Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Election

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby Belligerent Savant » Tue Mar 26, 2019 3:43 pm

.

Elvis » Tue Mar 26, 2019 1:04 pm wrote:
The Special Counsel found that Russian government actors successfully hacked into computers and obtained emails from persons affiliated with the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party organizations, and publicly disseminated those materials through various intermediaries, including WikiLeaks.


I look forward to comparing the SC report on that to the VIPS analysis.



^^^^^
I'll spare you the suspense. There's no substance to that claim. Vapors, unless there is something new or different from all prior reports of analysis performed.




On June 12 last year, Julian Assange announced that WikiLeaks had and would publish documents pertinent to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

On June 14, CrowdStrike, a cyber-security firm hired by the DNC, announced, without providing evidence, that it had found malware on DNC servers and had evidence that Russians were responsible for planting it.

On June 15, Guccifer 2.0 first appeared, took responsibility for the “hack” reported on June 14 and claimed to be a WikiLeaks source. It then posted the adulterated documents just described.

On July 5, Guccifer again claimed he had remotely hacked DNC servers, and the operation was instantly described as another intrusion attributable to Russia. Virtually no media questioned this account.

The FBI has never examined the DNC’s computer servers—an omission that is beyond preposterous. It has instead relied on the reports produced by Crowdstrike, a firm that drips with conflicting interests well beyond the fact that it is in the DNC’s employ. Dmitri Alperovitch, its co-founder and chief technology officer, is on the record as vigorously anti-Russian. He is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, which suffers the same prejudice. Problems such as this are many.


https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new ... -dnc-hack/
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5573
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Mar 28, 2019 10:04 am

SCHIFF: "You might think it's OK that [Flynn] secretly conferred with a Russian ambassador about undermining US sanctions & then lied about it to the FBI. You might say that's all OK -- that's just what you have to do to win... I think it's corrupt & evidence of collusion."



“She Was Not Involved”: E-mails Show Ivanka’s Lawyer Asked for Changes to Michael Cohen’s Congressional Testimony
Emily Jane FoxMarch 27, 2019 7:09 pm
Image
By Al Drago/Bloomberg/Getty Images.
Not terribly long into Michael Cohen’s public testimony before Congress last month—after he referred to President Donald Trump as a cheat, racist, and con man, but before he showed the Oversight Committee financial documents that he said proved his former boss manipulated his assets in order to deceive banks and insurance companies—Cohen took a moment to apologize. When he last appeared on Capitol Hill, Cohen had lied about a Moscow real-estate project Trump pursued while seeking the Republican presidential nomination. To align with Trump’s denials of any business dealings with Russia, Cohen told Congress that his negotiations ended before February, 2016, when in fact they had stretched well into June.

“The last time I appeared before Congress, I came to protect Mr. Trump,” he said. “Today, I’m here to tell the truth about Mr. Trump.”

Cohen, who has been sentenced to three years in prison, also made another explosive claim. President Trump, he said, had spoken in “code” to prompt Cohen to lie about the Moscow project. Moreover, Cohen said, his false testimony was coordinated with the president’s attorneys. “Trump’s personal lawyers reviewed and edited my statement to Congress about the timing of the Moscow Tower negotiations before I gave it,” he said in his prepared remarks. At the time, Cohen had a joint defense agreement with the president, so the document was reviewed by Trump’s attorney, Jay Sekulow, as well as Abbe Lowell, the lawyer representing Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump. According to Cohen, neither attorney raised objections to the document, which included his false statement about the Moscow project.

Sekulow issued a statement protesting Cohen’s assertions: “Today’s testimony by Michael Cohen that attorneys for the president edited or changed his statement to Congress to alter the duration of the Trump Tower Moscow negotiations is completely false.” But Cohen had communications detailing these alleged edits, some of which lawmakers requested in a closed-door hearing with the House Intelligence Committee the following week. One document, which I have reviewed, was an e-mail exchange between Cohen and his then attorney, Stephen Ryan, outlining changes that Ryan said Lowell had asked them to make in order to distance Ivanka from the Moscow deal. Attached to the e-mail were drafts he said were Lowell's suggested edits. The extent of Lowell’s involvement has not been previously reported.

“Abbe asks for us to affirmatively address in our statement on the 25th:

-[Ivanka] was not involved in the backs and forths with FS [Felix Sater] and MC [Michael Cohen]

-she did not know FS was involved in the possible project in that country

-she was not in any meetings or calls with people putting it together (esp. from that country)

-and maybe that, by then, MC knew she was at least skeptical about him.”

Ryan included his response to Lowell. “Yes, am developing the writing and shared it this am with MC to see if I have it right. MC will want me to do anything your client asks that is accurate, which is not really an issue—but it may be perceived as awkward to go as specific as your requests.” Ryan added that he was hoping to share a version “only with” Lowell that week. Later, in the e-mail chain, Ryan attached a document that he said had Lowell’s red-line edits included. A spokesman for Lowell declined to comment.

Ivanka said in an interview earlier this year that she knew “literally almost nothing” about the Trump-branded tower in Moscow and the negotiations surrounding it throughout the campaign. But Cohen, under oath, told Congress last month that he briefed the Trump family, including Ivanka, on the project on “approximately 10” occasions. In a December memo detailing Cohen’s cooperation as he pleaded guilty to lying to Congress, the special counsel’s office also noted that Cohen had “briefed family members” of Trump about the project. Initial documents suggest the Moscow tower would have included a “Spa by Ivanka Trump.” They also would have given Ivanka the power to approve “all interior design elements of the spa or fitness facilities.”

Ivanka, who then served as executive vice president of development and acquisition at the Trump Organization, had been involved in these sorts of decisions as part of her role. In November 2015, Ivanka forwarded Cohen an e-mail from a Russian weightlifter who said he could help arrange a meeting between Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin to discuss real-estate opportunities in Russia. That same year, she e-mailed Cohen a suggestion for an architect who could work on the Moscow tower. (Peter Mirijanian, a spokesman for Lowell, said at the time that Ivanka was merely passing on an “unsolicited e-mail” from the weightlifter’s wife, and that Ivanka’s role in the project was limited to “reminding Mr. Cohen that, should an actual deal come to fruition . . . the project, like any other with the Trump name, conform with the highest design and architectural standards.”)

Cohen’s false testimony to Congress in 2017 ultimately did not include all of the provisos and caveats that Ryan said Lowell had asked for. They determined that Cohen going out of his way to be so specific about Ivanka's involvement would, in fact, have seemed awkward. Instead, Cohen’s commentary about Ivanka was boiled down to about one sentence.

Still, the revelation of Lowell’s involvement, as the e-mails suggest, in Cohen’s original testimony will likely be of interest to congressional investigators. After Cohen appeared before Congress for four marathon days last month, the House Judiciary Committee sent sweeping document requests to 81 individuals and organizations—many brought up by Cohen in his appearances—including Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, Jared Kushner, the Trump Organization, and its C.F.O., Allen Weisselberg. Ivanka herself was not asked for documents, though 52 individuals and organizations were asked for documents related to Ivanka or her businesses. Many, like former attorney general Jeff Sessions, former White House communications director Hope Hicks, and former Trump bodyguard Matthew Calamari, were asked for documents that could pertain to conversations between Ivanka and foreign governments. Cohen was also asked for documents related to Ivanka and any potential emolument violations, discussions with foreign governments, financial transactions with the Russian government or businesses, the Trump Tower Moscow project, and changes made to his initial congressional testimony.

Since his appearance on Capitol Hill, Cohen has continued to cooperate with Congress and investigators in the Southern District of New York and the New York Attorney General's office, who are pursuing a number of investigations that focus on Trump, his family, and their business, including the hush-money payments to women alleging affairs with Trump, matters related to the presidential inauguration, whether the Trump Organization inflated insurance claims in the past, and if the president offered Cohen a pardon.

The e-mail between Cohen and his attorney about his testimony sheds light on the potential new avenues for investigators to probe, as the country settles into a post-Mueller universe. One stunning feature of the saga so far is that, while the president and his family have remained unscathed, they’ve left a trail of wreckage in their wake. Paul Manafort is set to serve about six years in prison. Roger Stone awaits trial as Michael Flynn and Rick Gates anticipate their sentences. Cohen, of course, is set to report to serve his three-year sentence at the beginning of May. Equally stunning is the number of documents Trump’s former associates have saved, and how willing they’ve been to share those receipts with investigators.https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/03 ... -testimony




Bob Litt's piece that everyone conflating "collusion" and "conspiracy" should read.

What Does the Barr Letter Actually Say About Collusion?


What Does the Barr Letter Actually Say About Collusion?

By Robert Litt Monday, March 25, 2019, 12:20 PM


Bill Barr speaks at his confirmation hearing to serve as attorney general on Jan. 15. (Credit: C-SPAN)
The prevailing take on Attorney General William Barr’s letter to Congress on the Mueller report is summed up in the New York Times: “The investigation . . . found no evidence that President Trump or any of his aides coordinated with the Russian government’s 2016 election interference.” But a careful reading of Barr’s letter suggests that that may be wrong.

In fact, Barr’s letter quotes Special Counsel Robert Mueller as stating that the investigation “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” Saying that the investigation did not establish that there was collusion is not the same thing as saying that the investigation established that there was no collusion. Two points are worth emphasizing.

First, as quoted by Barr, Mueller used the words “conspired” and “coordinated.” Unlike the colloquial term “colluded,” these terms have legal significance. “Coordination” with a foreign government would be a basis for a finding of criminal liability under the election laws, and “conspiracy” would be a criminal agreement to violate those laws. This language suggests that Mueller’s report viewed the conduct through the lens of a criminal investigative process—that is, whether the evidence met the Department of Justice standards for prosecution, including the ability to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was intent to violate the law.

This interpretation is further supported by Barr’s discussion of the obstruction allegations. Barr’s language dismissing those allegations is strikingly similar to that used by Mueller with respect to the Russia investigation: Barr said that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein “have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel’s investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense,” echoing Mueller’s statement that the investigation “did not establish” a conspiracy. This conclusion must be read in coordination with Barr’s 2018 memo arguing that acts within the president’s constitutional authority over law enforcement, including firing the director of the FBI, cannot constitute obstruction of justice—at least if they do not “impair[] the integrity or availability of evidence.”

Barr’s letter to Congress makes clear that there was substantial evidence supporting the possibility that the president obstructed justice—enough that Mueller did not feel he could draw a conclusion—but that Barr nonetheless concluded that prosecution was not warranted. By using the same language that Mueller used with respect to “establishing” coordination with Russia, Barr’s letter suggests the possibility that, rather than “no evidence” of collusion, Mueller did find such evidence—but similarly did not conclude it warranted a criminal prosecution. Clearing up this ambiguity is yet another reason why the Mueller report should be released promptly.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-does-b ... -collusion



Random Observations on a Cover-Up: The Barr Letter, Not the Mueller Report
1. Fuck the spin. We know nothing about Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election. What we know is how Attorney General William Barr characterized the report and its findings. Barr is a Republican sin eater, engorging himself on a banquet of crimes and betrayals going back decades. He has no moral or ethical standing here, and his legal standing is based on how he was going to wolf down the slop trough of sins of the Trump administration. Unless and until we see the actual report, the actual evidence, the actual two goddamn years of work that was done and that, apparently, Barr only needed less than two days digest and shit out a summary letter, we know nothing.

2. But, hey, for shits and giggles, let's say take the cackling Russia naysayers' perspective and treat Barr's letter like it's totally legit. Well, look at the second page, where Barr says explicitly that Mueller showed that Russia tried to interfere in the 2016 election. I mean, call me a crazy conspiracy theorist, but when I read, "The Special Counsel found that Russian government actors successfully hacked into computers and obtained emails from persons affiliated with the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party organizations, and publicly disseminated those materials through various intermediaries, including WikiLeaks," I think that's pretty fucking serious and damning and deserves action from, oh, hell, let's say the White House.

2a. Barr writes that "the Special Counsel did not find that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate" conspired with Russians to spread disinformation through social media. But when it comes to the DNC hacks, he writes, " the Special Counsel did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it" conspired on them, leaving out the more all-encompassing "any U.S. person." Which says to me that someone in the U.S. sure as shit conspired.

2b. This part is entirely fucked up: apparently, there were "multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign." So, just to get this right, Russian operatives told the Trump campaign, presumably Jared, Junior, and Manafort, "Hey, we're dicking around on social media and, by the way, we've hacked the shit out of Hillary's email. Wanna fuck?" And we know that Jared and/or Junior winked about lifting sanctions while saying out loud, "Oh, no, we'd never want that." And then they didn't go directly to the FBI and turn everyone in who contacted them. That inaction gave tacit approval. Put it this way: If President Hillary Clinton's campaign hadn't turned over Russian offers of hacked Trump emails to the FBI, DC would be on fire tonight as enraged Republicans demanded Pennsylvania Avenue run red with the blood of her administration.

2c. And if this had been written about President Hillary Clinton: "while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate [her]," the only thing we'd be talking about is how she wasn't exonerated. The GOP and the media wouldn't let her say that she was exonerated. They wouldn't allow such an obvious, demonstrable lie. But with Trump, well, fuck us all, it never matters that he lies like the rest of us breathe.

2d. Frankly, Mueller's report could exonerate Trump on everything. It could be everything that Republicans are spinning it to be. But I'm not gonna buy anything one way or the other until we get to see the thing. I'd be a credulous idiot to think any other way. Right now, without the report, this is a cover-up. Of obstruction. Of the extent that our electoral system is at risk. Of what Trump's relationship with Russia actually is.

3. While Trump and his party of religious zealots, miserable racists, child molester enablers, and generally shitty humans are attacking Democrats savagely, let's not leave out the role Trump played in making the investigation into Russian meddling in the election all about him. He saw it as tainting his "Greatest Victory in the History of Everything Yeah You Heard Me Fuck You," so he sought to discredit the investigation and the people doing it.

But here's the trouble I have. If you believe the Barr letter, you have to believe that Russia did meddle in the election. It's right there. It says so. Yet every time Trump has been given the opportunity to agree with fucking everyone that such interference occurred, he has dismissed, demurred, or denied it. He has suggested multiple times that it could be the Chinese or the mythical 400-lb hacker. And his administration is doing precious little to prevent that interference again. This is like the climate change of espionage here: it happened. It's happening. Everyone knows it's happening. But because a tiny group of tiny dicks refuse to act, nothing will be done. And it'll just get worse while the tiny dicks get jacked off on all of us.

So, at best, Trump has such a fragile ego that he fears anyone questioning his election. Or he wants Russia to interfere. Or he's utterly compromised. In other words, he sure as shit acts like he's guilty and we're fucked either way.

4. Democrats did put too many eggs in Mueller's basket. And now they should kick the investigations into high gear. Get some fuckin' subpoenas going. Drag some motherfuckers before committees and put 'em under oath. Get Trump's goddamn tax returns. Some emoluments clause, motherfuckers. Some bribery.

Look, Trump is buried up to his neck in shit. Sure, it would be nice to have backed up dump truck of manure and covered his orange deflated yoga ball of a head. But we can also get our shovels and finish the job with the shit that's already there.

5. Let's fuck shit up in 2020. I don't buy that concentration on Russia has hurt Democrats. If anything, it has unified us and pissed us off. Feel that rage. Embrace it. Use it to fuel you through November 2020 because, without some miracle or dark magic, we're not getting out of the rest of this Trump term. Gird yer loins, motherfuckers. Gird 'em for the long fight.
http://rudepundit.blogspot.com
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Mar 28, 2019 11:01 am

U.S. Approves Secret Deal to Sell Nuclear Technology to Saudi Arabia
Many U.S. lawmakers are concerned that sharing nuclear technology with Saudi Arabia could eventually lead to a nuclear arms race in the Middle East

Reuters Mar 28, 2019 11:13 AM

U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, March 20, 2018.\ Jonathan Ernst/ REUTERS
U.S. Energy Secretary Rick Perry has approved six secret authorizations by companies to sell nuclear power technology and assistance to Saudi Arabia, according to a copy of a document seen by Reuters on Wednesday.

The Trump administration has quietly pursued a wider deal on sharing U.S. nuclear power technology with Saudi Arabia, which aims to build at least two nuclear power plants. Several countries including the United States, South Korea and Russia are in competition for that deal, and the winners are expected to be announced later this year by Saudi Arabia.

>> Analysis: MBS has a BDS problem: Khashoggi's shadow haunts the Saudi crown prince

Perry's approvals, known as Part 810 authorizations, allow companies to do preliminary work on nuclear power ahead of any deal but not ship equipment that would go into a plant, a source with knowledge of the agreements said on condition of anonymity. The approvals were first reported by the Daily Beast.


Pressure on Iran, Hezbollah is working: Pompeo


The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) said in the document that the companies had requested that the Trump administration keep the approvals secret.

"In this case, each of the companies which received a specific authorization for (Saudi Arabia) have provided us written request that their authorization be withheld from public release," the NNSA said in the document. In the past, the Energy Department made previous Part 810 authorizations available for the public to read at its headquarters.

A Department of Energy official said the requests contained proprietary information and that the authorizations went through multi-agency approval process.

Many U.S. lawmakers are concerned that sharing nuclear technology with Saudi Arabia could eventually lead to a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman told CBS last year that the kingdom would develop nuclear weapons if its rival Iran did. In addition, the kingdom has occasionally pushed back against agreeing to U.S. standards that would block two paths to potentially making fissile material for nuclear weapons clandestinely: enriching uranium and reprocessing spent fuel.

Concern in Congress about sharing nuclear technology and knowledge with Saudi Arabia rose after U.S.-based journalist Jamal Khashoggi was killed last October in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul. The Part 810 authorizations were made after November 2017, but it was not clear from the document whether any of them were made after Khashoggi's killing.

Representative Brad Sherman, a Democrat, called on Secretary of State Mike Pompeo during a congressional hearing on Wednesday to release the names of the companies that got the approvals by the middle of April, and Pompeo said he would look into it. Sherman also said the Trump administration had attempted to evade Congress on sharing nuclear power with the kingdom.

Pompeo said the administration was working to ensure any shared technology nuclear power would not present proliferation risks.

