MacCruiskeen wrote:Anyway, why is everyone in such a hurry to be such an expert? What is this, a lottery or what? Since when did these dumb-ass labels become explanations? And why and how has all this junk-psychiatric terminology become part of common speech?
When you're going to have a kid nowadays it seems the standard operating procedure is to get yourself a book of baby names and a copy of the DSM IV. Then you can go through them choosing what the kid will be called and what disorders it will have. Don't ask me why, or when this change occurred - I'm not a parent so it's hard for me to judge others.
Very hard not to a lot of the time.
But the forums are out there, very well-populated, full of proud new parents trying to decide whether their baby fits the diagnostic criteria to be classed as a sociopath. I'm sure you're already aware of this, but I wasn't till the first Jani thread came up. They have their own internal language (GFG = Gift From God = a child with a mental illness of some description, often only diagnosed by the parent) and they put their children's often mind-boggling medication levels in their signature lines. They are competing with each other. It's a subculture.
There are real mental illnesses, of course, and children can suffer from them, and drugs
are sometimes needed to treat them, but... no, what is going on in these forums, the levels of self-delusion, entitlement, and mutual reinforcement of their shared belief system (because it is a belief system) is not healthy, and is not really about what's best for the children involved, and does more harm than good.
Nobody seems to have much concern about bodily diseases unless they are already apparent in the child, for some reason. Where are all the parents reading diagnostic manuals on lung disorders or bowel complaints in advance of any symptomn appearing in the child, since these are far, far more likely to effect a youngster than esoteric dysfunctions of the sort lumped together under the term schizophrenia?
Shaken baby syndrome is different, it at least has a reasonably well-understood etiology (unlike schizophrenia, ODD, RAD, etc) - maybe it shouldn't have the word syndrome in it's title, and anyone tried for causing it should just be charged with assaulting a minor to their permanent injury or death, but that's just an argument over language and law which doesn't help the kids any. I agree with the guy who pioneered the diagnosis that all the symptomns of shaken baby syndrome can be created without someone having intentionally shaken the child, so the presence of the shaken baby syndrome in a child shouldn't necessarily mean a crime has been committed.
I'm quite a long way out of my depth on all this, though, and should probably stay out of it altogether.
"The universe is 40 billion light years across and every inch of it would kill you if you went there. That is the position of the universe with regard to human life."