Honduras Coup: Soldiers kidnap VZ, Cuba, Nicaragua envoys

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby John Schröder » Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:37 am

http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefie ... ment-32221

Ryan Vaquero wrote:I have been having a back-and-forth exchange with Frances Robles of the Miami Herald, after reading her article which was designed to make President Manuel Zelaya appear to be a raving lunatic:

    They're torturing me, Honduras' Manuel Zelaya claims Honduras' fallen leader told The Miami Herald he is being subjected to mind-altering gas and radiation -- and that `Israeli mercenaries' are planning to assassinate him.
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/5min/story/1248828.html

The article has seemed to be a lot of cherry-picking journalism. El Pais presented the actual quotes from President Zelaya, which already make him seem a lot more reasonable:

    Mercenarios israelíes, ultrasonidos y suicidios fingidos
http://www.elpais.com/articulo/internac ... es/ultra...

Regardless, as I explained to Frances Robles, the claims made by President Zelaya are not far-fetched, although they are presented that way in the article.

First, it is clear that toxic gases have been used against the Brazilian Embassy. That goes without question. Anyone who has been subjected to long periods of exposure to CN/CS gas in a closed space will testify to the mind-altering effects of it -- as will any doctor.

Second, while Frances Robles was attempted to make the use of "sonic weapons" seem unreasonable and looney, every major media outlet was broadcasting a live demonstration of the weapon in use at the G20 demonstration in Pittsburgh:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebQMzggpHI0

An unfortunate coincidence for the Miami Herald that the "sci-fi device" they were trying to discredit President Zelaya with was simultaneously being used against crowds in the United States. I also reminded her that sound weapons (although much cruder) were used against Manuel Noriega during the invasion of Panama by the United States.

In addition, Honduras-based La Tribuna (which, as we've discussed, has had semi-balanced coverage of the coup) also confirmed the use of this weapon in this article:

http://www.latribuna.hn/web2.0/?p=44108

And, they also report on the connection to Israel:

    "Es la última arma secreta en dotación desde hace tiempo por el ejército de Israel, usada públicamente sólo ahora después de muchos años de experimentación."
However, Frances Robles leads off her story in the first paragraph with the most startling assertion: "[H]e claims his throat is sore from toxic gases and 'Israeli mercenaries' are torturing him with high-frequency radiation."

While Frances Robles had the time to write me back numerous times, provide me with a link to the New York Times and several other newspapers which were reporting on President Zelaya's claims, somehow the Miami Herald reporter could not supply me with the actual quote from President Zelaya in which he claims that "Israeli mercenaries are torturing him with high-frequency radiation."

Frances Robles has had the time to send me four e-mails and yet has still not been able to supply me with the actual quote from President Zelaya regarding the radiation weapon claims. In fact, once I began sending independent confirmations of the use of toxic gas and sonic weapons, the tone turned a little hostile: "I am not going to comb through my notes to find quotes for you."

Of course, President Zelaya's claims would seem less strange if Miami Herald readers knew that Billy Joya of Battalion 3-16 was publicly involved in the Micheletti regime -- a reknowned torturer who certainly is up on all the latest toys of psychos who abuse the bodies of human beings for a living.

Now, maybe I am mis-reading Frances Robles. According to her, President Hugo Chavez spoke directly about her Miami Herald article in his New York press conference and said, specifically about her article: "I send the Miami Herald reporter a big kiss for finally telling the truth." (Anyone who can confirm that President Chavez said this about the Miami Herald article, please let me know via e-mail.)

I am very open to the idea that my gut feeling about all this is wrong. However, it feels to me like President Zelaya's initial claims regarding gases, sonic weapons, communications disruptions and Israeli groups seemed bizarre and the Miami Herald attempted to discredit the president. I also feel that they might have gone too far by also crediting him with saying that "radiation weapons" are being used (although, this COULD refer to the sonic weapons). To be clear, I have NO CONFIRMATION that President Zelaya did not speak to Frances Robles about "high-frequency radiation weapons." All I can say is that I have asked for the specific quote from her 4 separate times and have yet to receive the specific quote.

The next article written for the Miami Herald by Frances Robles was called "Time running out for Honduras' Manuel Zelaya, experts say" -- of course, any number of experts could be found to say any number of things which is an even more direct form of cherry-picking.

I would like to mention that Frances Robles also wrote the article which interviewed the top Honduran Army attorney who first admitted that the law was broken by the golpistas. Also, she has written on the censorship imposed by the coup regime.

However, during this time of immediate crisis, when things really matter, I find it interesting to see these two articles come out of the Miami Herald.

And, I have to say that I am happy that the quotes provided by Frances Robles on behalf of President Zelaya about the use of sophisticated weaponry to invade the sovereignty of the Brazilian Embassy are being proven accurate. So, while I have seen the article in question being re-posted on many right-wing blogs as "evidence" that President Zelaya is paranoid, anti-Semitic, etc, many of these folks will need to eat their own words as more and more independent confirmations of President Zelaya's claims come out. Thanks to NarcoNews for supplying this in-depth report about them.


http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefie ... ment-32222

Al Giordano wrote:I've been working on a story about her story as well. Yesterday I interviewed President Zelaya directly about it. The reason she can't (or won't) give you the exact quote is because she spliced various quotes together and left out words he added to them such as "rumored" (rumorado) and "alleged" (supuesto, which he used multiple times in his interview with her). She cut and pasted it to make him look nuts and also anti-semitic, which isn't the case, as many of his Honduran Jewish supporters testify.


It's worth noting that Larisa Alexandrovna also fell for the Miami Herald's propaganda piece, calling him "the crazed Zelaya" and alleging that "he has lost his mind". I'm sure she's right now writing an apology, retracting her unfounded insults. But then again, probably not. Shame on her.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:54 am

http://quotha.net/node/393

Reponse to desperate fantasy-world golpista comments

...claiming that no chemical attack happened yesterday, despite the hundreds of reports of injuries, and claiming that I, Zelaya, or Radio Globo is making up the sonic attacks...They're actually amusing in their utter idiocy, if it's possible to laugh while crimes against humanity are being carried out. Here's one:

    Adrienne, did you know Zelaya is a cocaine addict? Of course he is. Anyway, you can tell by all the fantasy b.s. he is saying about the chemicals, gases, and radioactivity... With radioactivity it would take 10 years to kill the basterd. Anyhow, don't waste your time posting this crap. Not even Lula dared to accuse Honduras of this crap at the UN Security Council because he knows it is not true. Better spend your time reading Alice in Wonderland.

    Geez, I wish all of this you posted was true.
Yep. that's the kind of sound reasoning available to fascists. Anyway, here's a picture of the sonic arms being used:

Image

And another, from the same clever author from Cincinnati, this time wishing I'd be raped:

    Zelaya should be in prison

    Hey, being trapped in the Brazilian embassy is a joyride compared to what awaits Zelaya in the real prison. Imagine that: stuck in a rat hole with hundreds of other thugs and junkies like him. Even so, he would not pay back all the damage he has done Honduras. By the way Adrienne, if you feel so passionate about Honduras and Zelaya, why don,t you go down there and live in that hell with the alleged supporters of Zelaya? Trust me, you would be raped in no time. Better off, stop commenting about stuff you don't have the slightest idea about. Thanks.
...and thank you, for your helpful suggestion. It's such a good argument; rest assured I'll take it very seriously.

