The Wikileaks Question

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby Montag » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:14 pm

I find dismissing entire publications to be not useful. Unless you can examine a particular piece see what the claims are, and if any of them can be corroborated at all. If you just read the papers that have been parasitized by CIA/MI6/Mossad etc. I don't see how you can really understand what's happening in the world.

Of course, I'm sure they run psyops and things of that nature to get stories out in Al Jazeera, the Middle East, Asia wherever too. So just b/c we're reading non-Western media doesn't necessarily mean it's not what the CIA wants us to know.
User avatar
Montag
 
Posts: 1259
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:32 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby vanlose kid » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:19 pm

Montag wrote:I find dismissing entire publications to be not useful. Unless you can examine a particular piece see what the claims are, and if any of them can be corroborated at all. If you just read the papers that have been parasitized by CIA/MI6/Mossad etc. I don't see how you can really understand what's happening in the world.

Of course, I'm sure they run psyops and things of that nature to get stories out in Al Jazeera, the Middle East, Asia wherever too. So just b/c we're reading non-Western media doesn't necessarily mean it's not what the CIA wants us to know.


can you yourself make sense of what you're saying?

*
"Teach them to think. Work against the government." – Wittgenstein.
User avatar
vanlose kid
 
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby Montag » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:22 pm

vanlose kid wrote:
Montag wrote:I find dismissing entire publications to be not useful. Unless you can examine a particular piece see what the claims are, and if any of them can be corroborated at all. If you just read the papers that have been parasitized by CIA/MI6/Mossad etc. I don't see how you can really understand what's happening in the world.

Of course, I'm sure they run psyops and things of that nature to get stories out in Al Jazeera, the Middle East, Asia wherever too. So just b/c we're reading non-Western media doesn't necessarily mean it's not what the CIA wants us to know.


can you yourself make sense of what you're saying?

*


Yes, let's see if I can shorten it... To dismiss an entire paper I don't really find to be useful. American Free Press is a website I have looked at and in general looks pretty bad and I haven't read it in some time -- so I think some can be dismissed probably.

To control our minds things are planted in the press b/c that is what the rulers (or however we describe the people in power) want us to know. Even sincere journalists who think they are printing truth can be mislead and sold a bill of goods. I'd suspect the same is done outside of North America, Europe, Japan too.
User avatar
Montag
 
Posts: 1259
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:32 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby Simulist » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:24 pm

It seems to me that he's saying disinformation is sown everywhere, and that one must not be dismissive, but discerning.

(Oops, Montag, I see you just replied to Vanløse.)
"The most strongly enforced of all known taboos is the taboo against knowing who or what you really are behind the mask of your apparently separate, independent, and isolated ego."
    — Alan Watts
User avatar
Simulist
 
Posts: 4713
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: Here, and now.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby Montag » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:26 pm

Non-westerners often understand that their media is lies though (maybe Alice can speak to this living in Egypt). Although, I read an article where a woman in Venezuela was interviewed and she said she was amazed what had happened to the media in that country after Chavez was elected. Suddenly papers she had grown up reading and believing in were printing essentially nothing but falsehood(s).

edit: Just in case of confusion (b/c Chavez has been so vilified in the US media) when I was talking about the media presenting falsehood I was talking about the anti-Chavez media... The woman I was referring too, of course, had to see the media in it attacks on Chavez to learn how bogus it was. If you want to know more about the Venezuelan media read this:

Anti-Venezuela Spokespeople Misrepresent Reality of Press Freedom in Venezuela
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-weis ... 51986.html
Last edited by Montag on Sun Dec 12, 2010 7:04 pm, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
Montag
 
Posts: 1259
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:32 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby Montag » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:27 pm

Didn't anyone see the movie the Green Zone? I'd suggest watching it...
User avatar
Montag
 
Posts: 1259
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:32 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby MacCruiskeen » Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:31 pm

JackRiddler wrote:
Reichsminister fuer Propaganda Dr. Joseph Goebbels wrote:
Im Pausenhof treten die Lehrzoeglinge aus dem Fernen Osten unseren voelkischen Heranwachsenden mit den Fuessen im Arsch. Vom Buecherlesen bis Rechnen, sind die Gelben uns so weit voraus, dass wir nur noch Ihr Staub essen! Mit anderen Woertern, die Welt sieht uns als Schwaechlinge an.



Bisschen frei adaptiert. (Sorry about no umlauts.)

EDIT: There we go. Just sent the above to her e-mail at WP. Subject line: "Dear Ms Parker: Fan mail from Germany."


Good on you, Jack. :clapping: You really captured that pre-war Prussian-dominie Duktus. (I like "Lehrzöglinge"!)

Image

Unfortunately, your sterling efforts are probably wasted on Ms. Parker. I bet she'll put it through the mangle called Google Translate and then fail to recognise it as her own.

Also, you are now on the Homeland Security watchlist as a suspected neonazi turrrst. Expect prolonged and painstaking cavity searches next time you try to board a flight to Chermany.
Last edited by MacCruiskeen on Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby Montag » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:53 pm

This woman wrote a book with Jim DiEugenio look what she says about "unparalleled" investigate journalist Bob Woodward. I always thought it fishy an man made famous for exposing things, "morphed" into the scribe for the royal court.

Bob Woodward
http://www.ctka.net/pr196-woodward.html
User avatar
Montag
 
Posts: 1259
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:32 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby AlicetheKurious » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:41 pm

barracuda wrote:
AlicetheKurious wrote:Israel

8bitagent wrote:Israel

BenD wrote:Israel


Some things never get old.


Some things do, including this type of cheap and lazy dismissal of everything people say, when it involves Israel.

barracuda wrote:
8bitagent wrote:2006 unjustified blitz of Southern Lebanon


Apparently you haven't read the cable about Murr. Too bad, it's pretty juicy, but it might not satisfy your particular narrative desires. Reality seldom will.


I've read it, several times. Are you saying that Elias Murr's treason justifies the bombing of Southern Lebanon? That's exactly what it sounds like.

Incidentally, the cables actually corroborate what Hizbullah has been saying for years, which some, specifically in groups aligned with the United States, dismissed as "conspiracy theories" and "paranoia". Several ironies here: Murr has always been very close to Syrian intelligence and now he's volunteering tips to the Israelis? In any case, this is not the first time that Murr has been suspected of treasonous acts on behalf of Israel. His denials have always been so indignant, so adamant...

This time, Murr was deeply embarrassed by the revelations, which showed him to be not only a traitor (as many already suspected) but an extreme sectarian, suggesting that Israel bombing Lebanese territory where Shi'a Lebanese citizens live is only "Hizbullah's problem". At first he denied that the cable was accurate, saying ""The cable does not reflect the truth about what happened during the meeting and it has no value." Well, that didn't go down too well, and the calls for his arrest on charges of treason continued unabated. So now he's come up with a winning strategy: claiming that he's only guilty of "holding a different opinion" (!!) and insisting that those who call him a traitor should themselves be arrested... Hilariously, he launched this novel defense in a joint press conference with the notorious neocon/zionist Jeffrey Feltman, US Assistant Secretary for Near-Eastern Affairs, one of the most hated men in Lebanon.
"If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby nathan28 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:55 pm

AlicetheKurious wrote:Incidentally, the cables actually corroborate what Hizbullah has been saying for years



This fits into your meta-narrative that the cables are a pro-Israel hatchet job how?
„MAN MUSS BEFUERCHTEN, DASS DAS GANZE IN GOTTES HAND IST"

THE JEERLEADER
User avatar
nathan28
 
Posts: 2957
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby barracuda » Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:17 pm

AlicetheKurious wrote:
barracuda wrote:Some things never get old.


Some things do, including this type of cheap and lazy dismissal of everything people say, when it involves Israel.


What's lazy is the apparent reading abilities of some of the members of the forum, who feel the need to ask the same questions over and over regarding the lack of inclusion of their pet issues within the 1/100th of the cables which have yet been released, whether Israel, or 911, or whatever, even though those questions have been addressed virtually every time they've been raised, and addressed substantively. I realise it's a long thread(s), but the "where is Israel in all this?" question has really become merely an echo.

barracuda wrote:
8bitagent wrote:2006 unjustified blitz of Southern Lebanon


Apparently you haven't read the cable about Murr. Too bad, it's pretty juicy, but it might not satisfy your particular narrative desires. Reality seldom will.


I've read it, several times. Are you saying that Elias Murr's treason justifies the bombing of Southern Lebanon? That's exactly what it sounds like.


That's plain silly, Alice, and has me wondering whether our ears are similarly constructed. I was responding to 8bit's unresearched claim that no cables had shown up regarding the 2006 incursion. Murr's treachery has literally been discussed in virtually every single arab media outlet on the planet, and you could only have missed it if you didn't care about it in the first place. The revelation that the Lebanese Minister of Defense would be suggesting Lebanese targets to the Israeli army is unconscionable and yes, treasonous. It remains to be seen if the cable will in fact result in any significant repercussions for Murr himself, the very idea of which has any number of interesting implications, some of which you've raised in your post.

Incidentally, your suggestion that I might support the aggression of the fascist Israeli state against a civilian population is absurd on the face of it. I do not support war, or killing, or Israel, for that matter. I do support well reasoned analysis, though, and generally, thoughtfulness.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby AlicetheKurious » Sun Dec 12, 2010 7:52 pm

nathan28 wrote:
AlicetheKurious wrote:Incidentally, the cables actually corroborate what Hizbullah has been saying for years



This fits into your meta-narrative that the cables are a pro-Israel hatchet job how?


Look at the glee with which Netanyahu and the Israeli right-wing press greeted the Wikileaks revelations about how certain Arab "leaders" secretly told the US to attack Iran. The Israelis are so utterly divorced from reality that they think, "Now that it's all in the open, those Arab "leaders" will be forced to finally say in public what they've been saying in private!" They have no clue...

If that was the plan, as I suspect it was, it will backfire big-time and even further de-legitimize these regimes and put them very much on the defensive. They've been outed as liars and hypocrites and in some cases, traitors; as conspirators with the vicious invaders and killers and oppressors of millions of innocent Arabs and Muslims. There's a reason why not one Arab newspaper, even among the bravest of opposition papers, has dared to publish the more revealing leaks about their own president or king (with the unique exception of the truly independent Lebanese leftist Al-Akhbar): because it strips these rulers naked and shows them for the lying sycophants they are, and provokes among their public that most dangerous of emotions: contempt. Far from coming out of the closet, so to speak, Arab leaders will now feel under pressure to prove that they are not the weak sycophants and hypocrites the leaks show them to be. In Lebanon, where tensions have been very high between the Hariri-led and the Hizbullah-led camps, the leaks have given a big moral push to the latter and put the former even more on the defensive.

But clearly that wasn't the plan. See, as the prime consumers and believers in their own propaganda, neither the Americans nor the Israelis see themselves the way others see them. To most Egyptians, Israel is associated with atrocities against helpless people, with wanton destruction and sadism and theft and implacable hatred. Business between some high-level Egyptians and Israelis can flourish only in the dark. The Egyptian regime understands, but the Israelis can't, that once exposed to the light of day it will not be tolerated and there's a point beyond which people will rise up, no matter what the cost.

I think that we have a long way to go before we can assess the full impact of the Wikileaks. Iran now can claim the moral high ground, having generously dismissed the leaks about how its neighbours have been inciting Iran's enemy to bomb it. I'd love to be a fly on the wall at the next official meeting between the two presidents. Saudi Arabia and Egypt and Yemen and Qatar now exist under a cloud of suspicion that smells like treason, as do many of America's "allies", and the onus is on them to dispel it somehow. If, as I believe, the intent was to force Arab leaders into a more open relationship with Israel, it was a very serious miscalculation and will have unpredictable but almost certainly negative consequences for both.
"If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby AlicetheKurious » Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:05 pm

barracuda wrote:What's lazy is the apparent reading abilities of some of the members of the forum, who feel the need to ask the same questions over and over regarding the lack of inclusion of their pet issues within the 1/100th of the cables which have yet been released, whether Israel, or 911, or whatever, even though those questions have been addressed virtually every time they've been raised, and addressed substantively. I realise it's a long thread(s), but the "where is Israel in all this?" question has really become merely an echo.


No, it's not an echo, it's a necessary reminder. Given Assange's flat assertion that 9/11 was not a conspiracy, and the remarkable density of dubious allegations that could have been written by Netanyahu himself about countries that happen to be on Israel's hit-list within that 1/100, it's worth keeping in the forefront of our minds.

barracuda wrote:That's plain silly, Alice, and has me wondering whether our ears are similarly constructed.


No need to get in a snit. I simply misunderstood what you meant. (It was ambiguously phrased, you know).

barracuda wrote:Incidentally, your suggestion that I might support the aggression of the fascist Israeli state against a civilian population is absurd on the face of it. I do not support war, or killing, or Israel, for that matter. I do support well reasoned analysis, though, and generally, thoughtfulness.


Sorry to have inadvertently impugned your moral standards, I didn't mean to. As for well reasoned analysis and thoughtfulness, what's not to like?
"If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby barracuda » Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:38 pm

AlicetheKurious wrote:Sorry to have inadvertently impugned your moral standards, I didn't mean to.


Ah, well, think nothing of it. I am also a supporter of AlicetheKurious, you know.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Wikileaks Question

Postby JackRiddler » Sun Dec 12, 2010 9:09 pm

.

barracuda wrote:...

WikiLeaks recent releases have actually created a significant political effect in the world....

And frankly, no matter how you personally react to the demeanor and grooming of Julian Assange, he is at present being held in Wandsworth prison by the authority of the British Crown on charges of having unprotected sex with two apparently very attractive women. His detention in solitary confinement at a high security lockdown under constant surveillance is paced at the moment by the activities of the Americans, the world's most violent and unforgiving empire, preparing espionage charges against him in hopes of extradition and, presumably, interrogation and imprisonment.


Given that, and the fact that the Justice Department is preparing espionage or other charges against Assange while American politicians and pundits openly call for Assange's death, those who incessantly peddle one unsubstantiated speculation about Assange and Wikileaks after the next are diverting from both, the exposures through the cables of high crimes by many states and officials, and from a frontal, significant and generalizable assault by empire on our freedoms of the press and Internet.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 174 guests