Israel tasked with spying on Americans - Bamford

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby stefano » Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:20 am

American Dream wrote:I've been looking at the arguments for a Zionist conspiracy ruling the world for a long time now, and it seems to be crap.


Well, yes, it is crap. I never said Zionists "rule the world". No one group rules the world. What I'm saying is Zionists have influence in US affairs of state out of all proportion to the usefulness of Israel as an ally of any kind and contrary to the interests of US citizens, partly thanks to the efforts by American Jews to keep the Holocaust and Hitler in the forefront of people's minds, to paint any criticism of Israel as anti-Semitism, and to bully or bribe politicians on their way up.

stating a clear position with regards to the validity of the Protocols.


"I don't know and I don't care" is a clear position. Why do I need to read up on an obscure Russian text from a hundred years ago to talk about current affairs?
User avatar
stefano
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby AlicetheKurious » Wed Nov 26, 2008 7:22 am

American Dream said:

I have done a good deal of progressive activism around Palestine/Israel. I think that not being clear about "anti-Semitism" and its relation to overblown theories of Jewish global domination, is like going before the ADL, ZOA, WJC and all the rest, and taping a giant "Kick Me!" sign to your back.


No. First, the ADL, ZOA, the WJC and all the rest have neither the moral nor intellectual authority to impose their interpretation of reality on me. In fact, they are the very last people I would ever entrust with my brain, even if I were inclined to hand it over to anyone, which I am not. Forgive me for being blunt, but your thinly-veiled threat that if I know what's good for me, as one self-described "progressive" buddy to another, I'd better not stray outside the boundaries drawn by these cretinous intellectual bully-boys, is not only insulting to my intelligence, but profoundly hypocritical.

I wonder if you're capable of appreciating the irony: "American Dream" is advising "Alice the Curious" not to be too curious, not to think too freely, and to watch what she says, for fear of what "the ADL, ZOA, the WJC and all the rest" will do. First, if I understand you correctly, you're saying that regardless of what I'm actually arguing, and regardless of the evidence I present in support, all you are capable of hearing is "World Jewish Conspiracy".

Second, you seem to be warning me: "There is no 'World Jewish Conspiracy' but you'd better not talk about it or The Jews will Get You." Orwell used the term double-think to describe that sort of thing. Deeply embedding two irrational, mutually exclusive, emotionally-charged archetypes in people's minds (the Holocaust Victim and the Omnipotent, Wrathful Jew), and programming them as an automatic response to any mention of Jewish people, is a powerful method of short-circuiting rational thought about anything involving the action of any individual or organization that uses the "Jewish" label.

It seems the American Dream is turning into an Orwellian nightmare. How sad for you.

This reminds me of something I once heard, about how elephants are trained. When they're still babies, one leg is chained to a post driven into the ground. After struggling in vain to free itself, the baby eventually learns to give up even trying. The lesson is so deeply embedded that long after the elephant becomes huge and powerful, all it takes is the thinnest of chains around its leg to keep it still, no post necessary.

The reason I bring this up, is that I've looked everywhere, even under the bed and behind the door, and haven't found any evidence of the "ADL, ZOA, the WJC and all the rest", coming to get me. Furthermore, as far as I can tell, you're the one who's been trying to tape a giant "Kick Me!" sign on my back, by gratuitously introducing the Protocols and dishonestly framing my arguments as "World Jewish Conspiracy" theory, waving them like a giant red cape to call forth the bull.

This is the kind of tactic that prevails in the 'real world' outside the RI board, where all too often ideas and evidence are suppressed with violence and threats, where slogans and the parroting of second-hand thoughts have replaced intelligent discourse and where conditioned responses have replaced reason. No wonder it's such a mess.

I do feel that all ideas should be able to be considered rationally, and not ruled out a priori. Problem is, I've been looking at the arguments for a Zionist conspiracy ruling the world for a long time now, and it seems to be crap.