But seriously. I think it's important to see the level of argument that golpistas have long been reduced to to justify the atrocities being committed to justify their deluded ideology. This isn't fringe; this is mainstream golpista. Like teabaggers here in the U.S., these people- the ones who chant in their marches "the best Melista is a dead Melista" replacing the communist of this slogan from the death squads in the 1980s with "Mel supporter," are certainly an embarrassment to the actual intellectual architects and beneficiaries of the military coup--the oligarchy itself.

This same highly literate chap (or gal, but I'd venture that's unlikely given the style), clearly peeved by truth he forced himself to read, puts forth another convincing argument with regard to the right of anthropologists to comment:

    I agree.

    Anthropology?? Common, the people at the Library of Congress know what they are doing. Finally the truth about Honduras will see the light. Communists, stay away from Honduras.
Actually, it stops being funny. It's profoundly sad that the U.S.-aided whitewashing of Honduran history, military and oligarchy-led refusal to engage in a real debate in the 1990s, and the resulting impunity for war criminals like Billy Joya results in such a profound ignorance (or enthusiastic acceptance) of the brutality justified by a Cold War ideology that entails accusing anyone who acts against authoritarianism of being a communist, then hunting them down and killing them.

Another golpista who contradictorily identifies himself as

    ---Alan,
    happily married to a lady from Honduras who is proud of her country today.. And who went to high school with him and knows his family's bloody history..
...Dude looks like a lady situation? More power to ya, Alan from Miami. That clearly gives you legal authority to claim--in a nutshell (putting a shell on a long, rambling, angry essay)--that Zelaya had no legal right to a fair trial.

Another very convincing legal response, coming from outside Seattle (hey, check out Quotha's widespread reader distribution) to Rosemary Joyce's brilliant breakdown of the flaws in the Schock report goes as follows:

    Anita, Quit your nit picking and your crying. The Honduran Supreme Court has the final say as to what is constitutional or not and they gave Zelaya the boot. All the rest is is just a distraction.

Well, if that's not a well-reasoned argument, what is, really.

Okay, I could go on with this all day- believe me, there are enough delusional golpista comments on this site to do so. But I'm sure you've seen enough, and in any case, it's much more important to continue exposing the specific, horrific violence being carried out in Honduras against everyone from babies to grandparents, men and women, poor and--oh, right, mostly poor--in the name of these ideas.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:15 pm

http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefie ... -gas-story

Perú Official Threatens “Legal Action” Over Honduran Tear Gas Story

By Al Giordano

Image

On the website of today’s daily La República – an important newspaper in Perú – a YouTube video by Honduras’ Gremio de Cineastas (a filmmaker’s association) that we published on Narco News on Wednesday - and something we reported from that video - has now launched a national polemic in that Andean country, including a threat of “legal action” by the country’s Government Minister against those of us that reported it.

The video shows Honduran coup regime police invading the Hato de Enmedio neighborhood of Tegucigalpa shooting tear gas canisters clearly stamped, “National Police of Perú.”

This is what your servant wrote at the time:

    “We can also see in that video the revelation that the tear gas canisters shot by the National Police yesterday were stamped as property of the government of Perú, suggesting strongly that Peruvian President Alan García is a participant in smuggling arms to the Honduran coup regime. Something he will now have to answer for to the Organization of American States in general, and his neighbor Brazil in particular.”
The story then got picked up by the Brazilian national newsweekly Carta Capital and then by Peruvian dailies La Primera and La República, causing the Congress of that country to launch an investigation and demand that the Government Minister appear at a hearing to testify.

La República reported the story and then asked:

    How could these gases arrive in Honduras if they belong to the Peruvian police?
A little while later, after Government Minister Octavio Salazar issued his threat of "legal action," the newspaper put a line through that sentence, like this:

    How could these gases arrive in Honduras if they belong to the Peruvian police? [crossed out in the original, don't know how to do that -- John]
And the newspaper's reporter added this text:

    I now publish the denials by the Government Minister about tear gas bombs with the seal of the National Police of Perú used by the government of Honduras:

    1. The Perú National Police have not sold, nor donated, nor delivered any kind of material in general nor tear gas bombs in particular to the government of Honduras.

    2. Through corresponding channels, the Government Minister solicited official information from Honduran authorities about this matter.

    3. The Honduras Security Minister, Mr. Jorge A. Rodas Gamero, has responded in writing that, “at no moment was this kind of material obtained, nor donated, nor in error, by the National Police of Perú.”

    4. The Honduran official said that the tear gas materials was obtained by its government from the Honduran business “Representaciones Comercio e Inversiones (RCI),” which had obtained it from the business, “Combined Systems, Inc.” of the United States.

    5. Rodas Gamero informed that, while reviewing the tear gas grenades found that “on the original wrapping was a banner with the name of the National Police of Perú, but the sale to our country was covered by another with the grenade’s specifications.”

    6. The tear gas grenades mentioned with this ribbon had to do with an order that the business Combined Systems was going to send to the National Police of Perú. The contract between them was signed in August 2007. However, in October 2007, the contract we canceled by the Government Ministry due to noncompliance with the norms of public contracts. As a consequence, the PNP never received the tear gas material.

    7. The Government Ministry reserves the right to initiate pertinent legal actions to preserve the image of the country and the police institution.
La República also reports:

    “The Congress of the Republic has filed a motion for the Interior Minister, Octavio Salazar, to appear at a hearing and explain the presence of Peruvian tear gas bombs in the hands of the de facto government of Honduras.”
The US company, Combined Systems, Inc., that the Honduran regime says is the source of its gas grenades, is based in Jamestown, Pennsylvania. Through its subsidiary website with the ironic name of less-lethal.com, it deals in chemical munitions, impact munitions, flash-bang devices and multi-effect grenades, arms launchers and other such toys, which, whether through Perú or not, seem to have no problem getting into the hands of a coup dictatorship that has fetishized chemical warfare against its own people and even a foreign embassy.

In the comments section under the La República story, reader Mario Antonio Young Rabines made sure to remind the Minister of whom that legal action would properly be directed toward:

    Spacio Libre, if it has the merit of having posted the video last night, wasn’t the first news organization to report the news. The first, if I’m not mistaken, was The Field, from the pen of Al Giordano of the US-based Narcosphere network. In the article… Giordano made reference to different aspects of recent happenings in Honduras that the mainstream media doesn’t pay much attention to, including the ‘curious’ finding in Honduras of a tear gas bomb with the seal of the Peru National Police…

    “Here in Latin America, it was a renowned Brazilian journalist, Antonio Luiz M.C. Costa, editor of the weekly Carta Capital, who first reported the information from The Field… and he posted it on his Facebook page at 15:10 p.m. Later, this writer, Frido Martin, had read the wall of the Brazilian journalist and put a link to The Field on his Facebook wall, too, at 16:20 hours. A few minutes later, a journalist from the Peruvian daily La Primera was put in contact with me and received the link to this information. La Primera is thus the first print daily to publish this information. At 16:49, on my own Facebook wall, I linked also to the YouTube video that shows the ‘Peruvian’ tear gas bomb (this video had been in Al Giordano’s article). Hours later, at night, Spacio Libre put the story on its front page. On its Facebook wall, Spacio Libre hung the information at 22:06 which can be proved at this link. Finally, from Spacio Libre, La República published the information.”
Although that account reads like instructions to the Peruvian Minister about whom such “legal action” should be taken against – that would be us, Sir, and we can hardly contain our excitement at your threat – it also serves as an excellent diagram of how information moves quickly across the Internet and how stories become internationalized: from independent video makers of the Gremio de Cineastas in Honduras to Narco News to Brazil’s major news weekly, to two daily newspapers and some web pages in Peru… all in a matter of hours… And now the Peruvian Congress wants an investigation into how the Honduran regime got its simian mitts on tear gas canisters with National Police logos on them.

That's fútbol, Narco News style, in which the information ball bounces from Honduras through somewhere in América, ricochets through Sao Paulo then Lima then, GOOOOOOLLLL¡

Reporting for the Peruvian daily La Primera, Raúl Weiner wrote:

    “The story is very serious, to have clandestine relations between a government that daily proclaims itself democratic and the coup plotters condemned by the world, behind the backs of all Peru. The situation rarifies even more because a country as important as Brazil has taken a decisive role in the current phase of the Honduran crisis, decisively pushing the return of President Zelaya, and Peru appears to be in the opposing camp, providing the weapons to save Micheletti.”

If what the Peruvian government claims is true (and we will continue our journalistic work to find out) – that weapons made by Combined Systems, Inc. found their ways into the hands of the Honduran coup regime without the help of Perú, but still brandishing its National Police force’s name – it would seem that said “legal action” might be better directed toward whomever is responsible for shipping weapons to an illegitimate regime with the Peruvian National Police name still stamped on them. There can't be much love for Perú or its National Police this week in the barrio of Hato de Enmedio, that's for sure.

This would not be the first time that matters of tear gas and crowd control have caused scandals and polemics regarding the National Police of Perú. On June 20, Kristin Bricker reported for Narco News on the June 5 massacre by those same National Police of unarmed Awajún and Wampi indigenous peoples, and how those police were trained in “riot control” with US drug war funds.

The new attention to tear gas canisters in Honduras marked “National Police of Perú” also opens up some not-so-old wounds in Peruvian political and police circles. In 2007, Perú’s Comptroller General did indeed nullify contracts signed by the National Police with Combined Systems, Inc. because they did not follow government procedure for such purchases. That led to revelations that the then-Government Minister Luis Alva Castro had lied when he justified the purchases due to a supposed “imminent” situation in which the National Police would have no tear gas left to beat down the country’s indigenous and social movements. But it turned out that the PNP had, at the time, in storage more than 96,000 such canisters. Furthermore, officials alleged the contract with Combined Systems, Inc. constituted an overpayment of $1.5 million dollars based on prices the company had offered Perú for the same products two years prior.

In the wake of the Peruvian tear gas scandal, twenty public officials were fired, including the Logistics Director of the National Police. Unpaid for the gas grenades it did ship to Perú, Combined Systems, Inc. reportedly attempted to pressure the Peruvian government through Washington and the negotiations over a trade agreement between the two countries.

During that scandal, current Government Minister Octavio Salazar – the man who yesterday threatened “legal action” against those who report on the tear gas canisters marked “Perú” in Honduras – was himself an official in the National Police, and at the end of 2007 was promoted by President Alan García as its national police chief. This summer, he was promoted again, to be Government Minister, the top non-elected official in the land, which a former government minister, Remigio Hernani, called a “disgrace” due to open investigations regarding Salazar and 41 vehicles assigned to the National Police and alleged embezzlement of funds.

So, bring on the Congressional investigation. And if Salazar wishes to file a “legal action” against this newspaper, bring that on, too. So much interesting information about Perú and its National Police and its own use of chemical weapons against its own people – as well as how it procures those arms and what happens to them after that - would come out during the discovery process to make Peruvians and people all over the hemisphere and the world better informed about all of it.

Still, it is interesting to note the speed with which Honduran coup officials came to the defense of Salazar and the García government in Perú yesterday to confirm their claims that Perú isn’t helping the coup regime. One wonders whether Honduran coup officials would have been so quick to jump to the aid of governments from Brasilia to San Salvador to Managua to Buenos Aires to Quito to Caracas to La Paz to Santiago to Asunción that nobody suspects could be playing footsie under the table with the Honduran coup regime. It's modus operandi has been, rather, to seek to expel diplomats of those countries, or keep them from entering Honduras, or to engage in chemical warfare against one of their embassies. That the coup mongers in Tegucigalpa so quickly lent themselves to Salazar’s public relations defensive is perhaps a matter that the Peruvian Congressional investigation underway will help sort out. Where there is smoke, there is often tear gas, too.

(Narco News staff reporter Kristin Bricker assisted with the reporting of this story.)
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:09 pm

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009- ... 108866.htm

Ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya’s surprise return Monday was made possible with help from certain sectors of the armed forces, the country’s ambassador to Panama, Juan Alfaro Posadas, said here Thursday.

A sector of the Honduran armed forces begins to shift their loyalty to Zelaya, who appeared in Brazilian embassy in Honduras Monday, the ambassador told a press conference.

“They are young officers, captains, mayors and lieutenant colonels, who have supported president Zelaya,” said Alfaro.

Zelaya’s delegation was able to enter Honduras with the collaboration of these sectors from the armed forces who support his restitution in power, he said.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:48 pm

http://machetera.wordpress.com/2009/09/ ... sociation/

Spanish original:

http://www.bolpress.com/art.php?Cod=200 ... 9929e5e6f5

The Inter-American Press Association (IAPA) Feigns Unawareness That Its Own Members Were Behind the Honduran Coup

By Jean-Guy Allard

Translation: Machetera


The Inter-American Press Association (IAPA) that bemoans the “limitations” on press freedom suffered by media opposed to the coup d’etat, avoids recalling that two of the main conspirators behind the coup which led to the expulsion of President Zelaya from Honduras are also its main (and practically only) Honduran members.

Associated for decades with the CIA and located in Miami, USA, the IAPA has issued “denunciations” of the electricity cutoffs to Channel 36 and Radio Globo, through which they are trying to give themselves a legitimate image.

The IAPA criticizes the climate of “instability and restrictions surrounding the press” in Honduras “in recent months,” which in some cases, it notes, has led to “self-censorship.”

