Deep History Condensed

[operator kos]

I'm curious, but shouldn't the Office of Military Intelligence or Naval Intelligence also be listed or are there too little key names of interest in connection with listed historical events? Its already known by now that Oswald, for instance, was an intelligence asset of the government or am I not seeing the name on there? Or what about Tippit, who's own police unit had people specifically assigned in a special unit under military intelligence, or does this only count the Key Figures, where all those below are simply involved in some way. This would be better as a downloadable excel file to search through.

The problem is that there are about 16+ different U.S. intelligence agencies operating these days, and I wanted to keep the list of VIPs to a manageable amount. I narrowed it down to D/FBI, D/CIA, DD/CIA, and D/NSA. The other major ones I might consider would be the MIA, NRO, and NGA, although since I have a whole category for UFOs, I might need to add AFISRA (Air Force Intelligence). There also seems to be some interesting stuff going on with ONI in relation to some of the deep history events I've listed, but... you can see how muddled and over-details this might all get. Will reconsider once I've gotten the timeline itself up-to-date.

[slimmouse]

On first glimpses, ( Ive only read two articles at the site I'm linking to) this looks like an interesting place to put some flesh on the bones of what is an excellent project OK. The article Ive just read contains an abolute stack of names and facts to cross reference. Apologies in advance if it turns out to be a dud. Like I said It just looks pretty ok to me based on what Ive read so far..

Its actually only my second visit to to Dean Hendersons site, and I read this article immediately after I'd read this particular thread for the first time, thanks in large part to the bump from Jack.

So, in honour of both Synchronicity, and the scholars at RI, especially on this thread the OP, Im going to post it here.

Heres a quick snippet, containing a few things I didnt know, followed by the link: Not being a previous party to any of the following facts, it certainly got my interest.

In 1980, the American Legion national convention passed Resolution 773, which called for a congressional investigation of the Trilateral Commission and its predecessor the Council on Foreign Relations. The following year the Veterans of Foreign War (VFW) adopted a similar resolution. Congressman Larry McDonald introduced these resolutions, but Congress did not pass them. On September 1, 1983 McDonald, a long-time critic of the global elite, was a passenger on Korean Airlines 007 when it was allegedly shot down by the Soviets. [3]

Link ; http://deanhenderson.wordpress.com/2013 ... #more-2922

Im gonna read a bunch of his stuff tommorrow, so if it turns out to be as promising as this looks on first glances, I'll prolly start the odd thread or two with excerpts from his articles, if that doesnt sound too rude.

[operator kos]

Thanks, slim, will check that out.

Also... the 1960's section of the timeline is now complete: http://www.afterthedream.net/deep-history-1960s.php

[operator kos]

The 1970's section of the timeline is now complete. It includes some some truly bizarre events- an explosion of cult activity, government research into psychic phenomena, UFO abductions witnessed by groups of people, and of course a long list of horribly depressing CIA black ops.

[stillrobertpaulsen]

.

Oh, my, I really appreciate this. I've been wanting to do the same thing, especially with the personnel, for years!

These are the right positions, if you had to pick exactly this number of offices. And I really like that you threw in the DJIA. I am printing this fucker right now. Nice work. Only thing is to distinguish NSA from NSA, but since you left off the NSA (that's the next item I'd add, if I were expanding it), it's dandy.

I'm printing this right now!

Can anyone even name DIA and ONI heads? How to show the periods of highest influence of mandarins, think-tanks and ruling class busybodies is another question. In government I'm talking about people like Wohlstetter, Andrew Marshall, Team B, Perle/Wolfowitz, among private operators Samuel Huntington, David Rockefeller, RAND, CFR, AEI, Committee for Present Danger, Project for a New American Century, i.e., who is are the dominant "muses" at any given time. Just starting that list makes me realize how little I know, and how the more you know, the less you know you know.

.

The other NSA would be a good addition. I just looked up a list of the directors and I was embarrassed to say that I had no idea who 2/3 of them are. Gonna look up DIA and ONI too, and to be honest I couldn't even tell you who the *current* directors of those are.

I've added PNAC and RAND. CFR and AEI originate before the period I focused on here, but it might be good to list some of their top members?

It was hard figuring out how many "players" to limit the chart to, as it's a bit more than an eyeful already, but I'll keep thinking about it. Thanks for the feedback!

Just in case you hadn't seen this yet (I noticed you do have DIA heads in your 60's and 70's timeline, great job!) here is a link for DIA history and the Directors of ONI.

[operator kos]

So at long last, the timeline has finally been transferred over to its own dedicated site, deephistory.us. I've also now finished the 1980's section of the timeline.

As U.S. economy is deregulated, corporate malfeasance multiplies and the stock market roars ahead only to suffer catastrophic collapse. With little regard for international law, the U.S. continues to intervene militarily in the Middle East and Latin America. Right-wing think-tanks spring into existence at an unprecedented pace.

[Pele'sDaughter]

I love it! I really appreciate how easy it is to use and cross-reference. Bookmarked.

[Project Willow]

Nice work Op Kos!

[norton ash]

Very useful. Thanks, OpKos.

[IanEye]

This is a wonderfully executed idea.
Thank you very much for your hard work, operator kos.

[LilyPatToo]

What they said This is a great resource and so much easier to use than my zillions of bookmarked articles. Thank you

LilyPat

[operator kos]

Aw, thank you guys!

