TRUMP is seriously dangerous

[Iamwhomiam]

I would not write-off Sanders, nor would I accept Clinton as a shoe-in. But if a Trump - Palin ticket is announced, I'd feel sure the ticket was a Clintonian psyop meant to advantage Hillary.

SRP, Yes, Kennedy pushed his own agenda. He just couldn't imagine the push-back, though I feel sure Ike made it quite clear to him and everyone else then paying attention..

[Wombaticus Rex]

Could the management get behind Trump?

This sure seems like a big tell to me.

Via the CEO of the Blackstone Group:
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/20/blackton ... -cruz.html

Blackstone's Schwarzman: I'd pick Trump over Cruz

Longtime Republican Stephen Schwarzman said Wednesday if the GOP presidential race came down to Donald Trump and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, he would go with the real estate mogul.

"If those are my choices, I'd sort of, you know, I'd be really trying to figure out where we go," the chairman and CEO of Blackstone Group told CNBC's "Squawk Box" at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. "If I had to do that one, I would do Donald."

An average of four major national polls calculated by Real Clear Politics shows Trump leads the GOP pack with 34.5 percent of support among likely Republican voters, while Cruz follows in second place with 19.3 percent.

Schwarzman said the country finds itself in "some kind of odd protest moment," but what the nation needs is someone who can bring together Americans.

"The question is, what is everyone protesting about? There are a lot of things that I guess you could, but what's needed actually is a cohesive, healing presidency, not one that's lurching either to the right or to the left," he said.

Schwarzman spoke a day after tea party favorite Sarah Palin endorsed Trump in advance of the Feb. 1 Iowa caucuses.

No enthusiasm, just a certain kind of clueless realism.

[Iamwhomiam]

Well, I'm sure Trump is far more malleable then he would have any believe. Cruz has an agenda. Trump doesn't seem to. Trump now just wants to win; he bought into his own fantasy and he's enjoying living it. Plus, it will make for endless conversation for those playing rounds on his many golf courses.

Hell, if I had to, I'd make the same choice.

[Burnt Hill]

Donald Trump’s father was Woody Guthrie’s landlord, and also a racist asshole

In private notebooks, the folk singer railed against billionaire real-estate mogul Fred Trump


by Collin Brennan

on January 21, 2016, 9:15pm

The right-wing media likes to imagine billionaire real-estate mogul Donald Trump as some kind of folk hero, even if there’s nothing particularly heroic about standing in front of a camera and producing the intellectual equivalent of fart noises. In any case, Gawker reported today that Trump shares an interesting connection with an actual folk hero: Woody Guthrie, the American balladeer responsible for “This Land Is Your Land” and countless other songs championing justice and equality.

As it turns out, Guthrie had a lot of opinions about Trump’s father, New York real-estate magnate and noted racist Fred Trump. That’s because Fred was Guthrie’s landlord during a two-year tenancy in Brooklyn. A lease Guthrie signed in December 1950 also bears the signature of one Fred Trump, but that document is only the first of many to result from the pair’s oft-contentious relationship.





Guthrie’s main grievance with Trump seems to have stemmed from the latter’s streak of unrepentant racism and profiteering. Having already traveled the country and written many a song about the racial injustice he witnessed along the way, Guthrie was acutely aware of the systemic forces that worked to subjugate blacks in America. One of these forces was the Federal Housing Authority (FHA), which established guidelines that made it easy for developers like Trump to keep blacks out of their federally subsidized public housing projects. Guthrie took up residence in one of these projects, a massive complex Trump had dubbed “Beach Haven.” What Guthrie didn’t know was that Trump had done everything in his power to ensure that only whites were allowed in to this supposed “haven.”

Guthrie caught on quickly to Trump’s vision of a lily-white utopia and soon began to air his grievances in his notebooks. The songwriter took aim squarely at his scumbag landlord, leaving no doubt about his feelings for “Old Man Trump”:


I suppose
Old Man Trump knows
Just how much
Racial Hate
he stirred up
In the bloodpot of human hearts
When he drawed
That color line
Here at his
Eighteen hundred family project ….