Just as hypocritically as the other press organization corresponding to North American intelligence, Reporters Without Borders, which attributes a new “wave of censorship” to President Zelaya’s return, the IAPA acts as though it is completely unaware that its own members are those who fostered the Micheletti regime.

Carlos Roberto Flores Facussé, the former president of Honduras (1998-2001) and the owner of the La Tribuna newspaper, and Jorge Canahuati Larach, the billionaire owner of the La Prensa and El Heraldo newspapers are among the conspirators who brought about the coup.

For those who may be unaware, the IAPA which aims to represent press freedom in America is nothing more than the cartel made up of the largest proprietors of communications media on the continent. Created in New York in 1950 through a U.S. intelligence operation, it was a pirate takeover of the legitimate pan-American organization created in Havana in 1943.

The IAPA is so closely linked to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that its headquarters in Miami is named after its founder, Jules Dubois, a CIA agent and former U.S. military intelligence colonel who died miserably in a Bogota hotel in 1966, under hazy circumstances.

Over the years, this association of press magnates intervened in UNESCO in order to defend the control of information by private business, participated in the dirty propaganda war against the democratic government of Salvador Allende, and kept quite silent during the coup against Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez. In the meantime, it has never missed an opportunity to attack Cuba.

A real network of magnates from the corporate press, the IAPA manipulates information far and wide across the continent, in parallel with its radio and television stations which pursue the same destabilizing objectives. Through the servile collaboration of its providers, the press agencies, the IAPA continually expands its attacks against Latin American leaders which are then taken up by its media affiliates.

In Honduras, the television, radio, cable and Internet circuits are entirely in the hands of very few individuals: Rafael Ferrari, Miguel Andonie Fernández, Rodolfo Irías Navas – all of them, primary “shareholders” in the Micheletti coup.

These millionaire communication media barons are such business professionals that some, such as Rafael Ferrari, also have their tentacles in U.S. chain franchises such as Burger King, Dunkin’ Donuts and Pizza Hut.

Instead of dedicating itself to stopping cold the fascist impulses of its associates Flores Facussé and Canahuati Larach, the IAPA went so far as to organize a “meeting” in Caracas with the reactionary Venezuelan press, under the pretense of “discussing the situation of freedom of expression,” but really to attack President Hugo Chávez all over again. The IAPA and Venezuelan Press Group held their meeting last Thursday and Friday in Caracas, in order to discuss the situation of freedom of expression throughout the continent.

The adjunct Secretary General of the Latin American Federation of Journalists (Felap), Nelson del Castillo, denounced this IAPA maneuver, pointing out that this mafia organization “has fathered the derailment of democratic processes, in the name of certain liberties, when the only intention is to violate the rights of the people and keep them in the most backward political, economic and social [state].”
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)


Postby John Schröder » Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:29 pm

http://hondurascoup2009.blogspot.com/20 ... m-law.html

Grade D-: Flawed Research from the Law Library of the Library of Congress

Janine D'Addario, Coordinator of the Office of Communications of the Congressional Research Service, was kind enough to confirm what many people now have noted: the attribution of bad research to that office was wrong. I am delighted, as I told her, to hear that the report was not the product of the "nonpartisan Congressional Research Service".

Those quotation marks, by the way, refer to comments by neither Ms. D'Addario nor me. They enclose the quoted "speech" of US Representative (R-Ill) Aaron Schock, still posted as of 12:30 PDT on his official congressional website, that wrongly characterize the source of the analysis purporting to give the Honduran Congress a leg to stand on in the question of the constitutionality of their actions on June 28. Visit it and you can also see the box with the link to "Schock Honduras CRS Report".

Rep. Schock's press release makes clear that there remains a problem with Bad Research from a Federal agency, even if the source is not the highly-respected CRS. Either we have to conclude that the research of the Law Library of the Library of Congress is generally unreliable, or that this specific report should never have been approved for release.

As a scholar, I would much prefer not to have to throw into question all research emanating from an office of the Library of Congress. But until someone there issues a statement retracting the report, based on the amply documented and easily substantiated sources showing the basic facts of law are mistaken, the full faith of the Library of Congress is behind a piece of research I would not accept for a term paper by an undergraduate.

To recap: the report, again in the words of Rep. Schock's office "concludes that the removal of former Honduran President Manuel Zelaya was legal and Constitutional". The Law Library report does so by proposing a novel legal theory, not actually articulated by the Honduran Congress itself on June 28 or since. The researcher virtually had to do this, because the stated bases of the June 28 actions would not meet legal or constitutional scrutiny.

This is not just my opinion. Armando Sarmiento, whose commentaries on this report published on quotha.net are required reading, describes the legal bases for refuting this report. Add to these analyses the opinions of US, Spanish, and Honduran constitutional law experts who find the coup violates the Honduran Constitution previously cited here. And, as Jennifer Moore explains in a report reproduced at quotha.net, a research group representing the American Association of Jurists, the National Lawyers Guild, the International Association of Democratic Lawyers and the International Association Against Torture, came to the same conclusion.

The Law Library may have rules against citing such external sources, or may have simply been interested in answering the narrowest possible version of a set of specific questions by consulting documents in its databases. The basis for the conclusion by the Law Library researcher is a section of Article 205 of the Honduran Constitution that was declared unconstitutional by the Honduran Supreme Court in 2003. A search of the Law Library would not have produced the Supreme Court ruling, because the Honduran Congress refused to publish it, as explained by Sr. Sarmiento in response to my inquiries:

    El congreso ordenó que el fallo de la Corte Suprema del 7 de mayo de 2003 no fuese publicado ...sin embargo, el efecto legal es obligatorio.

    Congress ordered that the verdict of the Supreme Court of May 7, 2003, would not be published ...nevertheless, the legal effect is obligatory.

    Ley de Justicia Constitucional en su Artículo 94 menciona que “La sentencia en que declare la inconstitucionalidad de una norma será de ejecución inmediata, y tendrá efectos generales y por tanto derogará la norma inconstitucional, debiendo comunicarse al Congreso Nacional, quien lo hará publicar en el Diario oficial la “Gaceta”.

    The Law of Constitutional Justice in its Article 94 mentions that "The sentence in which the unconstitutionality of a norm will be of immediate execution, and will have general effects and therefore it will derogate [abolish] the unconstitutional norm, having to be communicated to the National Congress, which will publish it in the official newspaper, "La Gaceta".
Sr. Sarmiento adds that

    Aunque el congreso se haya negado a publicarlo el fallo de la Corte Suprema el mismo está vigente desde el punto de vista jurídico.

    Even though the congress had refused to publish the verdict of the Supreme Court the same is in force from the juridical point of view
That is, rulings of unconstitutionality go into effect immediately; they are not contingent on publication, unlike laws, which do not become official until they are published. This is part of the difference between the role of Congress, which is to make laws (that then need to be shared with the people by publication) and the Supreme Court, which has the role of interpreting the constitution, by ruling laws or even parts of laws unconstitutional, rulings which immediately invalidate these laws and any action based on them.

