'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby Belligerent Savant » Tue Dec 13, 2022 9:29 pm

Harvey » Tue Dec 13, 2022 6:13 pm wrote:Vandana Shiva points to a possible way forward.



And a bit of good news, some people who are getting attention for doing it in America:



I enjoyed that Vandana Shiva interview when I listened to it initially some months back.*

If there is any silver lining to overt State control attempts over the coming years, it'll be the potential development/resurgance of agrarian communities (and perhaps with it, variations of the barter system, localized farming and reliance on local community members or nearby communities to help repair/build, etc.).

These are ideals; perhaps a pipe dream given the potential for humans to become corruptible, but I'll take the above over the currently planned WEF-esque dystopia, however realized.


*though the cynic in me sometimes wonders just how genuine Brand is, given his history. I endeavor to keep neutral and simply digest the data as it comes, with a standard measure of discernment. Applicable for any/all info these days.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5575
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby Gnomad » Wed Dec 21, 2022 3:41 am

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... wsuit-says

According to the lawsuit – filed in the US federal district court of Puerto Rico – evidence of the conspiracy dates back to 1989 when the defendants, which include ExxonMobil, Shell, BP and Rio Tinto, individually and through trade association formed the Global Climate Coalition (GCC) as a “not-for-profit corporation to influence, advertise, and promote the interests of the fossil fuel industry by giving false information to their consumers and the public at large”.

It argues that so-called rival companies conspired for a common purpose – to deceive consumers and sow confusion in order to keep fossil fuel sales high and profitable – and that the GCC was a propaganda machine specifically set up to oppose the Kyoto protocol, the first major international effort to combat climate change. To do this, a written action plan was devised in 1998 to mislead consumers by convincing them that “global warming” was not occurring, and if it did happen, there was no scientific consensus on whether fossil fuels were to blame.

In other words, the action plan was allegedly a climate change denial plan executed through a network of dark money ploughed into thinktanks, research institutions, trade groups and PR firms, and provided a roadmap for an open-ended enterprise that is still implemented today.


The lawsuit argues that the oil and coal companies knew that Puerto Rico was a “sitting duck” because of its geographic location, which made the island and its people particularly vulnerable to climate change events – namely hotter and wetter storms, extreme heat and rising sea level – caused by their carbon products.

Over the past two decades, Puerto Rico – along with Haiti and Myanmar – has been among three territories most affected by extreme weather such as storms, floods, heatwaves and droughts, according to the Germanwatch Climate Risk Index, which are becoming more intense due to human-made global heating driven by greenhouse gases. In September, Hurricane Ian left much of the island without power and water, as well as damaging essential infrastructure like roads and bridges.

The damages resulting from the 2017 storms – and the likelihood of worse climate disasters battering the island in the future – come down to the acts and omissions of the defendants, as the oil and coal companies, along with their worldwide co-venturers, are collectively responsible for at least 40.01% of greenhouse gases, the lawsuit argues.



And lets compare the rail density in Europe to USA - well of course you would need a car, wonder why there is no good rail network in the US?

Image

I mean, even Russia has a more extensive network...
la nuit de tous approche
Gnomad
 
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby Gnomad » Wed Dec 21, 2022 11:50 am

https://www.reuters.com/business/3m-sto ... 022-12-20/

Dec 20 (Reuters) - U.S. industrial conglomerate 3M Co (MMM.N) on Tuesday set a 2025 deadline to stop producing PFAS, the "forever chemicals" used in anything from cell phones to semiconductors that have been linked to cancers, heart problems and low birth weights.

Perfluoralkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) do not break down quickly and have in recent years been found in dangerous concentrations in drinking water, soils and foods.

Legal pressure over the damage caused by PFAS has increased. Last month, 3M and DuPont de Nemours Inc (DD.N) were among several companies sued by California's attorney general to recover clean-up costs.