In 1979, Village Voice reporter Wayne Barrett published a two-part exposé about Fred and Donald Trump’s shady real estate empire. Barrett’s carefully researched piece accuses Trump of being “a substantial impediment to the full enjoyment of equal opportunity” and includes plenty of damning accusations from Trump’s own employees. It’s too bad that Guthrie wasn’t around to see it; the songwriter had succumbed to Huntington’s Disease 12 years earlier.

Given Donald Trump’s penchant for bigotry and racially charged denouncements of Mexicans and Muslims, it would seem the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. If Trump’s vision to “Make America Great Again” involves the same kind of white supremacist tactics his father employed so liberally, well, let’s just say we’re in for a scary future.

The best way to avoid this future, of course, is simply to ask “What would Woody Guthrie do?” before stepping into the voting booth. And you can be sure that America’s last great folk hero wouldn’t hesitate to give that blustery idiot the boot.

http://consequenceofsound.net/2016/01/donald-trumps-father-was-woody-guthries-landlord-a-racist-asshole/

[Iamwhomiam]

Nice to see you're paying attention, Burnt Hill. http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?p=587017#p587017

[fruhmenschen]

http://www.expertclick.com/NRWire/Relea ... x?id=76885

President Obama Clinton
Madison , WI
Saturday, January 23, 2016


In the seventy years since World War II America has risen to be a mighty empire, the so-called indispensible nation towering over all nations in the world. Eat you heart out, Rome. As such, it has long had the strongest military in the world, devoting far more than other nations in terms of the percent of the economy or just plain outright in money. So it comes as no surprise that presidential candidates from above average per capita military spending states won all eleven elections of the Cold War and since then the only two presidents from below average military spending states each had worked with the CIA in their college days and since. This is poorly understood by most Americans, as secrecy even from one's spouse is asked of agents.

The Press and the CIA

The Church Committee investigation of the CIA in the seventies exposed the deep connection between the agency and the press. Many of the most prominent journalists in America started their careers in the CIA, and one CIA head boasted he had had close ties to 400 of the top journalists when he was in office. There is no evidence that things have changed since then. CIA recruitment features the same 1% type ivy leaguers that go on to dominate politics, business, and the press. These elites know each other. Bob Woodward and Ted Koppel were once Naval Intelligence, Walter Cronkite was OSS during the war, and Phil Graham and Ben Bradley, editors of the Washington Post, were CIA. Stories come more easily to those with connections to the most secretive agency in the country, so these people easily rise to the top. That Bush the father, Clinton, and Obama used the CIA to propel their careers is really nothing new under the sun. Ford reported proceedings back to J. Edgar Hoover while on the Warren Commission, and the CIA kept Carter and his CIA head Admiral Turner out of the loop according to one Bob Woodward book. Funny how he knew that, see what I mean?

Obama and the CIA

When Carter was elected president, Hamilton Jordan, his campaign manager, said in his book that the election would be futile if Zbigniew Brzezinski was appointed national security advisor. Sorry about that Hamilton. When Brzezinski retired to teach at Columbia, he soon chose this student Barack Obama as a young protégé. The article shown below suggests Obama visited Pakistan twice in the eighties, once as a student, once working for CIA front company Business International for three years just out of college, most probably as a CIA agent. At the time Pakistan was the staging ground for mujahideen warriors against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. No wonder Barack Obama tripled troop strength in Afghanistan in his first year as president. He was a good disciple of Brzezinski who went on to write The Grand Chessboard about that part of the world. So when Saturday Night Live made fun of the press fawning over Obama in 2008, they were probably criticizing members of the same intelligence fraternity: Obama and the press. As the famous quote in the movie "JFK" states, "once CIA, always CIA."

Clinton and the CIA

When the CIA was looking for a place to manufacture guns for the contra war in Nicaragua, they picked a backwards state not on the border to minimize interference with other government agencies like Customs or Firearms (ATF). The $100 million annual revenue from this activity created Clinton's claim that Arkansas had the strongest economy of any state under his leadership during that period of time, a big boost to his presidential campaign. Terry Reed witnessed an unhappy Clinton being assured by Bob Barr that he was "number one on the list" for the position he really wanted. That evidently meant the CIA would help him get the presidency. By the way, the $100 million a year came from crack cocaine sales in Los Angeles as explained in Gary Webb's 1998 book Dark Alliance and the 2015 movie "Kill the Messenger."

For more information about the military presidency and politics:

https://www.academia.edu/20604100/POLIT ... Presidency

Hint: to read this paper for free, you must click on the tiny word "read" in the middle of the bottom of the screen after you go to the above link on academia.edu.

ADDENDA:

Here is the Progressive Review story on Obama:

http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2009/Ob ... 3jan09.htm

The Strange Rise of Obama

Progressive Review 3jan2009

As we have noted, one of the unanswered questions about Barack Obama is how a young politician of such little achievement got so far so fast — from state senator to president in four years. Bill Blum provides new light on the subject. To understand this phenomenon, it is important to recognize that if a young Obama was vetted or otherwise used by the CIA, it was not all that unusual. From the 1950s on, the agency repeatedly interfered in the education of the talented young by recruiting or co-opting them for its own purposes. Yale's Skull & Bones Club, for example, was a classic case of a recruitment camp for future intelligence types. The purpose — for the short run — is more information, and — for the long run — a supply of US future government officials whom the agency trusts and can use. And it often begins with a bright college student an insider thinks might fill the bill. . . .

Bill Blum, Anti-Empire Report — The question that may never go away: Who really is Barack Obama? In his autobiography, "Dreams From My Fathers", Barack Obama writes of taking a job at some point after graduating from Columbia University in 1983. He describes his employer as "a consulting house to multinational corporations" in New York City, and his functions as a "research assistant" and "financial writer." The odd part of Obama's story is that he doesn't mention the name of his employer.

However, a New York Times story of 2007 identifies the company as Business International Corporation [1]. Equally odd is that the Times did not remind its readers that the newspaper itself had disclosed in 1977 that Business International had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries between 1955 and 1960. [2]

The British journal, Lobster Magazine — which, despite its incongruous name, is a venerable international publication on intelligence matters — has reported that Business International was active in the 1980s promoting the candidacy of Washington-favored candidates in Australia and Fiji. [3] In 1987, the CIA overthrew the Fiji government after but one month in office because of its policy of maintaining the island as a nuclear-free zone, meaning that American nuclear-powered or nuclear-weapons-carrying ships could not make port calls. [4] After the Fiji coup, the candidate supported by Business International, who was much more amenable to Washington's nuclear desires, was reinstated to power.

In his book, not only doesn't Obama mention his employer's name; he fails to say when he worked there, or why he left the job. There may well be no significance to these omissions, but inasmuch as Business International has a long association with the world of intelligence, covert actions, and attempts to penetrate the radical left — including Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) [5] — it's valid to wonder if the inscrutable Mr. Obama is concealing something about his own association with this world.

[1] New York Times, October 30, 2007

[2] New York Times, December 27, 1977, p.40

[3] Lobster Magazine, Hull, UK, #14, November 1987

[4] William Blum, "Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower", pp.199-200

[5] Carl Oglesby, "Ravens in the Storm: A Personal History of the 1960s Antiwar Movement" (2008), passim

William Blum - Homepage: http://killinghope.org/bblum6/aer65.html

Colony Net, 2008 — In an effort to shore up his foreign policy credentials during the primary campaign, the junior senator from Illinois — then in a tight primary contest with Hillary Clinton in Pennsylvania — bragged about the time he had spent in Pakistan. He argued that Clinton's foreign policy "experience" consisted only of quick photo ops, while he had spent "quality time" with "real people." Not only that, he had actually gone on a partridge-hunting trip near the Pakistan city of Larkana. His partridge-hunting apparently impressed the gun owners of Pennsylvania very little, inasmuch as Clinton won that primary by 10 per cent.

Eager to impress the Pennsylvania crowd with his "foreign policy experience" and knowledge of guns, Obama thus let slip the fact that he'd been to Pakistan. (It is believed that he made two trips to Pakistan.) There must have been more to that trip than meets the eye, however, because the candidate has said virtually nothing about it since. You won't find anything on the Obama campaign site. . .