Last month, Democratic House members alleged in a report that top White House aides ignored warnings they could be breaking the law as they worked with former U.S. officials in a group called IP3 International to advance a multibillion-dollar plan to build nuclear reactors in the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia.

IP3 did not immediately respond to a request for comment about whether it was one of the companies that got a Part 810 authorization.

Separately, the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, accepted a request by Senators Marco Rubio, a Republican and Bob Menendez, a Democrat, to probe the administration's talks on a nuclear deal with Saudi, the GAO said on Wednesday.
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/u-s-app ... um=twitter


Trump Ally Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University Landed Pentagon Contract Months After Trump’s Election
Falwell has used Liberty-owned Freedom Aviation for personal, business, and political travel. Now it’s selling jet fuel to the Pentagon.

Lachlan Markay
03.28.19 4:20 AM ET
EXCLUSIVE
Alex Wong/Getty
Welcome to Pay Dirt—exclusive reporting and research from The Daily Beast’s Lachlan Markay on corruption, campaign finance, and influence-peddling in the nation’s capital. For Beast Inside members only.

Just months after President Donald Trump took office, the federal government signed a contract to buy hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of jet fuel from a university run by one of the president’s top political supporters.


The Pentagon’s energy-procurement arm inked the contract, valued at nearly $900,000, with a company called Freedom Aviation on May 9, 2017, and has purchased more than $400,000 in turbine fuel from the company since then. Freedom Aviation is wholly owned by Liberty University, a conservative school in Lynchburg, Virginia, led by high-profile Trump supporter Jerry Falwell Jr.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/jerry-fal ... n?ref=home



Jared Kushner just left the Senate Intel Committee ...was there for 3 hours


Image
Image
Image
Image








Note--it was baked in the from the start. Jim Comey said when announcing the investigation that FBI wasn't investigating collusion. And yet, that's what everyone kept using.



Sarah Kendzior

https://c10.patreonusercontent.com/3/ey ... D&ext=.mp3

"Trump is a Kremlin asset, but the intel community does not want to admit to another historic failure on their watch. If the FBI admits the Trump family is guilty, then they admit that they are guilty themselves of not doing their job."
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Mar 29, 2019 6:26 am

this is precisely what Adam Schiff was doing here: distinguishing between the political question of "collusion" and conspiracy.


Rep. Schiff: You Might Say That's All OK. But I Don't Think It's OK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8gAYUupm2k

WITHOUT OBJECTION. I'M GOING TO TURN TO OUR WITNESSES, THE SUBJECT OF THE HEARING TODAY. BEFORE I DO, AND AS YOU HAVE

CHOSEN, INSTEAD OF ADDRESSING THE HEARING, TO SIMPLY ATTACK ME, CONSISTENT WITH THE PRESIDENT'S ATTACKS, I DO WANT TO

RESPOND IN THIS WAY. MY COLLEAGUES MAY THINK IT'S OKAY THAT THE RUSSIANS OFFERED DIRT ON THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR

PRESIDENT AS PART OF WHAT WAS DESCRIBED AS THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT'S EFFORT TO HELP THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. YOU MIGHT

THINK THAT'S OKAY. MY COLLEAGUES MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY WHEN THAT WAS OFFERED TO THE SON OF THE PRESIDENT AT A PIVOTAL

ROLE IN THE CAMPAIGN, THAT THE PRESIDENT'S SON DID NOT CALL THE FBI, HE DID NOT ADAMANTLY RE ADAMANTLY REFUSE THAT

FOREIGN HELP. NO, INSTEAD THAT SON SAID THAT HE WOULD LOVE THE HELP OF THE RUSSIANS. YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY THAT HE

TOOK THAT MEETING. YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY THAT PAUL MANAFORT, THE CAMPAIGN CHAIR, SOMEONE WITH GREAT EXPERIENCE IN

RUNNING CAMPAIGNS ALSO TOOK THAT MEETING. YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY THAT THE PRESIDENT'S SON-IN-LAW ALSO TOOK THAT

MEETING. YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY THAT THEY CONCEALED IT FROM THE PUBLIC. YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY THAT THEIR ONLY

DISAPPOINTMENT AFTER THAT MEETING WAS THAT THE DIRT THEY RECEIVED ON HILLARY CLINTON WASN'T BETTER. YOU MIGHT THINK

THAT'S OKAY. YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY THAT WHEN IT WAS DISCOVERED A YEAR LATER THAT THEY LIED ABOUT THAT MEETING, AND

SAID IT WAS ABOUT ADOPTIONS, YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY THAT THE PRESIDENT HAS REPORTED TO HAVE HELPED DICTATE THAT LIE.

YOU MIGHT THINK THAT'S OKAY. I DON'T. YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY THAT THE CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN OF A PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN

WOULD OFFER INFORMATION ABOUT THAT CAMPAIGN TO A RUSSIAN OLIGARCH IN EXCHANGE FOR MONEY OR DEBT FORGIVENESS, YOU

MIGHT THINK THAT'S OKAY. I DON'T. YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY THAT THAT CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN OFFERED POLLING DATA. CAMPAIGN

POLLING DATA TO SOMEONE LINKED TO RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE. I DON'T THINK THAT'S OKAY. YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY THAT THE

PRESIDENT HIMSELF CALLED ON RUSSIA TO HACK HIS OPPONENTS' E-MAILS IF THEY WERE LISTENING. YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY THAT

LATER THAT DAY, IN FACT, THE RUSSIANS ATTEMPTED TO HACK A SERVER AFFILIATED WITH THAT CAMPAIGN. I DON'T THINK THAT'S OKAY.

YOU MIGHT THINK THAT IT'S OKAY THAT THE PRESIDENT'S SON-IN-LAW SOUGHT TO ESTABLISH A SECRET BACK CHANNEL OF

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE RUSSIANS THROUGH A RUSSIAN DIPLOMATIC FACILITY. I DON'T THINK THAT'S OKAY. YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S

OKAY THAT AN ASSOCIATE OF THE PRESIDENT MADE DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE GRU THROUGH GUCCIFER 2 AND WIKILEAKS THAT'S

CONSIDERED A HOSTILE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY A SENIOR CAMPAIGN OFFICIAL WAS INSTRUCTED TO REACH

THAT ASSOCIATE AND FIND OUT WHAT THAT HOSTILE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY HAD TO SAY IN TERMS OF DIRT ON HIS OPPONENT. YOU

MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY THAT THE NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER DESIGNATE SECRETLY CONFERRED WITH A RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR

ABOUT UNDERMINING U.S. SANCTIONS AND YOU MIGHT THINK IT'S OKAY HE LIED ABOUT IT TO THE FBI. YOU MIGHT SAY THAT'S ALL OKAY.

YOU MIGHT SAY THAT'S JUST WHAT YOU NEED TO DO TO WIN. BUT I DON'T THINK IT'S OKAY. I THINK IT'S IMMORAL. I THINK IT'S UNETHICAL. I

THINK IT'S UNPATRIOTIC. AND YES, I THINK IT'S CORRUPT. AND EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION. NOW, I HAVE ALWAYS SAID THAT THE QUESTION

OF WHETHER THIS AMOUNTS TO PROOF OF CONSPIRACY WAS ANOTHER MATTER. WHETHER THE SPECIAL COUNSEL COULD PROVE

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THE PROOF OF THAT CRIME WOULD BE UP TO THE SPECIAL COUNSEL AND I WOULD ACCEPT HIS

DECISION, AND I DO. HE'S A GOOD AND HONORABLE MAN AND HE IS A GOOD PROSECUTOR. BUT I DO NOT THINK THAT CONDUCT CRIMINAL

OR NOT IS OKAY. AND THE DAY WE DO THINK THAT'S OKAY IS THE DAY WE WILL LOOK BACK AND SAY THAT IS THE DAY AMERICA LOST ITS

WAY. AND I WILL TELL YOU ONE MORE THING THAT IS APP-- I DON'T THINK IT'S OKAY THAT DURING THE PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN MR.

TRUMP SOUGHT THE KREMLIN'S HELP TO CONSUMMATE A DEAL THAT WOULD MAKE HIM A FORTUNE, HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF

DOLLARS, I DON'T THINK IT'S OKAY HE CONCEALED IT FROM THE PUBLIC. I DON'T THINK IT'S OKAY THAT HE ADVOCATED A NEW AND MORE

FAVORABLE POLICY TOWARDS THE RUSSIANS, EVEN AS HE WAS SEEKING THE RUSSIAN'S HELP, THE KREMLIN'S HELP TO MAKE MONEY,

YOK IT'S OKAY THAT HIS ATTORNEY LIED TO OUR COMMITTEE. THERE'S A DIFFERENT WORD FOR THAT. THAN COLLUSION. AND IT'S CALLED

COMPROMISE. AND THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF OUR HEARING TODAY.




Timothy Snyder - "What Can European History Teach Us About Trump’s America?"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nEmBmGK5kM
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Mar 30, 2019 1:03 pm

Lindsey Graham urged McCain to give Trump-Russia dossier to FBI
https://www.axios.com/lindsey-graham-jo ... d1e6c.html


Image

The only reason Lindsay spilled the beans is that it was going to come out anyway in the Mueller Report. He’s getting out ahead of the story in a busy news week to avert a spanking from Trump.

wondering if Lindsey might be one of the 3rd parties that Barr wants to protect by redacting certain information in the Mueller report.



Fox News anchor Chris Wallace burst Fox viewers’ bubble Friday, informing them that the Russia investigation did not begin with the infamous Steele dossier


LET ME CLARIFY
Fox News’ Chris Wallace Sets Record Straight: Russia Investigation Did Not Start With Trump Dossier

‘This will drive some of our viewers nuts,’ the ‘Fox News Sunday’ host noted. ‘The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and the dossier.’

Justin Baragona
03.29.19 12:59 PM ET

Reacting to conservative commentators and opinion hosts pushing for an investigation of the investigators following the completion of the Mueller report, Fox News anchor Chris Wallace burst Fox viewers’ bubble Friday, informing them that the Russia investigation did not begin with the infamous Steele dossier.

Following the release of Attorney General William Barr’s four-page summary of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report that said the Trump campaign did not conspire with Russia in its 2016 election interference, Republicans and right-wing media personalities have declared the need to open an investigation into how the Russia probe started, claiming it was part of a Deep State coup to stop Donald Trump. This culminated in conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh ranting to Fox News Thursday about the need for “accountability.”

“They began an investigation based on a phony dossier created and written by associates of Hillary Clinton. It was opposition research,” Limbaugh told Fox News anchor Bret Baier. “This is outrageous what has happened here. There needs to be an investigation into this. There needs to be accountability for everybody who participated in this.”

During Friday morning’s broadcast of America’s Newsroom, Fox News anchor Bill Hemmer highlighted Limbaugh’s remarks while noting that the Department of Justice inspector general is looking into how the FISA warrants were handled by the FBI. Wallace, meanwhile, said there was “one other point” he’d like to make.

LISTEN TO HIM
Judge Napolitano: Schiff ‘Correct’ on Evidence of Collusion

Justin Baragona

“This will drive some of our viewers nuts,” the Fox News Sunday host noted. “The Trump investigation did not start with the FISA warrant and Carter Page and the dossier.”

The dossier in question was compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele during the 2016 presidential election for research firm Fusion GPS, alleging there was a conspiracy between Donald Trump and the Russian government. The document began circulating in the media in the fall of 2016 and was eventually published in January 2017 by BuzzFeed after then-FBI Director James Comey briefed President-elect Trump on it.

Wallace continued: “It started in June and July of 2016 when George Papadopoulos had spoken to a Russian agent and spoke to an Australian diplomat and said he had heard they had information on—dirt on Hillary Clinton.”


As Hemmer attempted to interject, Wallace demanded Hemmer let him finish his thought, adding that while potential FISA abuses are a “legitimate basis of inquiry” it is “not where the investigation started.”


Hemmer, meanwhile, said he thought they needed to “add we think in quotes” because “the story is not entirely yet revealed,” prompting Wallace to push back.

“I don’t think there is any doubt they started investigating—I mean, everybody agrees they started investigating in the summer of 2016,” Wallace declared. “Look, I’m not saying what they did was right or any of that but we know that’s when the investigation started. There has been documentation of that.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news- ... itter_page





Polly Sigh


NEW: House Oversight Cmte Chair @RepCummings is seeking to subpoena Carl Kline, Trump's former White House Personnel Security Director, who overruled career security specialists' rejections of 30+ security top secret clearances and issued them any.
https://bit.ly/2OGACOZ

Image

Jared Kushner's was one of 30+ cases in which Trump appointed Carl Kline overruled career security experts and approved a top secret clearance for Trump officials despite unfavorable information – an unprecedented number overruled rejections.


SCOOP: Two career security specialists rejected Jared Kushner for a top secret clearance after an FBI background check raised concerns about potential foreign influence on him — but they were overruled.…

SCOOP: Two career security specialists rejected Jared Kushner for a top secret clearance after an FBI background check raised concerns about potential foreign influence on him — but they were overruled.

Officials rejected Kushner for top secret clearance, were overruled
Kushner's background check identified questions about his family business, foreign contacts, foreign travel and meetings during the campaign, sources say.
https://nbcnews.to/2UiLqEv


Jared Kushner's was one of at least 30 cases in which Trump appointed Kline overruled career security experts and approved a top secret clearance for Trump officials despite unfavorable information – an unprecedented number overruled rejections.

Even though Jared Kushner's FBI background check flagged concerns about his family's business, foreign contacts, foreign travel, and meetings he had during the campaign, Kline overruled two career security specialists and recommended Kushner for a top secret clearance.


Kushner then sought an even higher designation to gain access to "sensitive compartmented info [SCI]" so his file was sent to the CIA for a ruling. They balked. One officer called the White House, asking how Kushner got even a top secret clearance.

Jan 2018: Intelligence officials became concerned that the Chinese govt was seeking to use business inducements to influence Kushner’s views. Chinese envoys couldn’t believe Kushner was so compliant and eager to mix policy & business interests.

Feb 2018: Officials in at least 4 countries [including UAE, China, Israel, & Mexico] have privately discussed ways they can manipulate Jared Kushner to their advantage by exploiting his financial difficulties and lack of foreign policy experience.

Apart from staff on the National Security Council, Jared Kushner issues more requests for information to the intelligence community than any White House employee. What's Kushner doing with ALL that intel?

Prince MBS boasted that in Oct 2017, Kushner divulged Saudi figures disloyal to him – intel straight from the PDB. In Nov, MBS launched his royal purge. "Saudi figures named in the PDB were among those rounded up; at least 1 reportedly tortured."

Feb 2018: At least 30 officials and political appointees – including Jared Kushner – have been working in the administration without full security clearance.

Per @Dan_F_Jacobson: It takes some pretty bad stuff to be denied a clearance. That there have been 30 denial recommendations of WH staff in the last 1.5 years is itself crazy, before you even get to the overruling part.

Per @Dan_F_Jacobson: Now let's talk about Kushner. That multiple career officials recommended denying his clearance is damning. They would not do that lightly for someone of Kushner's stature and position. [Hooboy!]
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1088 ... 99746.html









Even though Jared Kushner's FBI background check flagged concerns about his family's business, foreign contacts, foreign travel, and meetings he had during the campaign, Kline overruled two career security specia…
Show this thread


House Oversight has posted a notice to vote on subpoenas Tues for:
-Ex WH Personnel Security Dir. Kline to testify in security clearance probe
-Docs from Bill Barr & Wilbur Ross re 2020 Census citizenship question
via @kylegriffin1 https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status ... 4566835201


NEW: House Oversight Cmte Chair @RepCummings is seeking to subpoena Carl Kline, Trump's former White House Personnel Security Director, who overruled career security specialists' rejections of 30+ security top…
Show this thread
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Mar 30, 2019 2:40 pm

This Portlus Glam article is full of new info on Andrey Rozov, the developer who worked w/Felix Sater & signed LOI with Trump for Trump Tower Moscow - including info (and chart) connecting to my story on a NYC deal w/Sater, Rozov & accountant Ilya Bykov




Moguls, Mayors, & Moscow Tower: The Well-Connected World of Trump’s “Expert” Russian Developer
Go to the profile of Portlus Glam
Portlus GlamFollow
Mar 28

The city of Reutov in Russia sits squarely on the outskirts of Moscow — a dreary and congested suburb of roughly 87,000, separated from the Capital by Moscow Ring Road. Once a bustling hub for textile manufacturing, Reutov is now designated a “naukograd”, or science town. Since the start of the Cold War, the city has been host to the country’s rocket design agency NPO Mashinostroyeniya, where cutting-edge space satellites, ICBMs, and cruise missiles are developed.

But for all of its history (the city dates back to the 1400’s), there’s not much of a reason to visit Reutov these days. Ask residents of this and surrounding suburbs the reason why and they’ll likely point you upwards — towards the tall, ugly, beehive-like structures that litter the city skyline. To locals, these shoddily-built and half-finished “condos” represent in bold terms the corruption of their local city government.

Image

Source: “Cheated interest holders of residential complex ‘Novokosino-2’ demand to attract the bankrupt developer to criminal liability”, Financial Newspaper.
Over the past decade, a league of rabid developers flushed with bank-loaned cash has descended upon the region, building up real estate at far higher rates than the suburban population demands. For local officials who control the leasing of land, this development boom has been a lucrative, if illicit, money-making opportunity. Victims of their schemes are mostly the unwitting, working-class home buyers of the region. These defrauded residents allege that in exchange for favorable contracts and permits, developers have funneled a cut of their investments to city administrators through various proxies, shell LLCs, and offshore accounts.

Against this backdrop of corruption, presidential candidate Donald J. Trump’s would-be Moscow Tower partner Andrey Rozov began developing the Novokosino-2 residential complex in 2011. In 2012, Rozov began another ambitious project—Reutov Park shopping mall—in partnership with AMMA Development. Rozov didn’t just happen upon theses cash-infused projects in suburban Moscow by chance. He had already spent two decades doing business with some of the country’s richest and most powerful oligarchs. Indeed, a study of his background reveals a characteristic role for Rozov — one as the public-facing front for larger and much more opaque business interests.
In U.S. media reports, Rovoz’s portrayal has been that of a “tier-two developer” who couldn’t secure financing, land, or government approval for the deal. In reality, Rozov owns and manages a large web of interconnected companies that span inside Russia and across the globe — even into the United States. They include real estate, broadcasting, software, and many other types of companies whose ultimate owners are masked behind a revolving door of nominee directors, shells, and offshores.

Proof of Rozov’s high-level business ties is not difficult to find once you know who you are looking for (“Rozov Andrey Vladimirovich”), and the multiple tax ID’s he and his associates use. In 2014, Rovoz received an Order of St. Sergius of Radonezh III award from the Russian Orthodox Church. In 2015, he received Amnesty from the Kremlin on murder charges stemming from a reckless boating accident in Crocus City Harbor. That same year, despite public evidence that Rozov’s companies were actively involved in a massive fraud and embezzlement scheme, he continued to receive a steady flow of bank loans and new building projects around Reutov.

Image

SOURCE: From left to right: Alexander Khodyrev (former-Mayor of Reutov, current-Mayor of Korolev and Ivanteevka), Yevgeny Suvorov (IC Expert, Khodyrev’s bodyguard), Andrei Rozov (IC Expert).”
Image
SOURCE: From left to right: Nikolay Kovalev (First Deputy Head of Administration, Reutov), Yevgeny Suvorov (Khodyrev’s bodyguard, IC Expert), Pavel Lebedev (one-time Director of Expert Development, Altius Development), Andrei Rozov (IC Expert), Alexander Khodyrev (former-Mayor of Reutov, current-Mayor of Korolev and Ivanteevka) 04/16/2014.

Rozov’s odd luck in business — despite what appears to be repeated failings and even criminal activity — raises fundamental concerns about the true purpose of the Moscow Tower deal. While not exactly known for its “extreme vetting” of foreign business partners, the Trump Organization’s selection of I.C. Expert was particularly risky. On its face, it exposed the fledgling presidential candidate to obvious blackmail at a time when the Russian Government was just starting to ramp up its attacks on the 2016 U.S. elections.

Just this week, in fact, BTA Bank of Kazakhstan sued Felix Sater — a key player in those Moscow Tower negotiations. In their New York lawsuit, BTA Bank alleges that Sater conspired to “invest (funds stolen from the bank) to develop a Trump Tower project in Russia.” While the merits of these allegations are suspect considering Sater’s history with the bank, it reinforces an important and yet unanswered question: whose interests were Andrey Rozov representing when he agreed to build the “tallest tower in Europe” with candidate Trump?

MOGULS, MAYORS, AND MOSCOW TOWER: A THREE-PART SERIES

The Moscow Tower deal with I.C. Expert was not the only foreign real estate deal Donald Trump was negotiating during the 2015–16 presidential campaign. Also, I.C. Expert was not the only developer the Trump Organization was negotiating with to build Trump’s long-sought tower. And the whole story is not very neatly told.
This will be three-part series exploring the well-connected business world of candidate Trump’s chosen developer in Russia: a group of companies called “Expert” that is headed — but not exactly owned — by Andrey Rozov.

PART 1: ANYONE CAN START A BANK IN POST-SOVIET RUSSIA


Source: Moscow City skyline with West Tower (Zapad) completed, and East Tower (Vostok) under construction, circa 2011.

The story of Trump Tower Moscow usually begins with Sater and Rozov’s time together serving on the board of Mirax Group, a Russian real estate company that would later default into bankruptcy as it’s corrupt leader Sergei Polonsky fled arrest in 2011. Sater joined the board in 2008, during the same period he was developing Trump Soho with the Bayrock Group. At the time, Mirax was involved with several major development projects in Russia, including Federation Tower in Moscow City — slated at the time to be the “tallest tower in Europe”.

By the time he joined Mirax in 2008, Sater had already been working for several years to help the Trump family build something in Russia. In 2005, before ground had been broken on Trump Soho, the just recently-bankrupted Trump signed a one-year deal with Bayrock to explore a Trump-branded project in Moscow. Bayrock Group even found a site for the project — an old pencil factory — but the effort apparently “fizzled”. Later in 2006, Sater would travel to Moscow with Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. to “(connect) with potential partners” for the same purpose. By 2010, Sater worked directly for the Trump Organization as a Senior Advisor to Donald Trump — complete with an office on the 24th floor.

For Rozov’s part, his business life before Mirax is much less-documented — but no less “colorful” than Sater’s own. One primary source is a financial report from JSC “FIRST MOSCOW INSTRUMENT-MAKING PLANT V. KAZAKOVA”, where Rozov served as Chairman of the Board alongside Mirax and Basic Element executives. After Rozov’s boss fled the country, Oleg Deripaska bought out the Mirax shares in 2014 and now controls the project completely.

Image

SOURCE: Architectural designs for the residential complex with social infrastructure on the site of V. Kazakova, “a complex silhouette that supports the panorama of Moscow-City skyscrapers, respects the historical part of Kutuzovsky Prospect.”
A brief professional bio for Rozov appears in the company’s Q4 2009 Report:
2002–2004: Eastern Finance Company CJSC — Finance Director
2002–2005: Conglomerate-1 LLC — Deputy General Director
2005–2007: Mega-Invest LLC — Vice President
2007–2009: Mirax Grad LLC — Deputy General Director
2007–2009: JSC “First Moscow Instrument-Making Plant”—Chairman

Using this as a springboard, the contours of Rozov’s career begin to take shape. Rozov started out in the cut-throat business world of post-Soviet Russia, working closely alongside Andrei Mikhailovich Godzinsky — one of the country’s first “financiers” and head of Eastern Financial Company. During the 1990’s turf wars in Russia for wealth and power, banks could be easily established to collect the deposits of unwitting customers. These banks would then close on a dime, with the funds gone and the beneficial owners hidden behind easily-concealed corporate structures. Unsurprisingly then, Godzinsky sat on the board of several banks and companies.

Such was the mentoring by which Rozov learned the skills of “entrepreneurship”. One early endeavor was called the Union Bank of Development, established in 1994. Among its last founders in 2002 was a company founded by Rozov — “TRAS AND COMPANY 1”. Partner to Rovoz in that company was Julie Vereshchagina, who appears as a director and/or founder in various other Rozov-connected entities. In 2002, the Union Bank of Development was declared bankrupt, and in 2004 its banking license was revoked.

This setback did not deter Rozov, or those interested in having Rozov represent their interests. A more pertinent example is his relationship to the recently-bankrupted AMB Bank, whose owner Anatoly Motylev was charged in a criminal scheme in 2015. As the owner of four banks, Motylev’s crimes included embezzlement of customer deposits, estimated at more than 126 billion rubles ($2.13 billion).

Rozov’s connection to AMB Bank can be traced through his former role as Deputy General Director of Conglomerate-1. Beginning in 2011, Conglomerate-1 was the construction company contracted to build approximately ten of the Novokosino-2 residential buildings in Reutov. Like it’s sister company I.C. Expert, Conglomerate-1 has been embroiled in hundreds of lawsuits related to the project’s unsafe and undelivered homes.
According to financial records, Conglomerate-1 is owned by Sphere Investments Limited, registered in the British Virgin Islands to the same address as several other Rozov-connected companies. More to the point, Conglomerate-1 is the owner of a 17.67% stake in its subsidiary, AMB Bank. Controlling an additional 17.33% stake in AMB Bank is Rozov’s partner Julie Vereshchagina, through the company ABN-Trading.

Further exploring the tangled web of AMB Bank ownership harkens the old adage “follow the Russian lawyers”. In particular, Alexander Viktorovich Khalizev and Natalya Igorevna Korzhenkova, both of whom work on behalf of the Russian Government’s “Deposit Insurance Agency” (DIA). The pair represent Kremlin interests in bank cases both domestically and in foreign courts. Khalizev and Korzhenkov currently represent over a dozen Russian banks in various stages of solvency and have previously represented many others. Of note, both acted as “representative for the bankruptcy trustee” for AMT Bank, in part owned by BTA Bank of Kazakhstan.

According to public records, Khalizev assumed control of AMB Bank from Korzhenkova on November 23, 2016, who had acted as the DIA representative since December 30, 2015. Shortly thereafter, in December 2016, Khalizev submitted a court filing in a U.S. case against another troubled Russian bank — Vneshprombank (VPB). In his sworn statement, Khalizev assumed control as a “foreign representative” from Korzhenkova, who had been appointed on March 11, 2016.

Image

Image


Screenshots 1–3: Banks under the control of Natalya Igorevna Korzhenkova; Screenshots 4–6: Banks under the control of Alexander Viktorovich Khalizev.
VPB is currently undergoing bankruptcy proceedings in New York City after a criminal scheme involving its owners. Investigators believe the bank’s leadership created an “organized crime group” to grant loans to their own sub-companies. Between May 2009 and December 2015, the group allegedly stole over 114 billion rubles ($1.7 billion). VPB was declared bankrupt in March 2016.

Earlier this year, Investigative Journalist Wendy Siegelman published a scoop regarding a New York City real estate filing that showed Felix Sater involved in a 2015 transaction with a Russian-born NYC accountant named Ilya Bykov. Per Siegelman’s reporting, “the same month that Felix Sater was urging Trump to come to Moscow, records show that (Sater) and (Bykov) represented the same company, which was simultaneously finalizing the $43.5 million sale of a midtown Manhattan office building.” Purchased by its mystery owner just a year earlier in 2014, the deal “made an estimated $8 million or 22% increase over the purchase price“.”

Subsequently, Trump’s would-be Moscow Tower developer Andrey Rozov was revealed as the owner of that Manhattan property. At the same time, Bykov had been appointed as manager of VPB ex-President Larisa Markus’ business affairs in the U.S. In the same Manhattan court where DIA lawyers Khalizev and Korzhenkova represented Kremlin interests in the VPB case, Bykov fought the agency’s bid to turn over related records.

Image

Andrey Rozov is a former “Deputy General Director” at Conglomerate-1 (TIN: 7713191505); Conglomerate-1 was a construction company contracted to build several Novokosino-2 buildings in Reutov. It is currently a defendant in dozens of fraud lawsuits in Russia.
From here we travel back to Reutov, and the public scandal Rozov’s company was caught in by the fall of 2015. In its planning and funding phase, Novokosino-2 in Reutov had been pitched to home-buying “investors” as a well-funded, expansive residential complex with 8,569 units and community features like parks, schools, and a health clinic. Between 2010–2015, Rozov ’s projects received loans from well-known banks like Sberbank, as was once showcased on the Novokosino-2 website.

One lender that remains advertised is Otkritie Bank, in which sanctioned bank VTB owns a 10% stake. In 2017, Russia’s central bank bailed out Otkritie after it too was caught in a 2015 scheme. In emails to Trump Organization lawyer Michael Cohen, Sater had claimed that financing for Trump Tower Moscow had been secured from VTB — a claim the bank has denied.

Image

Despite Expert’s ongoing and more-than-adequate funding, by 2015 construction had virtually ground to a halt, with many buildings sitting half-completed and still undelivered today. Those who did receive keys were greeted by heat-less flats, cold water, flooding, and other hazards. Thousands of residents and defrauded investors soon organized, and have been battling against the city and development companies in court ever since. Yet somehow, even after Rozov signed the Moscow Tower LOI in October 2015, I.C. Expert received land permits to develop two new buildings in Novokosino-2 (#16 and #17) and a large Sberbank loan in excess of $180M that November.
Simply put, such luck is simply not possible in Russia without the direct approval of President Vladimir Putin.
With research and other help from @Agenthades1, @arapaho415, @RighteousBabe4, @brazencapital, @JedGarren, @MacFinn44, @mopeng, @Stephaniefishm4, @SaysDana, @ThomasS4217

COMING UP IN PART TWO:

Corruption in Reutov had become systemic by the time I.C. Expert entered the city’s real estate market in 2010. The poster boy for that corruption was Reutov’s (now former) Mayor, Alexander Khodyrev, who controlled the city government and its land since 1996. “Poster boy” is meant quite literally— a YouTube documentary from 2012 revealed Khodyrev’s proclivity for commissioning lavish paintings of himself. As the city’s chief administrator, he’s alleged to have stolen millions from the city’s residents through various fraud schemes with local developers, utility companies, and others.

Image

SOURCE: “Derevsky on the background of many paintings with the face of Khodyrev.”
https://medium.com/@PortlusGlam/moguls- ... 057f40fa9a



Will Flynn bring back Yellowcake to WH Menu after 1-21-17?
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=40188




You Keep Telling Me That’: How Michael Flynn Kissed Up to Russia’s Ambassador
That time Trump’s national security adviser and Moscow’s emissary surprised White House staff.

Erin Banco,
Asawin Suebsaeng
03.29.19 4:57 AM ET

In the first few days of the Trump administration, Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and then National Security Adviser Michael Flynn got on the phone.

The Obama administration for months had gathered intelligence on the ways in which Russia was actively engaged in manipulating American politics. Despite that, the brand new Trump administration was already well on its way to developing a close relationship with Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin.

Kislyak and Flynn wanted to continue to build that relationship via a short, customary phone call, according to two individuals with direct knowledge of the conversation.

But reports swirled that that Flynn had talked with Kislyak during the transition following the Obama administration’s new round of sanctions on Russia. That story was quietly being refuted inside the halls of the White House and to members of the intelligence community. The message: nothing to see here, according to one former intelligence official.

The call between Flynn and Kislyak after inauguration seemed to carry on normally to those in the room listening in. The two officials exchanged pleasantries and expressed optimism about working to broker a new era of U.S-Russia relations. But then, as the two officials were saying their goodbyes, Kislyak invited Flynn to the Russian embassy in Washington to eat Russian food. Flynn’s response: “You keep telling me that.”

That one, short phrase raised eyebrows among intelligence and national security staffers in the room. The call, they thought, was supposed to have been the first official conversation between the two men. At least that’s what they had been told.

“That one, short phrase raised eyebrows among intelligence and national security staffers in the room. The call, they thought, was supposed to have been the first official conversation between the two men.”
It wasn’t until much later that they realized how extensively the two had communicated during the transition.

The goal of that call during the first few days after inauguration was to try and set up an official meeting between Kislyak and Flynn in Washington. They never got that far.

Flynn resigned in February 2017 and later pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his communications with Kislyak.

Fast forward two years later and Flynn is still waiting to be sentenced for those lies despite the fact that Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel’s Office has all but folded and has submitted its official report submitted to the Department of Justice.

And Donald Trump still hasn’t taken a pardon for the retired general off the table.

On Wednesday, the president called into the Fox News show hosted by Sean Hannity, a close friend and top informal adviser of Trump’s, and said, “many, many people were incredibly hurt by this whole scam, but it is much worse than that,” and that Flynn “was a man who had an incredible record in the military, you see what happened to him… and you know what he has gone through.”


A copy of a letter from Attorney General William Barr advising Congress of the principal conclusions reached by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, is shown Sunday, March 24, 2019 in Washington. (AP Photo/Jon Elswick)
Here’s What to Watch for When Mueller’s Report Finally Drops

House Judiciary Demands Docs From Everyone in Trumpworld
When pressed about pardon considerations for Trump allies such as Flynn, the president dodged. “I don’t want to talk about pardons now, but I can say it’s so sad on so many levels,” he said.

A FAMILY AFFAIR
Michael Flynn’s Family Is at War Over QAnon

Will Sommer

Still, President Trump has publicly gone to bat for Flynn—a man he says he greatly respects. He even went so far as to wish his former national security adviser “good luck” on Twitter on the day of his sentencing in December.

“Will be interesting to see what he has to say, despite tremendous pressure being put on him, about Russian Collusion in our great country, and, obviously, highly successful political campaign,” Trump posted. “There was no Collusion!”

An indictment filed by Mueller’s office in December 2017 said Flynn “falsely stated” that he did not ask the Russian ambassador "to refrain from escalating the situation in response to sanctions that the United States had imposed against Russia that same day.” And Flynn told the FBI also that he did not recall Kislyak "subsequently telling him that Russia had chosen to moderate its response to those sanctions as a result of his request."

Flynn was supposed to be sentenced in December. The special counsel recommended he face little to no jail time because he cooperated extensively with them following his indictment. But during his sentencing hearing, Judge Emmet Sullivan spoke out harshly against Flynn, saying “I’m not hiding my disgust, my disdain for this criminal offense.”

Flynn conferred with his lawyers and asked that the sentencing be postponed so he could continue cooperating with law enforcement.

In a filing in March, the Special Counsel’s Office said it had received all the information it could from Flynn but the judge did not set a new sentencing date for the former national security adviser, who could face up to five years in prison.

Trump suggests publicly that Flynn is still in his good graces. But Trump didn’t come to back Flynn without some doubts along the way.

Flynn’s ascension to the highest ranks of the Trump administration—quickly followed by his dramatic fall—was met with some prescient reservations, including from President-elect Trump himself.

During the presidential transition, Trump asked his close advisers if they thought picking Flynn would be “too risky,” given that Trump had been told the retired Army lieutenant general had a reputation for being a “wild man” and a “cowboy,” according to two people with direct knowledge of these conversations.

“Will he be a problem, do you think?” one of the sources recounted Trump asking during the presidential transition.

This line of questioning was spurred on, in part, by a comment President Barack Obama made to his successor during their post-election meeting, when Obama warned Trump about hiring Flynn. This was during a very brief period when Trump and Obama’s relationship was at least superficially much warmer, when Trump had publicly stated that Obama was a “very good man” whom he looked forward to consulting in the future. (Relations and communication between the two broke down almost immediately after the start of the Trump era, especially after the current president accused Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower.)

"Key personnel announcements and nominations came out as we were in the midst of [President Obama’s] final overseas trip,” said Ned Price, a former CIA analyst and spokesman for the Obama-era National Security Council. “The news, especially the appointment of Michael Flynn, hit hard. It cast a pall over the traveling White House team because Michael Flynn is someone who was no stranger to the Obama administration, having served as a top intelligence official, and someone who later made no secret on the campaign trail of his extreme and xenophobic views, which we feared would be turned into policy.”