Well, goody for you. You've examined all the evidence, you've made up your presumably superior mind, you've neatly labeled and filed it all away, and now you're generously trying to save the rest of us from going to the trouble of figuring things out for ourselves. How very...big brotherly of you.
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Sounder » Wed Nov 26, 2008 8:35 am

American Dream wrote:
I've been looking at the arguments for a Zionist conspiracy ruling the world for a long time now, and it seems to be crap.

stefano wrote...

Well, yes, it is crap. I never said Zionists "rule the world". No one group rules the world. What I'm saying is Zionists have influence in US affairs of state out of all proportion to the usefulness of Israel as an ally of any kind and contrary to the interests of US citizens, partly thanks to the efforts by American Jews to keep the Holocaust and Hitler in the forefront of people's minds, to paint any criticism of Israel as anti-Semitism, and to bully or bribe politicians on their way up.


AD, if you are 'really' looking for a Zionist conspiracy then you are not aiming high enough. The PTMB (powers that make believe) rely on the manufacture of emotional entanglements that serve to fix ones thought-loops to low grade resonance patterns. Surely you have no desire to contribute to this, right? :fingerwag:


Thank-you Alice
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:14 am

stefano wrote:
No one group rules the world. What I'm saying is Zionists have influence in US affairs of state out of all proportion to the usefulness of Israel as an ally of any kind and contrary to the interests of US citizens, partly thanks to the efforts by American Jews to keep the Holocaust and Hitler in the forefront of people's minds, to paint any criticism of Israel as anti-Semitism, and to bully or bribe politicians on their way up.

stefano, I agree very much with your statement, and I would add one caveat: The State of Israel is far more useful to U.S. elites than it is to the average citizen.



AlicetheKurious wrote:
First, the ADL, ZOA, the WJC and all the rest have neither the moral nor intellectual authority to impose their interpretation of reality on me. In fact, they are the very last people I would ever entrust with my brain, even if I were inclined to hand it over to anyone, which I am not. Forgive me for being blunt, but your thinly-veiled threat that if I know what's good for me, as one self-described "progressive" buddy to another, I'd better not stray outside the boundaries drawn by these cretinous intellectual bully-boys, is not only insulting to my intelligence, but profoundly hypocritical.

I literally have a different perspective. I am looking at this from the standpoint of organizing in North America within heterogenous communities. What I have seen, again and again, is how any apparent taint of racism can and will be used by the defenders of Israel to undermine efforts to do anything at all progressive for the goal of Peace and Justice in Palestine/Israel. Please note that I am not saying there necessarily is in those cases any anti-Jewish sentiment, just that the charges will be used as a roadblock. I am enough of a "conspiracy theorist" to countenance the idea that these sorts of tactics may be organized and taught by people here who are directly tied to the Israeli State.

I have seen this happen again and again in different locales where we have waged campaigns. Thus I feel that it is of the utmost importance that these campaigns be implemented without any (even apparent) taint of racism or cultural insensitivity.



AlicetheKurious wrote:
I wonder if you're capable of appreciating the irony: "American Dream" is advising "Alice the Curious" not to be too curious, not to think too freely, and to watch what she says, for fear of what "the ADL, ZOA, the WJC and all the rest" will do. First, if I understand you correctly, you're saying that regardless of what I'm actually arguing, and regardless of the evidence I present in support, all you are capable of hearing is "World Jewish Conspiracy"

I can not validate your interpretation of reality here. I'm not telling you what to think, nor am I telling you to hide the truth for fear of the Zionist organizations. It is true that I have been asking you what your position is towards tropes of World Jewish Conspiracy such as "The Elders of Zion" thesis.



AlicetheKurious wrote:
as far as I can tell, you're the one who's been trying to tape a giant "Kick Me!" sign on my back, by gratuitously introducing the Protocols and dishonestly framing my arguments as "World Jewish Conspiracy" theory, waving them like a giant red cape to call forth the bull.

I don't think that it's gratuitous at all. If you are going to argue that "the Zionists" rule America, and hence the World, well that argument exists within a historical and intellectual context, and that context includes 100+ years of fabrications along these lines. If you feel that it is meaningful to look at these arguments divorced from any such context, then that's how you feel.

What I can support personally is a strong critique of the Israeli State, complemented with a "deep politics" analysis that looks critically at Israeli efforts toward international influence in context, thus recognizing a conspiratorial ecology which includes all the concentrations of power around the world, most especially in the political and financial realms.



Sounder wrote:
The PTMB (powers that make believe) rely on the manufacture of emotional entanglements that serve to fix ones thought-loops to low grade resonance patterns.

I agree strongly. Again and again I have seen very positive activist efforts melt down due to the emotional charge around the various issues related to Palestine/Israel, be it Jewish sensitivities around "anti-Semitism", activists' desire for Justice, or what have you. For this reason, I know that it is important that we be very thoughtful about how we present our arguments. If our goal is to create positive change, and not simply to vent emotion, than our words and actions must be impeccable.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Sounder » Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:12 am

AD wrote...

If you are going to argue that "the Zionists" rule America, and hence the World


It is not the same thing, to say Zionists have undue influence in American affairs and saying that "Zionists" 'rule' America. This is an example of category confusion and reframing. You change 'influence' to 'rule' and thereby exagerate the claim, remove proper meaning from the category 'influence', and by connecting 'rule' to 'Zionists' a falisy is presented as someone elses belief.

Careful American Dream, or people might start to think of you as the Diane Rhiems of RI.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:20 am

Sounder wrote:
It is not the same thing, to say Zionists have undue influence in American affairs and saying that "Zionists" 'rule' America.


Agreed, and the relationship between Uncle Sam and Israel is an unhealthy one. To what degree this relationship is driven by elites, and to what degree it is driven by the grassroots is a different question. However saying that Americans are governed by "ZOG", the Zionist Occupation Government, is a different matter entirely...
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Sounder » Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:03 pm

American Dream, I reread AtK's guerrilla in the room post, which I heartily agree with, so that I must admit that my assertions were sketchey at best.

So I'm sorry.

More like the inherent sloppiness of language.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby AlicetheKurious » Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:29 pm

American Dream said:

What I have seen, again and again, is how any apparent taint of racism can and will be used by the defenders of Israel to undermine efforts to do anything at all progressive for the goal of Peace and Justice in Palestine/Israel. Please note that I am not saying there necessarily is in those cases any anti-Jewish sentiment, just that the charges will be used as a roadblock. I am enough of a "conspiracy theorist" to countenance the idea that these sorts of tactics may be organized and taught by people here who are directly tied to the Israeli State.

I have seen this happen again and again in different locales where we have waged campaigns. Thus I feel that it is of the utmost importance that these campaigns be implemented without any (even apparent) taint of racism or cultural insensitivity.


Again, no. In my experience, the greatest danger to activists is allowing others, especially their enemy, to define what is acceptable and what is not, and themselves to be drawn into a rigged game on the enemy's home turf. Take zionist apologists, for example: characteristically, they'll make up for the flimsiness of their moral, intellectual and historical case by trying to put their opponent on the defensive using their trusty bag of tricks, which includes gimmicks like -- out of the blue-- accusing their opponent of being a fan of the Protocols, of being an "anti-semite" etc. (I'm not accusing you of being a zionist, AD, but obviously you've internalized quite a bit of the zionist wold-view and tactics, perhaps without even realizing it.)

Like I said, the first crucial thing for a zionist apologist to do is to try to set up the terms of discourse in such a way that the zionist places him or herself on the high ground, as a sanctimonious and self-righteous judge of the anti-zionist, and the anti-zionist in the position of seeking the zionist's approval! This is a particularly neat trick, since in reality, the flimsy and easily exposed moral basis of zionist ideology is actually its single weakest point. But a great deal of groundwork has already been prepared in advance, in unexamined assumptions, memes and themes widely disseminated through the popular media, so the rational and moral defenses of the anti-zionist may have already been softened.