Astute readers may have begun to wonder how a struggling young college student with a divorced, middle-class mother managed to fund a three week trip to Pakistan. . . But Barry Obama-Soetoro was off shooting partridges in Pakistan, hosted by a young man named Muhammed Hasan Chandio. Chandio's family owned a substantial amount of land in the region, and Obama apparently met him while both were students. (Chandio is currently a financial consultant in New York, and a donor to the Obama campaign.). . .

Another of Obama's hosts in Pakistan was Muhammadian Mian Soomro, Obama's senior by about 11 years, son of a Pakistani politician and himself a politician, who became interim President of Pakistan when Pervez Musharraf resigned in August of 2008. Soomro has said that "someone" personally requested that he "watch over" Barack Obama, but will not name that individual . . .

A trip to Pakistan is no doubt more than a jaunt to a Florida beach. Few Americans would consider traveling there now, thinking it to be a dangerous place. In 1981, when one of Obama's possible two trips there occurred, it was less safe. Because of the war between Afghanistan and the Soviet Union, millions of Afghan refugees fled to Pakistan, which was under martial law. The Afghan "mujahedeen" fighters had bases in Pakistan, and they moved back and forth to fight the Soviets. . .

In the early 1980s, Pakistan was one of the destinations Americans were prohibited from visiting — it was on the State Department's list of banned countries. Non-Muslims were not welcome, unless they were on official business, formalized through the embassy of the country of origin. The simple truth is that no young American would have a reason to or be able to visit Pakistan in 1981, unless he was on official government business of which the State Department was aware. . .

Adding to the mix is the fact that Ann Dunham, Obama's mother, had visited at least 13 countries in her lifetime, and had worked for companies that required travel to Pakistan. Her employers appear to have included the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Ford Foundation, Women's World Bank, and the Asian Development Bank. Note that USAID and the Ford Foundation have (allegedly) been used as covers for CIA agents. . . .

The story of Business International also includes its 1960s joint meetings with members of SDS at the prodding of Carl Oglesby. Not everyone was happy at the idea — including Bernadette Dorn — and probably for good cause.

Obama also was one of eight students selected to study sovietology by Columbia professor Zbigniew Brzezinski who, if he wasn't a CIA official, was as close as you can otherwise get. Brzesinski is now a member of Obama's inner circle.

If the Obama Pakistan story sounds somewhat familiar, it may because the Review was one of the few places that reported one of Bill Clinton's similarly interesting trips:

"1960s: Bill Clinton, according to several agency sources interviewed by biographer Roger Morris, works as a CIA informer while briefly and erratically a Rhodes Scholar in England. Although without visible means of support, he travels around Europe and the Soviet Union, staying at the ritziest hotel in Moscow. During this period the US government is using well educated assets such as Clinton as part of Operation Chaos, a major attempt to break student resistance to the war and the draft. According to former White House FBI agent Gary Aldrich Clinton is told by Oxford officials that he is no longer welcome there." source: 6jan2008



Here is the text from the Amazon listing of the 1994 book Compromised: Clinton, Bush, and the CIA by Terry Reed and John Cummings:

http://www.amazon.com/Compromised-Clint ... 1561712493

Compromised is the true story of Bill Clinton's political sell-out to the CIA.

Clinton's unbridled political ambitions and his campaign pledge to create "jobs for Arkansans" led him to compromise his ideals in exchange for CIA support in his bid for the Presidency.

He permitted the "Agency" to use Arkansas factories to make untraceable weapons and he allowed CIA contract agents to train Contra pilots on rural airstrips in support o

[Burnt Hill]

Nice to see you're paying attention, Burnt Hill. http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?p=587017#p587017

oh, and you are not stalking me?
I missed one of SLaDs post, even though I have been following the thread(somewhat).
Good thing I didn't quote someone else's typo though!
Thanks for being kind.

[seemslikeadream]

Trump says he could shoot somebody on 5th Ave and still not lose loyal voters

Panicked Over the Trump Phenomenon
January 23, 2016

America’s conservative establishment is in panic mode as renegade billionaire Donald Trump continues to dominate the Republican presidential race and thumb his nose at the GOP donor class, which is alarmed that all its money might not dictate the outcome this time, as Bill Moyers and Michael Winship write.


By Bill Moyers and Michael Winship

David Brooks is a worried man. Like many establishment Republicans, the conservative columnist for The New York Times sees the barbarians pouring through the gates and fears for both his party and the republic. Hail, Trump! Hail, Cruz! It’s enough to send a sober centrist dashing through the Forum in search of a cudgel.

There was Brooks on a recent edition of the PBS NewsHour, his angst spilling out across the airwaves like fog from a nightmare: “I wish we had gray men in suits,” he told Judy Woodruff, conjuring in some nostalgia-minded the courtly cabal of well-heeled businessmen who drafted war hero Dwight D. Eisenhower to run for president as a Republican.

“We don’t have that,” Brooks continued. “But the donor class could do something.”

Ah, yes. The donor class! Those deep pockets flung open even wider by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision just six years ago, permitting the richest of the rich to pour even more of their fortunes into control of our electoral process. Brooks was saying openly what many of them are thinking privately: Only we can save the party from the megalomania of Donald Trump and Ted Cruz and protect our precious status quo.

How best to do this? Brooks suggested that panicked “state legislators who are Republicans, congressmen, senators, local committeemen” should join with the donors “so they don’t send the party into suicide.”

Makes sense — many of those very same folks already are deep in hock to the donors, their contributions often laundered via entities with high-falutin’ names – ALEC, for one, the American Legislative Exchange Council that lends a helping corporate hand to legislators eager to write favorable laws, provide tax breaks, dismember public employee unions and privatize government services.

As Brooks’ vision of a coup unfolded, the donors and their allies would handpick their candidate, “winnowing the field.” He reiterated his NewsHour lamentations with a New York Times column headlined “Time for a Republican Conspiracy!”

So let’s get this straight: One of the most prominent of Republican elites in the country, who has even been touted as President Obama’s “favorite pundit” (we’re not making this up!), is calling on the donor class to rescue the party from the rabble. Game’s over, voters: The oligarchs will decide this election.

For that’s what they are: a small, unbelievably wealthy group of the powerful and privileged who already have a tighter grip on our nation, its government, politics and economy than the rapacious robber barons of our first Gilded Age. Brooks and like-minded elites believe they must be trusted to do the right thing. Let them be the Deciderers.

Count billionaire Charles Koch among them. He recently told Stephen Foley of the Financial Times that he was “disappointed” by the current crop of Republican presidential candidates and especially critical of Trump and Cruz. “It is hard for me to get a high level of enthusiasm,” he said, “because the things I’m passionate about and I think this country urgently needs aren’t being addressed.”

Koch said that he and his well-oiled machine had given each of the candidates a list of issues it wants addressed but “it doesn’t seem to faze them much. You’d think we could have more influence.” In other words, if you’re going to spend $900 million on this election, as Koch and his cronies plan to do, shouldn’t you get what you paid for?

Yes, we know: money can’t always buy an election. If it could, Mitt Romney would just be finishing his first term as president. Or Jeb! Bush, whose super PAC runneth over with $100 million in cash, would be leading the pack. So far he’s not even been able to get his silver foot on the first rung of the ladder.

But to the oligarchs, bankrolling an election campaign isn’t all that it’s about. They contribute now for the day when the electioneering is over and the governing resumes. That’s when their investment really begins to pay off.

In the words of the veteran Washington insider Jared Bernstein, senior fellow at the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities and former chief economic advisor to Joe Biden, “There’s this notion that the wealthy use their money to buy politicians; more accurately, it’s that they can buy policy.”

Environmental policy, for example, when it comes to energy moguls like the Kochs. And tax policy. Especially tax policy.

Bernstein was quoted in one of the most important stories of 2015 – an investigation by The New York Times into how tax policy gets written. Unfortunately, this complex but essential report appeared between Christmas and New Year’s and failed to get the attention it deserves. Here’s the heart of it:

“With inequality at its highest levels in nearly a century and public debate rising over whether the government should respond to it through higher taxes on the wealthy, the very richest Americans have financed a sophisticated and astonishingly effective apparatus for shielding their fortunes. Some call it the ‘income defense industry,’ consisting of a high-priced phalanx of lawyers, estate planners, lobbyists and anti-tax activists who exploit and defend a dizzying array of tax maneuvers, virtually none of them available to taxpayers of more modest means. …

“Operating largely out of public view — in tax court, through arcane legislative provisions and in private negotiations with the Internal Revenue Service — the wealthy have used their influence to steadily whittle away at the government’s ability to tax them. The effect has been to create a kind of private tax system, catering to only several thousand Americans.”

That “private tax system” couldn’t have happened without compliant politicians elected to office by generous support from the donor class. As the right-wing billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife put it: “Isn’t it grand how tax law gets written?”

Sam Pizzigati knows how it happens. He’s been watching the process for years from his perch as editor of the monthly newsletter Too Much! Reminding us in a recent report that “America’s 20 richest people — a group that could fit nicely in a Gulfstream luxury private jet — now own more wealth than the bottom half of the American population combined, a total of 152 million people,” Pizzigati concludes that one reason these and other of America’s rich have amassed such large fortunes is that “the federal tax rate on income in the top tax bracket has sunk sharply over recent decades.”

So here’s the real value of all that campaign cash and lobbying largesse: underwriting a willingness among legislators and government officials to bend the rules, slip in the necessary loopholes and look the other way when it comes time for the rich to hide their fortunes.

This is the status quo to which the donors cling so tightly and clutch their pearls at the prospect of losing. But now, with Trump seemingly ascendant, some of those who might have been relied on to support a donor revolt are betraying Brooks’s call for a coup, weakening in their resolve and beginning to think that maybe the short-fingered vulgarian isn’t such a bad idea. Despite his populist brayings, they hope, he might well be brought into their alliance.

Which brings to mind a line from the movie version of the musical Cabaret. In pre-Third Reich Germany, the decadent Baron Maximilian von Heune is talking with the British writer Brian Roberts, explaining why the elite have allowed this Hitler fellow to get a jackboot in the door.

“The Nazis are just a gang of stupid hooligans, but they do serve a purpose,” he says. “Let them get rid of the Communists. Later we’ll be able to control them.”

We all know how well that turned out.

[seemslikeadream]

1/20/2016

Sarah Palin and Donald Trump: 69ing on the Road to Hell
Pausing between licks on her clit, Donald Trump said to Sarah Palin, "Now, tell me. Is that not the best tasting dick you've ever had in your mouth?" Palin, into the task at hand, uttered a muffled affirmation that, yes, Trump's penis was indeed delicious. "You got that right," Trump continued. "I make sure to keep it nice and clean. I get this special soap just for the male private area from a place in Spain. And I eat lots of fruit. Blueberries. Kiwi. Only the best. So when I blow my huge load, it'll be like sweet yogurt. You'll be asking for seconds." Palin reached out a hand and started push Trump's back, indicating that his head should be buried in her snatch and not talking about his own prick, which, to be honest, she could barely keep hard. "Oh, right," Trump exclaimed. "You know you don't taste too bad, either. You could barely tell you had any kids, let alone ones like that big-headed boy. It's a well-maintained, top-shelf slit, and I should know." Palin hit him again, and he went about clumsily attempting to bring her to orgasm. That was the deal they made, and Trump knows all about the deal.

Palin didn't need to say much in her liaison with the leading Republican presidential candidate in a penthouse at the Ames Holiday Inn. And, indeed, if you had walked in on them, you'd have wondered if it was a pair of lovers giving oral pleasure or two leathery snakes eating other from the tail up. When she gave her endorsement to Trump in Iowa, Palin went on, at length, about...well, really, it was kind of hard to tell since her "speech" would more accurately be described as an oxy-fueled, deranged, incomprehensible stream of consciousness that would make James Joyce say, "What the fuck are you talking about?" before drinking himself to a thankful death.

From what it's possible to piece together, or maybe to interpret, like it's Faulkner at his most obscure, Obama is a pussy, liberals are victimizing real conservatives, and Trump will, shit, make America great again or something. Seriously, you figure this shit out: "Where, in the private sector, you actually have to balance budgets in order to prioritize, to keep the main thing, the main thing, and he knows the main thing: a president is to keep us safe economically and militarily. He knows the main thing, and he knows how to lead the charge." The Rude Pundit reads really difficult theory and criticism. He actually can understand a Judith Butler article (shout-out to the academic geeks out there). He can't understand those sentences up there. Besides, there is no reason that we would treat this speech as anything other than ranting madness, which comes across even more when you watch it and see Palin shifting and twitching and gesticulating around like a ferret that got into the meth stash.

