TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby Skunkboy » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:17 am

http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2011 ... upy_la.php



Sarah Mason, TIME's Protester of the Year: More Photos, Details Behind Occupy L.A. Cover


By Simone WilsonThu., Dec. 15 2011 at 4:40 PM


​Ah, the elusive Sarah Mason -- she of the knit yellow cap and 99 percent bandana, gracing TIME's already iconic "Person of the Year" cover for 2011, yet turning her face from this new spotlight and returning no press calls (that we know of).

Just as any good, principled occupier would do. However, because we're mildly obsessed at this point, we spent the day ravaging the Internet for photos, videos and stories that could fill in the holes behind Mason's cover shoot.


​(Which was, as we already told you, shot by LA Weekly freelancer Ted Soqui and cartoonified by L.A. street artist Shepard Fairey. See right.)

Mission accomplished. It appears the dreamy-eyed 25-year-old was among 20 Occupy L.A. protesters who linked arms in a circle around a pop-up encampment at the center of Bank of America Plaza on November 17. That day's march had begun at a downtown intersection, where LAPD riot cops arrested various protesters for failure to disperse, and ended at the B of A.

Mason -- a Highland resident who works at a Santa Monica art gallery -- was arrested at sundown, as was the rest of the elbow-linked chain. The bandana she wore was reportedly soaked in vinegar, "just in case the police sprayed them with gas or pepper spray."

​(Occupy factions across the country held demonstrations on the same date -- a "National Day of Action" meant to remind Wall Street and the 1 percent that the Occupy movement was still alive and growing on its two-month anniversary. A massive march and police crackdown likewise took place in New York.)

Back in L.A., Occupy was hoping to set up a mini camp outside the Bank of America to supplement their sardine-packed encampment on the L.A. City Hall lawn.

But police officers (and the banksters in the B of A high-rise) weren't having it. Tension was high between cops and protesters as rubber-bullet guns were cocked and tents ripped from their stakes. And at nightfall, 20 arrests were made -- nothing like the eventual raid on the City Hall encampment, which ended in almost 300 arrests (some allegedly brutal), but the biggest clash up to that point.

​On the night of the final raid, Mason explained to the Los Angeles Times that she could no longer stand her ground because of the jailing on the day of her cover shoot.


Protesters Sarah Mason and Scott Shuster did decide to leave, because both said they couldn't risk arrest.
Mason, who was arrested during a protest at Bank of America this month, said, "There's no curfew on the 1st Amendment."

​Shuster, the guy she was apparently hanging with that night, now tells the Times that Mason "was surprised and a little embarrassed to see her picture on the cover of Time." However, he might be a little biased:


He said she had earned the honor for her work at Occupy, where she is known as a consensus builder who once taught police how to participate in the protest's nightly general assembly meeting. Shuster said Occupy had helped Mason grow politically and personally.
"She found her voice," he said, and then paused. "I'm probably not the best person to ask, though. I've had a crush on her since the moment I met her."


A little awkward, but by all accounts, she was a magnetic person to be around. Soqui, the photographer behind the TIME cover, tells the Weekly that he was immediately drawn to her as a subject, though "when I was taking the pictures, she was real nervous, and I was just trying to calm her down." (He eventually did so by telling her he worked for this newspaper. Boo-ya. Soqui has also spoken with Mason since the TIME issue came out, and says she's "truly humbled by it. She says, 'It's not about me.'")

More fawning: A couple days before the Bank of America action, NPR called her a "tall, 25-year-old [who] could be a GAP model." She was having a bit of an existential crisis at that point:


SARAH MASON: I am here because I feel a moral obligation to speak out against injustice.
NPR: Mason has been camping out here a few weeks, but leaves each day for her full-time job at an art gallery in Santa Monica. She admits to getting weary, and lately has been thinking...

MASON: What are we doing here? You know, what is - what is the point of this? You know, can't we be doing this at home? Can't we be doing this somewhere else?


​The most thorough character profile of Mason we've seen so far is by Cady Lang, for 360 Magazine. Some fun facts from the exhaustive piece:
•Though Mason's small gray tent was unassuming from the outside, the inside was "a bohemian paradise, complete with tapestries, blankets and pillows in rich earthy tones, candles and picture frames" and "a cozy haven where one can hide from the chaos of a bustling day in downtown Los Angeles."


•Mason has "inky dark hair and bluntly cut bangs" and a "straightforward, frank attitude." She also has a "girlfriend" named Meagan.



•A dark, telling moment in her past: Mason accrued massive debt on a credit card issued to her by Bank of America, because of what she calls "pressure to look a certain way" -- perhaps contributing to her participation on November 17, and her current discomfort with all this celebrity. More from 360:

Mason is quick to assess that weakness though, noting that she still struggles now with spending. Her current job is at an art gallery in Santa Monica, where she's felt the pressure to keep up appearances.
"Being in Southern California, being around people where image or being on the cutting edge is priority puts me in a situation where I feel more conscious of myself; now, I'm working at an art gallery where image is very important, and I struggle with it still," she divulges matter-of-factly. "I frequently find myself walking around stores in the mall, ready to make big purchases, and buy impulsively just because I feel insecure. I make myself reflect, and then I'm like no."


