The Clitoris: A Recent Discovery in Human Anatomy (NSFW)

[Peregrine]

But I'd say that while there are probably a few straight boys who regularly make a point out of letting the ladies know that they'd totally strangle anyone who tried to go there

I must admit, I was a little bummed (no pun intended) when my fella informed me when we first got together that that was his no-fly zone...

[Luther Blissett]

Very cool news about the goddess of fertility's belt buckle.

As I've posted here before, I read reddit sometimes. Not as often as RI, but it's good to see what's up, culturally, with a vast, slightly younger, overwhelmingly atheist, majority-progressive international community.

I have to say that, anecdotally, "pegging" is far more popular with the straight male set there than in the general population. My monocle is frequently shattered. Peruse reddit.com/r/sex and I'm sure you'll come across a reference to it without much trouble.

[compared2what?]

Dang. I was SO hoping that someone would have acted badly on this thread since last I looked at it.

I felt that it would probably be the only chance I'd ever have to tell anyone to quit acting like a male correlate.

[Searcher08]

I hereby declare that I have strong anecdotal evidence for the G spot. However, where the search for it may be going wrong is that I believe it's not an issue of nerve endings in that particular part of the vagina, but instead is an area where certain types of pressure, combined with other stimulation elsewhere, can cause a particularly quick and intense orgasm.

They might want to look at what's directly behind the spot inside the vagina where the G-spot supposedly is.

That seems to me to be consistent with my conjecture about optimal locations for pressure/force/friction/torsion and whatever else can be modeled using tensor calculus within the divine cavity.

You just combined wit, maths and sex in one sentence.
<Wayne> I am not worthy! : <bow>

[elfismiles]

Here ya go ... I just searched for dodson two views of woman and twas the first hit:

http://dodsonandross.com/fineart/two-views-woman

For as long as I can remember I have fantasized and practiced (and loved every moment of) worshiping at the alter of the feminine.

"Tie me to your headboard, throw your legs over my shoulders and let me wear you like a feed-bag."
- Goat Boy, aka Bill Hicks

I also have a framed print of her "Two Views of Woman" picture. These were originally my grandfather's. He was a sex researcher whom I believe knew Betty before his death.

Can one see this picture online? Not easily ga-gagulled.

.

[Twyla LaSarc]

I could tell you there are male correlates, but if go into too much detail here it will wig the straight boys out...

I'm extrapolating from a very small body of anecdotal data here. But I'd say that while there are probably a few straight boys who regularly make a point out of letting the ladies know that they'd totally strangle anyone who tried to go there, there are also probably a few who practically can't get through an entire first date without making sure they won't be buying a woman who doesn't know that they simply can't get off any other way dinner twice.

But....Honestly, I really have absolutely no idea whether most straight boys have any very strong feelings about being heterosexual while having sexually responsive male correlates. One way or the other. All I really know is that the issue rarely arises. I have no clue why. And no reason to inquire, either.

Maybe somebody impartial should do a survey or something.

I have no use for men who bar the door katie to alternative sexual experience, and the men I've hooked up with tend to sooner or later make excellent fodder for studies... or movies.

As a result, I am inclined to disbelieve in a gay/straight spectrum, thinking instead of the words of a wise friend who once told me that there are only two states of sexuality- not male female/gay straight, but sexual and non-sexual.

If you are so homophobic (ie: entrenched in a dualistic all-or nothing sexual identity system) that you will refuse to have your prostate massaged, well, just say you are apparently missing out.

[Project Willow]

^^ I can think of a few fellas whose experience I would have liked to have broadened in that area, if you know what I mean.
........................

My own experience has been that the G spot stimulation is a very different sensation from the usual clitoral sensation, and it's the only thing that has been associated with ejaculation (which is a very different fluid from the usual vaginal lubrication).

According to a recent study (although it had a terribly small sample size) 50% of women do have a developed homologous prostrate gland structure wrapping around the distal end of the urethra, and it is theorized that a portion of these women are able to ejaculate.

WARNING: NSFW IMAGE TO FOLLOW!














Anterior wall of vagina with engorged prostrate-homologue.

Skene's glands have highly variable anatomy, and in some extreme cases they appear to be absent entirely. If Skene's glands are the cause of female ejaculation and G-Spot-orgasms, this may explain the absence in many women.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... x/abstract
The Human Female Prostate—Immunohistochemical Study with Prostate-Specific Antigen, Prostate-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase, and Androgen Receptor and 3-D Remodeling
...
Results. Fourteen of 25 patients had glandular structures encircling the urethra. Twelve of 14 showed positive staining for PSA, PSAP, and AR in gland acini, while the excretory ducts, the urethra, and the surrounding stroma did not express those proteins. ["The other 11 specimens showed only gland-like structures"] The strongest PSA and PSAP expression was found in apical cytoplasm of the glandular cells, and AR was confined to cell nuclei. Prostatic glands were located laterally [to the side] to the distal [outer] half of the urethra. ["One of both urethras, which underwent a total serial immunohistochemical work-up, showed developed secretory glandular structures."

Conclusions. A female prostate was found in every second woman in this study and can be discriminated from other urethral caverns and immature paraurethral ducts. Possible neoplasms of this source tissue expressing the prostate-specific markers may therefore be denominated as female prostate tumors.

The Female Ejaculation Controversy

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01720.x/abstract
Introduction. The existence of female ejaculation and the female prostate is controversial; however, most scientists are not aware that historians of medicine and psychology described the phenomenon of female ejaculation approximately 2,000 years ago.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02472.x/abstract
Results. In this case report, we provided new biochemical evidences demonstrating that the clear and abundant fluid that is ejected in gushes (squirting) is different from the real female ejaculation. While the first has the features of diluted urines (density: 1,001.67 ± 2.89; urea: 417.0 ± 42.88 mg/dL; creatinine: 21.37 ± 4.16 mg/dL; uric acid: 10.37 ± 1.48 mg/dL), the second is biochemically comparable to some components of male semen (prostate-specific antigen: 3.99 ± 0.60 × 103 ng/mL).

Conclusions. Female ejaculation and squirting/gushing are two different phenomena. The organs and the mechanisms that produce them are bona fide different. The real female ejaculation is the release of a very scanty, thick, and whitish fluid from the female prostate, while the squirting is the expulsion of a diluted fluid from the urinary bladder.

You never really knew me at all...

Edited for having forgotten how to conjugate verbs.
Edited for pics not showing.

[Project Willow]

Here is another nice, brief overview of the history of the disappearing clitoris in Rebecca Chalker's The Clitoral Truth, published in 2000.

http://books.google.com/books?id=m3m3_Uq8qWkC&lpg=PA242&ots=G1Xhok1AYT&dq=rebecca%20chalker%20clitoris%20laqueur&pg=PA73#v=onepage&q&f=false

Page 73.

[Nordic]

The female prostrate gland would definitely explain my experiences with the G-spot phenomenon in some of the women I've known.

But after seeing that one particular photo above, it may be a while before I make a visit to that area ........

[Project Willow]

^^ There you go C2W.

Nordic, young women in this country feel so ashamed about their genitalia that they are voluntarily having themselves surgically mutilated. Please do not contribute to that travesty. Also, consider that your opinion on the aesthetic value of that particular tissue just might be influenced by your having been acculturated in a sexually repressive, sexually shaming, misogynist society. Thank you.

And that's about the amount of energy I am willing to expend on dick behavior in this thread.

[peartreed]

There you go introducing supersensitive topics, like in the thread on Strieber's latest book where you introduced mind control again, and this, your thread on the clitoris, where you then get testy and attack the respondents that rub you the wrong way.

[crikkett]

Any photographic image of genitalia should have come with a NSFW warning at the very least.
It was in poor taste. I was offended.

[Project Willow]

Forgive me if I assumed the thread title was warning enough.

Mods., can you please add a not safe for work both to the thread title and my post above?

Peartreed, if you have a personal issue with me, address me via pm. Don't follow me around the board simply to attack my character. Contribute productively to the thread topic or exit.

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

I think it must be a joke, either that or he was joking in the pm he just sent me.

If the post is a joke, it's actually kinda funny in a refreshingly self-deprecating way.

Only I didn't send you any P:M. You made that up.
There's something corrupt in this thread and I think I know what.

January 4th I posted about psyops going back to the 1938 movie 'The Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse' used to hide the creation of a pre-WWII propaganda unit being fought over by Rockefeller and Cherrington called The Bureau of Cultural Affairs.

I posted it in the 8th page of the 'Hugh Manatee Challenge' thread-
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=33793&start=105

...and now this pornographic diversion with false claims about me by Project Willow who has denied mass media psyops in my previous threads....

Yeah, it all makes sense. As usual. Carry on. Enjoy your diversion from scientific fascism history.

[Jeff]

Jesus. It's not all about Hugh.

And don't respond to this. Don't even click on this thread.