A lot of people are misrepresenting this, inadvertently.
Some say "how about a real discussion?" Use the search function. You will find many dozens of pages on threads on these very forums wherein dedicated and sincere folk like Isachar, JD and stickdog99, to name but a few, have produced
masses of evidence, frankly fit to convince anyone those towers didnt fall by aircraft impacts and fires alone, and that the NIST and other "official" explanation(s) are not only enormously, fatally, flawed, but also fundamentally dishonest, in their premises, methodologies and conclusions (see bottom of this post.)
The acrimony erupting here, as I said, will seem a trifle perplexing unless you understand the long and detailed history this subject has had on these forums.
Orz and nomo's position is that people should not look at the skyscrapers' collapses, that to do so is ridiculous, and a waste of time, and that therefore the entire 911 truth movement is filled with idiots spouting garbage. Which, strangely, seems to be Jeff's position too.
I don't mind agreeing to disagree, but I don't like venomous attacks on "cd" proponents and researchers, or the ridiculing of the entire truth movement based on focussing on the deliberately ludicrous assertions of pod people, no planers, and tv fakery types. It's all deliberate disinfo. The astute observer will of course notice that professional hit pieces in the mockingbird media adopt the exact same tactics.
Jeez.
Keep on reading and learning people.
Here's a simple question for orz and Nomo (edited Jeff's name out of this question. Fourthbase is surely correct in asserting that Jeff would answer a frank and wholehearted "yes" to the following);
Do you think the 911 attacks could be reasonably characterised, either in part or in whole, as an "inside job?"
Or, to be more specific; did those responsible for the attacks have assistance from within the, well, lets say the anglo-american-west european intelligence agencies and their allies amongst the super-rich elite of the wealthy middle eastern oil states and global organised crime, without which the attacks could not have enjoyed the "success" they did, in order to further the large scale geo-political agendas I already mentioned? By which I mean the introduction of police state panopticon dept. of pre-crime legislation at home, and criminal wars of conquest, regime change and resource control abroad.
Just so we all know where we stand. Of course you are perfectly free to ignore these questions, rephrase them, assert them irrelevant or meaningless, or obfuscate, hedge or dissemble. You are also free to joke, quip, insult or deride. Take your pick.
And, well I've got be helpful and give all you nice folks the background to this wee spat. So, I would encourage everyone to check out the following links. It's a holiday weekend aint it? All these links are extremely relevant background to this thread, and a pretty interesting read into the bargain;
Dutch company says Controlled Demoliton for bldg 7
The Latest on Melted Steel
most effective weapon of COINTELPRO is Ridicule & Debunk
Manuel Garcia: "elastic waves" caused wtc collapse
CD of WTC-7 a hoax? Prove it.
Proof of Shaped charges in WTC 9/11
Structural Engineering Prof on WTC Collapse Anomalies
Dr Steven E. Jones' WTC Power Point Presentation
Jeff's It's the Real Thing Post
9-11 Trolls--how they act who funds 'em?
If you read all those threads you will have learned something.