OK, now that we know more about Sarah Mason than we do our own grandmother, we can get back to stalking nobodies like Lindsay Lohan and appreciating Occupy, instead, for what it needs to be -- a sea of discontented faces, not one beautiful set of eyebrows on the front of TIME Magazine.

However, we do wish TIME and Fairey would stop pretending its cover art isn't a single person existing in a single moment. From their "making of" story:


As the artist behind our Person of the Year 2011 cover commemorating this year's pick, The Protester, Fairey says his cover image is based on a composite of 26 different photographs of real protests from around the world. "These organic protest movements have arisen around the globe and a lot of it was fueled by social media, but it was a pervasive phenomenon," he said. "It wasn't one specific movement but general unrest. I wanted to look for ideas to represent that." ...
Though the protests themselves have been anything up light, Fairey didn't want the image to feel menacing. "A lot of these people are not threatening," he said. "A lot of them are just regular folks who feel dissatisfied." Instead he wanted to create something that "meant business, but wasn't scary." He used a collage of scenes from the Arab Spring to Moscow to Occupy Wall Street as a backdrop, images he said shows the dramatic accumulation of these global protests rather than displaying them as isolated events.


BS. We found the soft-lidded, isolated one, and her name is Sarah Mason. "The spirit is definitely Sarah's," Soqui tells Metro. "The other 25 images wouldn't really support it." Watch her sing a solidarity song to riot cops with hundreds of her comrades, below. (She's the one in the yellow hat. Obviously.)


If every man helped his neighbor, no man would be without help.

-Bruce Lee
User avatar
Skunkboy
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:43 pm
Location: The High Lonesome
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby 3×5 » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:25 am

I think it's interesting that Shepard Fairey's aesthetic was to emulate Soviet Constructivist propaganda, focusing on Andre The Giant as a mock cult of personality, and it's all done with this cheeky irony, but then he's hired by the Obama campaign to make actual Constructivist propaganda for an actual cult of personality. I don't know if it's possible to sell out any worse than that.

And yet, if you go to his site, ObeyGiant.com, the tagline says 'Manufacturing quality dissent 1989', a sarcastic nod to Noam Chomsky, as though he's still trying to force his tongue back into his cheek.

(By the way, I don't think he encoded crescent moons and vaginas into that illustration. I do suspect that he is trying desperately to retain some credibility with this graphic, though, and I don't think he'll succeed.)
3×5
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 1:04 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby Nordic » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:54 am

That article is even more heavy-handed feminization of the movement. I mean, all of it, from rhapsodizing about her looks to describing the feminine nest she made of her tent.

What's up with that?

Are they trying to make the movement a Siren's song, something that will lead you to destruction on the rocks of anti-authoritarianism?

Probably.

Don't follow the evil alluring female, she will lead you to your doom.

Goes all the way back to Adam and Eve.

The "protestor" is the serpent with the apple.

Resist.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby Laodicean » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:28 am

3×5 wrote:
(By the way, I don't think he encoded crescent moons and vaginas into that illustration. I do suspect that he is trying desperately to retain some credibility with this graphic, though, and I don't think he'll succeed.)


He made this one too, before the Time cover:

Image

I am not directly associated with either the Obama re-election campaign or the organizers of Occupy Wall St. After I put my Occupy HOPE image and brief statement online Friday, I received responses from people and some very important issues were raised. It is hard to put across complex ideas with an image, and even harder to have a reasonable discussion in this polarizing, sound-bite oriented, media landscape, so I was grateful for some thoughtful feedback. My most eye-opening discussion was with an organizer of Occupy Wall St. who remains anonymous to preserve the lack of hierarchy within the movement. Below is a bit of our dialogue, which shows the many nuances to be navigated…

This image represents my support for the Occupy movement, a grassroots movement spawned to stand up against corruption, imbalance of power, and failure of our democracy to represent and help average Americans. On the other hand, as flawed as the system is, I see Obama as a potential ally of the Occupy movement if the energy of the movement is perceived as constructive, not destructive. I still see Obama as the closest thing to “a man on the inside” that we have presently. Obviously, just voting is not enough. We need to use all of our tools to help us achieve our goals and ideals. However, I think idealism and realism need to exist hand in hand. Change is not about one election, one rally, one leader, it is about a constant dedication to progress and a constant push in the right direction. Let’s be the people doing the right thing as outsiders and simultaneously push the insiders to do the right thing for the people.


http://owsnews.org/after-conversations- ... pe-design/
User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby AhabsOtherLeg » Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:53 am

Nordic, a while back you were talking about how terrible CNN was, how stupid it was, how offensive it was in it's very determined infantilism, backwardness, and insularity.

I didn't really know what you meant at the time, because the CNN I was watching here seemed reasonably decent and balanced.

But I thought the things I watched on CNN here was the same stuff that you were seeing on CNN over there. It's not! It's really not. I've since been shown the difference between CNN International and CNN domestic - and the difference is amazing, and quite frightening. It's like the difference between The Independent and The Sun. CNN are quite openly and blatantly saying, to the whole world, that they think their American viewers are thick as shit, and will watch any old nonsense - whereas their international wing reports news.

On a related note, been reading up on one of the premier scumbags of our age, Kelvin Mackenzie. A former editor of The Sun, one of Rupert Murdoch's bottom feeders. He gave a priceless insight into the attitudes of our media handlers after someone suggested to him (back in the 80s) that he could potentially report some news in his widely distributed newspaper:

"You just don't understand the readers, do you, eh? He's the bloke you see in the pub, a right old fascist, wants to send the wogs back, buy his poxy council house, he's afraid of the unions, afraid of the Russians, hates the queers and the weirdos and drug dealers. He doesn't want to hear about that stuff."

That Stuff means actual news.

Also, great thread! Thanks. I knew Time was shady, compromised, pathetic, worthless, etc. - but I used to think they were clever as well, and professional in their subterfuges. Evidently not.
"The universe is 40 billion light years across and every inch of it would kill you if you went there. That is the position of the universe with regard to human life."
User avatar
AhabsOtherLeg
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 8:43 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Sun Dec 18, 2011 2:07 am

I worked a political event covered by CNN International and talked to the camera op who usually worked overseas.

He said he couldn't believe what was broadcast here in the US. 'Just garbage.'
That's CIA domestic psyops manipulating the poor illiterates, religious superstitious, and indoctrinated authoritarian personalities.
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby Laodicean » Fri May 11, 2012 8:33 am

User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby Nordic » Fri May 11, 2012 6:04 pm




My wife showed me this this morning. To start off, I utterly despise TIME magazine. They are the WORST example of corporate media imaginable.

This picture disgusts me, not because it shows a woman breastfeeding, but because it is utterly exploitive.

Can you imagine how this went down? "Hey, we've got this really attractive Mom who still breastfeeds her huge-ass kid!" "Really? That's awesome! Get her number!"

"Mommy, why are we going to this photo studio?"

"Because, honey, they want to take our picture."

"You mean, me, too? Why?"

"Because we're special"

"Why are we special?"

"Because you get special treatment with the way I feed you."

"What?"

"Listen, we're going to go into this room with a bunch of people, I'm gonna wear a sexy tank top, and there are going to be a bunch of lights that go off with a blinding POP over and over again. All you have to do is drink from me the way you always do, okay?"

"Mommy, I don't want to do that."

"Honey, they're paying us. Just do it. I'll get you ice-cream if you do it, okay?".

Seriously FUCKED UP SHIT.

Also, they manage to put the word "France" up at the top. You know, to make the association between those liberal "Frenchies" and this (to their readers) abominable mothering.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby justdrew » Fri May 11, 2012 6:52 pm

anyway, La Leche League support breast feeding up to 7 or 8 IIRC.

Image
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby Simulist » Fri May 11, 2012 6:55 pm

Nordic wrote:This picture disgusts me, not because it shows a woman breastfeeding, but because it is utterly exploitive.

Can you imagine how this went down? "Hey, we've got this really attractive Mom who still breastfeeds her huge-ass kid!"

Is this actually the model's own kid? I'm sort of hoping so.
"The most strongly enforced of all known taboos is the taboo against knowing who or what you really are behind the mask of your apparently separate, independent, and isolated ego."
    — Alan Watts
User avatar
Simulist
 
Posts: 4713
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: Here, and now.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Fri May 11, 2012 7:03 pm

Simulist wrote:
Nordic wrote:This picture disgusts me, not because it shows a woman breastfeeding, but because it is utterly exploitive.

Can you imagine how this went down? "Hey, we've got this really attractive Mom who still breastfeeds her huge-ass kid!"

Is this actually the model's own kid? I'm sort of hoping so.


If not its a bit sus.
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10622
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby IanEye » Fri May 11, 2012 7:20 pm

I'm curious to know what Hugh makes of the kid's camo pants.
User avatar
IanEye
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:33 pm
Blog: View Blog (29)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby Laodicean » Fri May 11, 2012 7:22 pm

In Defense of My Friend Jamie Lynne Grumet -- TIME's Breastfeeding Cover Girl
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb ... 10510.html
User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3528
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Re: TIME's covers -- pure propaganda

Postby Simulist » Fri May 11, 2012 7:24 pm

Thanks, Laodicean.
"The most strongly enforced of all known taboos is the taboo against knowing who or what you really are behind the mask of your apparently separate, independent, and isolated ego."
    — Alan Watts
User avatar
Simulist
 
Posts: 4713
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: Here, and now.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next week's TIME cover...

Postby MinM » Fri May 11, 2012 7:32 pm

Image
Image
Earth-704509
User avatar
MinM
 
Posts: 3288
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Mont Saint-Michel
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests