The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:12 pm

Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:...still getting signed out and losing all my posts....fuck. So I'm posting this short-hand extra pissed.

JEEZUS, WR. Atrocity propaganda and exploiting feminism as a wedge is so obvious I didn't bother to point that psyops out in favore of the pictogram aphorism that most wouldn't get at this pathetic UFO-sucking board functioning as a honeypot for counterpropagandists MILES ahead of y'all.

What is that picture of the infant and needle saying? "BIG BABY!" duh. fuck.

It...is...called...a...PICTOGRAM. And it is used for the know-nothings who scan and do not read.
Can RI relate to the concept that there are people on the planet not exactly like themselves?
To not do so is a fucking FASCIST mentality.


You know, when you're this pissed off, maybe you just shouldn't post?
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby Nordic » Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm

OK, so today I had to go to Ralphs and stock up on some chow for the family. I took my son wtih me, who's 7.

Now, I have been to this Ralph's a million times. And I have been amazed, the past few years, now they never EVER have news magazines by the checkout aisles. Never. It's always tabloids, and People and fashion mags.

But now? That TIME magazine cover was at every damn aisle. Every one!

Ralph's is part of Kroger, one of the Big Three of the grocery chains in the United States.

I can't help but think that someone in upper management decided that that fucking magazine as gonna be on display to every Ralph's customer in California.

And it is. At least the Ralph's I was at, and around here you can't tell them apart. Unless you go to the 'hood, where they sell some different stuff.

Fortunately my son didn't notice it. Because I really did NOT want to have to explain to him what happened to that girl's nose.

I wonder who owns Kroger? And what their politicial allegiances are ...?
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby undead » Thu Aug 05, 2010 3:42 am

Wombaticus Rex wrote:
Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:...still getting signed out and losing all my posts....fuck. So I'm posting this short-hand extra pissed.

JEEZUS, WR. Atrocity propaganda and exploiting feminism as a wedge is so obvious I didn't bother to point that psyops out in favore of the pictogram aphorism that most wouldn't get at this pathetic UFO-sucking board functioning as a honeypot for counterpropagandists MILES ahead of y'all.

What is that picture of the infant and needle saying? "BIG BABY!" duh. fuck.

It...is...called...a...PICTOGRAM. And it is used for the know-nothings who scan and do not read.
Can RI relate to the concept that there are people on the planet not exactly like themselves?
To not do so is a fucking FASCIST mentality.


You know, when you're this pissed off, maybe you just shouldn't post?


There is a guy on the History Channel series called Ancient Aliens who is really gung ho about the idea, so much so that he looks like he is going to explode when he talks about it. His eyes pop out of his head and his face turns red. He can hardly contain himself. I saw that special and I couldn't help thinking about what the huge manatee would say, especially at the end with all the military types talking about current ufo sightings. There was a pretty good CIA alien psyop thread recently so I won't get too deep into it. Suffice to say that I am pretty convinced that the literalist UFO craze is a government psyop. The guy in the special reminded me of HMW because of the vociferousness and frantic urgency. He has basically the same manner as HMW except pro-aliens. Kinda funny.

So Hugh, if everyone on the board all suddenly snapped into a trance and said together, "YES... HUGH MANATEE WINS IS RIGHT... THE MASS MEDIA ARE MICROMANAGED BY THE CIA WITH COMPLEX LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING..." Then what would happen? Where would we go from there? I mean besides agreeing with everything that Hugh says ad infinitum.

must... analyze... propaganda... minutely... all the time... :x
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
User avatar
undead
 
Posts: 997
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:23 am
Location: Doumbekistan
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby 82_28 » Thu Aug 05, 2010 4:21 am

must... analyze... propaganda... minutely... all the time... :x


Such a simple, not even all that profound way to put it. But so profound. That is exactly it though. Everything is propaganda. Even the shit that's not. It's memes, meta relations between symbols, nothing can ever be claimed to be 100% CIA manipulation. And that's the beauty of it all. As you said undead:

must analyze propaganda minutely all the time

Hugh is merely one of the figures I happen to monitor in such a way, AND has colored my views of all movies and media since I began reading his ass some years ago and I DO thank him for it! But it's like when you're at an ice cream cone place and you are offered two scoops for the price of one. It will make you sick -- if you're like me at least. You're fine with only one scoop. No need for two. Hugh (all apologies for talking about you, Hugh -- but you do know you are unique), seems to dip in twice for every conspiracy. I firmly believe in "psyops" and the whole Disney thing even. But it's the fact that humans still interface with one another in "real time" that make his whole over arching theories somewhat fall apart, at least insofar as how ubiquitous it is. I always see what he is saying, I don't even know if he is necessarily even going overboard.

It is not about being right. But is about pointing to trends and ideas that may produce unsavory assholes who have crafted a way to "profit" and create certain other vectors of "profit" once the seeds have been cast. Hence, why I do not trust, myself, the entity of wikileaks. Too easy, too perfect, too filled with phony malfeasance. All war is illegal. This does not need to be proven by leaks that nobody is going to care about anyways. Those who care, already know. What they know will not help them or the victims (all of us) to stop the great machine of control. It's gotten to us already, almost two thousand years ago and many see it -- it plays itself out as the popularization of atheism right now. They are upgrading. Upgrades take some time, as we know. . .

Now we wait for it to load to see just what this program exactly does.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby stefano » Thu Aug 05, 2010 4:27 am

undead wrote:You know, because you're putting the public at risk when you don't get vaccinated.
You sort of are... Assuming a vaccine that works I mean, I have nothing to say about the MMR vaccine in question but polio and smallpox vaccines have saved a hell of a lot of lives, and depend on widespread use to work.

What is Herd Immunity?
User avatar
stefano
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Thu Aug 05, 2010 6:09 am

Yeah vaccines work to a point.

Providing they are clean, and they aren't for seasonal diseases, especially ones that can change mid season, then they are great.

But if you are vaccinated and someone else isn't then you aren't at risk.

I assumed that was your point undead.
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10616
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby undead » Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:19 pm

Vaccines are definitely very important in some situations, particularly in areas where those diseases are a serious risk. The United States is not really one of those places, though. Most of the stuff we are forced to get vaccinated for has been eradicated, so the risk for a individual who chooses to refuse the vaccines is minimal. If the risk for the individual is minimal, the risk for everyone else (who are vaccinated) is even less. I do not deny that vaccination programs are very useful to societies for eradicating diseases, but that doesn't mean that they are safe and healthy for individuals. Speaking out against the dangers of vaccines isn't about trying to get rid of them, it's about trying to change them to something more safe. Time magazine would like you to think that those crazy hippies want to take all the vaccines away and go back to the stone age, but that isn't really the case.

Thimerosol is the worst part of it and also the easiest to eliminate. They only use it so they can dilute the supply and maximize profits at the expense of public health. The worse public health is, the more money they make. There is a whole industry of privatized social services dealing with developmental disabilities that is growing exponentially because of this problem.
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
User avatar
undead
 
Posts: 997
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:23 am
Location: Doumbekistan
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby Nordic » Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:21 pm

How did this turn into a vaccine thread, or am I missing something?
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:31 pm

Its just an example of the way Time covers are blatant propaganda.

Neither undead or me are actually opposed to vaccinations, just pointing out the bullshit in the way the covers put together.
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10616
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby MinM » Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:17 am

Earth-704509
User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3287
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby undead » Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:10 am

Image

Image

Lenard A Adler M.D.
Professor
Departments of Psychiatry (VA) and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Langone Medical Center

Phone: (212)263-3580
Fax: (212)263-3581

Rivergate, 4, 427,
403 East 34th Street
New York, NY, 10016

Publications

1. Adler L.A.; Ciranni M.; Shaw D.M.; Paunikar P.. "ADHD screening and follow-up: Results from a survey of participants 2 years after an adult ADHD screening day". Primary Psychiatry. 2010; 17: 32 (#J0187382)

2. Durell, Todd; Adler, Lenard; Wilens, Timothy; Paczkowski, Martin; Schuh, Kory. "Atomoxetine Treatment for ADHD: Younger Adults Compared with Older Adults". Journal of attention disorders. 2010; 13: 401 (#J0180779)

3. Goodman D.; Faraone S.V.; Adler L.A.; Dirks B.; Hamdani M.; Weisler R.. "Interpreting ADHD rating scale scores: Linking ADHD rating scale scores and CGI levels in two randomized controlled trials of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in ADHD". Primary Psychiatry. 2010; 17: 44 (#J0187794)