Shareholders have also called for production of the chemicals to stop. Investors managing $8 trillion in assets earlier this year wrote to 54 companies urging them to phase out their use.

"3M has been facing a raft of litigation that has prompted the move," Victoria Scholar, head of investment at abrdn's Interactive Investor, said of 3M's deadline.

As investors prioritize environmental concerns, other chemical makers are expected to follow 3M's example.

"With 3M's scale and position as one of the world's largest producers of PFAS, we feel this could represent a turning point in the transition towards a more sustainable chemical industry," said Victoria Lidén, sustainability analyst with Storebrand Asset Management.

3M said its annual sales of manufactured PFAS are about $1.3 billion with estimated earnings before interest, tax, depreciation (EBITDA) margins of about 16%.


All in all, the chemical industry world-wide needs to be reined in, and in my opinion, no new chemicals should be allowed to be introduced before they have been thoroughly tested and assessed for all their possible effects in the environment...In the EU, there is already a framework for this, but in the US the situation is a lot worse. Often new substances can be pretty easily introduced, with minimal or no testing at all required beforehand.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/it ... dmark-bill

In fact, there are more than 80,000 chemicals registered for use today, many of which haven’t been studied for safety by any government agency. But that’s about to change…somewhat. President Obama today signed into law the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, named after the late senator who introduced a version of the bill in 2013. This marks the first overhaul in 40 years to the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976, the nation’s main law governing toxic chemicals.


https://www.wired.com/2009/09/humans-ha ... chemicals/

Humans have found or made 50 million different chemicals here on Earth, the vast majority over the last few decades.

At least, that's how many unique chemicals are now registered in a database maintained by the American Chemical Society as of yesterday. The announcement underscores the tremendous growth of the global chemicals industry after World War II.

A novel substance is either isolated or synthesized every 2.6 seconds on the average during the past 12 months, day and night, seven days a week in the world," said Dr. Hideaki Chihara, Ph.D. chemist and former president of Japan Association for International Chemical Information.

The rate new chemicals are being produced and isolated is astounding. It took 33 years to get the first 10 million chemicals registered and a mere nine months to get the last 10 million chemicals into the database. In part, the acceleration is due to better tracking by the American Chemical Society, but laboratories around the world are also just producing (and patenting) a tremendous amount of molecules.
la nuit de tous approche
Gnomad
 
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sun Dec 25, 2022 7:22 pm

.
I'm all for the above proposed measures, but have minimal confidence that PFAS cleanup and restrictions will be honored by some of these entities, especially if the cost/benefit analysis reveals cost of litigation will be less than overall profit margins.

Meanwhile, per my earlier commentary on the 'climate change' grifts, historically:

https://web.archive.org/web/20200924233 ... a547880cd0

U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked
PETER JAMES SPIELMANN

June 29, 1989

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ″eco- refugees,′ ′ threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP.

He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control.

As the warming melts polar icecaps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet, enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations, Brown told The Associated Press in an interview on Wednesday.

Coastal regions will be inundated; one-sixth of Bangladesh could be flooded, displacing a fourth of its 90 million people. A fifth of Egypt’s arable land in the Nile Delta would be flooded, cutting off its food supply, according to a joint UNEP and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study.

...


Maldives are still above water, last I checked. Indeed, a new airport passenger terminal is currently in development:

https://maldives-magazine.com/news/mald ... rminal.htm

Catch a glimpse of a New International Passenger Terminal of Velana airport

April 2022

That aside, preserving rain forests and other lands are of course necessary and worthwhile endeavors.

But I wonder why Gates is buying up so much farmland in the U.S.? This is the same man clamoring for consumption of insects and lab-grown meat over (for example) grass-fed beef.

