The Illuminati run the rug trade.
I got a beautiful rug. Really ties the room together.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
And if there is no intermediation (priestly or otherwise?), then who does the neophyte obey?
My only beef is when everyone wants to "contemplate their navel" while on hallucinogens and ignores social problems like hunger and homelessness.
teamdaemon wrote:True, but you're better off being socially managed than you are being initiated into the enlightened and consecrated to the Great Goddess.
I am afraid you are terribly confused. The ruling elite are not matrist. They do not worship a goddess. The feminine element of Christianity has been the target of persecution and extermination for 2000 years.It's the illuminated ones who are in trouble. People going along themselves might be blind, but people illuminated by an outside force are laying themselves open to being hijacked for the forces of evil.
It sounds like you are a bit paranoid. Being "highjacked" by an ideology of universal love and oneness isn't as bad as you make it sound. Reading the texts is one way. If you really want to feel it I would suggest that you try one of various plant sacraments that are increasingly available, especially if you live in England. I mean cannabis, psilocybin, peyote/san pedro, or ayahuasca. If you are really that worried about being possessed by evil spirits then find a native-born guide to help you through the experience.
Jeff wrote:In short, the ancient seers of the Mysteries in Europe and the Levant seem to have accomplished 2000 years ago what many of us have been attempting to do since 1947: figure out who the ETs are, where they originate, how they relate to us, and most important of all, how we ought to relate to them.
...
rothbardian wrote:Exactly--It's the same old baloney: "We're here to help you. We just need to take away your freedom first." Hillary, Rockefeller, Dick Cheney, Charles Manson, some sort of creepy non-humans and 4000-year-old "adepts"...they're all exactly the same to me-- they have a busybody philosophy that involves poking their noses into affairs that are none of their business, i.e. my life. It's the immoral concept of...controlling the lives of other people.
rothbardian wrote:
If it were all as PPan says it is...just a personal quest for spiritual awakening (or something), I'm all for the freedom to do such. But I'm seeing all of this stuff in a grand 'cosmic' context, where many powerful entities with ugly agendas have every reason in the world to try to 'snow' people with a bunch of deceptions. I'm certainly on the lookout for that sort of thing. I guess I would echo Morgan's (and Nemo's) concerns-- If they're "benevolent", then why is everything so secretive?
lunarose wrote:Valle explores the spiritual control component of ET actions on earth in great depth in his book Dimensions. from my reading of the book, i wouldn't take away that he is proposing a system exactly the same as the one supposed to be laid out by the gnostics. for one thing, in certain cases people have been healed and their lives greatly improved through alien contact. also, religions which have come to be accepted worldwide have been started and or propagated through contact which fits the same pattern as alien (he explores joseph smith's visions and the virgin of guadalupe from this perspective). he concentrates on the stories and images or ideas that come out of alien contact, and how these are spread and interpreted in the larger culture. i would recommend this book highly to anyone interested in the topic.
I contend that it's very possible the entire ET/UFO/etc phenomenon is all part of a millennia long psyops program by clearly non human intelligence whose puppeteered kingdoms and governments for quite awhile.
antiaristo wrote:professorpan wrote:The point Lash wants to make is to distinguish archaic initiatory tradition from priestly social engineering. It's the latter that's a project of "elitist control," not the former.
Exactly. Initiation rites are all about finding illumination and truth within one's SELF, as opposed to priestly intermediation between the Mystery and the masses.
Pan, if what you say is true, how do you account for the blood oaths?
And if there is no intermediation (priestly or otherwise?), then who does the neophyte obey?
But if I was to suppress my ego then being overtaken by someoneelse's would be the only possible outcome.
Funny how these losers will sell you this "Super-Galactic_Cosmic-Oneness" pipe dream of enlightenement, yet, for 4,000 years haven't beeen able to produce ONE "enlightened" individual.
This being the work of "deviant" adepts, yes? The "abuse" of iniatory knowledge? So where are all thse straight adepts?
Initiation in indigenous communities worldwide has one specific aspect.
Crossing the border between life and death to the afterlife/world of the dead, and meeting ancestors.
I wouldn't need to use my imagination if there was a gang of benevolent adepts working for the betterment of the minds of men.
Joe Hillshoist wrote:John E, just cos you haven't met any enlightened individuals doesn't mean there are none. Have you assessed every individual on the planet in the last 4000 years?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 175 guests