[operator kos]

The 1990's section of the timeline is now complete. The year 1990 alone contains some real doozies:

*Public support for an invasion of Iraq is ambivalent until the widely publicized testimony of "Nurse Nayirah" who describes seeing Iraqi soldiers take premature babies from their incubators in a Kuwaiti hospital and leave them to die. Nayirah, whose full identity it is said must be kept secret for the safety of her family, turns out to be the Kuwaiti ambassador's daughter. Her entire story is fake, and she has received coaching from the U.S. public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, for which they are paid $10 million.

*A grand jury is convened to investigate charges that Larry King is running a child prostitution ring for elite clients. King is declared incompetent to stand trial while children who were prepared to testify against him are intimidated by the FBI. Investigator Gary Caradori is killed along with his eight-year-old son when their plane mysteriously breaks apart over Illinois. Various other witnesses and family members of witnesses also "commit suicide".

*In Belgium, two F-16 fighter jets are scrambled to chase down triangular UFOs. The UFOs are confirmed by radar from both the ground and the jets and are witnessed by over 13,500 people. The jets are unable to catch up with the UFOs.

Then there's Waco, OKC, and the WTC bombing; PNAC, Plan Colombia, NAFTA & the WTO; the most massive human slaughter since WWII that nobody really cares about; Heaven's Gate & the Phoenix Lights; and let's not forget the James Bond of Al-CIA-duh: Ali Mohamed. Some seriously sinister business was going on in the 90's, and a lot of it was right the face of anyone who bothered to look.

[NeonLX]

That is a fantastically wonderful site! As others have said, it's deliciously easy to navigate. Even the url is easy to remember!

Thanks!

[Grizzly]

Indeed, nothing is off the table ...

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201312 ... itor.shtml

UK Parliament Makes A Mockery Of Itself Interrogating Guardian Editor
from the sad dept
The UK Parliament is presenting itself as a complete joke. Rather than looking into controlling the GCHQ (the UK's equivalent to the NSA), it has instead held a hearing to interrogate and threaten Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger for actually reporting on the Snowden leak documents and revealing the widespread abuses of the intelligence community. The hearing included the insulting and ridiculous question: "do you love this country?"

Committee chair, Keith Vaz: Some of the criticisms against you and the Guardian have been very, very personal. You and I were both born outside this country, but I love this country. Do you love this country?

Alan Rusbridger: We live in a democracy and most of the people working on this story are British people who have families in this country, who love this country. I'm slightly surprised to be asked the question but, yes, we are patriots and one of the things we are patriotic about is the nature of democracy, the nature of a free press and the fact that one can, in this country, discuss and report these things.

Perhaps equally ridiculous: after UK Prime Minister David Cameron ordered the destruction of Guardian hard drives, urged the Parliament to start this very investigation and flat out threatened news publications for reporting on government abuse, folks in Parliament have the gall to suggest that it's Rusbridger who broke the law in sharing some of the Snowden docs with the NY Times? Maybe if Cameron hadn't done everything he could to try to stifle a free UK press, the Guardian wouldn't have felt the need to share documents with a competitor.

Conservative MP Michael Ellis: Mr Rusbridger, you authorised files stolen by [National Security Agency contractor Edward] Snowden which contained the names of intelligence staff to be communicated elsewhere. Yes or no?

Rusbridger: Well I think I've already dealt with that.

Ellis: Well if you could just answer the question.

Rusbridger: I think it's been known for six months that these documents contained names and that I shared them with the New York Times.

Ellis: Do you accept that that is a criminal offence under section 58(a) of the Terrorism Act, 2000?

Rusbridger: You may be a lawyer, Mr Ellis, I'm not.

And from there it took a turn to the bizarre as Ellis started talking about how Rusbridger might reveal that GCHQ agents were gay. I'm not kidding.

Ellis: Secret and top-secret documents. And do you accept that the information contained personal information that could lead to the identity even of the sexual orientation of persons working within GCHQ?

Rusbridger: The sexual orientation thing is completely new to me. If you could explain how we've done that then I'd be most interested.

Ellis: In part, from your own newspaper on 2 August, which is still available online, because you refer to the fact that GCHQ has its own Pride group for staff and I suggest to you that the data contained within the 58,000 documents also contained data that allowed your newspaper to report that information. It is therefore information now that is not any longer protected under the laws and that jeopardises those individuals, does it not?

Rusbridger: You've completely lost me Mr Ellis. There are gay members of GCHQ, is that a surprise?

Ellis: It's not amusing Mr Rusbridger. They shouldn't be outed by you and your newspaper.

[Brief inaudible exchange in which both men are talking]

Rusbridger: The notion of the existence of a Pride group within GCHQ, actually if you go to the Stonewall website you can find the same information there. I fail to see how that outs a single member of GCHQ.

Ellis: You said it was news to you, so you know about the Stonewall website, so it's not news to you. It was in your newspaper. What about the fact that GCHQ organised trips to Disneyland in Paris, that's also been printed in your newspaper, does that mean if you knew that, information including the family details of members of GCHQ is also within the 58,000 documents – the security of which you have seriously jeopardised?

Rusbridger: Again, your references are lost to me. The fact that there was a family outing from GCHQ to Disneyland … [CUT OFF]

There was much more in the hearing, with multiple UK members of parliament making statements that suggest that they are ignorant of a variety of things, including how encryption works and the nature of a free and open press.

But, really, just the fact that they're spending time investigating Rusbridger in the first place, rather than looking more closely at what the GCHQ is doing, makes a complete mockery of the UK Parliament.

neo mcCarthyism lased with some kind of dark madness, like something out of The Illearth War, by Stephen R. Donaldson; a sickness perhaps?