From an August 2021 article:
Bill Gates owns 242,000 acres of farmland in 19 states. In addition, he owns 25,750 acres of transitional land and 1,234 acres of recreational land for total land holdings of 268,984 acres. His largest holding is in Louisiana (69,071 acres), followed by Arkansas (47,927 acres) and Arizona (25,750 acres).

https://agfundernews.com/gates-if-not-f ... h-farmland
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5575
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby Gnomad » Mon Dec 26, 2022 11:51 am

Related to Gates land grabs etc... And the recent "protect 30%" of nature.

https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/12/ ... ous-people

But although it’s promoted by governments and big international conservation NGOs as a solution to the climate and biodiversity crises, the '30x30' plan is seeing growing opposition from a number of organisations and experts.

So why is it so controversial?

30 x 30 could be the ‘biggest land grab in history’

According to Survival International, an organisation campaigning for Indigenous rights, 30 x 30 will be the biggest land grab in history.

The fear is that the plan won’t recognise or strengthen the rights of Indigenous people and local communities, as delegates gather in Montreal. 

Sophie Grig, Senior Researcher for Survival International's conservation campaign explains. 

“Up to 300 million people could be directly displaced and dispossessed. Many will be Indigenous people, who have protected their lands for millennia,” she says.
Moses Sawasawa/Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
People displaced by conflict wait for the arrival of United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Peace Operations Jean Pierre Lacroix in Bunia, eastern Congo.Moses Sawasawa/Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

“Those who have done the least to damage the environment, stand to lose the most. Because they rely on their lands for survival - eviction from these will be completely devastating for them.

“Time and again Indigenous people tell us that without their lands they simply will not survive. If implemented, 30x30 will devastate lives on an unimaginable scale,” she adds.
People are being evicted in the name of conservation

Already in many Protected Areas around the world local people, who have called the land home for generations, are no longer allowed to live on and use the natural environment to feed their families, gather medicinal plants or visit sacred sites.

But research has shown that, beyond doubt, Indigenous people are nature’s best guardians. It is no coincidence that 80 per cent of Earth’s biodiversity is found in their territories, which make up about 20 per cent of the world’s land.

‘Fortress Conservation’ is one example of a conservation model that excludes Indigenous communities. It began with the formation of Yosemite, the world’s first national park, in North America over 150 years ago. 

To preserve the ‘pristine wilderness’ humans needed to be expelled so the native Americans, who had lived in and cared for the region for thousands of years, were evicted.

To preserve the ‘pristine wilderness’ humans needed to be expelled.

This conservation model continues today, in many developing countries.

The latest plans by the Tanzanian government involve evicting 70,000 Maasai from their homeland, to make way for elite tourism and trophy hunting. As with most cases involving Indigenous populations, they are neither consulted nor included in decision making processes and are not compensated for any losses.


https://www.euronews.com/green/2021/11/ ... nvironment
What can we learn from Indigenous communities about safeguarding the environment?

https://www.euronews.com/green/2021/08/ ... eaking-un-
Giving Indigenous people land rights significantly reduces deforestation, says UN report
la nuit de tous approche
Gnomad
 
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby Belligerent Savant » Mon Dec 26, 2022 10:06 pm

Geoengineering startup has begun releasing particles into the atmosphere, "in an effort to tweak the climate."


A startup says it’s begun releasing particles into the atmosphere, in an effort to tweak the climate
Make Sunsets is already attempting to earn revenue for geoengineering, a move likely to provoke widespread criticism.

December 24, 2022

Geoengineering refers to deliberate efforts to manipulate the climate by reflecting more sunlight back into space, mimicking a natural process that occurs in the aftermath of large volcanic eruptions. In theory, spraying sulfur and similar particles in sufficient quantities could potentially ease global warming.

It’s not technically difficult to release such compounds into the stratosphere. But scientists have mostly (though not entirely) refrained from carrying out even small-scale outdoor experiments. And it’s not clear that any have yet injected materials into that specific layer of the atmosphere in the context of geoengineering-related research.

