Coercive Engineered Migration: Zionism’s War on Europe

[semper occultus]

...another cut-out-and-keep effort Alice - appreciated as always...

[slimmouse]

Maybe its just me, but it strikes me as increasingly clear from this thread in general, and from alices last post, that their is indeed some grand continuity of a conspiracy by powerful players to make life an overall misery for your average dude.

Its isnt of course any kind of Jewish conspiracy. Its a conspiracy by forces who have no allegiance whatsoever to any kind of cause, and yet have managed to convince the rest of us to fight for such causes.

To blow each other up in the name of God, or Country, or Democracy (hahahah) for example

If thats somehow not the darkest kind of satire, then fuck knows what is

[tapitsbo]

Of course Alice's bit about transformations to religions by secret societies dovetails with MK-ULTRA, and so on.

[semper occultus]

Samuel Untermyer was the owner of the huge estate in New York that ended up as Untermyer Park, frequented as a ritual site by the Son of Sam cult....

.... ooo-eee-oooo...

[Wombaticus Rex]

Maybe its just me, but it strikes me as increasingly clear from this thread in general, and from alices last post, that their is indeed some grand continuity of a conspiracy by powerful players to make life an overall misery for your average dude.

Misery is more profitable than harmony.

Game theory constraints on multipolar conflict could also shape this landscape -- more robustly than a carefully scripted, centrally directed conspiracy could.

Just add water.

[Occult Means Hidden]

Has the narrative shifted somewhat? It's no longer Zionism's war on Europe, it's Turkey's. Correct?

[slimmouse]

Maybe its just me, but it strikes me as increasingly clear from this thread in general, and from alices last post, that their is indeed some grand continuity of a conspiracy by powerful players to make life an overall misery for your average dude.

Misery is more profitable than harmony.

Game theory constraints on multipolar conflict could also shape this landscape -- more robustly than a carefully scripted, centrally directed conspiracy could.

Just add water.

According to current thinking misery is more profitable than harmony.

Nuff said really

[backtoiam]

Acknowledge Weapons of Mass Migration or 'Legitimize' "Israel"
Fort Russ - 8th March, 2016

A deep divide has artificially been created in splitting the Resistance Community apart, and that's the issue of whether or not Kelly M. Greenhill's "Weapons Of Mass Migration" exist. The Harvard researcher proved in her 2010 book of the same name that there have been at least 56 instances of states purposefully generating, provoking, and exploiting massive waves of human migration as a means of promoting their respective policies, and keen observers have pointed out that the current Immigrant Crisis bears a striking structural resemblance to this strategy.

On the other hand, some self-proclaimed "anti-imperialist" "leftists" have smeared anyone who dares to suggest such an 'ideological blasphemy' as being a "racist", "fascist", "white supremacist", thus manufacturing a nasty spat that has sharply divided an erstwhile unified movement. Whether intentionally or not, this fully conforms with the US' strategy of weakening resistance movements against it by pitting their members against one another, as can be visibly demonstrated by the paranoid 'witch hunts' that these radicals are carrying out in 'purging' their ranks of "fascists" and publicly condemning their former 'comrades' online.

Fifth Generational Warfare And The Resistance Community

The author comprehensively wrote about how this new 'trend' is symptomatic of a larger manifestation of Fifth Generational Warfare that the US is waging against the multipolar world, in which Washington is seeking to provoke the fabled "clash of civilizations" that would unravel all of the pragmatic advances that Russia and others have made in pushing back against the US' hegemony. It's absolutely essential that the reader reference the article "Civilizational Aggression: Non-Western Revival And Leftist Rebranding" in order to understand the grand strategic reasons for why the US engineered the Immigrant Crisis in the first place and how some of the self-proclaimed "anti-imperialist" "leftists" are functioning as "useful idiots" in promoting unipolar agendas.

