Reposting as I think MacCruiskeen might have missed this. He wouldn't ignore it, I don't suppose, if one takes into account his punctilious insistence that everyone on the board at all times engage in
discussion. Thoughts welcome!
______
MacCruiskeen » Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:17 pm wrote:Don't mention it. And if you're looking for more detail and numerous links to the available evidence, then you might start by reading this here very thread
I
will mention it! Thanks for taking the time to reply, and thanks for limiting your superciliousness to moderate levels, by your standards - levels that most people would consider only moderately prickish. We can but imagine the near-superhuman efforts at self-control that that must have taken.
I have read the thread, but I haven't watched all the videos and followed every link on it, which is why I was looking for confirmation of what there is in the way of support for the rebuttal of the official theory. And I've now re-read the thread, but it certainly doesn't show everything you seem to think it does.
Says who? The very early reports were from news agencies, based on reports from eyewitnesses saying what they had seen while running through streets at night, hearing gunfire and screams. In
Brown's first conference, he's asked: "Is it fair to say you're talking about four people [...]?" and he replies: "That's our assumption now." Is that what you mean by
the official story? His remarks in the middle of the thing? By
his second conference - Friday morning - he is relaying that the suspect had told the police that "he was not affiliated with any groups and he stated that he did this alone." The Facebook post you posted on page 6 of this thread, which says "it appears that two snipers shot ten police officers", is
older than Brown's first conference. Unless there are other police statements of which I am unaware, Brown's are the two first official statements on the matter - the first states that police are
assuming there were four shooters, the second that Johnson was acting alone.
MacCruiskeen » Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:17 pm wrote:meanwhile no official mention whatsoever of the single shooter filmed firing off dozens of rounds on the street and killing at least one cop at point-blank range
By police, you mean? No, no mention. Is this suspicious, that Brown didn't announce having seen that video?
MacCruiskeen » Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:17 pm wrote:no mention of the fact that the police had known by no later than 9pm that that same shooter had retreated into El Centro,/ a college corridor described repeatedly as a parking garage
Described
repeatedly as a parking garage by different people - that is, Brown says in conference 1 that "we are in negotiations with a suspect involved in this shootings at the garage of El Centro," and then that statement was
repeated by press outlets who were at the press conference precisely so that they could then
repeat (or
report) Brown's words. That's what those things are for, press conferences. That is the single mention of a garage by
authorities. Correct me if I'm wrong, of course. And the above quote also shows that police did mention El Centro on their very first controlled interaction with the media. At conference 2 (Friday) Brown clarifies that this was happening at "El Centro on the second floor of the college there." It's only on Monday that he feels obliged to clarify that he "misspoke" in the first conference - the one he was giving in the middle of the night, while his men were pinning down a multiple murderer.
No, nothing of the sort in this thread. The only claim that Johnson carried an AR-15 was from eyewitness Ismael Dejesus.
MacCruiskeen » Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:17 pm wrote:still no account whatsoever of where the alleged shooter was "holed up" during the "standoff" (except now we're told it was somewhere on the second floor of the college as opposed to
in amongst a big bunch of parked cars)
Yes. Is that not an
account? Of course it is, and it was the account
as early as Friday morning: "at El Centro on the second floor of the college there in downtown Dallas."
That's the official account, though. As sinister as that is (and frankly I think that, and the C4 explosive the cops were able to get in '15 minutes', is the most sinister aspect of the whole thing), you're not claiming they're lying about this, are you?
Don't be coy, now![/quote]