Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Elvis » Wed Oct 14, 2015 5:26 am wrote:I can't bear to watch any of the debates whatsoever.
If John McAfee was in a presidential debate, I'd watch.
82_28 » Wed Oct 14, 2015 2:11 am wrote:The leftist part of the Democratic party absolutely want Sanders and distrust Clinton. But I think that O'Malley is the most electable and could probably take on the best that the republicans could bring. This I didn't know until seeing it tonight. I am not sure what any of it means, but holy stupidity.
This morning, I’ve been pointing out on Twitter that the unanimity of pro-Hillary Clinton journalism coming from the mouthpieces of establishment Democratic politics — Slate, Vox, New York Magazine, etc. — is entirely predictable and has no meaningful relationship to her actual performance at the debate last night. That’s because, one, the Democrats are a centrist party that is interested in maintaining the stranglehold of the DNC establishment on their presidential politics, and these publications toe that line. And second, because Clinton has long been assumed to be the heavy favorite to win the presidency, these publications are in a heated battle to produce the most sympathetic coverage, in order to gain access. That is a tried-and-true method of career advancement in political journalism. Ezra Klein was a well-regarded blogger and journalist. He became the most influential journalist in DC (and someone, I can tell you with great confidence, that young political journalists are terrified of crossing) through his rabid defense of Obamacare, and subsequent access to the President. That people would try and play the same role with Clinton is as natural and unsurprising as I can imagine.
82_28 » Wed Oct 14, 2015 10:56 pm wrote:82_28 » Wed Oct 14, 2015 2:11 am wrote:The leftist part of the Democratic party absolutely want Sanders and distrust Clinton. But I think that O'Malley is the most electable and could probably take on the best that the republicans could bring. This I didn't know until seeing it tonight. I am not sure what any of it means, but holy stupidity.
My good friend who spent a spell in Baltimore has covered the bases as far as I am concerned today about O'Malley being a crook. So that's good enough for me. So nix the prior comment from me. Bernie all the way -- I'm just afraid of how he'll age as he is already aged. Again, though if I support someone or something it is doomed to fail so I've basically given up on caring.
Nordic » Wed Oct 14, 2015 9:11 pm wrote:Just picking up on the vibe from the debate, which I didn't even watch, I now predict:
Bernie will be Killary's running mate. And that was the plan all along.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests