I finally watched this .it is from 1994 I think. Just incredible that despite these interviews nothing was done. Also ironic in that the BBC produced it.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Halloween is a month away, and we’ve already had the first bout of public outrage about fancy dress. Tesco and Asda were forced to apologise for stocking a “mental patient” costume which featured fake blood, a mask and a fake meat cleaver. The supermarkets were right to say sorry for encouraging misconceptions about mentally ill people, even if it was unintentional.
But what about fancy dress costumes which are deliberately offensive? “Bad taste” outfits are de rigueur at the moment, and at any student party you’re likely to find the mandatory idiot dressed as Himmler or a “paedophile pope”. Last year it was Jimmy Savile, and there are still plenty of ready-made Savile outfits for sale on Amazon, including a “Zombie Jimmy” outfit and a two part “bad taste mask set,” featuring Savile and fellow paedophile Gary Glitter. Having consulted my parents and other people born before 1989, it appears this trend to offend with your outfit is quite a new one (although, of course, Jimmy Savile costumes have been consistently popular for different reasons).
In fact, the popularity of offensive costumes is part of a general boom for the UK fancy dress industry. Sales are significantly higher than five years ago, and you can’t visit a city centre without encountering a group decked head to toe in overpriced tat. Never before have the costumes been so complex and diverse, nor the pressure to impress so high. Perhaps the sick jokes are a British twist on a very American tradition, or maybe they are caused by the inherent competitiveness in serious fancy dress, where the goal is to get a reaction: amazement, amusement or just plain anger.
And they usually get a reaction. We live in an age of outrage, where every offensive remark invites a thousand protests from an angry mob. The way photos are saved and shared online means there are no private jokes any more – wearing a jokey costume is a very public statement. Once a member of a minority group sees an offensive picture, they mobilise and a media storm begins. That’s what happened in August when a Jimmy Savile-themed float (which included men dressed as school girls) was allowed to participate in a Scottish fancy dress parade. These moments of anger are becoming increasingly common, and the way they play out is always similar. Which is probably why, according to Google Trends, uses of the words “vile” and “disgusting” (the red faced angry mob’s favourite words) have been steadily increasing since 2005.
But when we lament the rise of the sensitivity lobby, we forget how often outrage is caused by people who go out looking for it, and then claim to be surprised when they get it. Is there any sight more ridiculous than someone bemoaning over-sensitivity and PC Britain while dressed as a sexual predator? Surely causing offence was the intention: it’s not exactly good, clean fun. The problem with bad taste outfits is they aren’t even funny. They are unimaginative attention-seeking, straight out of the teenage “banter” playbook, along with jokes about the Holocaust. The only way to deal with this kind of idiocy is to expose it to public ridicule.
There is no right to not be offended, of course. Just because they are idiotic and have absolutely no cultural value, it doesn't follow that we should stop people dressing up as Mugabe or Savile or whoever. But before we complain about political correctness and over-sensitivity, we might also question why people want to dress up as a paedophile, and think about encouraging them not to.
“I could feel different people grabbing me. There were hands everywhere. I
was cut down my left arm and there was a lot of blood.”
The man said he passed out but heard his attackers arguing outside the bedroom door when he regained consciousness.
cptmarginal » Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:47 am wrote:This whole affair really deserves some more international press coverage, it's so fucking crazy. I came across this just now:
Man tells of agony at the hands of BBC paedo ring involving DJ Alan Freeman and evil pal Jimmy Savile - The traumatised victim claims he was just 11 when German film actor Victor Beaumont lured him to his plush London flat where the BBC stars raped him
I won't copy the full text here, but this part is so extreme that it's really unfair to characterize these people as just pederasts.“I could feel different people grabbing me. There were hands everywhere. I
was cut down my left arm and there was a lot of blood.”
The man said he passed out but heard his attackers arguing outside the bedroom door when he regained consciousness.
Searcher08 » Tue Oct 01, 2013 5:44 pm wrote:It was sickening to read that... not sure of what the equivalent in the US would have been, (perhaps Casey Casem?) but DJ Alan Freeman flew the flag for rock in the UK - there was a whole generation of 70s rock people who loved him - he was like a one man rock news service, did great in-depth interviews with bands, limitless enthusiasm... he was totally a part of growing up for myself and schoolfriends -
Reading about these real horrors is like losing a part of oneself; I choose to fill that gap with the bravery of the man who came forward to tell the truth.
Police have released the transcript of a 2009 interview with Jimmy Savile in which the disgraced former BBC presenter bullishly dismisses child sexual abuse allegations against him and threatens aggressive legal action to shut down the claims.
A sense of how the man, believed to be one of Britain's most prolific paedophile abusers, saw himself as beyond the law emerges from the transcript, in which Surrey police interrogators appear to take an almost deferential approach.
The interview with Savile, who is asked by officers at the outset if it is OK to call him "Jimmy", was carried out under caution at an office used by the presenter at the National Spinal Injuries Centre at Stoke Mandeville hospital, one of many locations where he is thought to have abused children over decades.
The late DJ, who was a fundraiser for the hospital, told the officers that while the NHS ran the hospital, "I own it."
Searcher08 » Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:23 pm wrote:was deeply interested in satanism
RocketMan » Wed Oct 16, 2013 1:11 pm wrote:Searcher08 » Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:23 pm wrote:was deeply interested in satanism
I remember reading something about a victim reporting seeing him in a robe, but has he himself gone on record about this...? Or which sources report this..?
Searcher08 » Wed Oct 16, 2013 7:23 am wrote:After all this blew wide open, I think we are further away than ever from understanding what on Earth was going on with him, but my intuition is that he operated at the very pinnacle circles of whatever constitutes 'deep political' power.
WHAT WAS HE?
RocketMan » Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:39 am wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/oct/15/jimmy-savile-boasted-police-abusePolice have released the transcript of a 2009 interview with Jimmy Savile in which the disgraced former BBC presenter bullishly dismisses child sexual abuse allegations against him and threatens aggressive legal action to shut down the claims.
A sense of how the man, believed to be one of Britain's most prolific paedophile abusers, saw himself as beyond the law emerges from the transcript, in which Surrey police interrogators appear to take an almost deferential approach.
The interview with Savile, who is asked by officers at the outset if it is OK to call him "Jimmy", was carried out under caution at an office used by the presenter at the National Spinal Injuries Centre at Stoke Mandeville hospital, one of many locations where he is thought to have abused children over decades.
The late DJ, who was a fundraiser for the hospital, told the officers that while the NHS ran the hospital, "I own it."
Savile mixed with everybody who was anybody, didn't he?
Waltzing around Buck Palace in his tracksuit, free access to the Houses of Parliament, Broadmoor, policemen round for tea on a Friday morn and chauffeuring him around, Prime Ministers having him over for long Christmas fireside chats year after year, Dukes, Princes, Princesses, Queens, priests, vicars, cardinals, even popes.
There was no section of society, no building in the land that he was excluded from, was there? Total access. A nonce gangster rapist, swanning around with monarchs and aristos and Popes and cardinals and Lords and ministers for 50 years.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests