Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Joe Hillshoist wrote:Lots of bushfires are deliberately lit.
There are fuckheads that drive around here when its dry throwing fuel soaked rags out of their cars onto the roadside vegetation. Especially when its dead and dry.
Once we were coming home from the shop and someone had done it about 100 metres down the road, tho on the other side of the road.
I had just got a new fire fighting outfit in the days before. Fireproof clothing. I beat the fire out with my jacket.
Mostly they are disturbed individuals. However I wouldn't put anything past Blackwater. They may even make their choppers available to put the fires out, that would certainly make them seem like a potentially valueable member of the community.
paulstone wrote:
The best way to stop a large fire is to put it out when it is a small fire. These "super hero" mornic firemen were playing a good game of gin rummy when they should have had all assets out at the beginning. Tankers, choppers and whatever else it takes. It's too late now. Haven't they learned yet? At the first sign of a fire in that timber dry, wind driven, historically fire prone area you bring out everything you have right at the start...not 3 days later...DUH! Oh, and don't we just feel so sorry for all those millionaires? When asked, they all say that "We will stay here and rebuild". Ya, you'll rebuild because you are insured 10 ways to Sunday. Guess whose homeowner insurance bills get to go up to cover your dumb asses? The rest of us!! How do you guys in Malibu get fire insurance in the first place? Burn the whole thing to the ground.
Posted 10/24/2007 3:17:41 AM
Recommend (0)Report Abusekd6rxl wrote:
Here's a radical idea:Not every neighborhood burns because of an unstoppable 200-ft wall of flame, but because there's nobody around to swat spot fires from blowing embers due to the combination of mandatory evacuations and shortages of firefighters. I'm not talking encouraging the running into burning buildings, and much wildfire-fighting, after all, is mostly pick-and-shovel work. Most homeowners have picks and shovels, after all.How about mobilizing homeowners as backup firefighters in some instances instead of automatic mandatory evacuations?
Posted 10/24/2007 3:19:35 AM
Recommend (0)Report Abuse
”Can this stuff be looked up on Lexus Nexus? I have tried to find these quotes on the internet because I wanted to save them, but I was never able to find them...”
Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:Thanks for real life-saving info, Joe. Saving that.
Radiant Heat Kills.
IanEye wrote:vigilant wrote:”Can this stuff be looked up on Lexus Nexus? I have tried to find these quotes on the internet because I wanted to save them, but I was never able to find them...”
[color=green]Vigilant, these types of quotes could certainly be looked up on Lexis-Nexis, which is an amazing resource. Sadly, all too many people aren’t even aware of Lexis-Nexis, and there is a reason for this.
The Porn Industry, underwritten by the CIA, is promoting a curvy starlet named Alexis Texas. This is classic keyword hijacking.
Jeff wrote:Images from Lions Peaks cameras operated by the High Performance Wireless Research and Education Network in San Diego County. Looks like the surface of Titan right now.
IanEye wrote:vigilant wrote:”Can this stuff be looked up on Lexus Nexus? I have tried to find these quotes on the internet because I wanted to save them, but I was never able to find them...”
Vigilant, these types of quotes could certainly be looked up on Lexis-Nexis, which is an amazing resource. Sadly, all too many people aren’t even aware of Lexis-Nexis, and there is a reason for this.
The Porn Industry, underwritten by the CIA, is promoting a curvy starlet named Alexis Texas. This is classic keyword hijacking.
Most people point to the whole “Deep Throat vs. Deep Throat” Watergate era CIA shenanigans and the fact that Bob Woodward was “former” Navy Intelligence as the earliest instance of this porn distraction technique. But they are wrong. This method of using erotic means to distract people from the “Truth” has been a CIA procedure since at least the Eisenhower Administration.
I mean, do you really think it is a coincidence that right in the middle of the whole “Suez Canal” fracas that there suddenly emerged in the Lutherville section of Baltimore Maryland a burlesque performer named Suzy C. Anal?
I think not Sir, I think not.
Hugh Manatee Wins wrote:Psy-ops is not funny, it kills. It is not a joke anymore than cancer, aids, tsunamis, or torture gulags. Doing an irrelevent non-contextual snicker-factor set-up is not clever in the least.
So you think that the CIA perps tasked with hiding political liabilities wouldn't use
name games to divert attention that even strippers use?
Gee, you really wrapped that up logically.
Interesting that suspicions about Blackwater are being countered with suspicions about
al-Queda..
Oops, IanEye has proven that name-substitution doesn't work on people.
et in Arcadia ego wrote:At whom are you directing all this angst? FWIW, Ian and myself seem to be largely agreeing with you, so not sure what your deal is here..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 185 guests