That’s in part because it’s highly controversial. Little is known about the real-world effect of such deliberate interventions at large scales, but they could have dangerous side effects. The impacts could also be worse in some regions than others, which could provoke geopolitical conflicts.

Some researchers who have long studied the technology are deeply troubled that the company, Make Sunsets, appears to have moved forward with launches from a site in Mexico without any public engagement or scientific scrutiny. It’s already attempting to sell “cooling credits” for future balloon flights that could carry larger payloads.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/1 ... e-climate/

This is not novel tech -- it's been around for many years.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5575
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby Gnomad » Tue Dec 27, 2022 4:58 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/26/opin ... rabia.html
Arizona’s water is running worryingly low. Amid the worst drought in more than a millennium, which has left communities across the state with barren wells, the state is depleting what remains of its precious groundwater. Much of it goes to private companies nearly free, including Saudi Arabia’s largest dairy company.

Thanks to fresh scrutiny this year from state politicians, water activists and journalists, the Saudi agricultural giant Almarai has emerged as an unlikely antagonist in the water crisis. The company, through its subsidiary Fondomonte, has been buying and leasing land across western Arizona since 2014. This year The Arizona Republic published a report showing that the Arizona State Land Department has been leasing 3,500 acres of public land to Almarai for a suspiciously low price.

The case has prompted calls for an investigation into how a foreign company wound up taking the state’s dwindling water supplies for a fee that might be as low as one-sixth the market rate. But the focus on the Saudi scheme obscures a more fundamental problem: pumping groundwater in Arizona remains largely unregulated. It’s this legal failing that, in part, allows the Saudi company to draw unlimited amounts of water to grow an alfalfa crop that feeds dairy cows 8,000 miles away.

Even if Fondomonte leaves the state, it will be only a matter of time before Arizona sucks its aquifers dry. While a 1980 state law regulates groundwater use in a handful of urban areas, water overuse is common even in these places. The situation is worse in the roughly 80 percent of Arizona’s territory that falls outside these regulations. In most of rural Arizona, whoever has the money to drill a well can continue to pump till the very last drop.

Many more agricultural operations are drawing down the state’s underground water reserves for free. And most of them are U.S.-owned. Minnesota’s Riverview Dairy company, for example, has a farm near Sunizona, Ariz., that has drained so much of the aquifer that local residents have seen their wells dry up. Meanwhile, some California-based farms, facing tougher groundwater regulations at home, are looking to relocate to neighboring Arizona for cheap water. These companies and other megafarms can afford to drill deep wells, chasing the rapidly sinking water table.

And it’s not just farming operations. Other sectors like mining and the military, which have a huge presence in the state, also benefit from Arizona’s lax water laws. It’s difficult to know how much water is being used up by one of the state’s largest employers, Raytheon Missiles and Defense, which, like Almarai, has a footprint in Arizona and Saudi Arabia. But manufacturing missiles has a water cost, too. And like Fondomonte’s alfalfa, Raytheon’s product is being shipped to Saudi Arabia.

....

As a geographer who studies Saudi Arabia’s history, I can’t help but think about how muddy the lines between victim and victimizer are when I hear this rhetoric. Ironically, American farmers helped kick-start the Saudi dairy industry. In the 1940s the U.S. State Department sent Arizona farmers to Saudi Arabia and coordinated two Saudi royal visits to Arizona to tout the state’s spectacular desert agriculture. The unsustainable alfalfa and dairy enterprise that Saudi Arabia set up in the wake of these visits drained the kingdom’s groundwater, sowing the seeds for Saudi companies to look to Arizona for cheap water.

Continues.....


The total insanity of doing stuff like this - growing water intensive alfalfa in a naturally dry area using ground water and then transporting it 8000 miles to feed dairy cows...
la nuit de tous approche
Gnomad
 
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby DrEvil » Wed Dec 28, 2022 6:11 pm

Belligerent Savant » Tue Dec 27, 2022 4:06 am wrote:
Geoengineering startup has begun releasing particles into the atmosphere, "in an effort to tweak the climate."


A startup says it’s begun releasing particles into the atmosphere, in an effort to tweak the climate
Make Sunsets is already attempting to earn revenue for geoengineering, a move likely to provoke widespread criticism.

December 24, 2022

Geoengineering refers to deliberate efforts to manipulate the climate by reflecting more sunlight back into space, mimicking a natural process that occurs in the aftermath of large volcanic eruptions. In theory, spraying sulfur and similar particles in sufficient quantities could potentially ease global warming.

It’s not technically difficult to release such compounds into the stratosphere. But scientists have mostly (though not entirely) refrained from carrying out even small-scale outdoor experiments. And it’s not clear that any have yet injected materials into that specific layer of the atmosphere in the context of geoengineering-related research.

That’s in part because it’s highly controversial. Little is known about the real-world effect of such deliberate interventions at large scales, but they could have dangerous side effects. The impacts could also be worse in some regions than others, which could provoke geopolitical conflicts.

Some researchers who have long studied the technology are deeply troubled that the company, Make Sunsets, appears to have moved forward with launches from a site in Mexico without any public engagement or scientific scrutiny. It’s already attempting to sell “cooling credits” for future balloon flights that could carry larger payloads.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/1 ... e-climate/

This is not novel tech -- it's been around for many years.


Which is why we know it's not being deployed at scale, in case you were hinting at weather manipulation. Last time we did it at a large scale we got the cool(ish) period from the end of WW2 to the seventies and acid rain.

And just to be clear: these guys are fucking morons and should be charged with every applicable environmental crime statute available.
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 4144
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby DrEvil » Fri Dec 30, 2022 8:01 pm

Belligerent Savant » Mon Dec 26, 2022 1:22 am wrote:.
I'm all for the above proposed measures, but have minimal confidence that PFAS cleanup and restrictions will be honored by some of these entities, especially if the cost/benefit analysis reveals cost of litigation will be less than overall profit margins.

Meanwhile, per my earlier commentary on the 'climate change' grifts, historically:

https://web.archive.org/web/20200924233 ... a547880cd0

U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked
PETER JAMES SPIELMANN

June 29, 1989

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ″eco- refugees,′ ′ threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP.

He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control.

As the warming melts polar icecaps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet, enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations, Brown told The Associated Press in an interview on Wednesday.

Coastal regions will be inundated; one-sixth of Bangladesh could be flooded, displacing a fourth of its 90 million people. A fifth of Egypt’s arable land in the Nile Delta would be flooded, cutting off its food supply, according to a joint UNEP and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study.

...


Maldives are still above water, last I checked. Indeed, a new airport passenger terminal is currently in development:

https://maldives-magazine.com/news/mald ... rminal.htm

Catch a glimpse of a New International Passenger Terminal of Velana airport

April 2022

That aside, preserving rain forests and other lands are of course necessary and worthwhile endeavors.

But I wonder why Gates is buying up so much farmland in the U.S.? This is the same man clamoring for consumption of insects and lab-grown meat over (for example) grass-fed beef.

From an August 2021 article:
Bill Gates owns 242,000 acres of farmland in 19 states. In addition, he owns 25,750 acres of transitional land and 1,234 acres of recreational land for total land holdings of 268,984 acres. His largest holding is in Louisiana (69,071 acres), followed by Arkansas (47,927 acres) and Arizona (25,750 acres).

https://agfundernews.com/gates-if-not-f ... h-farmland


Hmm, let's have a look at what the UN actually said in 1990 in the first IPCC report:

