be said for Lynette Frome and Sandra Good. There is a touching loyalty they have both shown. They all may not have that much going for them personally, but that sort of loyalty, under duress, that they have shown, raises them above their persecutors by a mile, in a world where loyalty and and fidelity are almost unheard of anymore.

8. In a philosophical sense what stage had you reached by the mid-1970s?

Basically I was played out on politics. I realised that the political process had been pre-empted by the major parties since before World War Two. Radical politics could only be used as a protest - there is little possibility of it’s being politically efficacious. I began to see that the crux of the problems of the west are essentially spiritual ones. Solve the spiritual problems and all other problems will take care of themselves more or less. I had reached a stage of nihilism by this time. It became apparent to me that there was not much worth conserving of this world we live in. Today I am even more amazed then ever that there are people who call themselves conservatives. What is there of this brave new world which is worth preserving - very little I think. This point of view was reached by me when I realised that we were not looking forward to the death of the west.For all practical purposes Western civilisation died in 1945 with the end of our second world war. Some say at Stalingrad. What we have witnessed ever since is the aftermath of it’s demise and it’s decomposition. And it will degenerate further I am sure. Most men and women of the west have not even realised that their civilisation has already bit the dust. I am sure the Roman citizen, just prior to the physical fall of their empire, never thought that their civilisation had withered and died. But it had died from within centuries before the first barbarian stood on the outskirts of Rome poised for the coup de grace.

So with that in mind, it seemed that the only thing worth the effort was to begin building the skeletal structure of a new culture, one at the grass-roots level. Petite nationalism plays no relevant part in what I am speaking of here. Many of us once thought of ourselves as patriots and nationalists. We don’t anymore. Our nation is in our DNA, and it extends to wherever those of like kind reside. This is the principal message in relation to the recently formed International Asatru/Odinist Alliance. It is an affirmation of what I have said here. My own patriotism today extends for all of about a half-mile around me. I can only relate to tangible soil that I stand on, My fields, my gardens, my orchards, my family my friends and Kinfolk. The rest is a wasteland.

So there are no old-right residues in me any longer. Nothing I want to save or preserve of the present order. My loyalty is to the vision of the future that I have. It would be too much in this interview to explore, but I hope to elucidate some of these visions, concepts and and dreams in the future. So that is why I have placed my main emphasis and activities on the spiritual and the cultural.

9. Given that you have been heavily involved in the emerging cultural “underground“ for several decades, do you ever become disillusioned? If so, how do you manage to overcome this?

Of course I become tired at times, disillusioned, burnt-out etc... Just like most everyone does that enters into these activities for any length of time. As an individual I am an introvert by nature - but an introvert who has learned all the skills of extroversion as a means of survival in the world. Nothing pleases me more than to have hours of solitude to think and dream and engage in reverie. That’s the poet and artist in me. I don't think I have experienced boredom since I was a small child. My mind and imagination are always active. I have found my own self to be among the best company I have ever kept. The inner dialog seldom flags. So, with this in mind, it has often been tempting to just go off and do my own thing without having to deal with all the problems of the world. But then I think of the enormity of it all and the consequences that lie in wait for our world, and then feel activated to keep on fighting for my beliefs. There are also friends, family and kinfolk who I feel I can't let down. So I fight on. Also, on the occasions when I felt almost ready to simply retire into my own world - something, some incident, will come along as a challenge, and I have a difficult time turning away from challenges. There will be infiltrators trying to throw a wrench into the works or others acting “human all to human“ etc... In this sense my own enemies have helped to generate my activism more than anything. I’m a fighter by nature. An intransigent fighter that never gives up.

One must admire the Viet Cong on the basis that they fought a gruelling war of attrition for forty years. It is that sort of attrition that wins in the end. Unfortunately many Americans have the idea that wars and revolutions are something you do for three or four years and then it’s over. We have a fast-food generation that has not cultivated patience and determination. They want everything fast or immediately, if not sooner. A real generation of spoiled children. The slogan of the Minutemen was “We Shall Never Surrender“; and that pretty much sums up my attitude.

10. How long have you been interested in Odinism, and what kind of activities are you involved in with the Asatru Alliance?

I have been interested in Heathen and pagan matters since i was a grammar school student. My formal entry to the Heathen world was about 25 years ago. Karen and I were seminal figures in the emergence of the general Pagan movement in the Midwest of the U.S. in the mid to late 1970s- from there we formed a early Odinist group The Northernway. Eventually The Northernway became the Wulfing kindred and affiliated with the original Asatru Free Assembly founded by Steve McNallen. When the old AFA broke up, a handful of us including Valgard Murray, Karen, myself and a few others formed the Asatru Alliance and started the process of organisation all over again. Today we have forty official and supporting groups in the U.S. and have taken the lead in the International formation I mentioned.