But when Trump began flagging others’ concerns about Flynn during the early weeks of the transition, his senior aides virtually across the board vouched for the retired lieutenant general, the knowledgeable sources say. Top officials such as Jared Kushner and Steve Bannon were close to Flynn. In 2017, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie claimed that he was ousted from leading the Trump transition in part because he urged against tapping Flynn to be the national security adviser.

CONGRATS
Michael Flynn Wasn’t Railroaded. He Just Played Himself.

Barbara McQuade

Trump, of course, ultimately took the side of the advisers who went to bat for Flynn, the “wild man” who would soon cause so much trouble for his young administration. The president liked his first national security adviser so much that during the start of Flynn’s legal woes, Trump wondered aloud if it would be possible, once the investigation into Flynn concluded, to re-install him back in the administration.
Erin Banco
Erin.Banco@thedailybeast.com
https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-micha ... ref=author
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:40 am

endy Siegelman


@WendySiegelman
20h20 hours ago
More
Stephen Feinberg Trump's Intelligence Advisor Board Chmn & Cerberus CEO ran companies that trained/modernized Saudi intelligence services & some members of team that killed Khashoggi (Feinberg reportedly divested before killing) by @IgnatiusPost HT @dcpoll https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/ed ... 118a17b76f
Image

After 2008 financial crash, Stephen Feinberg's Cerberus and Tom Barrack's Colony Capital were two of the firms that helped bail out Kushner by buying some of the debt in 666 Fifth Avenue (Feinberg, Barrack, Kushner have all had close ties to the Saudis)

After the financial crash in 2008, Stephen Feinberg's Cerberus Capital bought some of Kushner's debt at 666 Fifth Avenue building, along with Tom Barrack's Colony Capital

Feinberg's Cerberus Capital also bought some of Kushner's debt on 666 Fifth property

Then you get the building
From Bloomberg Businessweek

As the fuzzy strains of the Beatles’ Revolution filled the room, Donald Trump took the stage on Feb. 9 in Manchester, N.H., to celebrate his victory in the state’s Republican presidential primary. Before reiterating his campaign promises to do away with Obamacare, construct a wall along America’s border with Mexico, and rebuild the nation’s military so that “nobody is going to mess with us, believe me, nobody,” Trump thanked his family members, including his daughter Ivanka, who stood beside him in an elegant black dress with a white floral print, and her husband, the lanky, boyish New York real estate developer and newspaper publisher, Jared Kushner.

“Jared is a very, very successful real estate entrepreneur in Manhattan,” Trump proudly declared. “But he likes this better than real estate, I think.” By this, Trump clearly meant politics. Ivanka beamed like a guest on a late-night talk show. Kushner grinned sheepishly, as if he were mildly embarrassed by his father-in-law.

Kushner, 35, has become a frequent presence at Trump’s campaign events and a member of the candidate’s inner circle. In his effort to portray himself as a staunch supporter of Israel, Trump likes to mention that he has Jewish grandchildren. He has Kushner to thank for that. When Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner married in 2009, Ivanka converted to Judaism. “Give Trump some credit,” says Shmuley Boteach, a New Jersey Jewish leader and Jerusalem Post columnist who calls himself “America’s Rabbi.” “I mean, he’s got a Jewish daughter. He has orthodox Jewish grandchildren. He could easily have said when Ivanka was marrying Jared and going through the rigorous Jewish conversion process, ‘You know, you have a famous last name. You’re a beautiful, famous woman. Do you need this?’ ”


Father and son in 2012.
Photographer: Patrick McMullan/PMC
Kushner’s involvement in his father-in-law’s unexpectedly successful presidential campaign is the latest step in a rapid ascent. He began making major decisions at his family’s real estate company, then based in Florham Park, N.J., when he was 23 in 2004, around the time his father, a prominent Democratic fundraiser and aspiring kingmaker, pleaded guilty to tax fraud, misleading federal election officials, and retaliating against a witness. The younger Kushner expanded the business, purchasing almost $7 billion in property in less than a decade, much of it in New York City.

A decade ago he bought the New York Observer, at the time a money-losing but influential newspaper known for its dishy, withering coverage of the city’s billionaire class that conferred on Kushner a bit of the reflected glow of the peach-colored broadsheet. “Jared understands being a newspaper owner moves you into a different league,” says Mitchell Moss, a professor of urban policy and planning at New York University and an acquaintance of Kushner’s. “Politicians have to cultivate you. The elite come to you for attention, as opposed to you going to them. It reverses the relationship.”

It didn’t hurt that Kushner married into one of the city’s most famous real estate dynasties. By all accounts, Kushner has a warm relationship with his father-in-law. If Trump, now the presumptive Republican nominee, wins the general election, Kushner will be a regular White House visitor if for no other reason than he, his wife, and their three young children will be frequent dinner guests.

Myers Mermel, managing partner of Mermel & McLain Management, a New York real estate development firm, and a friend of Kushner’s, sees him as a contemporary Jack Kennedy, the attractive son of a rich family with the resources to become a force behind the scenes in Washington and even a potential candidate for national office. “He has a beautiful, brilliant wife,” says Mermel, a Trump booster. “He is clearly a man of faith. These are all values that contradict the negative image put forth by the Republican Party as New York values. He has the values that the Republican Party espouses.”

People who think highly of Kushner, and those who don’t, all talk about his impeccable manners. They say he never loses his temper, at least not in public. He’s unfailingly polite. He remembers names and opens car doors for people. “He’s very humble and calm, always,” says Asher Abehsera, Kushner’s partner in three real estate projects in Brooklyn. Kushner is also extremely guarded. He grants few interviews, and when he does speak for attribution, he often comes across as purposefully bland, as if he’s trying to discourage interest in his activities—or himself.

Yet Kushner has had an eventful life. The way to best understand him is through his father, with whom he had an unusual apprenticeship. Charles Kushner is a flamboyant New Jersey developer who built the Kushner Cos., his family’s business, into a billion-dollar operation with more than 25,000 apartments in the Northeast. Like his son, the elder Kushner sought influence, giving generously to Democrats, such as former President Bill Clinton and former New Jersey Governor James McGreevey, and also to the occasional Republican, such as former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani.

After McGreevey won the 2001 gubernatorial race with Charles’s help, McGreevey rewarded his top fundraiser by appointing him to the board of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which controls the three major airports in the region along with many of its bridges and tunnels, and has long been a source of jobs and contracts for the politically wired. It was a plum position, but Kushner didn’t hold it long.

In 2003, the Newark Star-Ledger reported that Kushner had gotten into an angry confrontation with a state senator from Atlantic City at a wedding. The paper said Kushner was upset about the senator’s demand that he appear in Trenton to answer questions about allegations that he’d made illegal campaign contributions. “He was going to have his way, even if it meant having an ugly spat in the papers,” says Micah Rasmussen, McGreevey’s press secretary at the time, who fielded questions about the incident.

In 2004, however, Kushner admitted before a federal judge in Newark that he’d contributed more than $385,000 in the name of some of his business partners without their approval. He also confessed to misleading federal election officials about it and arranging for his brother-in-law to be videotaped with a prostitute in a New Jersey motel to punish his sister for cooperating with the investigation. “It was like a Sopranos episode,” recalls Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club and a longtime foe.

The senior Kushner was sentenced to two years in prison. By then, his son had already assumed a leadership role in the company. Although he was only 23, Jared had grown up going to construction sites with Charles. While attending Harvard, he bought and managed apartments in Somerville, Mass., just outside Boston. “I remember him constantly being on the phone and working on project development and meeting construction guys,” says Nitin Saigal, who lived with Kushner for three years in college and later roomed with him in New York. While an undergraduate at Harvard, Kushner did a summer internship at SL Green Realty, one of New York’s largest commercial property owners, where he worked on deals. “It was pretty apparent way back then that this was a special young man who was going to be going places,” says Marc Holliday, SL Green’s chief executive officer.

Once he became CEO of the family business, the younger Kushner shifted its focus from New Jersey to New York. “He knew early in his career that the way to become important was to get out of Jersey and become a Manhattan developer,” says NYU’s Moss. Kushner had no profile in the city, but that changed in 2006 when he bought the Observer for what was widely reported to be $10 million. “Jared saw it as a way to have a voice in New York,” says Bob Sommer, who was president of Observer Media from 2007 to 2009. “It helped set him up as a serious player.”

“You’re in your 20s, and you’re a mogul already!”


In 2007, Kushner paid $1.8 billion for 666 Fifth Ave., an aluminum-jacketed office tower that takes up an entire block front between 52nd and 53rd streets in Manhattan, near Rockefeller Center. At the time it was the highest price ever paid for a single building in New York. Kushner didn’t put down much of his own money. He financed the deal with a $1.2 billion loan from Barclays Capital and an additional $535 million of short-term debt. It was a lot of leverage, but many real estate investors were borrowing heavily at the time. This deal, along with the purchase of the Observer, established Kushner as a force in Manhattan. When he appeared on CNBC, an anchor old enough to be his father was astonished. “You’re in your 20s, and you’re a mogul already!”

“You’re using that term very loosely,” Kushner protested in a soft voice.

Kushner married Ivanka Trump in October 2009 at the Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, N.J. It was the merger of two prominent real estate families and was attended by movie stars such as Russell Crowe and Natalie Portman, television personalities like Barbara Walters and Regis Philbin, and politicians such as Giuliani and Andrew Cuomo, now the governor of New York. With his glamorous new wife, Kushner became a staple in the gossip columns and even showed up in the pages of Us Weekly and Vogue. “He’s very unremarkable in his presence,” says David Patrick Columbia, co-founder of the website New York Social Diary. “She, on the other hand, is quite remarkable. It was a good move for him.” The couple socialized with Rupert Murdoch and Ronald Perelman. They made the rounds at fancy parties like the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Costume Institute gala. Kushner also threw some glitzy parties of his own, which the Observer dutifully covered.

Trump and Kushner tie the knot in October 2009.
Photographer: Brian Marcus/Getty Images
When the economy collapsed in 2008, office rents tumbled in Manhattan, and it became clear that Kushner had overpaid for his trophy property on Fifth Avenue, which was now estimated to be worth less than its debt. He managed to pay off the short-term portion by selling 49 percent of the retail space for $525 million to a partnership that included the Carlyle Group. But vultures still circled his shiny tower. Investors in distressed real estate such as Colony Capital and Vornado Realty Trust and the hedge fund Cerberus Capital Management bought portions of Kushner’s debt, hoping to position themselves either to win the building in a foreclosure or get Kushner to buy them out.

Kushner tried to make up for his weak financial position with politesse. He flew to California in 2009 to see Thomas Barrack, executive chairman of Colony Capital. Barrack expected Kushner to walk in with “17 attorneys,” ready to fight. That might have suited Kushner’s father, but his son was more diplomatic. He showed up at Barrack’s office by himself. “He didn’t have a piece of paper,” Barrack says. “He didn’t have a pen. He said, ‘I just want a little bit of time to explain my situations and my thoughts.’ ”

Ultimately, Kushner was able to buy time until the market recovered. He ended up parting with 49 percent of his remaining stake in the tower to Vornado for a mere $80 million, but he retained control of his office building.

Since then, Kushner has often invested with partners, putting less of his family’s money at risk. He’s chosen less pricey areas of the city like the East Village, Queens, and Brooklyn. He constructed six luxury apartments in SoHo on top of the historic Puck Building, former home of the 19th century satirical magazine. “It’s a gorgeous, magical building,” Kushner told the New York Times in 2013, sounding like his father-in-law. “But I wanted it to become the most incredible that it could be, let it realize its full potential.” He recently sold one of the apartments for $28 million, a neighborhood record.

The same year, Kushner and two partners paid $240 million for a factory-like complex in Brooklyn where the Jehovah’s Witnesses once published the Watchtower. They’re now transforming it into a home for tenants like Etsy, the online marketplace for artisanal goods, and WeWork, a startup that bills itself as “the physical social network,” renting office space to contract workers and freelancers. “I find Jared to be one of the most sophisticated real estate developers on earth,” says Adam Neumann, WeWork’s co-founder. To hear Neumann tell it, Kushner is also the most well-mannered. “A lot of times when I’m with Jared, I take cues from his behavior just to learn how to act,” he says. “You know, just to act a little bit better myself because it’s always good to learn.” On May 2, Kushner and three partners finalized a $700 million deal to purchase more property in Brooklyn from the Jehovah’s Witnesses, where they hope to develop another tech-oriented campus.

The New York Post reported last year that Kushner and Vornado have a plan to turn 666 Fifth Ave. into a “1,400-foot vertical mall, hotel, and residential tower.” It’s an ambitious project, but Gabby Warshawer, director of research for CityRealty, says the market for superluxury condominiums has cooled in recent months. “It would be a very expensive building because it would have unobstructed Central Park views,” she says. “But there are a lot of questions right now about whether there is an oversupply in that area at very, very high price points.” Then again, Kushner could keep the project on the drawing boards until the next real estate uptick. In the meantime, he runs his business out of an office in the tower with its own roof garden. People who visit sometimes run into Kushner’s father, who remains one of his son’s most trusted advisers.

Under Arthur Carter, the Observer’s previous owner and a former investment banker, the paper lost an estimated $2 million a year. Even so, Carter enjoyed publishing a paper that tweaked the rich people with whom he rubbed shoulders. The paper regularly shot rhetorical spitballs at Donald Trump. “I called him the prince of swine,” says Michael Thomas, who wrote a column called “The Midas Watch” in the paper for almost two decades. The Observer’s reporters and columnist were egged on by the late Peter Kaplan, its longtime editor-in-chief. He sermonized about how stories needed to have heroes and villains and lapsed into long silences if he was searching for the right word or had lost his train of thought. (I was a staff writer at the Observer from 1996 to 1999. I also wrote a jazz column for the paper in 2009.)

A spokesman for Kushner says he transformed the Observer into a profitable business with a higher editorial budget and a rapidly growing Web audience. However, Kushner didn’t appear to enjoy using the Observer to afflict the comfortable as had Carter and Kaplan. Former Observer staffers say he complained—politely, of course—when the paper wrote unflatteringly about his friends. They say he was also perturbed when the paper didn’t report as harshly as he might have liked on his family’s old foes in New Jersey, such as Chris Christie, who had prosecuted his father as a U.S. attorney and was elected governor in 2009.

After Kaplan’s departure in 2009, a revolving masthead of editors struggled to please the paper’s owner. In 2011, Kushner hired Elizabeth Spiers, founding editor of Gawker, a corrosive website that made the Observer seem like the Christian Science Monitor by comparison, to give the paper a much-needed jolt. Soon after she arrived, however, Trump began toying with the idea of running for president. He was no longer just another narcissistic New York character. With his eye on the White House, he transformed himself into the most vocal figure in the far right’s birther movement.


Kushner bought the New York Observer in 2006.
Photographer: Joshua Lutz/Redux

This was obviously a story the Observer had to cover, but how? When it came to his father-in-law, Kushner had difficulty keeping his composure. Spiers didn’t respond to several interview requests, but she discussed her experience at the paper earlier this year in an interview on Story in a Bottle, a tech-oriented podcast. Spiers said she’d had numerous fights with Kushner about the paper’s Trump coverage, which he wanted to be “neutral.” Once, she said, she left the door to her office open in the middle of a screaming match on the telephone because she thought it might be a good thing for the reporters to hear. She considered resigning, but then Trump abandoned his quest, and the paper no longer needed to cover him as assiduously. A Kushner spokesman disputes her account.

That’s not to say that Kushner didn’t continue to be a presence in the newsroom. Former Observer staffers say he pressed first one reporter and then another to pursue a negative story about another wealthy real estate figure and even accompanied them to a meeting with a source whom he promised had some juicy information. However, the source backed out, and the story was never completed. A Kushner spokesman says it was the source and not the publisher who originally suggested the story. Spiers left in 2012.

Kushner now had to find yet another editor-in-chief. In January 2013 he brought in someone who would stick around. His name was Ken Kurson. Most recently, he’d been working in New Jersey for a political consulting firm that handled Republican candidates.

In 2013, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman sued Trump, alleging that he had run an “unlicensed educational institute,” once known as Trump University, which defrauded 5,000 customers out of $40 million with his “hard-sell tactics.” In an advertisement cited in the case, Trump said, “In just 90 minutes, my handpicked instructors will share my techniques, which took my entire career to develop. Then copy exactly what I’ve done and get rich.”

The Observer published an almost 8,000-word unflattering profile of Schneiderman in February 2014, arguing that he was trying to use his office as a springboard from which to run for governor. That wasn’t a shock; Schneiderman’s immediate predecessors, Eliot Spitzer and Cuomo, had done the same. However, the Observer exhausted quite a few of those words on what it described as the “weak case” against Trump, and it gave him ample space to defend himself and attack Schneiderman. Employees of the paper at the time say they were stunned when the story materialized on the paper’s website. It was the first they’d heard of such a project. After some of them read it, they headed out for drinks, and not the celebratory kind. “It was more like, ‘Holy s---, let’s get some Scotch!’ ” recalls Matthew Kassel, a former Observer staff writer. “People seemed pretty disturbed about it.”

Kurson insists that Kushner had nothing to do with the story, but the New York Times and BuzzFeed reported that Kurson had originally assigned it to a would-be writer who worked in a New Jersey ice cream parlor and later begged off because he thought Kurson wanted a hatchet job. After that, Kurson assigned it to an Arizona-based writer who’d written extensively about poker. “He’s a friend of mine from 15 years ago, a writer I trust, I’ve hired a million times,” Kurson says. “I didn’t just, like, bring in some hit man.”

Kushner stands by the Schneiderman profile, saying that nobody has challenged the story. A Schneiderman spokesman declined to comment. However, in 2014, the attorney general’s office said there were so many things wrong with the story that it wasn’t worth the effort. Meanwhile, Schneiderman and Trump continue to enthusiastically fight it out in court with both sides trying to spin decisions at both the superior court and appellate level as knockout blows.

With Observer editor Kurson in 2015.
Photographer: J Grassi/PMC

After Trump declared his candidacy in 2015, Kushner became a campaign rally regular. In January he joined Ivanka at one in Council Bluffs, Iowa. Trump assailed the media and the Obama administration’s nuclear deal with Iran. Then he invited his family up. Trump’s wife, Melania, spoke first. A former model from Slovenia, she slouched in her cream-colored coat as if she was at a fashion shoot and addressed the crowd in heavily accented English. She was followed by Ivanka, who wore a dark, silver-buttoned jacket, and Kushner, clad in a blue suit. Trump pointed out that his daughter was 8 ½ months pregnant. “She’s very tough, by the way, I have to tell you,” Trump said. “Right, Jared?”