Based on current model results, we predict:
under the IPCC Business - as - Usual (Scenario A )
emissions of greenhouse gases, a rate of increase of
global-mean temperature during the next century of
about 0.3°C per decade (with an uncertainty range of
0.2°C to 0 . 5 ° C per decade); this is greater than that
seen over the past 10,000 years. This will result in a
likely increase in global-mean temperature of about
1°C above the present value by 2025
and 3 ° C before
the end of the next century. The rise will not be steady
because of the influence of other factors;


under the IPCC Business-as-Usual emissions scenario,
an average rate of global mean sea-level rise of about
6 cm per decade over the next century (with an
uncertainty range of 3—10 cm per decade), mainly
due to thermal expansion of the oceans and the melting
of some land ice. The predicted rise is about 20 cm* in
global-mean sea level by 2030
, and 65 cm by the end
of the next century. There will be significant regional
variations.


* 20 cm is just under 8 inches.

https://www.ipcc.ch/report/climate-chan ... sessments/
(the Policymaker Summary of Working Group I (Scientific Assessment of Climate Change link)
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 4144
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby Belligerent Savant » Thu Jan 05, 2023 10:27 pm

.
Get back to me when the runways on the Maldives need to be shut down due to flooding.
The highest point on the Maldives is just under 8 ft. And yet, the airport's being expanded. There seems to be no concern there.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geograp ... e_Maldives

Moving on...

Image

---------

It is noteworthy, however, that there apparently were 'great floods' in prehistory that had dramatic impact on life at the time.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_S ... hypothesis

But what caused those floods? Certainly no one was using 'fossil fuels' back then; no combustible engines, machines, or mass manufacturing going on (unless of course there's far more to history than we currently know). In other words, they were not man-made disasters.

Which means it can happen again, irrespective of human activity (and/or our collective arrogance and hubris).
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5575
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby DrEvil » Sat Jan 07, 2023 6:04 pm

You mean this airport?

Image

It is noteworthy, however, that there apparently were 'great floods' in prehistory that had dramatic impact on life at the time.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_S ... hypothesis

But what caused those floods? Certainly no one was using 'fossil fuels' back then; no combustible engines, machines, or mass manufacturing going on (unless of course there's far more to history than we currently know). In other words, they were not man-made disasters.

Which means it can happen again, irrespective of human activity (and/or our collective arrogance and hubris).


How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you don't even know the most basic things? This is spectacularly ignorant, even for you.

End of the last ice age ring a bell? I'll even throw in a hint: ice melts and becomes...?
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 4144
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby DrEvil » Thu Jan 12, 2023 6:29 pm

Meanwhile in reality:

https://arstechnica.com/science/2023/01 ... d-la-nina/

2022 was once again one of the warmest years on record

Final tallies contain no surprises—it was a warm one.
Scott K. Johnson - 1/12/2023, 7:14 PM

Image
Average 2022 temperatures compared to the average of 1991-2020.

They say history repeats, but usually they don’t mean it quite this literally. The global average surface temperature in 2021 ended up ranking fifth warmest or sixth warmest, depending on the dataset. We now have the tally for 2022—and it’s the new fifth or sixth warmest, depending on the dataset.

Each year in mid-January, various centers that manage global temperature datasets release their results for the previous year. Because each group pulls from a slightly different collection of weather stations and uses a slightly different calculation process, they don’t get exactly the same numbers. The big picture is identical, but since just 0.01°C can separate years in the ranking, those small differences can alter the order.

In the European Copernicus ECMWF dataset and the Berkeley Earth dataset, 2022 is the fifth warmest in the global instrumental record going back to the mid-to-late 1800s. Meanwhile, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and UK Met Office datasets pin it at No. 6, just below 2015 instead of just above it. NASA’s dataset has it tied with 2015 for fifth warmest. The total heat energy in the ocean, on the other hand, reached a new record. Over 90 percent of the total heat trapped by greenhouse gas emissions has gone into the oceans, and this value varies less from year to year.

There is nothing surprising about this. Berkeley Earth and NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies Director Gavin Schmidt published predictions last year that 2022 was most likely to come in just slightly warmer than 2021.

Last day of the year so how did I do predicting this years temperature anomaly and what will 2023 show? pic.twitter.com/OwWloWKQvs
— Gavin Schmidt (@ClimateOfGavin) December 31, 2022


Why were they able to do that? And why did 2022 end up where it did? The answer to both is that two factors tell you most of what you need to know about global temperature—the human-caused warming trend and the slow oscillation of La Niña and El Niño conditions in the Pacific Ocean.

This sloshing of surface water across the equatorial Pacific, with the wind sometimes piling up warm water on the western side (La Niña) and sometimes allowing it to stretch back across to the eastern side (El Niño), causes much of the year-to-year wiggling of average surface temperature. We’ve now been in a La Niña phase since late 2020, which has held the global average down—though this was the warmest of any La Niña year. These conditions can be forecast months ahead because they change slowly, which gives you a decent idea of how the global average will evolve.

Berkeley Earth notes that this year was the new record warmest over 8.5 percent of the area of the Earth, which happens to cover some 850 million people. The well-publicized Western European heatwaves occurred as part of the warmest summer—and year—on record in many places there, for example. Pakistan, which suffered extreme spring heatwaves followed by extreme flooding, didn’t quite set a new record for annual temperature, but neighboring Afghanistan did.

In the United States, 2022 was about the 18th warmest year on record. There were 18 weather disasters that exceeded $1 billion in (inflation-adjusted) damage, though—the third-worst tally going back to 1980.

Looking ahead, expectations are actually also similar to last year. The forecast is trending toward neutral conditions (in between La Niña and El Niño) by late spring. Last year, La Niña returned soon after, so the impact was small, but sustained neutral conditions would boost 2023 a bit above 2022 in the ranking. And if it fully transitions over to El Niño in the fall, the odds of 2024 setting a new record would then be pretty strong.

The climate system is complex enough that atmospheric temperatures wobble around a bit from year to year, but the human-caused warming trend is steadily lifting the baseline. That will remain true as long as we keep increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

Wobbles or not, the eight warmest years in the instrumental record are the previous eight years. All eight were more than 1°C above preindustrial times, and we are drawing nearer to the 1.5° and 2° C marks that international negotiations have focused on keeping us below.


And the elephant in the room which some people always manage to ignore:

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0063

Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections

Insider knowledge

For decades, some members of the fossil fuel industry tried to convince the public that a causative link between fossil fuel use and climate warming could not be made because the models used to project warming were too uncertain. Supran et al. show that one of those fossil fuel companies, ExxonMobil, had their own internal models that projected warming trajectories consistent with those forecast by the independent academic and government models. What they understood about climate models thus contradicted what they led the public to believe. —HJS

continued at link
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 4144
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby Gnomad » Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:29 am

NY Times has a story about that as well..

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/12/clim ... &smtyp=cur

(graphs at link)
Exxon Scientists Predicted Global Warming, Even as Company Cast Doubts, Study Finds

Starting in the 1970s, scientists working for the oil giant made remarkably accurate projections of just how much burning fossil fuels would warm the planet.

In the late 1970s, scientists at Exxon fitted one of the company’s supertankers with state-of-the-art equipment to measure carbon dioxide in the ocean and in the air, an early example of substantial research the oil giant conducted into the science of climate change.

A new study published Thursday in the journal Science found that over the next decades, Exxon’s scientists made remarkably accurate projections of just how much burning fossil fuels would warm the planet. Their projections were as accurate, and sometimes even more so, as those of independent academic and government models.

Yet for years, the oil giant publicly cast doubt on climate science, and cautioned against any drastic move away from burning fossil fuels, the main driver of climate change. Exxon also ran a public relations program — including ads that ran in The New York Times — emphasizing uncertainties in the scientific research on global warming.

Global warming projections “are based on completely unproven climate models, or, more often, on sheer speculation,” Lee Raymond, chief executive of the newly-merged ExxonMobil Corp, said at a company annual meeting in 1999. “We do not now have a sufficient scientific understanding of climate change to make reasonable predictions and/or justify drastic measures,” he wrote in a company brochure the following year.

In a statement Exxon did not address the new study directly but said “those who talk about how ‘Exxon Knew’ are wrong in their conclusions,” referring to a slogan by environmental activists who have accused the company of misleading the public about climate science.

“ExxonMobil has a culture of disciplined analysis, planning, accounting, and reporting,” the company added, quoting a judge in a favorable verdict in New York three years ago, albeit for a case that addressed the company’s accounting practices, not climate science.


But hey, its a conspiracy by those scientists! Think of all the hundreds of billions they are making now with their climate alarmism!
The oil business has been nothing but altruistic.

https://www.fuelfreedom.org/oil-company-subsidies/

It seems like every day there’s a new think piece out there decrying the subsidies that renewable energy, alternative fuels, and the vehicles that can run them receive. Yet when it comes to the substantial government assistance for oil companies, those same critics are conspicuously silent.

This silence becomes all the more questionable when you consider that many such freebies have been on the books for more than a century. It’s one thing to offer support to a fledgling industry that’s in the national interest, it’s quite another to continue to prop up an industry that owns a whopping 92% market share of the transportation fuels marketplace, decade after decade.,

Congress and the ethanol industry understood that subsidies should be appropriately phased out for established industries when they eliminated the ethanol subsidy in 2011. Similarly, wind and solar power subsidies are set to phase out in 2019 and 2022, respectively. However, oil companies continue to be subsidized at a rate of 7-1 compared to permanent tax breaks that go to renewable energy.

This is not to claim that other energy interests do not receive any favored treatment. However, it is notable that an industry so dominant in its market continues to receive such substantial taxpayer support.

In the past, we’ve outlined how much a gallon of gasoline actually costs when you factor all the hidden costs that come with our overwhelming dependence on oil. Today, however, we’d like to focus specifically on the direct support the virtual oil monopoly in the United States receives from the federal government.

Image

.......... snip .......... at link

The scope and specifics of these subsidies may vary widely, but the bottom line is always the same: Oil companies are given favorable tax treatment and subsidized with public dollars. By continuing this practice year after year, decade after decade, it makes breaking oil’s virtual monopoly even harder, and forces us to continue suffering from all the terrible trapping that come with our overwhelming oil dependency.

So the next time someone starts criticizing subsidies going to alternative fuels and vehicles, or renewable energy, keep these oil subsidies in mind. Indeed, as many will claim, the playing field is not level, but not in the way that many imagine. Subsidies to oil companies are one of the reasons that—despite being cheaper, cleaner, and American-made—alternative fuels haven’t more widely replaced oil in the transportation sector. If Americans want to achieve fuel choice and end the oil monopoly, we’re going to have to take a hard look at all the market distortions, including subsidies and tax breaks, that effectively lock in the status quo.
la nuit de tous approche
Gnomad
 
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby Gnomad » Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:44 am

And let us also remember that carbon dioxides effect on the atmosphere has been known since 1897 when Svante Arrhenius published this:

https://archive.org/details/jstor-40670917 Full text here

"ON THE INFLUENCE OF CARBONIC ACID IN THE AIR UPON THE TEMPERATURE OF THE EARTH" is an article from Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Volume 9.

Go ahead and read it there. Its been over a hundred years of more and more research proving the very same. Over a hundred bloody years.
la nuit de tous approche
Gnomad
 
Posts: 525
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 'EcoFascism' and related Acts of Criminality.

Postby DrEvil » Fri Jan 13, 2023 2:28 pm

It's a constant source of bafflement to me how people, often the ones who claim to think for themselves and routinely call others sheep, have gobbled up the oil industry propaganda so thoroughly. Even now, when climate change is glaringly obvious, they're desperately clinging to their narratives.
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 4144
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 173 guests