Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

[stickdog99]

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-england-london-58686141

[stickdog99]

[stickdog99]

Anyway, back to some conspiracy theory:

Excerpt only

An AI-powered Dept. of Defense program named "Project Salus," run in cooperation with the JAIC (Joint Artificial Intelligence Center), has analyzed data on 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 or older. Data were aggregated from Humetrix, a real-time data and analytics platform that tracks health care outcomes. Legal analysis from Thomas Renz of Renz-Law.com is included in a breaking video interview, below. The alarming findings show that the vast majority of covid hospitalizations are occurring among fully-vaccinated individuals and that outcomes among the fully vaccinated are growing worse with each passing week. This appears to fit the pattern of so-called Antibody Dependent Enhancement, where the treatment intervention (mRNA vaccines) is worsening health outcomes and leading to excess hospitalizations and deaths. These data, presented here, shatter the official Biden / Fauci narrative that falsely claims America is experiencing, "a pandemic of the unvaccinated." The data show that the pandemic actually appears to be accelerated by covid-19 vaccines, while unvaccinated individuals are having far better outcomes than the vaccinated. Furthermore, according to these data (shown below), the single best strategy for avoid post-vaccine infections and hospitalizations is natural immunity derived from a previous covid infection.

https://www.afinalwarning.com/559002.html

Primary source the above article is referencing: https://www.humetrix.com/powerpoint-vaccine.html

Highlights:

* Vaccine Efficacy of both mRNA vaccines appears to wane over time in this large 5.6M US-based 65 & over vaccinated cohort

* Risk of breakthrough hospitalization increases with time elapsed since mRNA vaccination with odds ratio

* Prior COVID-19 infection has a major protective effect against breakthrough hospitalization increasing to 2.5 at 6 months post vaccination

* Older age groups (75-84 & 85 and older) experienced further reduction in vaccine protection against hospitalization

* 161K Breakthrough cases

* 33K Breakthrough hospitalizations

* 10.4K requiring ICU admissions

* As Delta variant became predominant, COVID-19 cases increased five-fold in the >=65 population

* In this 80% vaccinated >=65 population, an estimated 71% of COVID-19 cases occurred in fully vaccinated individuals

* Breakthrough cases = 71% of total Covid-19 cases in cohort

* Breakthrough infection rates 5-6 months post vaccination are twice as high as 3-4 months post vaccination

* Age has a minor contribution to the reduced vaccine protection seen in the group vaccinated 5-6 months ago

* Moderna vaccine offers better protection than Pfizer vaccine for individuals vaccinated 4 months prior for weeks ending after July 31

* In this 80% vaccinated 65+ population, an estimated 60% of COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred in fully vaccinated individuals in the week ending August 7th

* 60% of COVID-19 hospitalizations are in vaccinated individuals

[mentalgongfu2]

Since this isn't here yet:

https://www.reddit.com/r/HermanCainAward/

[drstrangelove]

people have started to seek vindication through the deaths of others. Sad state of affairs. No doubt the double vaxxed who end up dying of covid will be mocked too in turn.

I like to think of social media as the back of a public toilet door. Strangers scrawling hateful shit they don't mean in an anonymous ventilation of pent up frustration that gets bottled up in trying times.

People are more empathetic in person than in ghost, so to speak. A human face is important. This is why I'm so uneasy with the psychological effects of long term mask mandates.

[Harvey]

India's Most Populous State Eliminates Covid-19 Through Ivermectin (AKA 'Horse Dewormer')

https://www.sott.net/article/459021-Ind ... e-Dewormer

For sceptics of scepticism, all the data is in the video and also among the links at the source.

On May 7, 2021, during the peak of India's Delta Surge, The World Health Organization reported, "Uttar Pradesh (is) going the last mile to stop COVID-19." The WHO noted, "Government teams are moving across 97,941 villages in 75 districts over five days in this activity which began May 5 in India's most populous state with a population of 230 million."

The activity involved an aggressive house-to-house test and treat program with medicine kits.

The WHO explained, "Each monitoring team has two members who visit homes in villages and remote hamlets to test everyone with symptoms of COVID-19 using Rapid Antigen Test kits. Those who test positive are quickly isolated and given a medicine kit with advice on disease management."

The medicines comprising the kit were not identified as part of the Western media blackout at the time....[but contained] Zinc, Vitamin D3, Ivermectin, and secondary antibiotic treatment.

Dr John Campbell asks a series of reasonable questions based on the data and forms a few measured, provisional and reasonable conclusions.

Notice that Dr. Campbell does not mention a single person who had any toxicity from those ten 12 mg pills of Ivermectin - in the entire state of over 200 million. Not one poisoning was reported. No Indian poison control articles or telephone calls were reported. Out of millions of distributed medicine kits, each containing 120 mg of Ivermectin, not one person in Uttar Pradesh was reported to have had a problem with the drug.

Notice that Dr. Campbell at no time criticizes the medicine kit as "fringe" or ineffective. After all, it would be improper to accuse a WHO-sponsored program such as the Uttar Pradesh test and treat - coordinated by WHO - of being "fringe."

Contrary to what little we receive - at great expense - from the government in the United States, these kits are efficient and contain gloves, a thermometer, and an oximeter. The last time I purchased an oximeter some ten years ago, it cost some $200.00. This entire kit - including the oximeter - costs only $2.65.

And notice that a government can purchase over one thousand home treatment Ivermectin containing kits for the price of one course of Remdesivir. Remdesivir runs $3,100, and it is an impractical drug as it must be given late in the disease during hospitalization. Moreover, it is a drug that does not save lives.

On the other hand, the Ivermectin kits are highly correlated with eliminating COVID-19 in Uttar Pradesh. Indeed with less than 11% of their population fully vaccinated, the Uttar Pradesh model of test and treat is superior not only to Kerala, with a much higher percent vaccinated. Uttar Pradesh beats the UK, the US, and nearly everywhere else in the world in terms of the lowest active COVID cases.

Rather than turning a blind eye to Uttar Pradesh, perhaps it is time to analyze its success. It is time for all to realize that far from being dangerous, Ivermectin is safer than hand sanitizer or plain Tylenol, judging from the number of United States poison control calls.

Now is precisely the moment to point out that Dr. George Fareed, Dr. Peter McCullough, and Dr. Harvey Risch were correct in their U.S. Senate Testimony on November 19, 2020. They advised that early outpatient treatment was essential and would save hundreds of thousands of American lives if adopted. It wasn't.

Now is the right moment to notice the onslaught of United States poison control articles attempting to smear Ivermectin, a drug proven safe and effective in the Uttar Pradesh test-and-treat program administered under the auspices of both the WHO and CDC.

It is appropriate to remind the reader that the WHO and CDC possess direct and recent knowledge of Ivermectin use for COVID-19 in India. Moreover, they know better than anyone the colossal effectiveness and overwhelming safety of Ivermectin used in those millions of Uttar Pradesh test and treat kits.

Perhaps it is also time to ask why exactly Dr. Tess Lawrie's peer-reviewed meta-analysis was given an Altimetric score of 26,697, making it number eight out of some 18 million publications.

This rank is far better than the top 1%, which would only need a ranking of 180,000 for it to rank in the top 1%. It would only need 18,000 for it to rank in the top .1%. Ranking in the top .001% would mean #180. Therefore, at number eight, it is 8/180 of the top .001% or roughly the top 4.4% of the top .001%. This article ranks in the top 5% of the top .001%!

In other words, only seven articles in the world out of those 18 million are ranked higher.

This peer-reviewed paper is one of the most cited of medical references of all time - period. That should alert any reader - immediately - to its historical significance. Dr. Tess Lawrie is a 30-year veteran WHO evidence synthesis expert. Her conclusion is every bit as meaningful as the article's rank. Here are those words,

"Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using Ivermectin. Using Ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that Ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally."

Maybe it is time to ask why Dr. Pierre Kory's peer-reviewed narrative review of Ivermectin ranks #38 out of the same 18 million publications.

He concludes,

"Finally, the many examples of Ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality reduction indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified."

If Dr. Lawrie's paper is ranked in the top 5% of the top .001% of all such published medical articles of all time, then Dr. Kory's is not far behind. His is 38/180 of the top .001% or the top 21% of the top .001%

Thus, both articles would rank in the rarified atmosphere of nearly one in a million.

Therefore, the reader must now ask why two magnificent independent reviews from two different continents, coming to the same conclusion, are both ignored by our world's medical leaders?

[Belligerent Savant]

India's Most Populous State Eliminates Covid-19 Through Ivermectin

https://www.sott.net/article/459021-Ind ... e-Dewormer

How many covid deaths (worldwide) could have been prevented if early treatments were made fully available, and encouraged? Instead, leaky vaccines are pushed/forced on populations as the lone option.
And those that refuse to be vaccinated? Largely ousted from freedom of movement or commerce, or otherwise from employment, which is all cheered on by ardent, dutiful followers of the current status quo. Those that die -- in many instances, i'd wager, for not being properly treated -- are then mocked.

Tragic, how easily some can become little monsters. Finger-pointers and snitches on behalf of Empire.


This was never about health or well-being.

Again, history rhymes.

[Belligerent Savant]

@tlowdon

10.1 UPDATE: UK CoV2 infection rates among fully vaxxed are now similar or higher in all age cohorts ≥30. They're lower in younger cohorts but still significant. Both vaxxed & unvaxxed get infected & in most age groups, the vaxxed moreso, which renders vaccine passports useless.

https://twitter.com/tlowdon/status/1443 ... 97184?s=20

-------------

Dr. Doug Corrigan
@ScienceWDrDoug

1/ “Fully vaccinated were more likely than unvaccinated persons to be infected by variants carrying mutations associated with decreased antibody neutralization.”, and “In unvaccinated cases, most viruses consisted of non-resistant variants”



Replying to
@ScienceWDrDoug

2/ In addition, the increase in the frequency of more antibody-resistant strains in the population correlates with the increase in the frequency of vaccination in the population



3/ “and the percentage of sequenced cases that were vaccine breakthroughs increased from 0% to 31.8% from February to June”



4/ and “Differences in viral loads were non-significant between unvaccinated and fully vaccinated persons overall (p = 0.99)”

Source:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 139v1.full

https://twitter.com/ScienceWDrDoug/stat ... 41473?s=20

[Harvey]

How many covid deaths (worldwide) could have been prevented if early treatments were made fully available, and encouraged?

Is the one and only point. Deliberate withholding of cheap and effective treatment resulting in mass death and injury, pushing expensive 'vaccines' which knowingly cause mass death and injury - there's a word for that and it isn't merely Capital or profiteering. It's called murder. Mass murder.

[Harvey]

Nosocomial outbreak caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a highly vaccinated population, Israel, July 2021

This nosocomial outbreak exemplifies the high transmissibility of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant among twice vaccinated and masked individuals.

Read the paper: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/conten ... 39.2100822

[stickdog99]

Anyway, back to some conspiracy theory:

Excerpt only

An AI-powered Dept. of Defense program named "Project Salus," run in cooperation with the JAIC (Joint Artificial Intelligence Center), has analyzed data on 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 or older. Data were aggregated from Humetrix, a real-time data and analytics platform that tracks health care outcomes. Legal analysis from Thomas Renz of Renz-Law.com is included in a breaking video interview, below. The alarming findings show that the vast majority of covid hospitalizations are occurring among fully-vaccinated individuals and that outcomes among the fully vaccinated are growing worse with each passing week. This appears to fit the pattern of so-called Antibody Dependent Enhancement, where the treatment intervention (mRNA vaccines) is worsening health outcomes and leading to excess hospitalizations and deaths. These data, presented here, shatter the official Biden / Fauci narrative that falsely claims America is experiencing, "a pandemic of the unvaccinated." The data show that the pandemic actually appears to be accelerated by covid-19 vaccines, while unvaccinated individuals are having far better outcomes than the vaccinated. Furthermore, according to these data (shown below), the single best strategy for avoid post-vaccine infections and hospitalizations is natural immunity derived from a previous covid infection.

https://www.afinalwarning.com/559002.html

Primary source the above article is referencing: https://www.humetrix.com/powerpoint-vaccine.html

Highlights:

* Vaccine Efficacy of both mRNA vaccines appears to wane over time in this large 5.6M US-based 65 & over vaccinated cohort

* Risk of breakthrough hospitalization increases with time elapsed since mRNA vaccination with odds ratio

* Prior COVID-19 infection has a major protective effect against breakthrough hospitalization increasing to 2.5 at 6 months post vaccination

* Older age groups (75-84 & 85 and older) experienced further reduction in vaccine protection against hospitalization

* 161K Breakthrough cases

* 33K Breakthrough hospitalizations

* 10.4K requiring ICU admissions

* As Delta variant became predominant, COVID-19 cases increased five-fold in the >=65 population

* In this 80% vaccinated >=65 population, an estimated 71% of COVID-19 cases occurred in fully vaccinated individuals

* Breakthrough cases = 71% of total Covid-19 cases in cohort

* Breakthrough infection rates 5-6 months post vaccination are twice as high as 3-4 months post vaccination

* Age has a minor contribution to the reduced vaccine protection seen in the group vaccinated 5-6 months ago

* Moderna vaccine offers better protection than Pfizer vaccine for individuals vaccinated 4 months prior for weeks ending after July 31

* In this 80% vaccinated 65+ population, an estimated 60% of COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred in fully vaccinated individuals in the week ending August 7th

* 60% of COVID-19 hospitalizations are in vaccinated individuals

LOL. It seems that Humetrix was not supposed to let this cat about of the bag: https://www.humetrix.com/powerpoint-vaccine.html

Here are the now removed slides: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/em ... NqepiAWJdI

[Harvey]

Truth is always stranger than fiction but is this for real?

https://www.rt.com/usa/535044-vaccine-s ... ket-video/

[stickdog99]

@tlowdon

10.1 UPDATE: UK CoV2 infection rates among fully vaxxed are now similar or higher in all age cohorts ≥30. They're lower in younger cohorts but still significant. Both vaxxed & unvaxxed get infected & in most age groups, the vaxxed moreso, which renders vaccine passports useless.

https://twitter.com/tlowdon/status/1443 ... 97184?s=20

-------------

Dr. Doug Corrigan
@ScienceWDrDoug

1/ “Fully vaccinated were more likely than unvaccinated persons to be infected by variants carrying mutations associated with decreased antibody neutralization.”, and “In unvaccinated cases, most viruses consisted of non-resistant variants”



Replying to
@ScienceWDrDoug

2/ In addition, the increase in the frequency of more antibody-resistant strains in the population correlates with the increase in the frequency of vaccination in the population



3/ “and the percentage of sequenced cases that were vaccine breakthroughs increased from 0% to 31.8% from February to June”



4/ and “Differences in viral loads were non-significant between unvaccinated and fully vaccinated persons overall (p = 0.99)”

Source:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 139v1.full

https://twitter.com/ScienceWDrDoug/stat ... 41473?s=20

WOW! Who could have predicted this??

[stickdog99]

Truth is always stranger than fiction but is this for real?

https://www.rt.com/usa/535044-vaccine-s ... ket-video/

I saw the video, and the guy appeared to be shaming her for not wearing a mask.

[Harvey]

I just watched it but the headline is accurate enough. Is this some kind of street theatre or what?