As for activities. We help and have often hosted national gatherings of the Alliance. We and members of our Tribe have been very active over the past ten years in developing Vor Tru to the fine magazine it now is. We have experimented with out-reach projects like Viking games open to the public and such. We recently did a formal dedication of an Asatru Hof we built and many other things. For a while we published a family oriented ‘zine called Othalla (we ceased publication because of time considerations and the work we were doing in other areas like Vor Tru.) I do all that I can to promote the alliance through interviews like this one I am doing here. So we have been busy on many levels and many projects, and continue to be. Our own group Tribe of The Wulfings is now a national, rather than simply a regional group.That is why we changed the name to tribe from kindred. It better describes our group as it presently is. It is composed of some very bright, creative and thoroughly dedicated people. And we all get along with one another and work together on myriad projects.


11. In recent years we have seen the growth of bands such as Blood Axis, Sol Invictus, Allerseelen and Death in June. Have you an opinion on why it has taken so long for this kind of music to achieve the recognition it deserves?

Yes, I do. There are certain dynamics to movements. Any movement in it’s beginning stages will attract some pretty sorry individuals. The Right, aside from a few leaders, was pretty much composed of people with little creativeness and even less ability at getting things done professionally.

In the second phase of a movement a higher calibre of people usually begin to fill it’s ranks and contribute their talents and aptitudes. Changes could compose music of this type 20 year or more ago - but there were no people in our ideological camp that had either the foresight or the business acumen to produce and get things generated. So, even though Changes was doing material like the later groups you listed, we were sort of doing it all in a void. At the time the only way we could expect to get our music and message out was by playing it on a stage. That meant we had to win auditions to do so. But beyond that, it we would be dependent on the large record companies for anything like wide distribution and production. Those running such companies had an exactly different agenda then we did.So we were blocked at every turn in that sense. Then a period of inflation hit and many of the large record companies began to falter and fail. Small entrepreneurs began to fill this paucity. Independent record companies began to pop up everywhere. They now are vying (compositely) for the profits that were once the exclusive realm of the big companies. As a result this type of music has finally had a chance to be heard and has begun to develop a following of loyal listeners and cohorts. I’m sure that the increasing decline has made such music and it’s message far more relevant than before.

12. How would you describe yourself politically?

At this junction I would describe myself as 'a-political' in a real sense. As I said practical politics have been pre-empted by the two party system - which has become in fact a one party system. It matters little who you vote for - it’s all part and parcel of the New World Order scheme. When there are changing parties in office - they practically don’t loose a beat on their grand conspiracies. Essentially in the U.S. we elect officials that spend most of their time in office dreaming up new ways to divest the citizens of the fruits of their labour. Recently in the state where I live they now want to tax canoes and other small water crafts - what’s next, a taxation on bathing suits? They spend all their time finding new areas to fleece us all. The other primary activity is their milk-sop imperialism around the world. That takes money to buy friends and eventually make them dependent on America. They fund all these activities with the money of their subjects here in the U.S.. This is the epi-centre of their dreams of a world shopping mall where everyone is an interchangeable work unit in their world plantation.So, that type of politics is fruitless at this time.

On an ideological level of politics I take this view. Ask me what system of government I think best and I must ask for which people, in what place, in what time? Certainly the American representative Republic worked fine for Anglo/Celtic people. It is probably an outward manifestation of their inner sense of justice, liberty et.al. Add millions of illegal Mexican immigrants, millions of Asians and what-not, and then the question of this system of republicanism comes into sharp question. This form of government is not inimitable to these other people or the cultures they come out of.

Most of South America has constitutions that read almost like carbon copies of the U.S. system - but we all have seen the reality of how this system works when applied to other people, with a different sensibility etc.. It doesn’t work. We observe one coup de tat after another, one oligarchy after another, a society pervaded by corruption at all levels - and most of those people in those countries seem content with it all - if they didn’t it would be otherwise.

When there are too many different groups in a nation there will be stringent competition and conflicts of interest. How does one deal with these conflicts of interest? It brings questions of liberty and freedom into question. As it stands in America we have what could be termed the Anarchy of tyranny. The streets are unsafe, crime rages everywhere and becomes more outrageous all the time. Meanwhile the government uses all of this as an excuse for more laws and tyranny.

