Jani's at the mercy of her mind

[agitprop]

Headlines--NOETIC JUSTICE

Irate Woman Ignores Own Children, While Flinging Accusations at Schofields Online.

Authorities Forced to Take Action!!

[MacCruiskeen]

Headlines--NOETIC JUSTICE

Irate Woman Ignores Own Children, While Flinging Accusations at Schofields Online.

Authorities Forced to Take Action!!

Don't dare accuse me of ignoring my own children, you repulsive troll. This is the second time you've made evil-minded accusations about me, based on absolutely nothing but your own filthy imagination.

Mods.

[agitprop]

Headlines--NOETIC JUSTICE

Irate Woman Ignores Own Children, While Flinging Accusations at Schofields Online.

Authorities Forced to Take Action!!

Don't dare accuse me of ignoring my own children, you repulsive troll. This is the second time you've made evil-minded accusations about me, based on absolutely nothing but your own filthy imagination.

Mods.

You are on the internets an awful lot, and your spittle flecked invective, though amusing, could call attention to your own child rearing skills.

[MacCruiskeen]

Headlines--NOETIC JUSTICE

Irate Woman Ignores Own Children, While Flinging Accusations at Schofields Online.

Authorities Forced to Take Action!!

Don't dare accuse me of ignoring my own children, you repulsive troll. This is the second time you've made evil-minded accusations about me, based on absolutely nothing but your own filthy imagination.

Mods.

You are on the internets an awful lot, and your spittle flecked invective, though amusing, could call attention to your own child rearing skills.

You deserve nothing better than invective, with or without spittle but preferably with. And it goes without saying that a child, any child, deserves something better, just as it deserves something better than the brutal molestation you and Big Schofield advocate and defend.

Now get out of my face. Address me once more and I'll complain directly to the Mods.

[agitprop]

You can dish it out but you can't take it...Can you? By accusing a specific individual of trying to kill his own daughter you are treading perilously close to libel. Malicious intent wouldn't be hard to prove. Do you really think the mods should interfere, and on who's behalf? The rich and famous are one thing, they're better off if they ignore slander, but some guy with a blog, who's hard up and has an expensive child. You could bring on a potential lawsuit. Think about before you let your emotions carry you away.

[MacCruiskeen]

You can dish it out but you can't take it...Can you? By accusing a specific individual of trying to kill his own daughter you are treading perilously close to libel. Malicious intent wouldn't be hard to prove. Do you really think the mods should interfere, and on who's behalf? The rich and famous are one thing, they're better off if they ignore slander, but some guy with a blog, who's hard up and has an expensive child. You could bring on a potential lawsuit. Think about before you let your emotions carry you away.

So on top of everything else, you're now trying to threaten me? You are a profoundly creepy little tosser, agitprop. No wonder you spend so much of your time defending serial child abusers.

Complaint's in.

[agitprop]

You can dish it out but you can't take it...Can you? By accusing a specific individual of trying to kill his own daughter you are treading perilously close to libel. Malicious intent wouldn't be hard to prove. Do you really think the mods should interfere, and on who's behalf? The rich and famous are one thing, they're better off if they ignore slander, but some guy with a blog, who's hard up and has an expensive child. You could bring on a potential lawsuit. Think about before you let your emotions carry you away.

So on top of everything else, you're now trying to threaten me? You are a profoundly creepy little tosser, agitprop. No wonder you spend so much of your time defending serial child abusers.

Complaint's in.

.
I'm not threatening you at all. I'm saying that others may view your accusations of attempted murder as actionable, and you could get others in trouble in the process. It's one thing to go back and forth with anonymous posters. It's quite another to launch on real people. It's doubtful anything will come of it, but you should be careful to qualify your statements, or somehow ameliorate them, when voicing concern.

[sunny]

agitprop, I would advise you to tread very, very carefully when it comes to accusations of a highly personal nature.

It's one thing to debate the child-rearing techniques of people who have put themselves out there in just that context, it's quite another to accuse another RI member of child neglect because of their opinions on the matter.

Please everyone, try and steer clear of personal attacks and stick to the subject at hand.

[lightningBugout]

AP, I find that your motives continue to appear very suspect.

In addition to the fact that you have gotten away with making a kind of attack that has gotten lesser posters banned, you continue to make statements that are both aggressive as well as incorrect.

You seem to like making broad generalizations out of singular observations. IE Mac, AFAIK, has not suggested that all pychosis is culturally constructed or mediated. Yet you happily hurl said assault.

[lightningBugout]

I know its apparently inappropriate but the little non-sequiturs make me laugh.

Later, she carried an imaginary rat in the palm of her hand and cautioned onlookers, "Be careful around him. He squirts."

[MacCruiskeen]

I know its apparently inappropriate but the little non-sequiturs make me laugh.

Later, she carried an imaginary rat in the palm of her hand and cautioned onlookers, "Be careful around him. He squirts."

Yeah, she's a clever and funny child all right, when she's left in peace and allowed to be a child for a moment.

Listen to Jani's mother Susan Schofield talk about her here (30th-50th minute). And listen to the way she talks about her, only really hitting her stride when describing Jani's "oppositional-defiant moment" [sic] at school. This is literally one of the insanest conversations I have ever heard.

But it's not really a conversation. Hardly anyone else can get a word in edgeways. The woman is relentless, like a pneumatic drill or a very loud alarm clock, and both of those objects probably have more self-knowledge and insight into a child's mind than she has. It's just dumbfounding.

The poor kid has to live with that all the time, and with her incessantly loving father.

Personally I'd choose the imaginary rats and cats too, any day. Who wouldn't? No bloody wonder they tell Jani to hit people. 400 the Cat is the truest friend she's got.

[agitprop]

agitprop, I would advise you to tread very, very carefully when it comes to accusations of a highly personal nature.

It's one thing to debate the child-rearing techniques of people who have put themselves out there in just that context, it's quite another to accuse another RI member of child neglect because of their opinions on the matter.

Please everyone, try and steer clear of personal attacks and stick to the subject at hand.

I made a jocular comment. That's readily apparent. "Noetic justice"? Moo haa haa. I could have gone on and on with Mac, in the same strident bullying tone she favours, but I chose humour. I was trying to illustrate how the definition of abusing children, can be turned on anybody, on just about any pretext.

My other point should not escape you or Mr.Wells. The Schofields are clearly not inviting accusations of attempted premeditated murder, by outlining their lives with their daughter, Jani and encouraging people's comments on their blog.

This site should afford people the opportunity to voice concern and curiosity about the father possibly having Munchausen's by proxy, resorting to methods he shouldn't, losing his mind, etc... but when you let a poster level an accusation, of attempted premeditated murder, without substantiating it, in any way, you could be inviting a lawsuit. It's doubtful, s they don't seem like the litigious types, but why allow that kind of rank sh** on this forum anyway?

Accusing elite perverts by name, is one thing. Disseminating that kind of info, if it's substantiated at all, can be useful to the rest of us, and the powerful pervs just ignore fringe sites and media anyway. But when you allow powerless parents to be abused, under the rubric of "protecting the children", I think you have to give your heads a shake.

[lightningBugout]

Who, the F-U-C-K, are you to say what this site "should" be? Huh? Go home.

And lets get it straight - Mac is no bully. You, OTOH, are flirting with it and apparently ready to close the deal.

[lightningBugout]

Not to mention, what the hell is up with Jani's mom's radio show? They open "bipolar nation" with celeb news about boy george and madonna and pseudo-KFI trashtalk? Puh lease. Not to mention the gnarly sex talk about the parents meeting. These people are crazy as well as they are disgusting.

[agitprop]

AP, I find that your motives continue to appear very suspect.

In addition to the fact that you have gotten away with making a kind of attack that has gotten lesser posters banned, you continue to make statements that are both aggressive as well as incorrect.

You seem to like making broad generalizations out of singular observations. IE Mac, AFAIK, has not suggested that all pychosis is culturally constructed or mediated. Yet you happily hurl said assault.

I'm aggressive? No, actually I'm just not submissive. And I would check carefully the assertion that Mac hasn't repeatedly voiced the opinion that psychotics are made not born. If I didn't get some tiny point of inference correct, I have to apologize for that.

You have to redefine, in your own mind, what it means to be on a forum where occult issues are being brought to light and understand the potential for the daylight to be easily obscured by a lack of nuance and a kind of raving fundamentalism. Is it possible for people to believe in the concept of evil, but hold back on seeing it everywhere and in everything? Not everyone is going to be on the same page, nor should they be.