Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Iamwhomiam » 25 Sep 2015 18:41 wrote:"For such an accident of nature, as modern science would have us believe, ..."
umm... There are no accidents in nature, slim. Perhaps you'll explain what you are referring to as "an accident of nature"? Modern science seems to raise more questions about "reality" than it is capable of answering.
Iamwhomiam » 25 Sep 2015 17:26 wrote:Excellent response, at least for this poster, slim!
The Moon's position in relationship to the Earth and of both to the Sun is beyond coincidence. The odds of such positions randomly being ordered is so great as to be far beyond chance, hence this thread's title.
We know the cosmic constant, the speed of light, the speed of a photon is the fastest anything can travel. But we also know that the closer we approach to this limit, the slower time progresses. At the speed of light, the photon quanta (particle) would in fact be stationary. And therefore time cannot exist.
You figure that one out; I can barely grasp the concept. Spooky Action at a distance.
Iamwhomiam » 25 Sep 2015 18:40 wrote:Can't wait until Valence Drive becomes the norm.
Thanks Drew, I'll check it out even though I do not believe time travel is possible, at least in this universe. Any attempt to achieve this, I believe, will result with your being deposited in a parallel universe with no possible return to that of your origin.
I'm recommending this author to all the "Dick heads" out there, particularly this one for starters...
Some time ago I posted some info about a brilliant fellow I met with 60+ patents to his credit. He stated he could not discuss many of his inventions, which taunted me into discovery mode and immediately after our luncheon had ended I returned home to begin my search to learn more about this mysterious man's work.
smoking since 1879 wrote:what gives?
smoking since 1879 » Sat Sep 26, 2015 1:57 pm wrote:Re time dilation...
My twin zooms off in a rocket and i sit here.
Conventional wisdom has it that I age at the normal rate and he ages slower.
However, from his reference frame, he is stationary and I am moving, so I should age slower than him.
what gives?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests