Baptist Identity:
How It Masks Clergy Sex Abuse in the Southern Baptist Convention
by Christa Brown | December 5, 2011
Page 7
- In effect, predatory clergy put on the mask of God in order to commit their crimes. Baptist identity helps to secure those masks and keep them in place. A shared denominational identity keeps the mantle of trust on ministers’ shoulders, but among Southern Baptists, denominational identity is simultaneously disclaimed for purposes of clergy accountability or discipline. Then everything is up to the local church, and it is as though the denomination disappears.
Page 13 | Conclusion
- Choices clearly exist. Yet despite the harm that is being done to so many, Southern Baptist leaders choose to promote their self-constructed version of “local church autonomy” as the singular component of Baptist identity for purposes of refusing what are now common-place institutional mechanisms for the prevention of clergy sex abuse. In so choosing, they allow religious doctrine to facilitate and mask clergy violence.
Page 21 | Note 71
- In practice, the Southern Baptist construction of “local church autonomy” presumes the New Testament prescribes the doctrine so precisely as to allow churches to cooperate for the funding of ministers’ retirements, for international missions, for keeping Baptist historical records, and even for investigating churches with gays in their membership, but not for responsibly assessing reports alleging clergy sex abuse. Given the obvious human hand in these definitional parameters, one can only wonder why Southern Baptist officials reject a definition that would allow for the better protection of church kids and for ministry to the wounded. Alternatively, Southern Baptist officials could choose to emphasize other aspects of their faith identity, such as Jesus’ call to care for the “least of these,” or to emphasize other aspects of their human identities, such as their role as parents and as community-minded adults who care for the young.
POST 2906