Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:How about you tell us what the Psychological Strategy Board was set up to do in 1951.
"Directive to: the Secretary of State, The Secretary of Defense, The Director of Central Intelligence: It is the purpose of this directive to authorize and provide for the more effective planning, coordination and conduct, within the framework of approved national policies, of psychological operations. There is hereby established a Psychological Strategy Board responsible, within the purposes and terms of this directive, for the formulation and promulgation, as guidance to the departments and agencies responsible for psychological operations, of over-all national psychological objectives, policies and programs, and for the coordination and evaluation of the national psychological effort.
The Board will report to the National Security Council on the Board's activities and on its evaluation of the national psychological operations, including implementation of approved objectives, policies, and programs by the departments and agencies concerned. The Board shall be composed of: a. The Undersecretary of State, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, and the Director of Central Intelligence, or, in their absence, their appropriate designees; b. An appropriate representative of the head of each such other department or agency of the Government as may, from time to time, be determined by the Board. The Board shall designate one of its members as Chairman. A representative of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall sit with the Board as its principal military adviser in order that the Board may ensure that its objectives, policies and programs shall be related to approved plans for military operations..."
Can I have my candy bar now, mister?
Give us your proof that the WWII Office of War Information's command of Hollywood stopped completely despite movies being tremendously effective forms of conditioning.
First, you'd have to define "command of Hollywood," which in your view means minute, pervasive manipulation of everything from casting actors for keyword value of their names alone to the placement of dog movies on store shelves to deflect attention from the trial of an Abu Ghraib dog handler.
The OWI was abolished in 1945. If you suggest it still exists, then it's up to you to provide proof -- it's not up to me to prove a negative.
Tell us that the widespread journalist psy-ops system exposed in the 1975 Senate Church Committee hearings doesn't continue and doesn'r show governance through media as proven.
Are there journalists in the employ of the CIA? Of course. Does the CIA control the placement of stories on Yahoo!'s front page to facilitate "keyword hijacking"? Nope. Unless you can prove it, it's simply a theory with no support.
That's another irritating trait of yours -- you can't imagine shades of control, or understand how someone can acknowledge CIA meddling in media, but no accept the depth of control that you believe exists.
Tell us how marketing and psy-ops are nothing alike.
Of course marketing and psyops are alike -- they are both designed to influence human behavior. But your leap -- that marketing IS a PSYOP, run by intelligence agencies and regularly hijacking keywords -- has no support whatsoever.
Bzzzzt. 3 strikes, you're out.