Kushner wagged his head and gave her father a you-don’t-have-to-tell-me look.

“Politically, wouldn’t it be great if she had her baby in Iowa?” Trump asked the crowd, which roared in approval.

Ivanka laughed and patted her father’s shoulder. Kushner gave Trump a good-natured shrug as if to indicate his father-in-law had a point.

“That would guarantee victory!” Trump continued.

It’s not clear if Kushner supports Trump’s more outlandish ideas, such as banning Muslim immigrants from entering the country to prevent terrorism. He’s said virtually nothing publicly about his father-in-law’s presidential aspirations other than telling the New York Times last year that he thinks Trump would “be great.” But Kushner has been laboring behind the scenes to get him elected. He helped set up a meeting in January with Trump and about a dozen Republican leaders to try to build a relationship with the party’s establishment. Earlier this year, Kushner also attempted to smooth things over between the Trump campaign and his friend Rupert Murdoch, who was unhappy with the candidate’s attacks on Fox News.

In March, people in the Observer newsroom began to suspect that Kurson was also working for the Trump campaign after a video appeared online of their editor-in-chief in the background at the March 8 event in Florida where Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski allegedly manhandled reporter Michelle Fields. (Lewandowski has been cleared of the charge.) Kurson says he went to the rally with Kushner as a journalist: “I cover politics.”

Then in early April, New York magazine reported that Kushner and Kurson had helped Trump prepare the speech he delivered to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, in which he strongly defended the Jewish state and condemned Obama. “Jared asked me if I’d eyeball this draft, and I did,” Kurson says. After the article appeared, Observer staff members crowded into his office and asked him to explain himself. Kurson says he agreed not to dispense any more political advice. “It didn’t just apply to Trump,” he says. “If some other campaign wants input here, we’ll have to pass.”

Kushner didn’t seem bothered by the Observer controversy. In late March he and his wife brought their third child home from the hospital to their penthouse on Park Avenue. Theodore James Kushner was born days before in New York. It may have been too late to help Trump in Iowa, but the New York primary was coming up on April 19. On the eve of the contest, the Observer endorsed Trump, who won handily. He and his family were one step closer to the White House.

—With David M. Levitt
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016 ... rump-card/

https://twitter.com/WendySiegelman/stat ... 5838763008
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby RocketMan » Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:05 am



Ben Norton makes a very good point at the end of this discussion which is excellent enough to transcribe here:

This is what we've been saying, not just since Trump was elected, but since before Trump was elected. And it was always that the best way to attack Trump is from the left, not the right. We saw this during the presidential campaign where Bernie Sanders was consistently pulling double digits above Trump whereas Clinton and Trump were very close in the polls. And we kept saying it when Trump was elected, that the best way to attack him is from the left. But Russiagate was always a tactic to attack Trump from the right. It was a way to move Trump further to the right to prevent any kind of anti-interventionist policies, to make sure that he sticks with the foreign policy consensus. And it was also a way for neoliberal Democrats and their corporate Wall Street donors to prevent any movement to the left. And once again these corporate neoliberal Democrats have given a gift to Trump as they did when they destroyed Bernie Sanders' campaign and they're going to continue doing it again and again and again, which is why need to continue to stress that the best way to attack Trump, the only effective way to attack Trump is not from the right with this stupid xenophobia against whatever boogieman like Russia or China or Venezuela [but from the left].
-I don't like hoodlums.
-That's just a word, Marlowe. We have that kind of world. Two wars gave it to us and we are going to keep it.
User avatar
RocketMan
 
Posts: 2813
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:02 am
Location: By the rivers dark
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Mar 31, 2019 10:08 am

frustrate, obfuscate, demean, deflect

poison debate


Affine Berenstain transformation

The same week Putin makes it illegal for critics to "insult" him online Devin Nunes attempts to silence critics with the threat of frivolous but costly lawsuits. That's some interesting timing Devin Nunes.

Vladimir Putin signed a restrictive new law that makes it illegal to insult government officials — including him
https://www.businessinsider.com/vladimi ... ent-2019-3


Please note, the goal of a majority on the right isn't for sincere debate. It's to frustrate, obfuscate, demean, deflect. Their aim is to poison debate. So never expect a reasonable response. Rather argue for the audience so that they don't come away misinformed or disengaged.
https://mobile.twitter.com/anonasnone




Jay McKenzie

Jay McKenzie Retweeted Ben Collins
Reminder: the group of far right trolls who admitted to starting QAnon—the ones who run disinfo campaigns with WikiLeaks, RT & Sputnik—are currently gaslighting you about Trump's connections to Russia ... with the help of WikiLeaks, RT & Sputnik.

This is information terrorism.

I've been covering Qanon for a year, and the amount of pro-Q people in this video from yesterday's Trump rally line in Grand Rapids is absolutely shocking. This is just a portion of it.

Ben Collins

So many things in American society had to fail for this many people to believe one party is run by an actual Satanic cabal that eats children, and Trump, Jesus and Bob Mueller are secretly ending it.


Social media companies helped it grow, but this is widespread systemic failure.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=O3u9TJao1Co



@gaslitnation is amazing & must-listen for anyone who is antifascist, anti-corruption, anti-trump

https://www.patreon.com/posts/25676321


Attorney General William Barr
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=41651


Don't depend the Bush's coverup artist FBI Mueller 9/11 & USAG Barr IranContra

Congress Public Hearings:

#Impeach #TrumpPence RICO, Treason, Extortion

https://twitter.com/YogiSunlight/status ... 2676117505



Trump cuts off aid to Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador
viewtopic.php?f=52&t=41653


Fintan O’Toole: Trial runs for fascism are in full flow
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=41246


from State run TV....fucking idiots
Image

Folks, the whole collusion story over three and a half years. All in 140 seconds. We watched it unfold. Remind yourself what we all saw.
https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1084549596842524672





"Mogilevich have good relationship with Putin since 1994 or 1993... Semion Mogilevich is best person who is wanted FBI. And Semion Mogilevich has contact with Al Qaeda. Semion Mogilevich sell weapons, sell weapons to Al Qaeda."
~A Litvinenko


Litvinenko Ties Putin to Crime Lord From Beyond Grave
Print article Published: Tuesday, 27 January 2015 10:08
Share
A recording released by the British newspaper the Telegraph purports to reveal close ties between Russian president Vladimir Putin and crime boss Semion Mogilevich, who is on the FBI’s Most Wanted list.
mogilevich 2001
Semion Mogilevich in 2001
The ten-year-old recording, from November 2005, was obtained in a Telegraph investigation, and appears to feature the now-deceased former KGB officer Alexander Litvinenko alleging links between the Russian president and Mogilevich, a Ukrainian national, described by investigative organization Global Witness as “the most dangerous mobster in the world”.
On the tape, Litvinenko claims that Mogilevich has had a “good relationship” with Putin since 1993 or 1994. He also alleges that Mogilevich sold weapons to al-Qaeda. This is not the first time that links have been drawn between Putin and Mogilevich; a leaked conversation between former Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma and a top security official in February 2000 also suggested that the two were on good terms.
Mogilevich, 68, is wanted by the FBI for his alleged participation in a fraud case involving a public company headquartered in Pennsylvania, US, that cost investors more than US$ 150 million in the mid-1990s. He was indicted in Pennsylvania in April 2003 on charges of fraud, money laundering, and falsification of records, among other economic crimes. The FBI suspects his involvement in weapons trafficking, murder, extortion, drug trafficking and prostitution, outside of the US.
Other claims surfacing from the Litvinenko recording include an allegation that a Federal Security Service (FSB) official is linked to al-Qaeda and the training of Chechen rebels. Under legal advice the Telegraph redacted the name of the official from the published tape, but suggest that it will come out during the inquiry into Litvinenko’s death, which begins Jan. 27.
Litvinenko, a former KGB and FSB officer, fled to Britain in 2000 and died on Nov. 23, 2006 from radiation poisoning caused by a lethal dose of polonium-210. British prosecutors charged Andrey Lugovoy, 48, with Litvinenko's murder on May 22, 2007, and requested his extradition from Moscow. The Russian government refused to comply. Lugovoy, a former KGB officer, is currently a member of the Russian Parliament. Litvinenko allegedly met with Lugovoy in London shortly before his death.
Theresa May, the United Kingdom Secretary of State for the Home Department, announced on July 22, 2014, that the British government would launch an inquiry into Litvinenko’s death. The public hearings are scheduled to begin Jan. 27, 2015.
https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/3608-lit ... yond-grave
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:50 pm

Jason Leopold


Continuing my thread on our reporting over past 2 yrs that largely revolved around following the money. I want to note it wasn't just what Mueller was doing but we dug deep to find out what congressional committees were doing as part of their probes 1/

Much of what @a_cormier_ & I reported on the Russia probe revolved around following the money

We reported a day before Manafort was indicted in 2017 that FBI…

These 13 Wire Transfers Are A Focus Of The FBI Probe Into Paul Manafort
BuzzFeed News has learned of a series of wire transfers, made by companies linked to Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, that federal officials deemed suspicious. Many of the wires went from offshore companies controlled by Manafort to American businesses.

Jason Leopold
Posted on October 29, 2017, at 8:56 a.m. ET

The FBI's investigation of Donald Trump's former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, includes a keen focus on a series of suspicious wire transfers in which offshore companies linked to Manafort moved more than $3 million all over the globe between 2012 and 2013.

Much of the money came into the United States.

These transactions — which have not been previously reported — drew the attention of federal law enforcement officials as far back as 2012, when they began to examine wire transfers to determine if Manafort hid money from tax authorities or helped the Ukrainian regime close to Russian President Vladimir Putin launder some of the millions it plundered through corrupt dealings.

The new revelations come as special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation is tightening, with reports that an indictment may already have been issued. It is not known if Manafort has been charged, or if he ever will be. Manafort has been the subject of multiple law enforcement and congressional inquiries. A spokesperson for Manafort would not comment for this story about the investigation or any of the specific transactions, but Manafort has previously denied wrongdoing.

Manafort took charge of Trump’s campaign in May 2016 and was forced to resign just three months later, amid intense media scrutiny of his ties to the notoriously corrupt former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych, who was supported by the Kremlin. A political operative for decades, the 68-year-old Manafort has worked for Republicans such as presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush, as well as for foreign leaders such as former Philippines president Ferdinand Marcos.

He has emerged as a central figure in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, in part because of Manafort’s many ties to prominent Russians and his work with Yanukovych. Manafort is reportedly also being investigated for money laundering by federal prosecutors in New York City, but there have been no formal charges from that probe. The FBI searched his home during a predawn raid this summer, reportedly as part of Mueller’s probe. Manafort has consistently maintained his innocence.

Now, BuzzFeed News has learned that investigators have been scrutinizing at least 13 wire transfers between 2012 and 2013. The transfers were first flagged by US financial institutions, which are required by law to tell an office within the Treasury Department about any transactions they deem suspicious. Such “suspicious activity reports” do not prove wrongdoing. Federal law requires financial institutions to file reports on cash transactions that exceed $10,000 in a single day, even if those transactions seem otherwise legitimate. Banks are also required to file the reports whenever they suspect money laundering or other financial crimes.

Bank officers flagged unusual behavior among five offshore companies that authorities say are associated with Manafort: Global Endeavour Inc., Lucicle Consultants Ltd., and three others that appear to have no current contact information.

Law enforcement sources say the companies sent funds in round-dollar amounts without explanation of what the money was to be used for. The countries where these transactions originated — notably Cyprus and the Caribbean nation of St. Vincent and the Grenadines — are notorious for money laundering. Federal law enforcement officials said they saw evidence of “layering,” the process by which the origin of money is obscured behind many layers of companies. Much of the money ended up in the US, sent to home improvement contractors, a hedge fund, and even a car dealership.

Manafort’s suspicious financial transactions were first flagged by Treasury officials as far back as 2012 and forwarded to the FBI’s International Corruption Unit and the Department of Justice for further investigation in 2013 and 2014, a former Treasury official who worked on the matter told BuzzFeed News. The extent of Manafort’s suspicious transactions was so vast, said this former official, that law enforcement agents drafted a series of “intelligence reports” about Manafort’s financial dealings. Two law enforcement officials who worked on the case say that they found red flags in his banking records going back as far as 2004, and that the transactions in question totaled many millions of dollars.

It’s unknown what became of the FBI’s Manafort investigation; no charges were filed. An FBI spokesperson did not return emails and phone calls this week. One FBI agent who was actively involved in the investigation told BuzzFeed News it “lay dormant” for a while but was never closed.

Then, last January, the Senate Intelligence Committee launched its probe into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. In April, the committee sent the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, a letter requesting a wide range of financial records “related to Russian attempts to influence the 2016 US election or individuals associated with it.” Specifically, the committee asked FinCEN officials for “any actions” they took to support law enforcement or intelligence inquiries; any documents they sent to the FBI; and any requests for information they sent to banks. Details of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s request have not been previously disclosed.

While searching for records to turn over to lawmakers, the former Treasury official said, FinCEN found its previous reports on Manafort and sent them again to the FBI International Corruption Unit, whose agents were working with Mueller on his investigation. According to a congressional source, this May FinCEN sent the Senate committee financial records covering a six-year time frame on Manafort — January 2011 through May 2017. In June, FinCEN also sent financial records on Manafort to the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism, which is conducting a separate probe on Russian interference. That committee also sought a wide range of suspicious activity records on Manafort and his wife, Kathleen, among other individuals and businesses. Manafort’s spokesperson declined to comment on what FinCEN sent the congressional committees about the Manaforts.

BuzzFeed News has learned specific details about 13 of the wire transfers, all of which took place between 2012 and 2013. At least four of the transfers originated with Manafort’s company Global Endeavour, a political consulting firm based in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Global Endeavour was hired by Yanukovych to consult and lobby on his behalf. Ousted after the 2014 Euromaidan Revolution, Yanukovych lives in exile in Russia and is accused of treason by Ukrainian authorities; the country’s general prosecutor said Yanukovych’s embezzlement of state funds was so egregious it resembled a “mafia structure.”

Wire transfers flagged as suspicious show that during the waning months of Yanukovych’s presidency, Global Endeavour sent more than $750,000 out of Ukraine. None of these transactions have been previously reported.

In November and December of 2013, for example, the company transferred almost $53,000 to Konstantin Kilimnik, a Kiev-based political operator. It’s not known what the money was for. A federal law enforcement official described Kilimnik as a linguist trained by the Russian army and about whom the US has gathered intelligence. He reportedly attended a military school some experts believe to be a training ground for Russian spies.

Kilimnik worked with Manafort for more than a decade, and the Washington Post reported that Manafort emailed his old partner in 2016 to offer “private briefings” to a Russian billionaire close to President Vladimir Putin.

Kilimnik declined to comment when reached Saturday by BuzzFeed News.

In September 2013, Global Endeavour transferred $500,000 that would ultimately end up back in Manafort’s control. First it went to a hedge fund in Florida, Aegis Holdings LLC, that is controlled by Marc Baldinger, a broker who in 2014 was suspended for 18 months for engaging in deals his financial institution didn’t know about. Baldinger’s brother, Bruce, is a real estate attorney who has worked with Manafort for about a decade.

The day after Aegis Holdings received the $500,000, it transferred the same amount to a securities clearinghouse, which ultimately sent the funds to Lilred LLC in Morristown, New Jersey. Lilred is run out of a brick office park. Business records show its manager is Manafort; its registered agent is Bruce Baldinger. Marc Baldinger told bank officials the money was a regular investment contribution from Manafort.

Neither Baldinger brother returned multiple phone calls or emails for comment.

Also in late 2013, Global Endeavour sent out $200,000 to a remodeling company in Long Island, SP&C Home Improvement. Stephen Jacobsen, a representative, told bank officials the funds were an advance on a remodeling project.

That project, at 377 Union Street in Brooklyn, has been the subject of media reports. The brownstone in the Carroll Gardens neighborhood first belonged to a company controlled by Manafort and his son-in-law, Jeffrey Yohai. The Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism is investigating Yohai and requested from FinCEN in June any suspicious financial transactions in which he is named, according to a copy of a letter reviewed by BuzzFeed News. He declined to comment.

SP&C, the remodeling company that received a wire transfer from Global Endeavour, was the first company to submit a permit to turn the three-story building into a single-family home. SP&C’s representative, Colleen Jacobsen, estimated the work would cost about $300,000, according to city records.

Stephen and Colleen Jacobsen did not return multiple phone calls, but he told bank officials that the money was a payment for a large construction project.

Four years later, the project is still unfinished. Last week workers from a concrete company — not SP&C — were seen at the home. An architect newly hired to work on the building said it was about 65% finished.

In addition to transactions involving Global Endeavour, there were wire transfers, never before reported, flagged as suspicious involving other companies. There were three by the Cyprus-based Lucicle Consultants — which has “strong ties” to Manafort, according to federal law enforcement sources — in March and April 2012. The company transferred a total of about $2.5 million, some of it directly to accounts controlled by Manafort. No contact information for Lucicle or any of its officers could be found.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... cious-wire



What we discovered, as laid bare in this report by @LoopEmma and me, is that committees like Senate Intel wanted to follow the money as it related to Russia/Russia interference but they were apparently being stonewalled by the Treasury Department 2/


Senate Intel Wants To Follow The Money In The Russia Probe. But Treasury Isn't Making That Easy.
Last year, staff inside Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network questioned whether the department was deliberately trying to stymie the Senate’s investigation.

Emma Loop
Posted on August 14, 2018, at 4:14 p.m. ET

Senate Intelligence Committee vice chair Sen. Mark Warner and chair Sen. Richard Burr.
In its investigation of Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, the Senate Intelligence Committee has spent more than a year trying to follow the money. But its efforts, unparalleled on Capitol Hill, have been hampered by a surprising force: the US Treasury Department, which has delayed turning over crucial financial records and refused to provide an expert to help make sense of the complex money trail. Even some of the department’s own personnel have questioned whether Treasury is intentionally hamstringing the investigation.

Little is known about what, exactly, goes on behind the locked doors that lead into the committee’s offices. But now, interviews and emails obtained by BuzzFeed News lay bare the numerous hurdles the secretive committee has faced in its mission to obtain and decipher troves of banking records that could shed more light on the Russian scheme — and whether the current president had anything to do with it.

Treasury has at times been reluctant to cooperate with the committee’s requests for sensitive financial documents that are significant to the Russia probe, at one point going at least four months without responding to one of the committee’s requests.

Last year, Treasury rejected the committee’s request for help from one of its experts, even as Treasury officials have speculated — behind closed doors — that the Senate committee would not be able to follow the twisting financial trail laid out in the documents they had turned over, a path that often passes through offshore shell companies or untraceable cash transactions.

In emails reviewed by BuzzFeed News, personnel within Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, discussed in 2017 whether Treasury was trying to thwart the committee’s investigation. Additionally, some FinCEN personnel questioned whether they had the proper legal authority to share confidential information about US persons with committee staffers.

Despite committee chair Richard Burr’s insistence to BuzzFeed News that the panel has received “every financial document” it has requested from Treasury, sources inside FinCEN told BuzzFeed News that they were initially instructed not to hand over financial documents on certain individuals. The directive, these sources said, came from senior Treasury officials in the General Counsel’s Office. To this day, FinCEN sources insist not all of the records requested by the committee have been turned over.

A spokesperson for FinCEN declined to answer specific questions about its cooperation with the committee. “FinCEN is in regular contact with congressional committees to provide documents responsive to their requests,” the spokesperson said. “We don’t discuss the specifics of requests related to committee investigations.”

Within the windowless walls of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s secure office spaces, a small staff pores over stacks of financial documents, working to analyze the complex banking records of dozens of key figures in the Russia investigation.

For more than a year and a half, the seven core staff members assigned to the committee’s Russia investigation have often worked late into the night and in some cases through the weekend, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Like special counsel Robert Mueller, who is running a criminal investigation into Russian election interference and potential collusion between the Kremlin and Trump campaign, the committee has in its possession thousands of pages of financial documents from the Treasury Department, sources say.

The documents are largely suspicious activity reports, often called SARs, handed over by FinCEN, which receives thousands of records every day from banks and other financial institutions. By law, bankers must alert Treasury to transactions that bear hallmarks of money laundering or other financial misconduct. Such suspicious activity reports can support investigations and intelligence gathering, but by themselves are not evidence of a crime; many suspicious activity reports are filed on transactions that are perfectly legal.

It is the focus on following the money that sets the Senate investigators apart from their counterparts on the House Intelligence Committee, which was also charged with investigating Russian meddling. While the reports include some of the president’s current and former associates, even the Senate committee did not ask the Treasury for financial records on Trump himself or his family members.

The financial documents “play a part of a very important roadmap just like every other piece of evidence,” Burr, a Republican from North Carolina, told BuzzFeed News. “They tell us whether you turn right or you turn left.”

But unlike Mueller’s team — which is stacked with attorneys from various fields and whose probe has already led to 35 indictments and guilty pleas — the Senate committee is short on financial experts, limiting its ability to follow the money. The seven core staff members are assisted by two staff directors and two lawyers, the source said, and their expertise lies mostly in national security rather than finance.

Seemingly aware of its own limitations, the committee made its doomed request for Treasury to send an expert to help analyze the documents. That request was shot down last year, FinCEN sources told BuzzFeed News, because Treasury did not want to be seen as playing a part in the committee’s investigation.

A couple weeks ago, the committee renewed its request for an expert. This time, FinCEN sources say it will likely be approved by Ken Blanco, FinCEN’s new director.

FinCEN’s slow response to document requests has already prompted backlash from senators. In April 2017, committee staffers formally requested a broad set of records, including “[a]ll documents that Treasury has sent to the FBI related to Russian attempts to influence either the 2016 U.S. election or individuals associated with it,” according to a letter obtained by BuzzFeed News. The committee sent another letter in August 2017 requesting suspicious activity reports on three dozen individuals and businesses that were subjects of the panel’s investigation Then, in December, the committee followed up with still another letter requesting documents on more individuals or entities — and expressing concern that FinCEN hadn’t responded to its earlier requests. The letters’ existence was first reported by BuzzFeed News in January.

“We appreciate Treasury’s ongoing commitment to working with the Committee’s bipartisan inquiry into Russia interference in the 2016 U.S. elections,” the letter read. “We are concerned however, that we have not received a response to our August 11, 2017, request for documents.”

After months of waiting on some documents, one committee staffer, in an email to FinCEN’s congressional liaison, agreed to narrow the committee’s request for SARs in an effort to obtain the records in a more timely fashion. In another email, a FinCEN employee wrote that a committee staffer had said the reports would be used to help draft a narrative in the committee’s final report about how money may have supported Russia’s interference in the election. Treasury officials then agreed to turn over a limited number of suspicious activity reports.

So far, the committee has asked for financial documents on at least 45 people or entities, according to the committee letters obtained by BuzzFeed News. Those people and entities include some of those involved in the Trump–Moscow negotiations, the now-infamous June 2016 Trump Tower meeting between Trump campaign officials and a Russian lawyer, and former Russian ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak. The committee has also obtained suspicious activity reports on alleged Russian spy Maria Butina; her partner, longtime GOP operative Paul Erickson; and Russian banker Alexander Torshin, BuzzFeed News has reported.

But at least one committee member feels Senate investigators have not done enough.

Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden has expressed frustration with how the committee has pursued — or not pursued — money matters. “I feel the committee has been AWOL on this,” Wyden, a Democrat on the committee, told BuzzFeed News.

“What I have said — and I’ve had this conversation with the chairman — it’s just a complete difference of opinion,” Wyden said. “I feel that counterintelligence 101 is following the money, because if you’re going to compromise somebody, the single best way to do it is money. So I said from day one, the very first hearing, that that was going to be the focus — my focus — and the chairman, he’s been candid; he doesn’t believe that’s our prime responsibility, and I think it’s a very substantial mistake.”

Wyden, who has blocked Treasury nominees to force the department to turn over documents to both the Senate Intelligence and Finance committees, urged Burr and Intelligence Committee vice chair Mark Warner earlier this year to hold a public hearing on “the financial relationships between Donald Trump and his associates and Russia.” He’s also urged committee leadership to bring Trump’s longtime personal lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen — “the president’s go-to money person,” as Wyden puts it — back for a public hearing with senators, which the committee initially said it would do but has since dropped. Committee staff interviewed Cohen behind closed doors in October. The committee has instead recently opted to hold public hearings on election security, social media, and the Obama administration’s response to Russian meddling.

Wyden pointed to “other pieces to the puzzle” that he believes require additional scrutiny, such as Trump’s attempted business dealings in Moscow before the election, his sale of a Palm Beach property to a Russian oligarch in 2008, and the alleged role of the recently indicted Butina in the Russian influence campaign. “You have to pull together the pieces.”

But Burr has dismissed Wyden’s complaints. “Whether every member has chosen to come and actually spend the time to go through [the documents] is a whole other question. I’m tired of hearing the fact that we don’t follow [the money],” Burr said. “We are investigating every avenue that gives us clarity into what the mission is of this investigation, but that’s not to fall outside the mission of the investigation. I could care less how they financed a deal 20 years ago somewhere because I don’t think it’s relevant.”

To be sure, other committees, such as the Senate Judiciary Committee, also asked FinCEN for financial documents, but their investigative efforts have been hampered by partisan squabbling, leaving the Senate Intelligence Committee as the sole remaining panel with the ability to produce a credible, bipartisan report about how the Russians meddled in American democracy — and whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin.

Whether the money trail leads to evidence of cash-backed Russian influence is a question that remains unanswered, Burr says. “You’re asking me to make a judgment call on an end result that we’re not at.” The committee hopes to complete its final report before the end of the year.

The committee’s work on follow-the-money issues isn’t over, according to Warner. “I’ve got unanswered questions in that arena, but we’re not finished,” he said. Asked how much the final report will rely on the financial documents, Warner said, “I think that will depend upon what all those documents show, because I think we’ve not fully reviewed all of them.”
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/em ... ssia-probe


Again, using docs, we obtained non public letters committees such as Senate Intel sent to Treasury requesting financial records on dozens of individuals and entities. But Treasury was not turning over these records as evidenced by this Grassley release which cites our work 3/

Image
And here is an example of how Senate Intel was stonewalled on its request for financial records it sent to Treasury as part of its Russia probe.

NOTE: The committee said these records should be provided "without pre-review by" Mueller. This letter was not previously released 4/

Image
Image

Several different Senate committees asked Treasury for records on dozens of individuals and entities over the past 2 yrs as part of their investigation into Russia/Russia interference. Whistleblowers stepped forward to tell the committees these records were being withheld 5/


It goes without saying that it will be interesting to see whether the Senate Intel report, whenever its released, and the Mueller report touches at all on their efforts to follow the money and what they found and what it means, if anything, since both devoted resources to it 6/

While we wait, you can read our #MoneyTrail deep dives here that provide insight into why these individuals and entities were of interest to Mueller and congressional investigators 7/7


FOLLOW THE MONEY

The House Intelligence Committee Wants To Question The Trump Organization’s Chief Financial Officer Following Cohen’s Testimony
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/em ... eisselberg

“In His Way, He Was Telling Me To Lie”: Michael Cohen Testified On Trump Moscow Cover-Up
In a public appearance before the House Oversight Committee, Cohen apologized for lying to Congress, and noted that, at that time, he was trying to protect the president.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/em ... -testimony

These Secret Files Show How The Trump Moscow Talks Unfolded While Trump Heaped Praise On Putin
Ahead of Michael Cohen’s testimony, read the original paper trail behind the campaign to build Europe’s tallest tower in Moscow — and how it played out alongside Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/az ... ater-putin

A Lobbyist At The Trump Tower Meeting Received Half A Million Dollars In Suspicious Payments
A bank flagged transactions, including large cash deposits, made before and after Rinat Akhmetshin attended the 2016 Trump Tower meeting.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/em ... spicious-p

The President Said No Site Was Picked For Trump Moscow — But Documents Show His Fixers Were Scoping A Prime Location
Trump told the New York Times the Moscow development was “not important” and he was “not even sure they had a site.” But documents reveal early plans to build the luxury skyscraper on an industrial complex near the Moscow River.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/em ... oscow-site

A House Democrat Is Targeting Steven Mnuchin’s Business Dealings In The Russian Sanctions Fight
Rep. Jackie Speier is seeking answers about Mnuchin’s reported business dealings with a Ukrainian-born billionaire with ties to Oleg Deripaska.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/em ... kie-speier

Trump’s Lawyer Said There Were “No Plans” For Trump Tower Moscow. Here They Are.
Rudy Giuliani claims the Moscow tower was barely more than a notion. “There were no drafts. Nothing in the file.” Documents obtained by BuzzFeed News tell a different story.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/az ... scow-plans

Lawmakers Vow To Investigate Evidence That Trump Told His Lawyer To Lie To Congress
“Such an instruction would amount to obstruction of justice,” one Democrat said.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/em ... -cohen-lie

President Trump Directed His Attorney Michael Cohen To Lie To Congress About The Moscow Tower Project
Trump received 10 personal updates from Michael Cohen and encouraged a planned meeting with Vladimir Putin. Update: The office of the special counsel is disputing BuzzFeed News’ report.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... estigation

The House Intelligence Committee Will Investigate Trump’s Company’s Plan To Give Putin A $50 Million Penthouse
Democratic members said they will look into the plan, reported by BuzzFeed News, when they assume control of the committee in January.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/em ... gate-trump

The Trump Organization Planned To Give Vladimir Putin The $50 Million Penthouse In Trump Tower Moscow
During the presidential campaign, Michael Cohen discussed the matter with a representative of Putin’s press secretary, according to two US sources.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/an ... -putin-the

Here’s How A Major Western Bank Enabled A Suspected Russian Money Launderer
Documents show TD Bank loaned $3 million to a company connected to Russian tax fraud and later linked to the special counsel’s investigation.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/az ... on-td-bank

The Planners Of The Trump Tower Meeting Moved Millions, And Mueller Is Now Investigating
Documents show suspicious transfers began six days before the controversial meeting.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/an ... er-meeting

A Series Of Suspicious Money Transfers Followed The Trump Tower Meeting
Investigators are focused on two bursts of banking activity — one shortly after the June 2016 meeting, the other immediately after the presidential election.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/an ... s-agalarov

Here's Why The FBI And Mueller Are Investigating "Suspicious" Transactions By Russian Diplomats
The former Russian ambassador received a salary payment twice as large as past years, and bankers blocked a $150,000 withdrawal.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... sy-mueller

Senate Intel Wants To Follow The Money In The Russia Probe. But Treasury Isn't Making That Easy.
Last year, staff inside Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network questioned whether the department was deliberately trying to stymie the Senate’s investigation.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/em ... ssia-probe

GOP Operative Made "Suspicious" Cash Withdrawals During Pursuit Of Clinton Emails
Peter W. Smith withdrew $4,900 in cash the day after he finalized a plan to work with “dark web” hackers.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... lynn-money

Here Is The Money Trail From The Russian "Agent" And Her Republican Partner
Federal investigators say some of the money went to Maria Butina’s campaign to help Russia infiltrate American politics.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... ney-russia

Here's How Ukraine's Ousted Government Got Away With $40 Billion
US investigators delivered troves of documents about Viktor Yanukovych, Paul Manafort, and “The Family.” Why isn’t Ukraine taking action?
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ta ... ear-and-no

Ivanka Trump Was In Contact With A Russian Who Offered A Trump-Putin Meeting
Her contact, a Russian Olympic weightlifter, said a meeting between Trump and Putin could expedite a Trump tower in Moscow.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/an ... ohen-tower

Trump Moscow: The Definitive Story Of How Trump’s Team Worked The Russian Deal During The Campaign
On the day of the third Republican presidential debate, Trump personally signed the letter of intent.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/an ... r-campaign

A Former Russian Spy Worked On A Trump Moscow Deal During The Presidential Campaign
While Trump was running for president, his business team was trying to develop a Trump tower in Moscow — with the help of a former Russian military intelligence officer. But in a twist, that former officer also provided intelligence to the US
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... elix-sater

Senate Investigators Have Steered Clear of Trump Family Members’ Finances in Russia Investigation
“If you want to compromise people, you do it with dough.”
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/em ... ump-family

Manafort Under Scrutiny For $40 Million In “Suspicious” Transactions
As the special counsel investigated President Donald Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort, authorities obtained details on “suspicious” banking activity that was first unearthed in 2014 and 2015. Those records were part of an FBI operation to track international kleptocracy that ultimately failed, but which Robert Mueller’s team resurrected
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... suspicious

Investigators Are Scrutinizing Newly Uncovered Payments By The Russian Embassy
US authorities are poring over hundreds of newly uncovered payments from Russian diplomatic accounts. Among them are transactions by former ambassador Sergey Kislyak 10 days after the 2016 presidential election and a blocked $150,000 cash withdrawal five days after the inauguration.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... f-election

Secret Finding: 60 Russian Payments "To Finance Election Campaign Of 2016"
The FBI is scrutinizing more than 60 money transfers sent by the Russian Foreign Ministry to its embassies across the globe, most of them bearing a note that said the money was to be used “to finance election campaign of 2016.” A spokesperson for the Russian government said the money paid for overseas voting in its parliamentary election.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... e-election

These 13 Wire Transfers Are A Focus Of The FBI Probe Into Paul Manafort
BuzzFeed News has learned of a series of wire transfers, made by companies linked to Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, that federal officials deemed suspicious. Many of the wires went from offshore companies controlled by Manafort to American businesses.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... cious-wire

Escalating Its Russia Probe, Senate Committee Follows The Money
The chairman of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee requested suspicious activity reports on a wide array of people and businesses, indicating he was intensifying its investigation.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ja ... o-finances




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OXKKtrP__I



When it comes to election meddling, Russian interference is just the tip of the iceberg.


WITH MUELLER’S REPORT FINALLY IN HAND, LET’S GET TO THE REAL ISSUE
William Barr, Rod Rosenstein, Mueller Report
Photo credit: DonkeyHotey / WhoWhatWhy (CC BY-SA 2.0) See complete attribution below.
Share Share Tweet
It is likely tons of ink and thousands of hours of airtime have been consumed by members of the media speculating on the contents and the timing of the Mueller report. That report has been submitted. Special counsel Robert Mueller’s job is over, and he can start golfing again.

On March 24, Attorney General William Barr gave the public the bare bones of Mueller’s conclusions.Mueller decided there was no evidence that Trump or members of his campaign conspired with Russia to influence the 2016 election, but came to no decision about whether Trump was guilty of obstruction of justice.

Members of Congress — particularly Democrats — are clamoring for the entire report, and underlying documents, to be publicly disclosed. The struggle to learn more will likely consume even more ink and air time.

Granted, transparency is important. Mueller worked for nearly two years; indicted more than 30 people, including six former Trump aides and 26 Russians; and examined many facets of Russian interference. Earlier this month, the House voted 420 to 0 for a resolution urging Barr to release the full report, withholding only information that was barred by law from being disclosed.

But it’s crucial that we don’t lose sight of what’s really important, and to keep in mind the limitations of Mueller’s charge. Last July, we published an op-ed by Klaus Marre that proved to be both prescient and wise. It still rings true.

The following was published on WhoWhatWhy on July 22, 2018.

Robert Mueller
Resistance dreams may never come true. Photo credit: DonkeyHotey / WhoWhatWhy (CC BY-SA 2.0) See complete attribution below.

Let’s Get the Facts Straight About Mueller and His Investigation
A lot has, rightfully, been made this week of President Donald Trump’s bizarre behavior when it comes to Russia and its apparent campaign to tilt the 2016 presidential race in his favor. While it wasn’t exactly surprising that the US president once again appeared to do his Russian counterpart’s bidding, the reason why this keeps happening continues to puzzle people.

Some believe that Trump’s frail ego can’t handle any notion that he did not beat Hillary Clinton fair and square. Others are raising the possibility of Russian President Vladimir Putin “having something” on Trump. The fact that people are even entertaining this theory is breathtaking in itself.