Surely, Trump had to pay her to be there. Palin may be many things, but she knows how to grift for some cash. She probably didn't even go to Cruz and jumped right to the billionaire so she could support the drug and alcohol habits of her brood of inbred beasts. Surely, Trump regretted it as soon as he realized he would have to stand there for however long Palin was going to have to blather on before she finally crashed and needed another hit of Klonopin or Vicodin or whatever takes the edge off her mania. In fact, you can pinpoint the moment when Trump realized that he might have made a terrible mistake. It's about 13 minutes in:



You gotta love that look of Trump glancing angrily to the side, as if asking some poor, demeaned assistant, "When the fuck is this kooky broad gonna finish? I got a tanning appointment." Don't pity Trump here. Laugh at him for thinking that he was getting a loyal dog when what he really bought was a rabid wolverine.

Trying to discern the substance of a Palin speech is like trying to figure out how to stick your hand into a roach-filled hole to get that coin you dropped: you might find what you're looking for, but you're gonna end up disgusted, skeeved out, and coated with goo. And here is that goo-slicked nickel: "The permanent political class has been doing the bidding of their campaign donor class, and that’s why you see that the borders are kept open. For them, for their cheap labor that they want to come in. That’s why they’ve been bloating budgets. It’s for crony capitalists to be able suck off of them." Leaving aside the obvious jokes on the phrase "suck off of them," Palin dissed "crony capitalist" in front of a man who has profited mightily from that system. That kind of ideological dissonance might be alarming, but, well, Palin.

So maybe what Trump wanted was Palin to assure the yokels and the yahoos in Iowa that he was the right man to stand up to "special interests." To the rubes who would vote for Trump just because Palin supports him, that means he'll represent white and dumb and evangelical America. Their Idiot Queen has deemed it so. So it must be. The road to hell is paved with such pitiful alliances.

And Palin gets to extend the expiration date on the Palin product line. Someone's gotta pay for all that bail when Viper or Quack or Titty or whatever the fuck her kids are named get arrested.

Oh, and fuck you, John McCain.

[General Patton]

1/20/2016

Sarah Palin and Donald Trump: 69ing on the Road to Hell
Pausing between licks on her clit, Donald Trump said to Sarah Palin, "Now, tell me. Is that not the best tasting dick you've ever had in your mouth?" Palin, into the task at hand, uttered a muffled affirmation that, yes, Trump's penis was indeed delicious. "You got that right," Trump continued. "I make sure to keep it nice and clean. I get this special soap just for the male private area from a place in Spain. And I eat lots of fruit. Blueberries. Kiwi. Only the best. So when I blow my huge load, it'll be like sweet yogurt. You'll be asking for seconds." Palin reached out a hand and started push Trump's back, indicating that his head should be buried in her snatch and not talking about his own prick, which, to be honest, she could barely keep hard. "Oh, right," Trump exclaimed. "You know you don't taste too bad, either. You could barely tell you had any kids, let alone ones like that big-headed boy. It's a well-maintained, top-shelf slit, and I should know." Palin hit him again, and he went about clumsily attempting to bring her to orgasm. That was the deal they made, and Trump knows all about the deal.

That was so fucking cash money. I support all works of erotic fiction featuring politicians.

[seemslikeadream]

^^^^^^



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pinZNYxQeo

[General Patton]

One thing though:

So when I blow my huge load, it'll be like sweet yogurt. You'll be asking for seconds

Should be changed to:

So when I blow my YUGE load, it'll be like sweet yogurt. You'll be asking for seconds

For accuracy.

[seemslikeadream]

ah the pornographic Trump bringing the General and the dreamer together

[Iamwhomiam]

^^^^
Ooo slad, you didn't!

[seemslikeadream]

hey I've been holding on to that gif since the McCain/Palin ticket .....I just wanted to use it one more time...