by wordspeak2 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 11:22 am
"I know on Kennedy he has said, he was not ending the Cold War and getting out of Vietnam. He viewed Kennedy as not really deviating from the essentially one party American system."
Right, but if you read, "JFK and the Unspeakable: How he Died and Why it Matters," you see that that couldn't be further from the truth. Kennedy was changing fast. Watch the American University speech that MinM posted. He was talking about ending the Cold War. He was talking about pulling out of Vietnam. He was engaged in a secret peaceful letter exchange with Kruschev. He wanted to make peace with the socialist world. He fought the Pentagon and CIA hawks over the Bay of Pigs. That's why he was killed by those hawks, they who represent the "military-industrial complex," they who are really in charge. There's *no way* that Noam Chomsky doesn't know this. He is not stupid.
It's a laughably disingenuous argument to say, "Who cares who killed JFK- JFK was only one man; people get killed all the time." Obviously, understanding who killed the president reveals that there is a unified force *above* the presidency that has vast control over the media and can get away with such a thing. That's the "forbidden truth" that must be concealed- the existence of the conspirators. It matters not whether they kill one president or four thousand Americans; the point is that exposing it pulls the curtain out and exposes the "unspeakable."
Chomsky's role is to ensure that liberals and progressive intellectual types, who are on the edge of recognizing the existence of the fascist "secret government" do not go all the way to seeing it. To do this he utilizes the tactic of "limited hangout," presenting a lot of truth about U.S. foreign and domestic policy while covering up the most important truths that expose the extent of the fascism. He also doesn't talk about CIA involvement in the drug trade... JFK, 9/11, CIA/drugs, etc.- these are the stories that show clearly that are government s run by Nazis *who have no allegiance to American people over any others.* These Nazis are pure globalists who have entrenched power way above the presidency. It is not simply an "institutional" problem, and that line is, again, patently disingenuous. Again, Chomsky is not stupid. Saying that it's all completely systemic covers for the actual people who are in perpetual power. Chomsky knows just what he's doing. He's serving the fine folks who funded his linguistics career.
And have you noticed how he talks like a computer? Like there's no, you know, emotion there? Is it not kind of bizarre? While most other leftists seem to have passion and humanization... Chomsky comes off as a language robot. Which, I assert, is just what he is. But almost no progressives will challenge him, because he's "highly distinguished"' and says that corporations are bad.