Whatever drives Trump’s actions, it is also the reason why he and his allies seek to undermine the investigation of special counsel Robert Mueller. They are doing this in a variety of ways, including arguing that the basis for the entire probe is illegitimate, that it is unconstitutional, and that Mueller’s team is biased. And that’s just over the past few weeks.

Foremost, however, is a claim Trump often makes on Twitter — or anywhere there is a microphone. The president’s first line of defense is that the investigation is a “witch hunt” because there was “no collusion” and no American has yet been indicted in connection with Russia’s meddling. And in any case, Trump and his allies claim, Mueller and his team have not yet alleged that Russia’s various activities affected the outcome of the election.

While there is a grain of truth in that defense, it is mostly bogus and terribly misleading. That is why it is useful to take a step back and look at the facts.

The main point of Mueller’s investigation is not to find out whether Russia and the Trump campaign coordinated their activities to defeat Clinton. That is only part of the probe. The primary focus is on how Russia interfered in the 2016 election. While Trump supporters may take issue with that assertion, it’s tough to argue the point since the order Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein signed to launch the Mueller probe is called “Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Russian Interference with the 2016 Presidential Election and Related Matters.”

So when Trump and his allies point out that mostly Russians have been indicted so far, they are conveniently leaving out the part where that is Mueller’s main job.

In announcing the indictments, Rosenstein has gone out of his way to note that no Americans are involved and that no determination is made with regard to the impact of Russia’s meddling.

“There is no allegation in this indictment that any American citizen committed a crime,” he said last week in announcing the indictment of 12 Russians who are accused of hacking Democratic websites. “There is no allegation that the conspiracy changed the vote count or affected any election result.”

There is a good chance that these statements are made entirely for Trump’s ears to ensure that he will leave Mueller alone. Predictably, the White House seized on Rosenstein’s remarks, with spokesperson Lindsay Walters stating that this is “consistent with what we have been saying all along.”

But just because no Americans have been indicted so far in connection with the actual meddling (a handful, including Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, and two former campaign aides have been charged with crimes not related to the election interference) does not mean that they won’t be.

Based on what we know already, one can certainly make the case that both Trump and his son Donald Jr. were attempting to coordinate something with the Russians. However, neither of those attempts (trying to get “dirt” on Clinton from the Russians in Don Jr.’s case and calling on Russian hackers to go after Clinton’s missing emails in the president’s case) will get them indicted. Other things might, however, so it would be foolish for Mueller to go there before wrapping up all other loose ends.

The second part of this line of defense — that the indictments do not allege the described actions affected the outcome of the election — is even more ridiculous because such a charge is impossible to prove. How many people could definitively say that their decision on who to vote for was determined by coverage of the DNC’s stolen emails or Russian-paid Facebook ads? Even if it were possible, it’s certainly not Mueller’s job to make that determination, which is why it’s such an effective strawman for Trump.

Unfortunately, the president’s disinformation campaign is working. Public opinion is slowly turning against Mueller and the investigation. That is a shame because he is doing important work which all Americans should be happy is being done — even Trump supporters and those who, correctly, point out that the US has also meddled (and worse) in foreign elections. Two wrongs don’t make a right and, hopefully, the Mueller probe will get people to realize that US elections are vulnerable.

And that’s where the real shortcoming of the probe is: Its scope is much too narrow. When it comes to election meddling, Russian interference is just the tip of the iceberg.

What the US really needs is a team of investigators with subpoena powers who will

put voting machine companies and their products (and their ties to the parties) under the microscope;
.
make sure the nominating processes in all states are fair;
.
examine the internal communications of lawmakers responsible for drawing gerrymandered maps and passing phony voter ID laws, whose real purpose is to suppress minority votes. Let’s see what really motivated them;
.
put the squeeze on government officials like Kris Kobach, who are perverting democracy by trying to tailor the electorate to their liking;
.
get the bank records and communications of the American billionaires who are funding all of this. Because even if the Russians did funnel a few million bucks to the NRA, that’s just chump change compared to what oligarchs like the Kochs or Mercers are shelling out every year to counter the will of the voters.
.
So if your outrage stops at the Russians, or if you think that the biggest threat to US democracy this fall is that Putin’s cybergoons will almost certainly try to put a thumb on the scale again, then you’re missing the big picture.

Because when it comes to rigging US democracy, it truly is “America first.”
https://whowhatwhy.org/2019/03/31/with- ... eal-issue/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby RocketMan » Mon Apr 01, 2019 5:37 am



Matt Taibbi wrote:I don't doubt that Russia tries to influence America's elections. I would imagine they are thinking of trying every conceivable angle to do so. But everything I've heard over the years leading up the this incident tells me that they're probably not even in the top 10 in terms of the countries that do this. It's both parties but probably more on the Republican side, I would say, actually, because a lot of it has to do with energy policy [...] And if they had done it that way it would have been more legitimate but they couldn't do it that way for reasons that are kind of obvious, because that would have imperiled everybody in the current political establishment.
-I don't like hoodlums.
-That's just a word, Marlowe. We have that kind of world. Two wars gave it to us and we are going to keep it.
User avatar
RocketMan
 
Posts: 2813
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:02 am
Location: By the rivers dark
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Apr 01, 2019 5:43 am

emptywheel


In which @mtaibbi, they guy telling everyone who'll listen that journalists fucked up in reporting the Russian story, admits he still doesn't know whether Russia did the hack.
Image
Vox notes that Taibbi is dodging, discussing the IRA indictment rather than the GRU one (note, IRA has admitted their own trolling), yet, he does it again, before suggesting that Yevgeniy fucking Prigozhin has no tie to the Russian govt.
Image
When asked to substantiate his claim that investigative journalism sucked too, Taibbi twice MISSTATES what this story says. Rather than treating the actual claim--that Trump's associates had contacts w/RU intelligence--he instead claims it said Trump did.
Image
Image

Let's look at what the record shows:

1) Flynn chumminess w/his former counterpart at GRU
2) Manafort's ongoing ties to Kilimnik, whom Gates acknowledges is former GRU
3) Cohen's work w/former GRU guy to get Trump Tower deal
4) The cut-outs cultivating Pap

Also, the guy who keeps dodging what the GRU indictment says (and who doesn't say a single thing abt what the Mueller investigation revealed) insists we have to look at the totality of the story.
Image
To substantiate his batshit insane claim that coverage of what he idiotically calls "Russiagate" is worse than WMD, he makes 3 claims:
1) The consequences of Iraq were immediate and the full consequences have all played out.
Image
emptywheel


@emptywheel
15m15 minutes ago
More
2) The *coverage* of Russian trolling (rather than the developing understanding of it) led to what he deems bad Internet censorship.

3) The US might adopt an aggressive posture in Ukraine and Syria ... I guess Taibbi has missed the last 7 years of history?

"Russiagate [sic] fundamentally changed the attitudes of people everywhere, and not just people in flyover country"

[I wonder if Taibbi has BEEN to flyover country recently...]
Image
"No dissent was allowed"
Image
And yet ... Taibbi did dissent.
I don't know whether this is intentional on Taibbi's part, but when Vox raises Manafort's sharing of polling data, Taibbi instead addresses Manafort pushing policy. The evidence, btw, is that he did, through 2017.
Image
Taibbi says that bc he wasn't able to substantiate what @JasonLeopold and @a_cormier_ did--that there was a deal--"no evidence ever surfaced that there was, in fact, a deal."

I guess Michael Cohen's sworn plea is not evidence either.
Image
Jason Leopold

Verified account

@JasonLeopold
Follow Follow @JasonLeopold
More
Replying to @emptywheel @a_cormier_
I guess he never saw any of this evidence?
These Secret Files Show How The Trump Moscow Talks Unfolded While Trump Heaped Praise On Putin
Image
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/az ... ater-putin
https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1 ... 8512876544







German Lopez

This is a nice attempt at a dunk, @mtaibbi, but the article you cite here is an updated reprint of an article @dylanmatt has published multiple times, going back to 2017.
A screenshot of a Rolling Stone article.
Image

Here are some previous versions of the article:

The Comey scandal won't end Trump's presidency unless Republicans agree it should
https://www.vox.com/2017/5/15/15644826/ ... presidency



Here's a subheadline from one of the previous articles — in July 2017, quite a bit before the Mueller report.
A screenshot of a subheadline: "Robert Mueller can't fell Donald Trump."

Image

Before I criticize people in my work, I like to use Google. I find it helps a lot!


It's not just Dylan, by the way. @seanilling also wrote this piece last year. It's literally headlined "Robert Mueller won’t save us."

Robert Mueller won’t save us
Only Congress can decide if the president is above the law.
https://www.vox.com/2018/6/18/17433612/ ... ule-of-law


Anyway, different Vox writers have different opinions on different topics. (You may be shocked to hear that not everyone at Vox agrees with my takes on alcohol policy.) Some were more bullish on Russia; others weren't. We ran pieces that argued different views. That's journalism.


InsideJoke

I read Taibbi's article it was garbage. He mischaracterized numerous articles. Like here where he openly lies that the
Daily beast asked a question put forth by Janine Pirro.
Image
Image

He literally fabricated a quote. I once thought he was good journalist from his work during the Iraq war. I don't understand how his work got so shoddy.


yeah this is the same exact thing Glenn does *constantly*. He will characterize a link or quote to make it seem really bad, then if you actually click it does not at all support his characterization of it.


Yeah and the article is mainly just a string of complaints about random articles. You know there's a lot to be smart things that could be said on how the media covers Trump and how they covered the Mueller investigation. Matt's article is just an disjointed bitch session.


I mean look at this BS, he actually weaves in complaints about
SNL with his rant against the press
Image
Crazy Cat Guy

Joke's on you, Matt! Turns out they regurgitated the same opinion piece every few months for the last several years! Take that, you "journalist," with your "new article"


When the entire argument in the new article is that the regurgitated opinion piece is brand new, then yeah..? The joke's on him.


https://twitter.com/germanrlopez/status ... 1258115072



Sessions coincidentally fired McCabe as McCabe was investigating him
By Tommy Christopher - March 21, 201810113

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe just so happened to be investigating Jeff Sessions for misleading Congress when Sessions fired him.

The air of corruption around the Trump administration's firing of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe just got a lot thicker with the bombshell revelation that McCabe was targeting the man who fired him.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired McCabe last week after months of pressure from Trump, who waged a relentless and very public smear campaign against the FBI leader.

According to ABC News, McCabe authorized a criminal investigation into Sessions almost a year ago after the attorney general told the first of several lies under oath to Congress.

Although one source claimed Sessions did not know about the investigation when he fired the deputy director, "an attorney representing Sessions declined to confirm that."

That's a significant unknown. Sessions was forced to recuse himself from the Russia probe because an investigation of the Trump campaign could have made him a tangential target. That he might have been the direct target of a perjury investigation would seem to constitute an even more severe conflict of interest.

Sessions' attorney also told ABC News that the perjury investigation had been closed recently. But last week, it was reported that at least three witnesses have told investigators that Sessions lied under oath about a Trump campaign meeting with now-convicted Mueller informant George Papadopoulos.

The firing was already badly tainted by Trump's improper calls for his dismissal. That firing occurred just days before McCabe was to retire with a full pension — exactly as Trump had demanded. Then Trump made it obvious that his intent was to discredit McCabe as a possible witness.

Now Trump's attorney general has to answer for his role in a firing that is looking dirtier by the minute.

https://shareblue.com/jeff-sessions-and ... stigation/



No, Russiagate Isn’t This Generation’s WMD
Barr gave Trump and media critics a fresh rallying cry. And the Steele dossier is back in vogue. Does anybody really know what’s going on here?

Timothy L. O'Brien
April 1, 2019, 5:30 AM CDT

Timothy L. O’Brien is the executive editor of Bloomberg Opinion. He has been an editor and writer for the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, HuffPost and Talk magazine. His books include “TrumpNation: The Art of Being The Donald.”
Read more opinion Follow @TimOBrien on Twitter
Attorney General William Barr has now released two letters that manage to both clarify and grossly muddle what we understand about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of President Donald Trump’s intersection with Russia.

Barr used the first, eight days ago, to “summarize the principal conclusions set out in the Special Counsel’s report”: Mueller’s findings didn’t produce enough evidence to show that Trump and his aides criminally conspired or coordinated with Russia in the country’s efforts to sabotage the 2016 presidential campaign. Mueller didn’t “fully exonerate” Trump nor did he decide whether the president obstructed justice, according to Barr, although Mueller apparently compiled ample evidence of obstruction (without, however, interviewing Trump). Mueller left Barr with a legal vacuum and Barr took it upon himself to fill the void by making his own call in a four-page note summarizing a 400-page document: Trump hadn’t obstructed.

Barr’s conclusion, and Mueller’s decision not to indict the president or any of his family members, touched off a week of debate about whether the media had been overzealous and prosecutorial in its coverage of the investigation. And when, exactly, would Congress and the public get to see a full, unfiltered version of the special counsel's report? There were questions too about whether Barr had overreached and sullied both the Justice Department’s reputation and the public’s understanding of the Mueller probe.

The attorney general was clearly aware of all of this and, with Democrats threatening to issue a subpoena for the full report, he waded in again on Friday evening. In a second letter, he promised to release the report by mid-April and was forced to re-characterize his first missive. The first one, he allowed, was never meant to be a summary or an “exhaustive recounting of” Mueller’s investigation. All he meant to offer, he wrote, was a “bottom line” conclusion.

I’ll avoid debating the merits of how Barr handled Mueller’s work here, but his take that Mueller, without fully exonerating Trump, absolved him of conspiring with Russia became a rallying cry for the president and for critics eager to zap the media (and cable news in particular) for breathless coverage of a probe memorialized in a report most people haven’t read.

Barr’s interpretation of the Mueller investigation – case closed! – was also taken to mean that accounts had to be settled (“a reckoning” was the phrase du jour in many of the first hot takes, as were many of the same examples of reporting lapses). Writers from the left, such as Matt Taibbi, and from the right, like Sean Davis, offered sweeping condemnations that pivoted credulously and erroneously off of the Steele dossier – the infamous and lurid report by a former British intelligence operative that outlined possible connections between Trump, his campaign team and Russia.

It all adds up to an ill-informed – and, for some, opportunistic – media roasting that the press has largely absorbed in silence, thrown off balance by Mueller’s final bow and Barr’s rapid-fire gamesmanship.

**************

I have some history with Trump. He unsuccessfully sued me for libel for a biography I wrote called “TrumpNation,” citing unflattering sections of the book that examined his business record and wealth. He lost the suit in 2011. While I’ve written regular opinion pieces about his latest iteration ever since he announced his presidency in 2015, I wasn’t a full-time chronicler of the Mueller investigation. I weighed in when Trump meddled with the probe (and, yes, firing former FBI director Jim Comey sure smacked of obstruction); when myriad, excellent reporters broke significant stories about it; when the GOP turned it into a political football; and when Mueller’s team filed revealing court documents (loaded with valuable information, including that Team Trump was populated with felons, Russian hackers burglarized Democrats’ computers, and propagandists, at the direction of Russian President Vladimir Putin, disseminated fake news to support Trump’s presidential bid).

I too was wary of the conspiratorial overreach that marked some of the Trump-Russia reporting even before he was elected. In the summer of 2016, I noted that all “conspiracy theories need a theory” and that the facts supporting an entrenched Trump-Putin bromance were hard to find, even though reporters (for good reason) had begun speculating about it. That didn’t mean the sketchy Trump links to Russians weren’t there, I pointed out back then (they were, and I and others wrote about them long before Mueller started digging). I also said in 2016 that it was “unlikely” that he had an active, current interest in a project in Russia itself (I was wrong about that. Trump pursued a deal in Moscow throughout the 2016 campaign and lied about it).

Obsession with Mueller’s investigation after it was launched in early 2017 was a facet of something that swallowed an even bigger portion of media attention: The Trump presidency itself. Reporters made lots of bad mistakes along the way. Headlines on news stories sometimes read like headlines on opinion pieces, and impeachment narratives invoked the ghosts of Watergate. Some reporters and pundits queued up for bragging rights, eager to be the first to identify some new twist that surely, finally marked the end of the Trump presidency. Others didn’t bullet-proof their reporting.

I’d take issue with Glenn Greenwald’s worry that flawed reporting about Russians zapping the U.S. embassy in Cuba with a weird microwave weapon really contributed to “exaggerating the grave threat posed by Moscow.” But there’s no question that another piece he identifies as an example of media overreach, BuzzFeed’s flawed story about Trump directing his lawyer, Michael Cohen, to lie to congress had a seismic impact on the debate over whether the media was being careful enough.

Probity was the centerpiece of a Wall Street Journal column, “A Catastrophic Media Failure,” written last Monday by Sean Davis, which interpreted the broader ramifications of Mueller’s findings (sans the final report) almost as hastily as Barr did. Davis, co-founder of “The Federalist,” a conservative web site, notes that he wanted to analyze how Mueller-watchers “managed to get the story so wrong, and for so long.”

Davis catalogs what he considers to be a rogues list of bungled Mueller-related stories and zeroes in, correctly in my mind, on a Jonathan Chait feature in New York magazine from last year. Chait, in several thousand words pulling together everything known about Trump and Russia, posited that the president might have been a Russian asset going all the way back to 1987 (during a period when Trump was publicly fooled into taking a meeting outside of Trump Tower with a Gorbachev impersonator).

Chait’s piece also featured a dizzying chart illustrating a web of Trump-Russia business and political ties, the kind conspiracy theorists tack to their basement walls. Much of Chait’s piece was aggregated from other reporters’ work and usefully put it all in one place, but its ambition to call out Trump as a lifelong Russian puppet undermined its authority and gave media critics ammo to attack journalists straining to find skeletons in Trump’s closet. If Mueller has concluded that Trump isn’t Putin’s stooge, which Barr’s letter suggests, then pieces like Chait’s will look even more feverish in retrospect.

On the other hand, Davis also attempts to take down the Washington Post and the New York Times’s Mueller reporting with the same sleight-of-hand that has plagued much of the condemnation of the Mueller coverage. Davis, like many critics, doesn’t clearly understand what the Mueller probe examined. Throughout his column he refers to it as an investigation of “collusion” when, in fact, it was an investigation of a “criminal conspiracy” (and obstruction, national security breaches and possibly more since… no one knows yet).