That being said, it's an indisputable fact that one of the foundational tenets of the Resistance Community is its unwavering opposition to "Israel" and its decades-long occupation of Palestine. There's no quicker way to gauge the sincerity of an individual's purported convictions than to directly ask them whether or not they believe that the establishment of "Israel" was legitimate. No genuine supporter of resistance ideology would dare to argue that it was, since such an assertion would immediately discredit them in the eyes of the community and clearly demonstrate that they're either a misguided ideologue or a political provocateur. It's possible for people to have constructive debates about "Israel's" future status, but the entire conversation absolutely must proceed from the starting point of its illegitimate creation first.

"Israel's" Establishment And The Zionist Movement

Accordingly, "Israel" is inherently illegitimate because it's the literal embodiment of "Weapons of Mass Migration", in this case, the large-scale migration of European Jews to the British colony of Palestine after World War II. The uncontrollable influx of new arrivals was utterly destabilizing for the local Palestinians, yet this process was 'legitimized' by a widespread "guilt complex" stemming from the perception that Jews formed a special category of World War II victims. This purposely misleading narrative was actively pontificated by Zionists in order to geopolitically 'justify' their long-held and publicly proclaimed vision of carving a "Jewish state" out of the Mideast, relying on their fundamentalist interpretation of religious texts to anoint themselves as "God's chosen people" and 'validate' their territorial claims.

The Zionists exploited a global tragedy in which a broad plurality of millions of separately categorized victims lost their lives in order to single out the suffering of their single demographic, using the attention given to their plight in order to correspondingly demand self-interested geopolitical 'restitution' from the international community. They had expertly manipulated the "guilt complex" prevalent in the immediate aftermath of the conflict in order to carry out the aggressive large-scale migration of their religious compatriots to the targeted territory of Palestine, a demographic offensive which was soon thereafter ex post facto 'legitimized' through the US and USSR's diplomatic recognition of "Israel" and subsequently white washed. Nevertheless, despite the Cold War calculations that went into each superpower's decision on this matter, it was impossible for them to hide the well-documented and easily verifiable fact that "Israel" is the direct product of geopolitically weaponized migration against the Palestinians.

From "Anti-Imperialist" To Imperialist Enabler

This returns the conversation back to the present time and the vicious 'witch hunt' that some self-proclaimed "anti-imperialists" are carrying out against their fellow resistance comrades. Their obsession with attacking anyone who raises awareness about the concept of "Weapons of Mass Migration" and frenziedly vilifying them as "racist", "fascist", "white supremacists" provides 'normative' cover for 'legitimizing' the establishment of "Israel". By denying the existence of "Weapons of Mass Migration", these self-proclaimed "anti-imperialists" are 'justifying' "Israel's" creation by refusing to associate it with the demographic aggression that was launched against the Palestinians. Omitting the indispensable fact that "Israel" is the planned result of Zionist-promoted weaponized migration reveals that these purported "anti-imperialists" are really just imperial enablers, whether through their misguided and dogmatic adherence to Cultural Marxism or through what might reasonably be some of these individuals' witting collaboration with the unipolar information agenda.

The Choice

Considering all of this, a simple binary axiom can be expressed:

"Acknowledging the existence of "Weapons of Mass Migration" delegitimizes "Israel", but denying the existence of "Weapons of Mass Migration" 'legitimizes' "Israel"."

There is no possible way that a self-described "anti-imperialist" could refute "Israel's" illegitimate establishment without recognizing the integral role that "Weapons of Mass Migration" played in its creation. Only by affirming that there really is such a concept as "Weapons of Mass Migration" can one begin to deconstruct the "guilt"-driven narrative that has mythologized the Zionist foundation of "Israel". Well-intentioned resistance supporters can debate amongst themselves whether the present Immigrant Crisis is yet another example of this element of Fifth Generational Warfare or not, but viciously denying that there's even such a thing as "Weapons of Mass Migration" is unquestionable proof that the relevant individuals are fraudsters and should have no place in the Resistance Community. It doesn't matter if they're misguided "leftists" or provocative infiltrators, if someone self-describes as an "anti-imperialist" but refuses to recognize that "Israel" owes its creation to "Weapons of Mass Migration", then they blatantly contravene one of the core tenets of the resistance movement and are fundamentally subverting it from within.

All members of the Resistance Community are thus faced with a very simple choice - acknowledge "Weapons Of Mass Migration" or 'legitimize' "Israel".

[Occult Means Hidden]

Acknowledge Weapons of Mass Migration or 'Legitimize' "Israel"
Fort Russ - 8th March, 2016

...


The Choice

Considering all of this, a simple binary axiom can be expressed:

"Acknowledging the existence of "Weapons of Mass Migration" delegitimizes "Israel", but denying the existence of "Weapons of Mass Migration" 'legitimizes' "Israel"."

There is no possible way that a self-described "anti-imperialist" could refute "Israel's" illegitimate establishment without recognizing the integral role that "Weapons of Mass Migration" played in its creation. Only by affirming that there really is such a concept as "Weapons of Mass Migration" can one begin to deconstruct the "guilt"-driven narrative that has mythologized the Zionist foundation of "Israel". Well-intentioned resistance supporters can debate amongst themselves whether the present Immigrant Crisis is yet another example of this element of Fifth Generational Warfare or not, but viciously denying that there's even such a thing as "Weapons of Mass Migration" is unquestionable proof that the relevant individuals are fraudsters and should have no place in the Resistance Community.

A very interesting find that seems to have taken cues from this thread. However it's a tragic dialectic that fails right out of the gate. As I've said, the reality of weaponized migration is a complete non factor. The factor is, if we call them weapons, how will we come to view refugees/migrant in the future? As people needing help or as a threat to be neutralized? Classifying them as weapons dehumanizes them. The PTB motives be damned. Further, lots of assertion on what is a true leftist, but no understanding that leftism has driven borderless/migrant/refugee acceptance since the very beginning. The saving grace of this analysis is a better understanding of Zionism, by applying it to Israel's establishment and its protection despite criminal violations - whereas the OP conflates Zionism with a bigger and nonsensical agenda. Interesting read. Thank you.

[AlicetheKurious]

Maybe its just me, but it strikes me as increasingly clear from this thread in general, and from alices last post, that their is indeed some grand continuity of a conspiracy by powerful players to make life an overall misery for your average dude.

Misery is more profitable than harmony.

Game theory constraints on multipolar conflict could also shape this landscape -- more robustly than a carefully scripted, centrally directed conspiracy could.

Just add water.

Not really, when the carefully scripted, centrally directed conspiracy is not even a secret. It doesn't need to be. Those who successfully engage in such conspiracies know very well how people think. To cite but one example, someone who read the Oded Yinon article published by the World Zionist Organization all the way back in 1982 and took it seriously at the time would have been able to correctly identify and interpret the many seemingly random and disconnected events that have inexorably led to its implementation over the past three decades, bringing us to the ghastly reality we're witnessing today. But even if by some fluke, someone had, he or she would have been helpless, unable to persuade anybody who could have done something about it. Ridicule kicks in, and denial, and wishful thinking, and also people's tendency to get carried away by the accompanying narrative, or over-focus on details and miss the big picture. Also, few have the time or energy to dig further, and seek corroborating evidence. Or the intelligence to even understand what they're reading, and the background knowledge to examine it in its real context. Or, for that matter, the stomach to admit even to ourselves the evil that some of our most successful and admired fellow humans are able and willing to do.

[Wombaticus Rex]

Oh, I think we're talking about the same elephant, here.

There's tons of evil conspiracies afoot. Most of them never come close to fruition because they do not heed Bacon's formula: "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."

The conspiracy you're talking about -- and I'm not implying you're remotely wrong about it -- worked because it exploits human nature and the same lines of force that shape our history.

[AlicetheKurious]

The conspiracy you're talking about -- and I'm not implying you're remotely wrong about it -- worked because it exploits human nature and the same lines of force that shape our history.

I'm reminded of something that happened many years ago. My kids were still very young, and I had a friend over one evening, with her own toddlers. They got into my bedroom, which was sort of off-limits because of all the potential hazards (electric cords, sharp corners, etc.) and were crawling all over the place, including under the bed, while others were jumping on top of it. My friend was frantically trying to catch them, but by the time she got one out of the room and was working on the next, the first one had gleefully come back inside. She got fed up and yelled at me, "Why are you just standing there? Help me!"

I simply turned off the light, and we watched as they promptly moved towards the door and left the room, then we shut the door behind them.

Sure, these were babies, but all humans can be manipulated, to some extent. People who are awake, and especially infants, don't enjoy being in darkness and, given a choice, will gravitate towards the light of their own will. I used common sense, and my ability to reach the light switch, but there are experts whose business it is to learn what causes people to do certain things and not others. Think about all the studies that have been done to discover what makes people more likely to make impulse purchases, to eat their meal more quickly, to feel uplifted, to be willing to lie, to commit violent acts, to conform, to defy, etc., etc. Especially since WWII, there has been an avalanche of corporate, government and military-funded experimentation and analysis of the human psyche individually and en masse in all its variations, and its likely response to every kind of stimuli.

...it's a tragic dialectic that fails right out of the gate. As I've said, the reality of weaponized migration is a complete non factor. The factor is, if we call them weapons, how will we come to view refugees/migrant in the future? As people needing help or as a threat to be neutralized? Classifying them as weapons dehumanizes them. The PTB motives be damned. Further, lots of assertion on what is a true leftist, but no understanding that leftism has driven borderless/migrant/refugee acceptance since the very beginning. The saving grace of this analysis is a better understanding of Zionism, by applying it to Israel's establishment and its protection despite criminal violations - whereas the OP conflates Zionism with a bigger and nonsensical agenda.

I couldn't disagree more. The more aware people are of the methods used to manipulate them, and of the manipulators' true purpose, the less susceptible they become to such tactics. Denying the reality of how we are being manipulated serves to make it more effective. It does us no good, and in fact is very harmful, to deny the well-documented and sordid history of how masses of people can be, and have been deliberately weaponized against each other, especially by persuading both "sides" that their own survival depends on destruction of the "other". In fact, such a strategy is so commonplace that it's a cliche: divide and rule. I'm amazed that RI members sitting in former colonies built on genocide of the conquered natives by immigrant settlers, such as America and Australia, are so indignant (and shocked, shocked!) at the very idea that masses of people can be weaponized, and that this is far from new.

Also, you're falsely presuming that only they are being manipulated. By bombing the hell out of their countries, using terrorist proxies to kill them, and destroying the civil infrastructure necessary to sustain human life, they are motivated to leave, while we are left to make informed choices, free of interference. But that's an outrageously baseless assumption. Whether through the globalized media, economic exploitation, false-flag attacks, the steady erosion of civil rights, the escalating violations of international law and national sovereignty, the corporate consolidation of media and communications, we are all being weaponized against each other, not just refugees, but also the populations in the host countries, and even spectators around the world, whose reactions are predictable and useful.

In Europe, experts are confidently predicting that in future elections, both the Far Left and the Far Right will make enormous gains, and that voters will be increasingly polarized into hostile camps. Some proto-paramilitary militias are emerging (no doubt with plenty of help from generous "allies"), and engaging in violent acts against civilians and civil infrastructure. Although this is still in the very early stages, it should be taken very seriously as a harbinger of things to come, if it's not addressed in time. European countries are being pitted against each other, with levels of rancor and internecine strife that would have been unimaginable only a short time ago. Barriers are being built, not only between member countries, but inside them.

The Schengen Agreement, which allows the free movement of goods, services and people among member countries, has been a major factor in Europe's unexpectedly rapid rise as a global economic and political power, not just by promoting unity and cohesiveness within the EU, but by eliminating the barriers to trade and employment and thereby growing the market for EU products by making them more competitive, and for EU workers, by freely allowing labor and investment to move where they are needed. I say 'unexpected', because the very idea that the EU could soon rival the US as a global economic or political power was contemptuously dismissed as recently as a decade ago, by the influential high priests of US hegemony in a unipolar world. By 2014, it became clear that they were very wrong.

The EU's economy — measured in terms of the goods and services it produces (GDP) — is now bigger than the US's: EU GDP in 2014:
€13,920,541 million

Trade
With just 7% of the world’s population, the EU's trade with the rest of the world accounts for around 20% of global exports and imports.

Around two-thirds of EU countries’ total trade is done with other EU countries.

