Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
drstrangelove » Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:54 pm wrote:Blackstone acquired Hignosis a couple months ago.
- https://www.blackstone.com/news/press/b ... royalties/
Trying to connect the dots on the corporate board seat circuit is a waste of time. I can link anyone who cares to the legal documents(global custody agreements) which give 5 custodian banks control over the boards of every publicly traded multi-national corporation of significance. This includes Warner brothers. The only exemptions are familiies who still retain control of their holding companies(like in the tv show Succession)
Now, for them to leverage this control is not that simple, but if they have the will to do so it can be done. And since people on the inside of this system know that this can be done, it often never needs to be. Private equity knows who their boss is, and if they don't they'll get a friendly visit from a Jeffrey Epstein, spend 12 months as his friend, then receive a video tape in the mail.There is no evidence to suggest Kindler had any influence on Young's decision
This is a mob lawyer's defence. I agree there's no paperwork or recorded phone calls proving they told Neil to do this. But it's a fact that hignosis and Warner Bros gave Neil their blessing to do it at the cost of foregoing their royalties. So this was done in partnership, a kind of corporate counter culture thing. Like BLM.
The other Canadian, Jilo something, her catalogue is owned by Hassan Khosrowshahi's holding company.
- https://persisholdings.com/investments/dri-capital/
This holding company is invested in three things. Music copyrights. Commercial real estate. Pharmaceutical patents - https://dricapital.com
I've spent the last month researching Blackstone and BlackRock. I wanted to write an essay but I've written almost half a book. It's no coincidence they keep showing up everywhere.
drstrangelove » 30 Jan 2022 13:07 wrote:I don't think people are questioning Neil Young's belief so much as his volition. He doesn't own his own music.
Belligerent Savant » 30 Jan 2022 15:06 wrote:^^^^^^^^^
Yes. I thought this was self-evident.
Also, Your response to Joe H was better than anything I was beginning to draft up so i'm re-sharing on this page as well.
Harvey » 30 Jan 2022 19:32 wrote:Joe reprimands others for not checking facts...
drstrangelove » 30 Jan 2022 19:34 wrote:The fact this is even news is evidence enough this whole thing is a corporate sponsored attack on one of the last media platforms with the independence to expose dissenting views to a mass audience. When I type 'Australia news' into YouTube the second thing that pops up is a morning talk show clip covering 'cancel Spotify'. Two reddit threads were voted to the top of both news and world news subreddits using botnets within hours. The pedo's over at CNN have been on his case for months now. All of corporate media celebrated when Rogan got covid, and there was a wave of disappointment when he kicked after taking horse dewormer.
I really shouldn't have to care about this. The reason I know this is apart of a coordinated attack is because I know about it. I shouldn't know about it. But it finds me. It wiggles its way into my news feed and goes
"hey lookie here at what these anti-establish canucks are doing to fight misinformation!"
and of course the whole thing is timed perfectly with the tech stock collapse.
"hey lookie here, Spotify stock has been dropping since these artists took a stand!"
Other artists will start to realise this will get them into the news cycle. Others will just get on board through mimesis. Did you know subway suicide rates and school shootings increase when the news covers them? The number of school shootings drops every fours years because of the election cycle. You could invest and divest firearm manufacturing stocks using this information and gain a steady income. That is of course if you are comfortable monetising tragedy.
People aren't "in on it". They are just disappointing.
Joe Hillshoist » Sun Jan 30, 2022 10:42 am wrote:Harvey » 30 Jan 2022 19:32 wrote:Joe reprimands others for not checking facts...
Sorry?
Have I got something wrong in this thread you want to post a link to?
drstrangelove » 30 Jan 2022 20:48 wrote:Rogan is the independent platform not Spotify. They paid him $100 mill to put him in a box and scrub a bunch of episodes from his archive. Rogan probably does have some institutional backing from the military industrial complex. When you are that influential you need someone watching out for you.
Harvey » 30 Jan 2022 20:08 wrote:Joe Hillshoist » Sun Jan 30, 2022 10:42 am wrote:Harvey » 30 Jan 2022 19:32 wrote:Joe reprimands others for not checking facts...
Sorry?
Have I got something wrong in this thread you want to post a link to?
Ha ha! Yes of course you have. And no of course I won't. It's funnier that way.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests