9/11 Cult Watch

[Jeff]

7 pages back...

Thanks for that. How long does this ride last?

[orz]

It's astounding that there those here who would deny those who died at the WTC's and their families a full investigation (one worthy of that term) of the events of that day. It's even more astounding that these same individuals are quite happy to attack those who challenge the patently false and contrived NIST report.

And more astounding still that you continue to post this kind of incoherent tripe, apparently in response to hallucinations about reading this thread rather than the real words any of us actually posted.

[isachar]

It's astounding that there those here who would deny those who died at the WTC's and their families a full investigation (one worthy of that term) of the events of that day. It's even more astounding that these same individuals are quite happy to attack those who challenge the patently false and contrived NIST report.

And more astounding still that you continue to post this kind of incoherent tripe, apparently in response to hallucinations about reading this thread rather than the real words any of us actually posted.

So sorry this is beyond your ability to comprehend. I do understand that Jeff must maintain the illusion that there is some official dogma that requires all who wish to question the multiple crimes of 911 to swear allegiance to, but that's just his overactive imagination at work and his apparent need to present himself as a martyr and those who think that investigating all aspects of these crimes are below him.

So, within this thread, jeff has gone from 'it doesn't matter' to 'I think it should be investigated', to well, it should be investigated, but I still think that anyone who questions the official fairy tale, and bothers to put forth cogent analyses that calls it into questio is deserving of contempt and disgust.

Keep spinning it. You can't 'think it should be investigated' and then lower the boom on any and all who expose the official hoax as well as those who go a step further to explore other reasonable hypotheses.

Lessee, I think that's called having your cake and eating it too, or in a word - hypocrisy.

All aspects of this crime must be left open to reasonable hypotheses until such can be excluded through a valid and legitimate investigatory process.

As we know for certain with the 911 Whitewash Commission, there were many who brayed just as loud as Jeff and orzo do now against those who rejected its received wisdom that has since turned out to be a fraud.

The NIST portion of the coverup is no less transparently phony. Attacking those who - in addition to rejecting the Whitewash Commission also reject the NIST coverup - serves only those who continue to benefit from this part of the hoax.

Spin it donkey boy.

[orz]

official fairy tale

[FourthBase]

So, within this thread, jeff has gone from 'it doesn't matter' to 'I think it should be investigated', to well, it should be investigated, but I still think that anyone who questions the official fairy tale, and bothers to put forth cogent analyses that calls it into questio is deserving of contempt and disgust.

[Jeff]

So, within this thread, jeff has gone from 'it doesn't matter' to 'I think it should be investigated'

No: your words, my mouth. But I know nuance is lost on you. So here, analyze this:

[Searcher08]

and the purpose of keeping this p-o-s alive is?

[barracuda]

[Searcher08]

I am currently waiting on top of the Holy RI mountain praying to everyone from the Flying Spaghetti Monster to St Jude (Patron Saint of LOST CAUSES!!!) that you are right, barracuda

[brainpanhandler]

Dear Mr. Wells,

Frankly I am appalled by the course you have chosen to take in seeking truth and justice for all the victims of 911. The 911 truth movement (I hesitate to use the term “movement” as I am sure it will illicit a derisive sneer. Sneer away Mr. Wells) is comprised of a broad and diverse cast of characters, none of whom can claim to have the market on truth cornered. The Nist report is a transparently pathetic excuse for science and yet you stubbornly, nay, pig headedly mock and degrade all who say so and by your vicious slander you disgrace the memories of all who died on that fateful day. Who are you to sit in judgement of those fellow seekers for the truth who choose the path of science and physical evidence? Shame on you and your pathetic crowd of sycophants and hangers on. How do you sleep at night? The 911 whitewash commission must be exposed for the pack of lies that it is. The investigation must be reopened. And yet you dance away, you keep spinning and evading. Why so evasive Mr. Wells? You’re in good company Mr. Wells, good company, with the Amy Goodmans and the Noam Chumpskys, the new left gatekeepers. I’ll hound you Mr. Wells. You can’t hide. Go ahead, ban me. See where that gets you. Then what kind of credibility will you have oh high and mighty one? Hmmm? Well you won’t get away that easily Mr. having-your-cake-and-eating-it-to, oh no. I’ll keep asking the tough questions. By ridiculing the diligent researchers trying to bring forth hard science and cogent reasoning you only aid the perpetraitors of the big lie, the hoax, the sham. You’re a sham man Mr. Wells and you should be ashamed.

[isachar]

So, within this thread, jeff has gone from 'it doesn't matter' to 'I think it should be investigated'

No: your words, my mouth. But I know nuance is lost on you. So here, analyze this:

So cute there, Jeff. Keep on pummeling those who attempt to expose that part of the hoax of 911 covered up by the NIST commission. It's your way or the highway, isn't it?

You progressively avoid any discussion, then assert it doesn't matter, next that it should be invesigated, all the while continuing to maintain that those who attempt to do just that are worthy only of contempt and derision.

Don't see a problem there Amy?

on edit-

Brainpanhandler fully captures my sense of disgust with those who would rhetorically dance on the graves of the 3,000 people whose deaths, when they can no longer be ignored are cheapened by attacks on those who think they deserve better than what NIST offered them.

Through their own wordson this thread, they have first tried to ignore them, then asserted this aspect of the 911 crimes 'don't matter', and continue to condemn and subject to ridiculoe those who would have the temerity to suggest alternative hypotheses that are no less credible and at least as scientifically rigorous as the official phony fairy tale.

Shame is right brain. Shame on the Amy's on this board who seek to repress, intimidate and silence those who point out the transparent fraud known as the NIST report. Shame on those who do the same towards individuals who have gone to great effort and sacrifice to put forth alternative hypotheses and, lacking a valid investigation by those who are legally/institutionally required to do so, have conducted such investigations as they are able into this aspect of the official 911 hoax.

[8bitagent]

I feel like I'm one of the few "truth" researchers whose fascinated by the inner workings of the hijackers, al Qaeda, and the global spanning deep para politics and connections that lead to 9/11?

I mean, do these two new cooperativeresearch data blasts interest anyone besides me?

http://www.911blogger.com/node/14393
http://www.911blogger.com/node/14490

It feels like most 9/11 researchers don't really know that much about what actually led to 9/11 or how it was carried out. All they can tell us is about fake planes, Cheney, Bush, "Standowns", "CD", fake cell calls, framed innocent al Qaeda, etc.

[isachar]

I feel like I'm one of the few "truth" researchers whose fascinated by the inner workings of the hijackers, al Qaeda, and the global spanning deep para politics and connections that lead to 9/11?

I mean, do these two new cooperativeresearch data blasts interest anyone besides me?

http://www.911blogger.com/node/14393
http://www.911blogger.com/node/14490

It feels like most 9/11 researchers don't really know that much about what actually led to 9/11 or how it was carried out. All they can tell us is about fake planes, Cheney, Bush, "Standowns", "CD", fake cell calls, framed innocent al Qaeda, etc.

8bit, most of those whose research I have followed - as well as my own - are just as interested in those aspects of the crimes of 911 covered or covered up by the Whitewash Commission as those covered or covered up by the NIST Commission.

A couple Muckraker reports that may be of interest to you:

http://www.muckrakerreport.com/id324.html
http://www.muckrakerreport.com/id324.html

[orz]

Amy's

If i were a mod you'd be banned just for the multi-stupidity of this embarrassing contrivance.

[Jeff]

Brainpanhandler fully captures my sense of disgust