The key passage in the Supreme Court ruling of May 7, 2003, that invalidated the constitutional amendment attempting to establish Article 205, section 10, says

    si bien el congreso Nacional de la República tiene la potestad de reformar la Constitución en las materias que el poder constituyente le ha conferido expresamente: esa potestad debe ejercerse respetando los límites constitucionales establecidos y la esencia de la de la Constitución. Esos límites no fueron respetados por el Congreso al introducir irregularmente, por medio de esa adición, una nueva excepción consistente en una norma accesoria adjetiva sin relación con alguna norma constitucional principal sustantiva por la que el Poder constituyente haya conferido al Congreso Nacional la atribución de interpretar la Constitución.

    given that the National congress of the Republic has the power to reform the Constitution in those areas that the constituent assembly has expressly conferred on it: this power should be exercised respecting the established constitutional limits and the essence of the Constitution. Those limits were not respected by the Congress by introducing, irregularly, by means of this addition, a new exception consisting of an accessory adjective norm without relation to some principal substantive constitutional norm through which the constituent Power might have conferred on the National Congress the attribution of interpreting the Constitution.
In other words: the Congress cannot just add a power that was not given it in the original Constituent Assembly that produced the 1982 constitution. It can amend those parts of the constitution that deal with powers it has, but cannot smuggle in a whole new power as a subsection of a section that did not give it that power.

We are dealing here with a struggle by the Honduran Supreme Court-- handicapped by being re-appointed one term at a time (formerly four years, now seven) by a process requiring unilateral approval by another branch of government-- to preserve the separation of powers that is key to a balanced government.

The finding by the Supreme Court was absolutely explicit about this being based on separation of powers. Their verdict adds

    Que no se desconoce que el Congreso Nacional ha realizado interpretaciones a la Constitución; sin embargo, en consonancia con los artículos 373 y 374, de la misma no puede atribuirse al Congreso Nacional esa facultad en detrimento de las atribuciones de los otros Poderes del Estado; pues ello afectaría la forma de gobierno, al vulnerar la independencia que debe existir entre ellos y por ende estableciendo relaciones de subordinación con relación al Legislativo, pues ello daría origen por parte del Congreso a leyes- sentencias, disfrazadas de normas interpretativas de la Constitución.

    That it is not unknown that the National Congress has made interpretations of the Constitution: nonetheless, in consonance with Articles 373 and 374 of the same [Constitution] the National Congress cannot attribute to itself this faculty in detriment of the attributions of the other Powers of State; since that would affect the form of government, weakening the independence that should exist among them and as an outcome establishing relations of subordination in relation to the Legislative [Branch], since that would give origin on the part of Congress to laws, sentences, disguised as interpretations of the Constitution.
Sr. Sarmiento notes in closing that

    Un detalle importante es que después del falló del 7 de mayo de 2003 el congreso NO HA REALIZADO NUEVAMENTE NINGUNA INTERPRETACIÓN DE LA CONSTITUCIÓN.

    An important detail is that after the verdict of the 7th of May of 2003 the Congress HAS NOT NEWLY CARRIED OUT ANY INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.

Including, pointedly, on June 28, 2009, when the analyst for the Law Library of Library of Congress thinks this would be the only way they could have considered what they were doing as legal. Which means the Honduran Congress could not think they could redefine the power to censure Congress does have under Article 205, section 20, which deals only with administrative conduct, to extend to the removal of a President from office, a power they do not have, and they did not even try to make that invalidated claim. It took a US researcher to do that.

If the Law Library had to rely on its own documentary resources, it should not have allowed citation of personal communications from a single, impeachable source with an open interest in a specific conclusion. Once one such source was cited, many others willing to explain the finer points of constitutional law, reaching contrary conclusions, were available. Sr. Sarmiento's reply to my inquiries came within hours, and with rich specific detail citing published records.

I give the Law Library a D-

They did correctly note the unconstitutionality of expatriating President Zelaya, and did correctly note that this expatriation interrupted the legal procedures by which the Supreme Court was beginning its hearings on the charges brought by the Public Prosecutor. But the Law Library report was confused about the separation of duties of the Armed Forces (who should not have carried out the raid) and the National Police (who are charged with enforcing court rulings), missing the relevant articles of the Constitution entirely. And it engaged in the construction of a spurious rationale for what the Congress might have been doing, which it did not do because the specific power claimed in Article 205, section 10, had been ruled unconstitutional.

In my teaching practice, I give students a chance to revise their first drafts. I am happy to provide the same option to the Law Library of the Library of Congress. I will update this blog when and if I receive a statement from them.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:12 pm

http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/354

Popular Resistance to the Coup in Honduras: an Interview with Bertha Caceres

Submitted by robert naiman on 27 September 2009 - 1:42pm

This interview with Honduran human rights activist Bertha Caceres was conducted on September 4 by Beverly Bell, author of Walking on Fire: Haitian Women's Stories of Survival and Resistance and Program Coordinator of Other Worlds.

Bertha Caceres is a co-founder of COPINH, the Council of Popular and Indigenous Organizations in Honduras. COPINH addresses human rights issues such as the impunity of large land-owners and the forced eviction of campesinos; illegal de-forestation by corporations; and compensation for victims of human rights violations committed by the Honduran government.

Beverly Bell: Here we are in Havana with Bertha Caceras Flores in the Forum on Emancipatory Paradigms, speaking about the tactics and repression of those behind the coup d'etat.

Bertha Caceres: The people of Honduras and the popular movement have suffered a big blow at the hands of what we are calling a dictatorship, and which, in terms of violation of human rights, has been criminal and repressive. We've seen how these repressive forces have dragged people out of their houses and has been brutal against the youth, against women, against indigenous people. And by this we mean to say that racism is really resurgent right now, racism and also violence against women. These things are reinforced by the militarization that has taken place in the whole region. We have around 15 compañeros that have been assassinated. Compañeros who were tortured before being killed and whose deaths were meant as a message to all of the young people and the demonstrators. In the South of the country, in Paraiso, there was someone who, after being captured, kidnapped basically, was tortured and then stabbed 47 times. And his body was left on the side of the road where the protests were taking place.

The form of repression has been direct, shameless, with torture and everything I've said. But there's also been a repression that is done with surveillance, with following people, especially against the organizations, through the telephones, following leaders. We know there have been plans to assassinate leaders like the "falcon" plan and the "tundra" plan, that are aimed at capturing leaders, torturing them, and them dumping them hurt, or with others assassinating them. And we've been denouncing this kind of thing.

But again the repression goes deeper than this. There's been a campaign of terror through the media, using the psychology of fear to criminalize protest, to criminalize social movements. There have been smear campaigns of all kinds, and threats. We have seen how the media, owned by the coup oligarchs, has been used to motivate violations of human rights. A shameless call to beat and repress. And also a violation of the right to free expression. We've seen how the coup government has been repressing all of the media. Where people were protesting, they've shut them up, they've kidnapped journalists. The media outlets were closed the day they imposed the curfew, which really has encouraged the human rights violations.

The state of emergency denies all of our human rights as civilians. We've seen how the military says that they don't need any kind of judicial order to detain people; this affects everything. The killing of women has increased 60% just since the coup began. The military and the police have been assaulting women, all of this rage against women just because they are women, and that's without even talking about indigenous people or black people.

So we're living in this repressive state, in a militarized society. Where death squadrons have been reactivated, shamelessly, the 3-16 [ed. note: an infamous military death squad that operated in Honduras in the 1980s], the generals who attended the School of the Americas, including CIA agents like Billy Joya [the leader of the 3-16], who was a trainer and organizer of torture, a good student of Gustavo Alvarez Martinez [a Honduran general during the 1980's who was accused of horrific human rights violations], and of John Negroponte [U.S. Ambassador to Honduras in the 1980s], and now he's the number one security advisor to Micheletti, the coup leader. And we've seen how the coup leaders have been accompanied by international terrorists like Otto Reich [Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State and supporter of the 2002 coup in Venezuela] and Robert Carmona [A leader in the 2002 Venezuelan coup], recognized counter-revolutionaries, and how the counter-revolutionary mafia in Miami has been so shamelessly involved with this. Robert Carmona was in the presidential palace, in the prosecutor's office, meeting with the attorney general in the Congress, guarded by the military.

We've seen an enormous attack against the social movements, trying to dismantle us. There have been an uncountable number of individual and collective human rights violations. I can say that all of these human rights violations have been documented, and have been denounced to unofficial human rights organizations in Honduras like COFADE, CODE, SIPRODE, and all of this documentation has been sent to the Inter-American Human Rights Commission, and to Judge Garzon, who was recently in Honduras. We've explained all of this to the Organization of American States, and all of the international delegations that have come to Honduras from Europe, the US, Latin America, the Caribbean. It's all there, documented, and evident, the violations of human rights.

Bev: How have laws been trampled or revised to justify all this?

Bertha: One way is, as I mentioned, the curfew, using the curfew and the state of emergency, with the suspension of all of our constitutional rights and guarantees. The regime has pushed forward laws that, for example, when they have captured activists, with the help of the Supreme Court, which is in support of the coup, they've used a category of accusation against the compañeros like sedition, terrorism, illegal protests.

They've used these same courts and the prosecutor's office to close radios and television stations. This has been documented on Channel 36, Radio Progress, Radio Globe, and the indigenous community radio stations.

They've also passed a law that considers it treason to be in resistance, to speak out against the coup, to even mention that in Honduras there was a coup is considered terrorism and high treason against the state. There have been a series of actions that are illegal, unconstitutional, in violation of human rights, and they practically haven't even had to change many laws to do it, because all of this law was there as part of the plan for the war against terrorism that Bush was pushing in Central America, and by using these laws they have criminalized the social movement, they've repressed us, and it doesn't really matter to them whether or not there's a law. It's a coup.

Bev: The other day, you spoke about that even though this is a terrible coup, and completely in disregard of human rights and democracy, this is also a special time for you all. Could you tell us what advances the movement has made as a result of this coup?

Bertha: Well, Honduras has always been an unknown country. Even now we've seen how all of the big news stations have left the country and that Honduras isn't an issue anymore in these media monopolies. We've always said that we've always been known for two things: for being a military base, which was the launching pad and training site for the attack on the Nicaraguan revolution and for training the elite death squads of Guatemala and El Salvador. And the other thing we're known for is Hurricane Mitch. It was a terrible disaster.

Now the world knows Honduras for a very different phenomenon. We've seen the amazement of the international community and the solidarity community. And that amazement wasn't only in the international community: we were surprised, as well, at how the from the Honduran people burst forth this enormous force. With all of this accumulated history of frustration, and demands, that all came forward in different ways and in different expressions.

A real gain has been the massive, incredible involvement of women in this movement. They have been strong, energetic, creative, coming up with new kinds of struggle, displaying an amazing amount of energy and a profound understanding of the concepts of struggle. Also the youth. The youth have been superstar participants in this movement. And it's no coincidence that the repression has been so fierce against them. Indigenous people as well: since the first day we've been present in this mobilization, in all of the marches, the occupation of highways, including the guarding of the Venezuelan Embassy, as a way of demonstrating how grateful the people of Honduras are towards the people of Venezuela. And of course to the people of Cuba. Up until now they haven't been able to touch the Cuban doctors, 300 of whom are still working in the country, and who have been threatened. So the people of Honduras have been able to draw on all of this richness, and creativity. Art, for example, has been a really important part of the resistance.

We've been able to unite ourselves around one central objective, which is to overthrow the dictatorship. Overcoming the individual interests of organizations, of different sectors... And to demand not only the reinstitution of the democratic president Manuel Zelaya, but also to unite around other historic demands, including the formation of a national constitutional assembly which is popular and democratic and has direct participation of the people. So this means that the challenge for the people of Honduras is going to be even greater than what we've been through already.

And the oligarchs are going to respond to this. We have a chant that we've really taken to heart, that says "they're afraid of us because we're fearless." They've realized that the people of Honduras have taken this on as a historical obligation. They made a mistake when they thought the resistance was only going to last three days. That's what they said: "Three days and this will all be over." And they were wrong. They've been wrong about a lot of things. We can see that they are weak. We see them as beaten down. We see them as wavering in front of the force of the people of Honduras.

Bev: The other day you said this has been the first time that you all have been united in a popular movement.

Bertha: Yes. To me, this is the biggest accomplishment of this movement: the unity of a social movement led by the Honduran people. And they didn't wait for structure or directions or ideology or leaders or anything. They didn't wait for anything. They had this explosion of organization, of rebellion, of insurrection in a way that was spontaneous, autonomous, and creative. And this pushes the social movements to become more conscious. The significance of a coup and a military dictatorship helps us form ourselves into what we call here one big knot. We're all united under the same objective, including in complicated issues like electoral politics. I think there's been a real process of maturing in this movement. The movement understands that the resistance front, which is a broad-based movement with a lot of different mass organization, needs to maintain its principles, and maintain its independence, and push these anti-coup electoral forces to join with the direction of the Honduran people, who have joined together around one proposal. So I think this movement has taught a lesson, not only to the ultra-right, but to ourselves, the popular movement.

Bev: You're here with a lot of revolutionaries and progressive folks in this Forum on Alternative paradigms. Many of them have lived through dictatorships in their own countries. What's the message you've been saying: "For now it's Honduras, yes, but..."

Bertha: I think that you have to be clear about one thing: the coup in Honduras has not just been against Honduras, it hasn't just been against Mel Zelaya and his cabinet. It's been against all of the emancipatory processes. It's been a clear, threatening message to the progressive and leftist governments in our continent. It's a clear message that the ultra-right and the imperialists aren't going to stop. They want to reclaim power in the middle of the economic crisis, where they know very well that they need our resources. The military coup in Honduras was directly related to the plundering of our resources. It's very clear the involvement of gringo geopolitical interests in the region. It's connected to other plans of militarization and annexation: the case of Colombia, the threat of destabilization of the governments of Ecuador, of Bolivia, and of Paraguay, and others. And of our region in Central America.

I think we're in a moment where this ultra-right and this imperialism is marking the beginning of a new 21st Century kind of coup. We see this. When we read the declarations of the right in Paraguay, this week, we were shocked to see that it is exactly the language that the oligarchy of Honduras used before and during the coup, that they used against Mel Zelaya.

So our call to the social movements of this continent is that we really push the need to unite ourselves and to create strategies between social movements and left governments. I know there are people who say, we need to maintain our independence, our autonomy. But that doesn't mean that we can't also make the alliances and the strategies that we need to make with these governments.

I think we need to be clear that this coup is the beginning of a strategy of direct aggression, and aggression backed by the US, against the process of integration of the ALBA (Bolivian Alternative for the Americas). The Honduran people were really fighting for ALBA. It was an initiative in part by the president, but it was something that we had to push for. And that's why it outrages us to see that these tyrants, these assassins, are using the money of the ALBA, this money that was produced by the labor of our brothers in the Caribbean, of the Venezuelan and Cuban people, to pay for their international jet-setting. That they're using to pay the plane tickets of [Honduran business man and coup supporter] Miguel Facusse. It's heartbreaking to see how they've robbed from the central bank of Honduras to pay the repressors. To pay the millionaires who are running this campaign of terror against our people. Who are they paying? The grand czar of the communications monopoly in Honduras, Rafael Ferrari, the same coup leader.

So I think this is a message to the international community, and a call for solidarity with the people of Honduras. That to fight against the dictatorship in Honduras right now is to fight for our whole continent.

Bev: You have said a museum that should be built. For what and why?

Berta: We have walked so much that if we were to add up the hours and the kilometers that we've walked - from Colon to San Pedro Sula, or from Batea or Piedra Gorda, del Paraiso to the capital, and the dozens of kilometers that they walk every day in the marches - it would be something incredible. I hope someone somewhere is calculating how much we've walked, and not just for the sake of walking but to defy a dictatorship. So a friend said, "Well, we've walked so much, for real, that we've worn out our shoes or our sandals. We've got to put together a museum. A museum for all the worn out shoes and flip-flops." We think that this is important. Maybe to other people it doesn't seem important, but for us it means to speak up, to raise up the evidence of this resistance. You know? We've seen compañeros with foot problems, with injuries, and they're still there marching. We've seen 76-year-old women who never let the resistance down, day after day. Or 10-year-olds giving profound and well thought out speeches to crowds of 70,000 people. It's something incredible. And it's something a people can only do when they feel that their hour has come.

Bev: Is there anything else you want to say?

Bertha: Only to emphasize the need for solidarity, to call out to all of the movements to be in solidarity with us. And to say that for us, as the Honduran people, it's important that you understand better our reality. What happened before the coup? What happened so that one day, the 28th of June, using the pretext that a public consultation was unconstitutional that they seized power? What happened before? What is the antecedent? What has the role of Honduras been in the international geopolitics? What have been the 100 years of occupation of the US in Honduras? What was the plunder of the transnational companies that now fund the coup? And the IFI's [international financial institutions]? And the same structures like the international bureaucracy, like the UN or the OAS, that funds the coup and then denounces them? What role has the oligarchy played, that thinks we're still living in the 80's? And why do they feel the need once again to re-launch this strategy of military coups?

We think it's important to understand all of this history. It might not be reaching other audiences because of the media blackout and the campaign of terror that the commercial media is running. And for the same reason that I mentioned at the beginning: that we have been a forgotten country. Our history, our resistance, the accumulation of all of these demands that the people are expressing right now. Our people have more reason than ever to call for a constitutional assembly. Because water has been privatized, because the land is being privatized, and our resources, by this military government.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:56 pm

http://sg.news.yahoo.com/afp/20090927/t ... dc673.html

The stakes rose in Honduras Sunday after ousted leader Manuel Zelaya, holed up at Brazil's embassy in Tegucigalpa, called on his supporters for a final offensive -- and coup leaders respond by giving Brazil a harsh warning.

Zelaya, who has been in the embassy since he made a surprise return almost one week ago, called on his supporters to converge on the capital on Monday, exactly three months after the coup.

"We're making a patriotic ... call to resistance across all national territory," Zelaya said Saturday in a statement handed to an AFP photographer inside the embassy.

He called on his supporters to peacefully march to the capital for a "final offensive against the de facto government."

Shortly after, the regime gave Brazil up to 10 days to define Zelaya's status in a statement read on national television.

It urged "that Mr. Zelaya immediately stop using the protection that Brazil's diplomatic mission gives him to instigate violence in Honduras."

The statement warned that "if that's not done, we'll be forced to take supplementary measures under international law," without elaborating.

The interim government -- which took over after Zelaya was ousted in late June at the height of a dispute over his plans to change the constitution -- promised not to attack the "integrity" of the embassy.

They are seeking to arrest Zelaya for violating the constitution.

The UN Security Council on Friday warned the interim Honduran regime headed by Roberto Micheletti not to harass the embassy, as Brazilian officials complained it was "under siege."

Several thousand Zelaya supporters took to the streets again Saturday, in a march on foot and in scores of cars, waving red flags, honking horns and calling for him to return to office.

Zelaya said Saturday that the regime had not responded to a call for dialogue which he made after returning to the country, but had replied "with more repression against the people."

"It's the only place in the world where there's an embassy under siege," said Francisco Catunda, the Brazilian charge d'affaires.

Most people inside the embassy were in good health, Catunda said, adding that one Brazilian diplomat told him he had smelled gas the previous day, after Zelaya accused the army of trying to poison him and some 60 people still inside the compound by pumping noxious gases into the building -- a charge roundly denied by Honduran officials.

Demonstrators have come daily to the embassy compound, which is surrounded by anti-riot police and soldiers, to show their support for the embattled head of state.

"Thanks, Brazil, for protecting Mel from this vile regime," one banner read, using Zelaya's popular nickname.

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, at a meeting of African and South American leaders in Venezuela, cautioned against "backsliding" on democracy in Honduras and throughout Latin America.

"We fought hard to sweep military dictatorships into the trash can of history, we can not allow these kind of setbacks in our continent," he said.

As efforts to mediate struggled to get off the ground, European Union countries decided to send back their envoys who were withdrawn after the coup, but said that did not mean they recognized the interim regime.

A daytime curfew was lifted Thursday and airports reopened, allowing businesses to resume and providing relief to an increasingly frustrated public. A nighttime curfew remained in place.

The United Nations on Wednesday froze its technical support for a presidential vote scheduled for November.

Regime authorities still wish to carry out the vote, which they say is the best exit to the crisis.

"We're losing guarantees for free elections and in these conditions the people will question and fail to recognize the electoral process and its results," Zelaya said.

A police spokesman told AFP Wednesday that two people had been killed in pro-Zelaya protests since the start of the week, and rights groups have voiced concern about clampdowns on demonstrators and local media.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:59 pm

http://wire.antiwar.com/2009/09/26/hond ... p-dispute/

Die-hard supporters of ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya are increasingly turning their anger toward the country's wealthy business elite, a small but powerful cadre believed to solidly back the interim government that removed him at gunpoint three months ago.

The capital is now covered with graffiti demanding "Turks out! — apparently a reference to the Central American country's large number of business people of Middle Eastern descent — and on Saturday pro-Zelaya marchers lashed out at the elite's dominance over wealth in a country where millions are poor.

"They own almost the whole country," pro-Zelaya protester Arnoldo Pagoaga, a medical doctor who marched in his white uniform, said Saturday. "They're terrorists. ... They own the army, and sic it on us."

Fellow demonstrator Rafael Alegria complained that Honduras "has a large immigrant community that owns everything: commerce and industry."

"We don't really have our own economy," Alegria said. "We have to set that right."

Meanwhile, reports emerged that the business community's firm support of interim President Roberto Micheletti might be faltering somewhat amid intense international economic and diplomatic pressure — and the coup's substantially negative impact on the economy.

"There are people who say that it was a businessman" who helped Zelaya sneak back into Honduras, Micheletti told The Associated Press in an interview late Friday. He added, however, that "there are so many theories that nobody knows" if it is true.

Zelaya has said he made a 15-hour, cross-country overland journey using various vehicles to slip into the country undetected Monday. But the Spanish newspaper La Nacion reported Friday that the scion of a local media and banking family, attorney Yani Rosenthal, had lent him a helicopter to whisk him to Honduras.

Rosenthal emphatically denied the report Saturday.

"I don't even have a helicopter, much less one to lend to somebody," he said.

He did acknowledge, however, that there are divisions within Honduras' elite.

"There are differences in the upper class, just as there are in the middle class and the lower class," he said, though he added that he doesn't think they have led to a significant reduction in support for Micheletti.

While the rich haven't suffered as much as the country's impoverished majority from the near-daily curfews and cutoff of international aid, industrial and retail interests are starting to feel the pinch.

"There has been significant damage to the economy ... especially from the curfews," Rosenthal noted. Another curfew was reinstated Saturday at 6 p.m. until 6 a.m. Sunday.

Some members of the business community have had their U.S. visas revoked, several business people told the AP on Saturday. They spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of repercussions.

U.S. Ambassador Hugo Llorens told foreign journalists Friday that the visas of key supporters of the de facto regime had been revoked.

Nonetheless, Micheletti says he has received no pressure from the business community to show more flexibility in talks with Zelaya, who is holed up at the Brazilian Embassy along with supporters and demanding to be reinstated as president.
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:18 pm

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps ... 04&sp=true

Reuters wrote:the cowboy hat-wearing leftist is unlikely to give in
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:10 pm

User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:17 pm

User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:46 pm

User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby John Schröder » Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:53 pm

http://hondurasoye.wordpress.com/2009/0 ... sue-at-un/

US’ Ice Queen Ambassador Prevents Real Discussion of Honduras Issue At UN

Image

The United States is chairing the UN Security Council this month (chair rotates monthly) and, as such, Susan Rice, US Ambassador to the UN, holds the gavel and controls the Council’s agenda. It is not uncommon for the US to place issues on the agenda to coincide with its chairmanship so that it can promote them swiftly or deep-six them altogether. With last Friday’s Security Council’s anemic approach to the crisis of Brazil’s embassy in Honduras, it appears this issue fell into the latter category.

In my update of September 25, I included news about the US’ perspective on the UN Security Council discussion regarding the Brazil embassy crisis. From the update:

    US Ambassador to the UN, Susan (Ice Queen) Rice said “the embassy – not the political crisis itself – was the focus of the meeting.”

Since Friday, I have been thinking that there must have been some dissent on this issue and, sure enough, ANSA Latina provides the proof. In its article below, we find that there was wrangling over the scope of the UN Security Council meeting about the crisis at the Brazilian embassy in Honduras. The article is in Spanish, but here is a brief English summary:

Brazil’s Foreign Minister, Celso Amorim, stated that, in a conversation with Ambassador Rice, she disagreed with calling a Security Council meeting to address the situation in Honduras, especially concerning the hostility of the Honduran military against the Brazilian embassy (gee, I thought this was the issue!). As this conversation was taking place in NY, the Honduran military was sending gases into the embassy and had formed a full military cordon around the building. Amorim warned Rice about a possible invasion of the embassy and added to Rice that, “if it was the US embassy that was being subjected to such hostility, you would be very irritated.”

Once again, the US persists in keeping as much daylight between itself and injustices it has a finger in. Yet, one more example of why a reform of the make-up of the Security Council is in order. On Thursday, Vietnam takes over as the October chair of the Security Council. Depending on your view of the ‘new” Vietnam and its acceptance of numerous US maquiladora operations, the US may have significant influence over the content of October’s agenda.

Final point, Susan Rice, has some peculiar personality issues that make her less than a diplomatic wonder. She has all the charisma of a brick wall and her demeanor is that of the tough kid on the block. I know people who had diplomatic doings with her her when she was at the State Department and they concur in this assessment. In retrospect, my calling her the Ice Queen is kind.

Ansa Latina informa: EEUU dice que el Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU no es lugar para hablar el tema de Honduras

Por Ansa Latina
sabado, 26 de septiembre 2009

BRASILIA, 26 (ANSA) – El canciller brasileño Celso Amorim discrepó con la embajadora norteamericana ante la ONU donde fue tratada la situación en Honduras, al tiempo que el Partido de los Trabajadores, del presidente Lula da Silva, considera “tibia” la posición de Washington.

La prensa brasileña informó hoy sobre una discusión entre el canciller Celso Amorim y la embajadora estadounidense ante la ONU, Susan Rice, en torno a las iniciativas diplomáticas sobre la tensión en el país centroamericano.

Susan Rice manifestó a Amorim su desacuerdo con Brasil por haber pedido una reunión del Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU para tratar la situación hondureña, en particular la hostilidad de militares contra la embajada brasileña, donde está refugiado desde el lunes el presidente depuesto Manuel Zelaya.

“Este no es el lugar (Consejo de Seguridad ONU) adecuado para este tipo de presentación” dijo Rice a Amorim, durante un diálogo privado ocurrido en el Palacio de Cristal de la ONU, publicó hoy Estado de Sao Paulo.

La legación diplomática brasileña fue atacada ayer con gases presuntamente tóxicos y desde el lunes permanece cercada por un cordón militar que restringe el ingreso de visitantes.

Por su parte Amorim, que en su discurso ante el Consejo de Seguridad advirtió sobre un posible intento de invasión a la embajada. Respondió a Rice alegando que “si la embajada de Estados Unidos (hubiera sido hostilizada) usted estaría muy irritada”. DFB
User avatar
John Schröder
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: Germany
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 150 guests