Should the anti-zionist be too smart to fall for that, and keep disseminating information that is damaging to the zionist narrative, the zionist apologist then typically throws diversionary smoke bombs into the discussion, often in the form of deliberate provocation and disruption, in the hope that the anti-zionist will lose his or her temper. The point is to ensure at all cost that the debate cannot go forward in a rational and informative manner, and most certainly not focus on relevant issues or facts.

Depressingly, this tactic works all too often. By allowing themselves to be manipulated and maneuvered this way, activists can quickly become demoralized and shaken, preferring to keep silent rather than deal with these kinds of attacks. This can create feelings of resignation, self-contempt or self-loathing in the anti-zionist for what he or she perceives as cowardice in the face of what he or she knows to be wrong. This can have terrible consequences.

What to do? I have to go to bed now, and I have a busy day tomorrow, so my answer to that question will have to wait. In the meantime, I'd like to open the floor to suggestions. To be cont'd...
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Wed Nov 26, 2008 8:46 pm

I will just say this: I have never ever met, much less worked with, an anti-Occupation activist who uses terms like "ZOG" nor claims that Zionists run the United States and/or the World. And I know a lot of activists, including some pretty important ones.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby AlicetheKurious » Thu Nov 27, 2008 2:47 am

Again and again I have seen very positive activist efforts melt down due to the emotional charge around the various issues related to Palestine/Israel, be it Jewish sensitivities around "anti-Semitism", activists' desire for Justice, or what have you.


I'm not surprised that you've seen "very positive activist efforts melt down" since I suspect, based on this very thread as Exhibit A, that there might have been a rather important causal relationship between the "melt-down" and your participatin in those efforts. (Tell me AD: did you throw any "Protocols" stink-bombs into those positive activist efforts? Or did you use something else? Do tell) :wink:

People who are interested in learning all about the tactics of "gatekeepers" should take a good look at this thread, and how the very important topic it was covering has been elbowed aside so that the thread is now all about us.

I'm writing in my car, btw, gotta go.
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:47 am

Not only would all the anti-Occupation activists that I know definitively eschew the use of the term "ZOG", if you asked them about the Protocols they would quickly tell you that of course the document is bullshit, as well as the concept behind it.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Sounder » Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:14 am

Now I am sorry I said I was sorry. Zionism proves itself to be a racist ideology every day as they steal and kill in a land 'given' to them by a third party using money extorted from a fourth party.

The idea that one might be 'discredited' for pointing this out is proof of moral inversion within our authority structures.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby stefano » Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:52 am

Back to things that actually matter, via Alternet:

On Monday afternoon, a jury in Dallas, Texas found five Palestinian men guilty of more than 100 charges in the nation's largest terrorism financing trial since 9/11 [...]

Edward Abington, the former number two intelligence official at the State Department (and ex-US consul in Jerusalem), told jurors he was never told that the Palestinian charity committees supported by Holy Land were part of Hamas in the daily intelligence briefings he received. In fact, these same charities, or "zakat committees," still receive donations from the U.S. Agency for International Development and the International Red Cross. [...]

Over fervent objections from the defense, the judge in the Holy Land trial allowed the prosecution to present testimony from an anonymous Israeli intelligence agent. This bizarre episode marked the first time in American legal history that testimony has been allowed from an expert witness with no identity. If the witness, who was introduced to the jury simply as "Avi," lied or committed perjury, he faces no consequences. He is officially non-existent, after all.
User avatar
stefano
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Sounder » Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:16 am

Zionists are not the big fish that they imagine themselves to be. As circumstances force them to confront their ignorance, then, at that time I will give them a break. We are all ignorant, after all. Till then, they might do well to stay away from bigger fish.
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Thu Nov 27, 2008 9:53 am

Sounder wrote:
Zionism proves itself to be a racist ideology every day as they steal and kill in a land 'given' to them by a third party using money extorted from a fourth party.

The idea that one might be 'discredited' for pointing this out is proof of moral inversion within our authority structures.


The war crimes and other violations of international law by the State of Israel are extensively documented, and thoroughly reprehensible. However, that is a different matter than the contention that the U.S. is governed by "ZOG".

It is not the Peace and Justice crowd that generally uses that term...
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 127 guests