The great mistake of the British Empire and the American Imperialism, and other empires before, was that they always assumed that governmental forms, cultural forms etc. were transferable to other people unrelated to them. The British did everything they could to turn their subjects into model Englishmen. What a farce. What a delusion on their behalf.

One of my favourite stories concerns Charles Darwin bringing the Terra Del Fuego native Jimmy Buttons back with him to England. They dressed him up in a suit, with stiff collar and cravat, sent him to the best universities, taught him high tea,and to act and deport himself like a Englishman. This accomplished, they allowed him to return, figuring he would be useful for their colonial ambitions there. But Jimmy Buttons was no fool. He saw European Civilisation from the inside - and it had nothing to do with him on a soul level. So when he landed back in his native land he quickly tore off all the western garments, organised a revolt and killed all the European colonists. You have to hand it to him, he remained who he was. They did not steal his soul as they did to so many other native peoples the world over. So, without a known people or place to apply a political system or ideology, anything I could say is simply in the realm of abstractions and has no immediate application.My final thought on what my politics are is simply - what works.

13. Do politics and culture go hand in hand?

I believe that all real culture is the outgrowth of the spiritual and religious. Think of the spiritual as the hub of a wheel, and the spokes emanating out from it are the various areas of life such as politics, culture, ethics etc.. In an Archaic society, such as Julius Evola describes in his book Revolt Against the Modern World, all facets of a Civilisation or culture are integrally bound to a spiritual source. Japanese culture is a fine living example of this. In all areas, spiritual, martial arts, gardening, poetry, painting etc. the same spirit underlies all of them. They are integrally one. This is not where we in the west are at today. We live in a hellishly fragmented world culturally and spiritually. There is no real centre or central axis to it all. It’s a grotesque hodge-podge. That is what Asatru is attempting to do on several levels, to provide that central spiritual axis from which all the other things will fall into place easily and create a wholeness for our people once again. Western Civilisation has been under the impress of so many culturally alien and distorting elements for nearly a thousand years.To change the direction now is indeed an epic task.

14. What are your plans for the future?

To continue to fulfil my destiny as a human being. I define destiny as that which is meant to be at the inception of life. What is coded into our DNA matrix. I see fate as the external or environmental factors that, which by their nature often impose road-blocks to our fulfilling are true destiny. We have to overcome fate so as to become that which we were intended to be. This may seem simplistic at first thought. It’s not. Living a life to it’s natural fulfilment is an arduous task. Few make it to the goal. But we should all strive to become full human beings - not specialists in some minutiae of life such as a profession or job, but truly human in all it’s many facets. The forces at work around us do all they can to turn us into automatons, company-men, one-trick ponies.

On a simpler level I hope to continue to produce music, art, and social philosophy and hold true to the slogan I mentioned earlier: "We Will Never Surrender!"
"If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything."
-Malcolm X
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: National Anarchism & the Far Right

Postby American Dream » Wed May 07, 2014 6:55 am

http://louisproyect.org/2014/05/07/from ... ma-reader/

From a Moon of Alabama reader
Filed under: Fascism,homophobia — louisproyect @ 1:48 am


Image


Just to poke the hornet’s nest with a stick, I posted that Golden Dawn “anti-imperiaist” statement on Moon of Alabama–one of the higher profile Red-Brown websites. Look at the homophobia and the barely suppressed admiration for fascism. In the next couple of days I plan to blog about the rebirth of National Bolshevism (in some sense it never went away.)

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Your Vice dot com article
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 01:37:31 +0000
From: <cnpmky9+n2lpmg@guerrillamail.com>
To: lnp3@panix.com <lnp3@panix.com>

Maybe if Fake Left did something more than suck dudes’ cocks and receive them in his arse, and actually spent time outside doing something besides mincing and sashaying between the home front door and the open Bentley door Jeeves holds open for them, they might not have completely lost the working class to right-wing groups such as Golden Dawn and the National Front.

The leader of Golden Dawn recommended killing bankers. This connects with down and out workers and the unemployed, and of course it also explains why left wing pussies are so HORRIFIED by Golden Dawn. It’s because Golden Dawn and the National Front actually speak in terms of protecting workers’ jobs and committing violence against the Wall Street criminals.

Oh, the horror. Can you even imagine a cocksucking buttfucking gay married leftist EVER suggesting that working class people should kill bankers? That day will never happen. Far better to be outraged by the workers than try to understand their anger. This is why the left is so pathetic, useless, and ineffective, and why it always will be.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 175 guests