Collusion, which isn’t a legal term, also isn’t a crime. It occurs whenever a group gets together to harm another party. There’s already lots of indisputable information and narratives showing that Team Trump was colluding frequently with Russians. Conspiracy, on the other hand, is a crime. It occurs when a group, intending to break the law, hatches a joint plot to further its own interests. Mueller, according to Barr, didn’t find that the president and those in his orbit “had conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election” – a narrow, precise and exculpatory conclusion. Barr doesn’t use the word “collude” once in the letter about the Mueller probe that got media critics fuming.

Davis dumps on the Times and the Post’s coverage in his column by citing the language of a well-deserved Pulitzer Prize award the papers shared last year for their national security and Mueller coverage. But he doesn’t actually refute the specifics in any of those stories or in the language of the award itself, which said the reporters “dramatically furthered the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign.” It’s easy to forget too that Mueller leveled about 200 criminal charges against 34 people and three Russian companies during his probe. Within that group, 26 people were Russian nationals and six were once Trump advisers.

Still, “America’s blue-chip journalists botched the entire story,” Davis says, because, he claims, the inspiration for all of the coverage was the Steele dossier. But that isn’t true and Davis doesn’t seem to know much about the dossier either. That much-misrepresented and misunderstood report from a former MI6 officer circulated among reporters and federal investigators in 2016. It was never published until BuzzFeed did so in 2017. I discussed the provenance and chronology of the Steele dossier here and here if you want to know the details, but it isn’t what prompted the federal probes of Trump’s involvement with Russians.

Nor was Steele a primary reason for the courts to issue special surveillance warrants to investigators tracking Trump operatives and advisers. Plenty of people were examining Trump-Russia leads well before the dossier got into their hands. (Journalists pegged Paul Manafort, for example, as a potentially porous and corrupt nexus between Trump, Ukraine and Russia from pretty much the moment he joined the presidential campaign in early 2016). But because Hillary Clinton’s team paid the opposition research firm that commissioned the Steele dossier, citing it as the wellspring of everything associated with Mueller became a convenient weapon for Trump’s allies – and for critics of the investigation.

Folks like Matt Taibbi.

Taibbi is a provocative, vivid, gutsy and reckless writer. He once published a book about Trump and the 2016 presidential campaign titled “Insane Clown President,” in which he describes Trump as “one of the world’s most corrupt and personally repulsive individuals,” someone who acts “like Hitler one minute and Andrew Dice Clay the next.”

Other than describing the president as a “crook with money,” Taibbi’s book doesn’t detail the sources of Trump’s corruption. He apparently doesn’t think it has anything to do with Russia. In an excerpt from an upcoming book he posted online shortly after Mueller ended his investigation, Taibbi lays out in great detail – and with some of the same examples used by Greenwald and Davis – why he thinks the media shredded its reputation in its Mueller coverage. His essay, “It’s official: Russiagate is this generation’s WMD,” is important, thoughtful and wayward.

Taibbi is much clearer than most media critics about what he thinks went haywire. “The story hyped from the start was espionage: A secret relationship between the Trump campaign and Russian spooks who’d helped him win the election.” He argues that because Mueller ended his investigation without indicting Trump for collusion, the media’s coverage propagated a myth as ruinous as the weapons of mass destruction reporting that helped launch the Iraq War. (He cautions that he could be proven wrong later, and he writes without the Mueller report in hand, which violates the sober-minded reporting guidelines he accuses the media of violating, but whatever.)

You may remember that tales of yellowcake uranium helped fuel the idea that Saddam Hussein had WMDs and Taibbi’s yellowcake for the Mueller era is… wait for it… the Steele dossier. “It’s the Magna Carta of #Russiagate,” Taibbi writes. Nice try. That’s succinct, catchy and demonstrably wrong. It’s also silly, because Taibbi admits in his own essay that his understanding is that the “origin tale” of how investigations into Trump and Russia began “has not been nailed down yet.” But that’s not true either. A lot of it has been squared away and Taibbi can read about it here, here, here and here for a small sampling. He just needs to Google the name “George Papadopoulos,” the former Trump foreign policy adviser whose meetings and conversations originally set the Trump-Russia probe in motion, instead of “Christopher Steele.”

If anyone wants a quick primer on how comical and irresponsible it is to keep identifying the Steele dossier as a springboard for everything that’s wrong with the Mueller probe, Fox News’s Chris Wallace offers a recent tutorial here in which he takes Rush Limbaugh, the right-wing talk show host, to task for the same court jestering.

Taibbi is more sophisticated than Davis but he cherry-picks his examples and largely ignores Mueller’s damning indictment of Russian hackers and the great reporting that preceded that. People who should know better have avidly linked to Taibbi’s essay as if it were the Rosetta Stone rather than an entertaining screed laced with mistakes, thematic fault-lines and curious cop-outs.

In a follow-up essay responding to critics of his WMD analogy, Taibbi emphasized that “the WMD fiasco had a far greater real-world impact” than reporting on the Mueller investigation did. Well, yes. Phantom WMDs were an excuse to launch a devastating war that killed hundreds of thousands and disrupted a region. The Mueller investigation encouraged reporters and pundits to ask tougher questions of Trump and his associates than they had during the presidential campaign, while focusing public attention on national security. Reporters and pundits, to their discredit, sometimes got out over their skis with speculation. But hundreds of thousands of people aren’t dead because of that. Making the comparison, even while acknowledging the distinctions, is a handy, clickbait-y bit of hyperventilating that Taibbi would have poo-pooed in the Mueller reporting.

Some of Taibbi’s other core concerns are spot on. He takes the media to task for failing to take Trump seriously as someone who could win in 2016 (conceding he made the same mistake himself). He sees Russiagate reporting displacing more relevant social and political explanations for why Trump beat Clinton, and he believes that Democrats’ failure to connect with working-class Americans is a greater threat to the country than Putin’s trolls.

I don’t see it as an either-or problem, though. Yes, the media can continue sharpening its understanding of the dynamics in the election and better understand how they might resurface in 2020. But that doesn’t have to come at the expense of solid Trump-Russia analysis.

A deep focus on Trump-Russia really hasn’t been about the media sticking its head in the sand. Remember: A financially-conflicted president who encouraged Russians to hack his opponent was told by his own intelligence and law enforcement agencies that Russia tried to sabotage the 2016 election. Instead of supporting the probe, Trump went out of his way to attack and undermine it. So it’s good journalism to explore his motives.

And reality is likely to keep intruding on everybody who has been ushering Trump-Russia coverage into the grave. Just last week, for example, Bloomberg News reported that Felix Sater, a Russian émigré, career criminal, and longtime business partner of the president, was sued in federal court in Manhattan by a Kazakh bank. The lender alleges that Sater wanted to launder stolen funds through the Moscow project that he, Trump and Cohen pursued in Moscow during the 2016 election.

Sater, whom my lawyers once deposed in that libel suit Trump filed against me, described the laundering charges as baseless, “cheap and desperate.” I’m sure the Steele dossier groupies will think it’s all without merit as well.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... tion-s-wmd



NEW: House Judiciary will vote Wednesday to authorize subpoenas for full Mueller report and underlying evidence, plus documents from Trump's ex-White House officials: Priebus, Bannon, Hope Hicks, Don McGahn, and former McGahn deputy Ann Donaldson.

The subpoenas to Trump's ex White House aides – Reince Priebus, Steve Bannon, Hope Hicks, Don McGahn, & Ann Donaldson – are related to the committee's investigation into possible corruption, obstruction, and abuses of power which began last month.

Image
Image

Today @rcfp filed a petition in D.C. federal court for an order allowing grand jury material cited, quoted or referenced in the #MuellerReport to be released to the press & the public.
Image

https://twitter.com/rcfp
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Apr 01, 2019 2:12 pm






https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=246&v=9fNUgmRkAEg

Bombshell New Allegations: Kushner Appears to be Extorting Qatari Government
BY ED KRASSENSTEIN & BRIAN KRASSENSTEIN March 29, 2019


While America’s attention has been focused primarily on the Mueller report, over the course of the last several weeks, a story that likely isn’t clearly captured in the Mueller report has been building steam. For well over a year now, there has been speculation about Jared Kushner’s security clearance, as well as his meetings and ties with various leaders within the Middle East. Now it appears as if this speculation is becoming a full-blown scandal.

Last week on KrassenCast we spoke to Vicky Ward, an investigative journalist and author of the new book Kushner Inc. Since then, Ward, who has been investigating ties that Kushner has had with the Saudis, Emiratis and Qataris, has come across new information that appears to imply that the president’s son-in-law may be extorting the nation of Qatar. HillReporter has also been in contact with several sources with ties to the Qatari government, which also help confirm some of the information that Ward has provided. Ward made another appearance today on KrassenCast, in Episode 12, that is now available on iTunes, Youtube. and Google Play


It all started back in April of 2017, after Jared Kushner’s father, Charles Kushner, met with the Qatari finance minister at the St. Regis Hotel in New York City.

“Charles Kushner asked for $1 billion according to someone in that meeting, to whom I have spoken. The Qataris turned Charles Kushner down because the deal was a bad deal,” Ward explained to KrassenCast.
The deal she is talking about was in regards to a building owned by Kushner Properties located at 666 5th Ave. At the time, the company was headed towards a foreclosure of the property as a balloon payment came due in January of 2019. According to some sources, the revenue from the building only covered approximately 50% of the mortgage payment.


Ward then went on to explain the shocking details of what happened next, according to Qatari officials:

“What I have learned is that in the ensuing month [May 2017] before the US visit to Riyadh, Jared Kushner got on a plane and flew to Doha, the Qatari capital, and he reamed the Qatari ruling family, the al-Thanis, for not doing the deal with his father… They began to feel that he was indirectly threatening their sovereignty. The next thing they know, when they show up to the summit in Riyadh, the Emir, the ruler of Qatar, arrives with an entourage, but his entourage is suddenly cut off from him, and not allowed into the summit at the same time by the Saudis, which he felt was a move to deliberately make him look weak. You have to remember during this summit, Jared and Ivanka go off for a cozy secret unmonitored dinner with [Saudi Crown Prince] MBS. Nobody knows what they talked about,” Ward explained to KrassenCast.
Just ten days later, against the advice of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Secretary of Defense James Mattis, the United States supported the Saudi and UAE-led blockade of Qatar. On June 6, 2017 President Trump shockingly supported the blockade of a key US ally in the region, forcing many within his own Administration and the GOP to question the move publicly.

“What the Qataris found was not just a blockade. There were Saudi [and] Emerati troops on their border,” Ward explained to KrassenCast. “What they interpreted this as, was Jared Kushner basically saying, ‘if you don’t pay my father and pay off this building, look what’s going to happen. We’re going to, I’m going to, the Americans are going to sanction an invasion of your country.’ Sources in the State Department say, yes, it’s true; troops were on the border,” Ward continued.

Nine months later, a Canadian company, Brookfield Partners, who the Qatari Investment Authority owns a $1.8 billion or 9% stake in, bailed out Kushner Properties, with a 99-year lease agreement for 666 5th Ave.

“They bail it out in a deal that makes absolutely no economic sense. They do a 99-year lease and they pay the entire 99-year lease up front. You don’t need to be good at math, you don’t need to be in the New York real estate community to understand how crazy that is,” Ward told KrassenCast.
Around this same time, President Trump publicly shifts course, no longer supporting the blockade, as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo tells Saudi Arabia to stop the embargo.

Last week, after hearing from two sources claiming to be familiar with the deal, HillReporter reached out to Brookfield for comment. Andrew Brent, the head of communications for Brookfield Properties denied that Qatar or QIA had any involvement in 666 5th Ave. deal.

“Please use this from me as a spokesperson for Brookfield as our on-the-record response to your inquiry: ‘Neither QIA nor any Qatari officials had any involvement at any point with Brookfield’s transaction for 666 Fifth Avenue,'” Brent told HillReporter
When we specifically asked Brent if the Qatari government knew that the deal would be taking place prior to its announcement, which would have been counter to other public statements made by Brookfield, Brent cut off all communications with us. In fact, we called and emailed him, as well as the company’s Senior Managing Partner and the Chairman, Ric Clark, several times, without getting a response.

We asked Ward her opinion on whether Qatar wanted it to be known that Kushner was likely extorting their nation by using the Saudi government as his pawn. Her response was rather frightening.

“I think the Qataris probably want it out there, but they don’t want their fingerprints on it because that would be dangerous to them. I think they’re genuinely afraid of Jared Kushner, so they don’t want to be associated with getting the story out there. They think their sovereignty is under threat and Jared is behind it. So, and they want that to end,” Ward explained.
Ward closed out the interview with the shocking revelation that she has heard that there is documentation out there to prove this apparent extortion attempt by Mr. Kushner and the Trump White House. Ward is continuing to investigate the matter. HillReporter has also separately been made aware of possible documentation that exists by additional sources.

The entire, shocking interview with Vicky Ward is now available on iTunes, Youtube. and Google Play, as well as in the embedded video below.


https://hillreporter.com/bombshell-new- ... ment-29169
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Apr 01, 2019 3:04 pm

We Are All Kasie Hunt's Face Trying To Figure Out WTF George Papadopoulos Is Talking About
Evan HurstApril 01, 2019 10:39 AM

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 2.02.19 PM.jpg

Who wants to start out their week with a little bugfuck batshit OMG WTF crazy? You do? Great, because that's what we're doing.

Now that the Mueller report Bill Barr letter has been released, Trump people are all sowing their wild oats in different ways, because they want us to believe that the actual Mueller report -- which nobody has read -- completely totally exonerates Donald Trump and his campaign of all Russian crimes past, present and future. It is not clear that is the case, but to know for sure, we'd have to read the fucking Mueller report, now wouldn't we?

George Papadopoulos, who went to jail for a handful of days for lying to the FBI, and who leaked Russian dirt about the Russians having Russian dirt on Hillary Clinton all over an Australian diplomat in London during the campaign -- the event that started the Russia investigation in the first place -- would like a pardon. Also, he has a book to sell. No, we will not be linking to it. Shockingly, it has "Deep State" in the title, because these people are nothing if not consistent (-ly paranoid).

Which brings us to the interview Pap did Sunday on Kasie Hunt's MSNBC show! What you need to know about the interview is that Kasie Hunt's face is the exact same face you will have if you watch the interview and try to make sense of the Bowling Green Massacre narrative that lives in Pap's head about what's REALLY happened these past couple of years.

There is no sense trying to transcribe any of this, but here are the top line things George Papadopoulos told Kasie Hunt, which made her make that face:

The Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud, who made the initial approach to Pap claiming ties to Russia and dirts on Hillary Clinton, was actually an operative of DEEP STATE, and that has just been proven, and Pap is pretty sure an FBI operative tricked him into meeting that guy in spy school in order to frame him for WITCH HUNT.
So why didn't he go to the FBI? Uh, well, HE DID, KASIE. (You know, when they interviewed him about how he was drunk-bragging all over Australian diplomats that the Russians were going to fuck Hillary Clinton the fuck up. Also, he lied to the FBI.)
But he's glad he didn't go to the FBI, because THEY WERE THE ONES DOING THE DEEP STATE WITCH HUNT, KASIE.
Robert Mueller wasn't even trying to witch hunt Pap for Russia stuff, they were trying to witch hunt him for ISRAEL STUFF.
Also he didn't even drunk all that stuff all over the Australian diplomat Alexander Downer in a bar in London, that was a false flag fake news story, just ask Congressman Mark Meadows, all these diplomats were spying on the Trump campaign, it was definitely a thing that happened, according to Mark Meadows, a very serious person.
When the interview was over, Kasie Hunt was like "OK, you betcha!" Except she didn't say those words, because she is a professional. And again, this was her face pretty much the entire interview.

And that was the end of that!

We wish we didn't have to type out nutbag shit like this, but now that the Mueller investigation is over -- and for however long Trump and his minions can manage to keep the actual report under wraps -- the Right is desperately looking for conspiracy narratives to replace what actually happened. And as much as we'd like to think Sean Hannity would refrain from mainlining Pap's garbage up his B-hole and then upchucking it into the president's mouth during TV time, that's not the America we live in right now, so this shit will probably end up on Trump's Twitter feed sometime very soon. As evidence of that, we can report that one of the idiots at The Federalist -- no, not the one who lost her everloving shit this weekend on Twitter and started gay-bashing journalist Yashar Ali, which led to her getting fired from The Federalist for being too much of an unhinged asshole, a different one -- is already taking Pap's shit seriously and doing deep dives into the alleged secret FBI operative who tricked Pap into meeting the Maltese lawyer, because of how it was all a COLLUSION WITCH HOAX.

In other words, things will get stupider before they get smarter. U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!
https://www.wonkette.com/we-are-all-kas ... king-about
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Trumpublicons: Foreign Influence/Grifting in '16 US Elec

Postby RocketMan » Tue Apr 02, 2019 5:33 am

Just a reminder, never to be forgotten. Luke Harding is awful.

AARON MATÉ: [...]You write “The thing which gave me pause was Kilimnik’s use of smiley faces. True, Russians are big emoticon fans, but I’ve seen something similar before. In 2013, the Russian diplomat in charge of political influence operations in London was named Sergey Nalobin. Nalobin had close links with Russian intelligence. He was a son of a KGB general. His brother worked for the FSB. Nalobin looked like a career foreign intelligence officer.” You go on to write “On a Twitter feed, Nalobin described himself thus: a brutal agent of the Putin dictatorship, smiley face.” So are you inferring there that because two Russians used a smiley face that that’s proof that Manafort’s associate was a tool of the Russian government?

LUKE HARDING: No. I mean really what you’re doing is now rather a sort of silly exercise. You haven’t read the book, but you’re taking one small bit and jumping on that.

AARON MATÉ: Because you’re using emoticons as proof of a Russian tie so I’m asking you about it.


-I don't like hoodlums.
-That's just a word, Marlowe. We have that kind of world. Two wars gave it to us and we are going to keep it.
User avatar
RocketMan
 
Posts: 2813
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:02 am
Location: By the rivers dark
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests