JackRiddler wrote:cw, I really don't want to gang up and I hope you won't take this as further snobbery, but:
It is tough for us to go out into our daily social /work circles and admit that there might actually be a cabal of wealthy powermongers who control the planet across all borders. It's too hard to take and so the baby goes out with the bathwater.
I disagree. It's really really easy and this is what most people seem to think, though they don't talk about it much and avoid those who do because they don't want to be tainted with "politics," they want to talk TV and sports and so forth. I think nathan28's answer is a great one, everyone should probably reread it before proceeding with my lesser thoughts.
Cabal theory is a mystification of reality. There is no "cabal of wealthy powermongers." There are ruling classes who own, and power elites who administrate, a set of overlapping empires (industries, resources, nation-states) that over time have tended to merge into a set of global interests (though the merger is never complete and can be reversed), and from which cabals are often spawned with their own particular agendas.
This is not just a more academic way of saying the same thing. It is a big difference. My wording describes a system that must change - the biggest question being ownership and control of the levers of power, which is capital. If you eliminated any given cabal, the system would not change. It would be reconstituted under different sets of cabals, which together constitute CLASSES.
It's a whole way of life that needs transforming, and not just who runs it. Who runs it is important, insofar as it won't transform overnight and some elites may be slightly more enlightened and move things closer toward that transformation than others, who will make things even worse.
In my view, the problem is the inequality in the distribution of resources and power (capital is a good shorthand) among various groups, the largest of which are left defenseless against well-placed minorities who control capital (and who are both in the state and outside it). Also, the ideology that justifies taking advantage of your power over others to exploit them maximally as a worthy expression of god's will, or of evolution, or of economic rationality (the basis can vary, long as the message is the same).
In Jones's world, it's all about eliminating a THEM who have caused all problems because they hate freedom - after which everyone else is left as free, fully autonomous individuals who will associate in liberty and produce the best possible world through the action of the free market, in which the deserving rise and the undeserving do not. This is pure mythology, and perniciously its only practical result will be to support the hated present system or to allow its next version to be reconstituted after a historical upheaval.