Trade has been hit by the global recession, but the EU remains the world’s largest player accounting for 16.4% of global imports in 2011. The EU is followed by the United States with 15.5% of all imports, and China with 11.9%. The EU was also the biggest exporter, accounting for 15.4% of all exports – compared with 13.4% for China and the 10.5% for the United States. Link

The EU, with its domestic market of nearly half a billion consumers with a relatively high standard of living, is now also the world's largest donor of international aid and the world's largest source of foreign investment, making it not only a huge global economic power, but potentially a political power with global influence to rival that of the US.

As the EU prospered economically, led by Germany and France, and began to chafe under its political subservience to the US, a number of prominent "realists" including Zbigniew Bzrezinski suggested that the US accommodate itself to the reality of an emerging multi-polar world.

But the very idea is anathema to to the so-called "neocons". Their core dogma is that the US must, at all cost, continue to monopolize global military power and enjoy absolute freedom to wield it without any constraints, including international law or any military deterrent. (To understand more about how "neocons" view the world and especially Europe, I strongly recommend reading Robert Kagan's seminal 2002 essay in favor of the US maintaining its supremacy as uncontested global military thug, "Power and Weakness).

Still, there was no problem as long as Western Europe, Russia and China remained militarily contained or showed no sign of questioning the US' global right to bully, and as long as Europe was content to focus on economic advancement only. The reason for the "neocons" complacency was the knowledge that Europe's power-house economies, like Asia's, have a fatal Achilles' Heel: they could be shut down at will by whoever monopolizes their access to oil and gas. As long as Russia was tame and under control, Iran was shackled by sanctions, and the US reigned supreme in the rest of the Middle East, that was fine. Also, with the much longed-for cauldronization of the Arab countries proceeding on schedule, and the US turning its sights on Asia and Africa and eager to reduce its direct presence in the Middle East, the "neocons" were confident that soon that monopoly would be in the hands of the Zionist state. Things were going very well.

But the recent emergence of Russia as a serious military power, led by Putin, both capable and willing to exercise that power even against the wishes of the US empire, especially in the Middle East, is freaking out the "neocons". Even worse, the prospect of any possible rapprochement between a united, prosperous EU led by Germany and a militarily powerful Russia is making them literally panic, especially in the Middle East arena, where the Zionist plan has lately encountered unexpected setbacks. Russia's allies China and Iran are also starting to show alarming signs of interest in flexing their military muscles (although these are still very, very, tentative) in Asia and Africa and the Middle East. Albeit still in the early embryonic stage, there are undeniable indications that a strategic, economic and even military block is possible, one that will no longer passively accept the US' diktats.

Over the past two years or so, we've witnessed Russia, and to a lesser extent Germany, France and Italy as they've stepped out of line and acted in their own national interest, when these have clashed with those of the American overlords. Even worse, by doing so, they've thrown serious wrenches in the Zionist plan for the Middle East, which in turn could thwart the Zionists' dream of becoming a new global economic, military and political empire. It's therefore not surprising to watch as these European countries are severely punished for their insufferable insubordination, and to nip this dangerous development in the bud.

[Joe Hillshoist]

Living in Australia and watching what has happened when people seeking asylum or refuge were framed as something other than "refugees" or "asylum seekers" over the last 15 years this:

As I've said, the reality of weaponized migration is a complete non factor. The factor is, if we call them weapons, how will we come to view refugees/migrant in the future? As people needing help or as a threat to be neutralized? Classifying them as weapons dehumanizes them.

Is exactly what has happened.

As a result minors are being sent to concentration camps in the pacific where some of them will certainly suffer sexual assault (this is acknowledged by everyone in Australia but no one in govt is stopping it) and all of them will suffer severe psychological damage, places where children under 10 attempt suicide.

People fleeing wars we started or life threatening situations are termed "potential terrorists", "illegals" or "queue jumpers" (not weapons ... yet) in the MSM. In public the language used to describe them is far worse. All of this enabled their indefinite detention in shitty camps, for their own good. IE as a deterrent to stop people drowning at sea and to destroy the "people smuggler's business model".

Reading thru O Colmain's writing in this thread its easy to see the similarities between how he frames refos and how they are framed in Australia and its a struggle to find him referring to the refugees arriving in Europe in a way that recognises their essential humanity or the suffering they have gone through that lead to them arriving there. That is my major problem with him and this series of essays. its as if he is trying to deny them humanity ... for whatever reasons he has.

I couldn't disagree more. The more aware people are of the methods used to manipulate them, and of the manipulators' true purpose, the less susceptible they become to such tactics.

That's obviously not happening in this thread.

Obviously population movement can be used as a weapon - look at what happened in Palestine.

That isn't the issue in this thread. Its the way the author of this series of articles frames the debate that denies refugees their basic humanity and sets refugees up as a threat to the people who could help them that is bothering some of us.

[backtoiam]

omh wrote:
As I've said, the reality of weaponized migration is a complete non factor. The factor is, if we call them weapons, how will we come to view refugees/migrant in the future? As people needing help or as a threat to be neutralized? Classifying them as weapons dehumanizes them.

Respectfully, I don't understand the disconnect with this. Nobody here at this forum, far as I can tell, is attempting to exacerbate this unfortunate situation.

Some of us me, alice, slad, etc...are pointing out the fact that THERE IS an effort being made to weaponize the refugees and that is apparent (to me). Nobody in this forum is attempting to weaponize these people or incite such a thing, as far as I can see.

We are simply pointing out the fact that it is being done by the power elite. So whats the problem? We all agree that it is a horrible thing and that all involved will suffer.

We are simply pointing out that IT IS being done by the same cabal that bombed these poor souls into the stone age.

[AlicetheKurious]

People fleeing wars we started or life threatening situations are termed "potential terrorists", "illegals" or "queue jumpers" (not weapons ... yet) in the MSM. In public the language used to describe them is far worse. All of this enabled their indefinite detention in shitty camps, for their own good. IE as a deterrent to stop people drowning at sea and to destroy the "people smuggler's business model".

Yes, and in response to this stimuli, the predicted and desirable outcome is for people to be divided into two irreconcilable camps: one determined to keep the refugees out of your own country, and one determined to let them into your own country. The narrative tells you that the annihilation of the nation of Syria is a given. That beautiful, precious nation is already being carved up and looted, even though the legitimate Syrian government and the national Syrian armed forces are fighting heroically to save it. There's no mention of how they're succeeding in liberating more and more Syrian territory, or how if these countries could be saved, and once more become safe, not just Syrians but Iraqis and Palestinians and all the others would love nothing more than to go back to their homes. The Masters of Discourse have decided how this ongoing war crime against the sovereign nation and people of Syria and all their other victims is to be framed, as a "refugee crisis" that is polarizing Australian and Western people, and fanning the rage on both sides. The escalating hostility is providing a fertile breeding ground for extremism and violence directed at each other.

Now imagine that instead of dividing people, it united them against the war criminals who have deliberately created this situation and are prolonging it and using it for their own selfish gain. Imagine if all that enmity and fury -- and appropriately massive and punitive legal and financial penalties -- were directed by well-informed, rational and responsible citizens of sovereign governments at those who fully deserve them, instead of at the victims. Because in fact, the refugees and the people in the host societies are all victims of truly evil sociopaths who also happen to be expert and highly experienced manipulators, and who have the means to control the narrative and frame it in the way that profits them.

I can imagine it, but I'm almost positive it will never happen. These guys are really good. So even when someone like Gearóid Ó Colmáin brilliantly and comprehensively lays it all out, exposes the whole ugly plot and identifies the perps in terms any layman can understand, the response is to accuse him of dehumanizing the refugees!!! In fact, Ó Colmáin is one of the very, very few who are refusing to play along with the script written by the criminals themselves. He's pointing to facts that are outside the framework provided, and to connections that we're not supposed to know about, let alone acknowledge. The same monsters who have already destroyed so many nation-states are now turning their sights on yours. The choice you're being offered is to either voluntarily surrender your national sovereignty, or to accept having the refugees' blood on your hands. No other choice is offered to you dupes, by those who deserve to be behind bars and are instead laughing all the way to the bank.

"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."