4. Goodman, David; Faraone, Stephen V; Adler, Lenard A; Dirks, Bryan; Hamdani, Mohamed; Weisler, Richard. ""Interpreting ADHD rating scale scores: Linking ADHD rating scale scores and CGI levels in two randomized controlled trials of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in ADHD": Erratum". Primary Psychiatry. 2010; 17: 18 (#J0190855)

5. Reimherr, Frederick; Amsterdam, Jay; Dunner, David; Adler, Lenard; Zhang, Shuyu; Williams, David; Marchant, Barrie; Michelson, David; Nierenberg, Andrew; Schatzberg, Alan; Feldman, Peter. "Genetic polymorphisms in the treatment of depression: speculations from an augmentation study using atomoxetine". Psychiatry research. 2010; 175: 67 (#J0189504)


His page lists over 100 publications, almost all about "Adult ADD". He is very fond of this drug called "Atomoxetine"

Important Warning:

Studies have shown that children and teenagers with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; more difficulty focusing, controlling actions, and remaining still or quiet than other people who are the same age) who take atomoxetine are more likely to think about killing themselves than children and teenagers with ADHD who do not take atomoxetine.

While your child is taking atomoxetine, you should watch his or her behavior very carefully, especially at the beginning of treatment and any time his or her dose is increased or decreased. Your child may develop serious symptoms very suddenly, so it is important to pay attention to his or her behavior every day. Ask other people who spend a lot of time with your child, such as brothers, sisters, and teachers to tell you if they notice changes in your child's behavior. Call your child's doctor right away if your child experiences any of these symptoms: acting more subdued or withdrawn than usual; feeling helpless, hopeless, or worthless; new or worsening depression; thinking or talking about harming or killing him- or herself or planning or trying to do so; extreme worry; agitation; panic attacks; difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep; irritability; aggressive or violent behavior; acting without thinking; extreme increase in activity or talking; frenzied, abnormal excitement; or any other sudden or unusual changes in behavior.

Your child's doctor will want to see your child often while he or she is taking atomoxetine, especially at the beginning of his or her treatment. Your child's doctor may also want to speak with you or your child by telephone from time to time. Be sure that your child keeps all appointments for office visits or telephone conversations with his or her doctor.

Your doctor or pharmacist will give you the manufacturer's patient information sheet (Medication Guide) when you begin treatment with atomoxetine and each time you refill your prescription. Read the information carefully and ask your doctor or pharmacist if you have any questions. You can also visit the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website (http://www.fda.gov/Drugs) or the manufacturer's website to obtain the Medication Guide.

Talk to your doctor about the risks of giving atomoxetine to your child, of using other treatments for your child's condition, and of not treating your child's condition.


Why is this medication prescribed?


Atomoxetine is used as part of a total treatment program to increase the ability to pay attention and decrease impulsiveness and hyperactivity in children and adults with ADHD. Atomoxetine is in a class of medications called selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. It works by increasing the levels of norepinephrine, a natural substance in the brain that is needed to control behavior.

What side effects can this medication cause?

Atomoxetine may cause side effects. Tell your doctor if any of these symptoms are severe or do not go away:

* heartburn
* nausea
* vomiting
* loss of appetite
* weight loss
* constipation
* stomach pain
* gas
* dry mouth
* excessive tiredness
* dizziness
* headache
* mood swings
* decreased sex drive or ability
* difficulty urinating
* painful or irregular menstrual periods
* muscle pain
* sweating
* hot flashes
* unusual dreams
* burning or tingling in the hands, arms, feet, or legs

Some side effects can be serious. If you experience any of the following symptoms, or those listed in the IMPORTANT WARNING or SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS section, call your doctor immediately:

* fast or pounding heartbeat
* chest pain
* shortness of breath
* slow or difficult speech
* dizziness or faintness
* weakness or numbness of an arm or leg
* swelling of the face, throat, tongue, lips, eyes, hands, feet, ankles, or lower legs
* hoarseness
* difficulty swallowing or breathing
* hives
* rash
* abnormal thoughts
* hallucinating (seeing things or hearing voices that do not exist)
* erection that lasts for several hours or longer
* seizures

Atomoxetine may cause sudden death in children and teenagers with heart defects or serious heart problems. This medication also may cause sudden death, heart attack or stroke in adults, especially adults with heart defects or serious heart problems. Talk to your doctor about the risks of taking this medication or of giving this medication to your child.

