Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:Oh, do please elaborate on your dismissal of "pseudoscience." I dare you.
We 'discussed' this here and I didn't identify the psuedoscience on that list because I don't claim that anything on that list is pseudoscience. Keyword hijacking is the pseudoscience (although that is being generous). Your theory may be informed by everything on that list, but your theory still doesn't work. It has too many false positives. But that doesn't bother you because you are not doing science. What you're doing is closer to some postmodern media analysis.