Atomoxetine may slow down children's growth or weight gain. Your child's doctor will probably monitor your child carefully during his or her treatment with atomoxetine. Talk to your child's doctor about the risks of giving this medication to your child.

Atomoxetine may cause other side effects. Call your doctor if you have any unusual problems while taking this medication.


ADHD Drug May Require More Study

September 23rd, 2002

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) - Eli Lilly and Co. on Wednesday said regulators may require more study of an experimental treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder before it can be marketed. However, Indianapolis-based Lilly said it had received an "approvable letter" from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which usually indicates the FDA is prepared to approve a drug but only once certain conditions are met.

Lilly said it hoped to introduce Strattera next spring, but at least one analyst said that might be overly optimistic. Approval hinges on discussions on the drug's label and submission of additional data or analyses from either existing studies or a potential new study, Lilly said. Unlike Ritalin and other drugs to treat ADHD, Strattera is not a stimulant - a factor Lilly hopes will make the medication more convenient to pick up from pharmacies.

Because stimulants carry potential for abuse, pharmacies require written prescriptions and do not allow refills. Lilly spokesman David Shaffer and FDA spokeswoman Laura Bradbard both declined to comment on the agency's clinical concerns. An industry analyst said Lilly may be too optimistic in its timeline for the drug, given that a new study may be required. "Almost certainly it is going to cause a delay," said Hemant K. Shah, an independent analyst from Warren, N.J. "It's a little surprising that the FDA is asking for this."Strattera's market potential is large at a time when Lilly needs a new drug to offset recent setbacks, Shah said. Those include last summer's loss of patent protection for the anti-depressant Prozac, Lilly's former best-seller, and manufacturing problems at Lilly plants in Indianapolis that could delay approvals of three other new drugs.

Lilly's Shaffer said Strattera will be produced at plants in Ireland and Puerto Rico, so its approval will not hinge on the success of Lilly's efforts to resolve the FDA's concerns in Indianapolis. Lilly shares rose 4 percent on Wednesday, closing up $2.28 to $58.24 on the New York Stock Exchange.

While many associate ADHD only with children, the condition exists in about 4 percent of adults, said Dr. Leonard Adler, a clinical psychiatrist at New York University who conducted an adult study of Strattera and has received research grants from Lilly. Symptoms include short attention span, impulsive behavior and difficulty focusing and sitting still. Strattera works by blocking reabsorption of a neurotransmitter that moves messages between brain cells. "The studies so far have shown the medicine to be very well-tolerated, and side effects are limited," including a slight increase in a patient's blood pressure and pulse, Adler said.

Strattera - A New ADHD Medication

Strattera is a Non-Stimulant Drug for ADHD

By Vincent Iannelli, M.D., About.com Guide

Updated September 30, 2005

While a lot of 'new' medications for treating ADHD have been introduced recently, like Adderall XR, Concerta, Focalin, Ritalin LA, etc., they are still all stimulants.

The FDA has now approved Strattera (atomoxetine), a new non-stimulant drug to treat ADHD in adults and children over age 6. This is not the first non-stimulant medication for ADHD though. Antidepressants, including Wellbutrin (bupropion hydrochloride) and tricyclics, like Desipramine and Imipramine, have long been considered second line medications, and are sometimes used when two or more stimulants don't work, are contraindicated, or cause too many side effects. Antidepressants are usually not considered to be as effective as stimulants though. And these medicines aren't FDA approved to treat ADHD, so Strattera's claim of being 'the first non-controlled medication that's FDA-approved to treat ADHD' is technically true.

The introduction of Strattera (pronounced Stra-tair-a) is going to be welcome news for most parents. Although widely known to be safe and effective, stimulants like Adderall and Ritalin, have long had a bad reputation and many parents are anti-Ritalin and hesitant to put their kids on a stimulant. So if it isn't a stimulant, how does Strattera work? It is thought to be 'a potent inhibitor of the presynaptic norepinephrine transporter,'1 which causes more norepinehrine to be available to increase attention and control hyperactivity and impulsivity. Like the stimulants, it is not yet known exactly how Strattera works though.

Although a new medicine, six research studies have already been done that show that Strattera is safe and effective.

One of these studies, Atomoxetine and methylphenidate treatment in children with ADHD: a prospective, randomized, open-label trial,1 compared Strattera and Ritalin. These children with ADHD, 228 in all, received either Strattera or Ritalin for 10 weeks, and those who took Strattera were found to have 'symptom reduction' and 'tolerability' that were 'comparable to that observed with' Ritalin.

Strattera Suicide Warning

Although infrequent, the FDA has warned about an increased risk of suicidal thinking in children and adolescents being treated with Strattera. Specifically, like many other psychiatric medications, the FDA states that Strattera 'may increase thoughts of suicide or suicide attempts in children and teens,' and that parents should call their child's doctor if their child has:

* new or increased thoughts of suicide
* changes in mood or behavior including becoming irritable or anxious

This warning doesn't mean that your child can't be prescribed Strattera or that he should stop taking Strattera if it is doing a good job managing his ADHD symptoms and not causing side effects. Instead, the benefit of taking Strattera should be weighed against the possible risks of the drug. And children taking Strattera should be 'observed closely for clinical worsening, suicidal thinking or behaviors, or unusual changes in behavior,' especially in the first few months of starting treatment or when the dosage is changed.
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
User avatar
undead
 
Posts: 997
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:23 am
Location: Doumbekistan
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby Nordic » Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:29 pm

Check THIS shit out!

An internal Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) document released by WikiLeaks in March reveals a secret plan to use the plight of Afghan women and refugees in developing media strategies to "leverage French (and other European) guilt" during an especially bloody summer of military escalation. The confidential document was prepared by the Red Cell, a secretive group that consults the US intelligence community.

.........

"Outreach initiatives that create media opportunities for Afghan women to share their stories with French, German and other European women could help overcome pervasive skepticism among women in Western Europe. Media events that feature testimonials by Afghan women would probably be most effective if broadcast on programs that have large and disproportionately female audiences."

The Red Cell memo encouraged creating media opportunities for Afghan women because of their "ability to speak personally and credibly about their experiences under the Taliban, their aspirations for the future, and their fears of a Taliban victory."

The Role of the Media

Jennifer Pozner, the director of Women in Media and News, a media analysis and advocacy group, told Truthout that the similarity between the Red Cell memo and Time magazine's push for militarism as the answer to the abuse of women is not a new phenomenon.

Pozner said that, following 9/11, the Bush administration used "the supposed humanitarian aspect of the war [to sell it to] those few who weren't convinced by rah-rah patriotism." Support of the corporate press was essential.

Pozner, who had followed the coverage of Afghan women in the media before the 9/11 terrorist attacks, said she saw this cynical trend continue under the Obama administration. The women's rights issue became a convenient propaganda tool for corporate media to sell the war.

"Once Afghan women and girls' suffering was no longer needed as a propaganda device, we quickly lost sight of their stories again in the U.S. media," Pozner said.

Nahid Aziz, an Afghan woman and professor of clinical psychology at Argosy University in Washington, DC, who now works with Afghans at home and immigrants in the United States, also derided the American media's concentration on the plight of Afghan women as a "political tactic ... that unfortunately is very true and representative of the American media."

"There are phases of talking about Afghan women, but there is no continued kind of attention," Aziz said. "It is all dependant on the politics."



http://www.truth-out.org/between-bomb-and-burqa62110
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby Jeff » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:41 pm

Nordic wrote:Check THIS shit out!

An internal Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) document released by WikiLeaks in March reveals a secret plan to use the plight of Afghan women and refugees in developing media strategies to "leverage French (and other European) guilt" during an especially bloody summer of military escalation. The confidential document was prepared by the Red Cell, a secretive group that consults the US intelligence community....


That's very interesting, and makes this even more interesting:

MAY 4, 2010 11:10AM
How TIME Magazine hijacked Afghan activist Malalai Joya

Beware of Greeks bearing gifts, Homer wrote thousands of years ago. Today human rights activists would be well-advised to beware of major American news magazines passing out honors. Last week, noted Afghan politician Malalai Joya, the author of "A Woman Among Warlords" whom the BBC has called “the bravest woman in Afghanistan,” was named one of TIME Magazine’s “World’s Most Influential 100 People” of 2010. The trouble is, the magazine presented her to the world in a brief but misleading text by Islam critic and American Enterprise Institute fellow Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who concluded her tribute with the words: “I hope in time she comes to see the US and NATO forces in her country as her allies. She must use her notoriety, her demonstrated wit and her resilience to get the troops on her side instead of out of her country.”

What an odd choice of words, considering that Ali is writing about a woman who wrote in the Daily Beast last week that:

more than eight years of occupation have made life bleak, and we are tired of being pawns in the US and NATO's game for control of Central Asia. We can longer bear the killing of our pregnant mothers, the killing of our teenagers and young children, the killing of so many Afghan men and women. We can no longer bear these "accidents" and these "apologies" for the deaths of the innocent.

Are Ali and the editors of TIME really entitled to tell Malalai Joya what to think about her country's plight? To set the record straight and to find out what really motivates this activist, journalist Sonali Kolhatkar of UprisingRadio contacted Ms. Joya yesterday and conducted an interview, which I have excerpted below (you can – and should – read the entire discussion here):

I am very angry with the way they have introduced me [Joya said]. They have a completely painted a false picture of me that does not mention at all about my struggle against the occupation of Afghanistan by the US and NATO, which is disgusting. In fact every one knows that I stand side by side with the glorious-anti war movement around the world and have proved again and again that I will never compromise with the US and NATO who have occupied my country, empowered the most bloody enemies of my people and are killing my innocent compatriots [inaudible] in Afghanistan. What TIME did was like giving an award to someone by one hand and getting it back by another hand. I have sent my protest to it to the Defense Committee [for Malalai Joya] but TIME did not bother to even answer than protest letter. Perhaps this is the kind of freedom of expression exercised by TIME and the USA. …

...

How to explain this discrepancy? Is TIME Magazine pursuing a sinister or at least tendentious editorial policy? You can bank on it. But TIME is also a commercial enterprise, and I suspect that this choice - like so much of our politics - has a lot to do with the middle-brow American take on the world, which always follows the rules of melodrama. As far as the money-driven mainstream media are concerned, our planet is packed to the rafters with heroes and villains, perpetrators and victims. It is particularly shaped by long-suffering heroines and noble fighters for human rights and justice, who must by necessity be allied with the United States, the leader of the “free world" and the very essence of truth and justice. If Malalai Joya hates the Taliban, it follows that she must love the US, right?

I’m afraid that a heroine who hates both – and who openly protests the ongoing destruction of her country by remote-controlled drones in order to "save" it for... whom exactly? – is too complex for most Americans in the age of talk radio and “24.” Their brains simply can't process this sort of information anymore, rather like those African famine victims whose emaciated bodies can't absorb rich Western food supplies. Malalai Joya asks too many embarrassing questions and leaves behind too many messy loose ends. But I'm sure the American Enterprise Institute would love to have a go at her.


http://open.salon.com/blog/judy_mandelb ... lalai_joya
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby smiths » Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:33 am

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, partner of Niall Ferguson, the current snakey power couple
the question is why, who, why, what, why, when, why and why again?
User avatar
smiths
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 am
Location: perth, western australia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The latest cover of Time Magazine.

Postby Jeff » Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:28 pm

With Its Horrifying Cover Story, Time Gave the War a Boost. Did Its Reporter Profit?

By John Gorenfeld
August 12, 2010 | 1:09 p.m

...

The piece lacked a crucial personal disclosure on Baker's part: Her husband, Tamim Samee, an Afghan-American IT entrepreneur, is a board member of an Afghan government minister's $100 million project advocating foreign investment in Afghanistan, and has run two companies, Digistan and Ora-Tech, that have solicited and won development contracts with the assistance of the international military, including private sector infrastructure projects favored by U.S.-backed leader Hamid Karzai.

In other words, the Time reporter who wrote a story bolstering the case for war appears to have benefited materially from the NATO invasion. Reached by The Observer, a Time spokesperson revealed that the magazine has just reassigned Baker to a new country as part of a normal rotation, though he declined to say where.

...



http://www.observer.com/2010/media/its- ... fit?page=0
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests