Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Lancet Global Excess Death Study Released

Postby JackRiddler » Fri Mar 11, 2022 8:43 am

.

Excess mortality estimates for last 2 years show three times as many additional deaths worldwide above baseline than given in official global Covid death estimate. Almost all of the difference comes from outside 'the West'. Study does not (could not yet) break it down further, leaving out question of effects of C19 vs. pandemic response. But let's take this initially for the excess death estimates, regardless of cause, because it already sets upper limits for overall Covid effects.

First, link to the study
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanc ... 40-6736(21)02796-3/fulltext

Summary
Background

Mortality statistics are fundamental to public health decision making. Mortality varies by time and location, and its measurement is affected by well known biases that have been exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper aims to estimate excess mortality from the COVID-19 pandemic in 191 countries and territories, and 252 subnational units for selected countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Dec 31, 2021.

Methods

All-cause mortality reports were collected for 74 countries and territories and 266 subnational locations (including 31 locations in low-income and middle-income countries) that had reported either weekly or monthly deaths from all causes during the pandemic in 2020 and 2021, and for up to 11 year previously. In addition, we obtained excess mortality data for 12 states in India. Excess mortality over time was calculated as observed mortality, after excluding data from periods affected by late registration and anomalies such as heat waves, minus expected mortality. Six models were used to estimate expected mortality; final estimates of expected mortality were based on an ensemble of these models. Ensemble weights were based on root mean squared errors derived from an out-of-sample predictive validity test. As mortality records are incomplete worldwide, we built a statistical model that predicted the excess mortality rate for locations and periods where all-cause mortality data were not available. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression as a variable selection mechanism and selected 15 covariates, including both covariates pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as seroprevalence, and to background population health metrics, such as the Healthcare Access and Quality Index, with direction of effects on excess mortality concordant with a meta-analysis by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. With the selected best model, we ran a prediction process using 100 draws for each covariate and 100 draws of estimated coefficients and residuals, estimated from the regressions run at the draw level using draw-level input data on both excess mortality and covariates. Mean values and 95% uncertainty intervals were then generated at national, regional, and global levels. Out-of-sample predictive validity testing was done on the basis of our final model specification.

Findings

Although reported COVID-19 deaths between Jan 1, 2020, and Dec 31, 2021, totalled 5·94 million worldwide, we estimate that 18·2 million (95% uncertainty interval 17·1–19·6) people died worldwide because of the COVID-19 pandemic (as measured by excess mortality) over that period. The global all-age rate of excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic was 120·3 deaths (113·1–129·3) per 100 000 of the population, and excess mortality rate exceeded 300 deaths per 100 000 of the population in 21 countries. The number of excess deaths due to COVID-19 was largest in the regions of south Asia, north Africa and the Middle East, and eastern Europe. At the country level, the highest numbers of cumulative excess deaths due to COVID-19 were estimated in India (4·07 million [3·71–4·36]), the USA (1·13 million [1·08–1·18]), Russia (1·07 million [1·06–1·08]), Mexico (798 000 [741 000–867 000]), Brazil (792 000 [730 000–847 000]), Indonesia (736 000 [594 000–955 000]), and Pakistan (664 000 [498 000–847 000]). Among these countries, the excess mortality rate was highest in Russia (374·6 deaths [369·7–378·4] per 100 000) and Mexico (325·1 [301·6–353·3] per 100 000), and was similar in Brazil (186·9 [172·2–199·8] per 100 000) and the USA (179·3 [170·7–187·5] per 100 000).

Interpretation

The full impact of the pandemic has been much greater than what is indicated by reported deaths due to COVID-19 alone. Strengthening death registration systems around the world, long understood to be crucial to global public health strategy, is necessary for improved monitoring of this pandemic and future pandemics. In addition, further research is warranted to help distinguish the proportion of excess mortality that was directly caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection and the changes in causes of death as an indirect consequence of the pandemic.

Funding
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, J Stanton, T Gillespie, and J and E Nordstrom

More
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanc ... 40-6736(21)02796-3/fulltext




Second, some points brought up by Raghib Ali.

https://twitter.com/drraghibali/status/ ... 8353091585

Dr Raghib Ali MD(Epi) MPH FRCP (UK)
@drraghibali
1. Far from the UK having the worst death rate in Europe (or even Western Europe) as many still think, it is actually 29th in Europe & 9th in Western Europe - below the Western European average & at the same level as France & Germany (no statistically significant difference)

Image

W. Europe: 140.0 (133.5-146.3)
Italy: 227.4 (212.0-242.5)
Portugal: 202.2 (190.7-212.2)
Spain: 186.7 (181.3-191.5)
Belgium: 146.6 (135.8-156.3)
Netherlands: 140.0 (131.3-147.6)
UK: 126.8(122.3-130.9) Eng. 125.8(122.1-128.7)
France: 124.2 (120.5-127.7)
Germany: 120.5 (115.1-125.1)

2. Even the misleading claim that many still make that the UK had the highest death toll based on absolute numbers (which is obviously mainly determined by the population size) is now wrong:

Italy: 259000
Germany : 203000
UK: 169000 (England: 142000)
Spain: 162000
France: 155000

3. England hasn't had a higher death rate than other home nations: all are basically the same level with no statistically significant difference:

England: 125.8 (122.1 - 128.7)
Northern Ireland: 131.8 (101.6 - 165.0)
Scotland: 130.6 (115.7 - 145.1)
Wales: 135.5 (121.9 - 147.5)

4. Sweden has not had a higher excess death rates than its Scandinavian neighbours (no difference except to Norway) and is well below the W. European average (as shown above):

Denmark: 94.1 (80.5-106.3)
Sweden: 91.2 (85.2-98.1)
Finland: 80.8 (66.2-94.0)
Norway: 7.2 (0.0-15.9)

5. There is no clear relationship between levels of excess mortality and different levels of restrictions/ NPIs across Western Europe or indeed the whole of Europe. (The much higher Covid death rates in Central and Eastern Europe are mainly due to lower levels of vaccination.)

Of course as we look back, we must see what lessons we can learn from countries that have had much lower excess death rates (like Norway) but all the commentary to date as to to how and why the UK (or Sweden) has done so much worse than its neighbours is clearly no longer valid.

And of course we owe it to the tens of thousands who have died, including many of my NHS colleagues, to have a proper public inquiry that looks at all the decisions made over the last two years to ensure we learn from our mistakes and see how we can do better in the future.

There are lots of other important findings in the full paper too showing that deaths from Covid have been much higher in many countries than official figures suggest and that excess death rates have varied very widely between countries and within regions.




A lot of this was evident starting soon after the beginning. That the measures were mostly bullshit (unless the goal was a biosurveillance security state and corporate economic control given the general crises). That there was little difference among countries based on measures adopted. Will there be a reckoning with all the lies and disinfo of the last two years? Will Swedish authorities get an apology for being accused of genocide? Ha, ha, ha.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Grizzly » Fri Mar 11, 2022 4:25 pm

Campbell discussing Pfizer documents. I almost feel sorry for the guy

“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4908
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby MacCruiskeen » Fri Mar 11, 2022 6:12 pm

"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby drstrangelove » Sat Mar 12, 2022 9:02 am

https://www.health.vic.gov.au/sites/def ... 2-No-5.pdf

^ That is a link to a 40 page document outlining the vaccine passport requirements for Victorian premises. It is 40 pages long because our technocrats have made vaccine passports universally mandatory for everything, but then gone and inserted clauses which specifically exempt almost everything.

They've made a whitelist of things you can do without a vaccine passport. Not a blacklist. Not things you can't do. But a whitelist. Every little thing has become a clause waiting to be stricken from the record.
drstrangelove
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby DrEvil » Sat Mar 12, 2022 6:51 pm

^^Reminds me of how they framed it when they considered vaccine passports here in Norway: it wasn't that the unvaccinated would be banned from x, y and z, but that everyone would be banned from x, y and z, but you could whitelist yourself by getting the vaccine passport. Some spin doctor earned their paycheck that day.
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 4142
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby MacCruiskeen » Sun Mar 13, 2022 3:16 pm

Mass "testing" in the Chinese city of Chongqing (pop. 16,382,000) after three (in figures: 3) "Covid" "cases" were "confirmed" there:

Image
https://media.gettr.com/group19/getter/ ... _500x0.jpg

Sneaky bastards, those tiny invisible Killer Dots. Thank goodness The Authorities can see them. Imagine if they snuck through unnoticed.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sun Mar 13, 2022 5:23 pm

Jay Bhattacharya
@DrJBhattacharya
·
Covid antibodies found in stored blood from Sept/Nov 2019 in European blood banks. The implications are enormous.

1. Long before the official start date, it was too late to stop the disease from spreading across the earth. We have wasted 2 years on lockdowns for nothing.
[1/4]
Virál Myālgía MD, PhD
@contrarian4data
· Mar 27, 2021
It always seemed probabilistically unlikely that SARS-CoV-2 was not circulating in multiple major international travel hubs by December.

French IgG study:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.10 ... 20-00716-2

Italian IgM study:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/1 ... 1620974755

Illusions of control.

Delusions of potency.


2. The pre-prints finding the virus in Nov/Dec 2019 in the Wuhan markets (reported breathlessly by the NYT) do not point to the true origin events of the virus.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/202 ... igins.html
[2/4]

3. The early seroprevalence studies that found a prevalence of 3%+ in large US metro centers are not so surprising in light of a Sept/Nov 2019 European start date.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2766367

Why have the studies @contrarian4data linked not received more attention from the press and scientific communities?
[4/4]

https://twitter.com/DrJBhattacharya/sta ... tWlUNEVtfg
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5573
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Grizzly » Sun Mar 13, 2022 6:45 pm

FORMER W.H.O. CONSULTANT EXPOSES TAKEDOWN OF IVERMECTIN
https://thehighwire.com/videos/former-w-h-o-consultant-exposes-takedown-of-ivermectin/

Del sits down for a one-on-one with the former W.H.O. consultant & research scientist, Tess Lawrie MD, PhD, who was a critical part of the Ivermectin trials over a year ago with overwhelmingly positive conclusions. See data and recorded personal zoom calls that reveal how a key review was attacked from within, keeping the safe, life-saving drug out of the hands of millions of dying Covid patients for more than a year.

#TessLawrie #Ivermectin #Unitaid #AndrewHill #15kaday
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4908
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Harvey » Sun Mar 13, 2022 7:03 pm

Belligerent Savant » Sun Mar 13, 2022 10:23 pm wrote:Covid antibodies found in stored blood from Sept/Nov 2019 in European blood banks...

...Why have the studies @contrarian4data linked not received more attention from the press and scientific communities?


And why are so few asking why there was no spike in deaths in 2019, despite Covid identified in samples as early as March that year. We know why, no point in pretending.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4200
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Sun Mar 13, 2022 10:41 pm

Harvey » 14 Mar 2022 09:03 wrote:
Belligerent Savant » Sun Mar 13, 2022 10:23 pm wrote:Covid antibodies found in stored blood from Sept/Nov 2019 in European blood banks...

...Why have the studies @contrarian4data linked not received more attention from the press and scientific communities?


And why are so few asking why there was no spike in deaths in 2019, despite Covid identified in samples as early as March that year. We know why, no point in pretending.


How do you get to what you are thinking from the article BS linked and that one sample of potential civid related material in Spanish waste water?
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10616
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Harvey » Mon Mar 14, 2022 1:52 pm

Joe Hillshoist » Mon Mar 14, 2022 3:41 am wrote:
Harvey » 14 Mar 2022 09:03 wrote:
Belligerent Savant » Sun Mar 13, 2022 10:23 pm wrote:Covid antibodies found in stored blood from Sept/Nov 2019 in European blood banks...

...Why have the studies @contrarian4data linked not received more attention from the press and scientific communities?


And why are so few asking why there was no spike in deaths in 2019, despite Covid identified in samples as early as March that year. We know why, no point in pretending.


How do you get to what you are thinking from the article BS linked and that one sample of potential civid related material in Spanish waste water?


If you'd been paying attention, you'd already know the answer to your question.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4200
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Mon Mar 14, 2022 8:24 pm

Have you even looked at excess death stats in 2019?

Everyone knows the virus was circulating well before the military games in Wuhan in October 2019 but it doesn't appear to have been circulating before the start of Spring/Autumn that year. But even the articles Bel linked mention Chinese doctors reporting excess severe respiratory illness that caused deaths in some cases.

Do you know how waste testing works? Why is it less likely than PCR testing to cause false results? One result then no more in sewerage tests in Spain yeah? Seems like a false positive or do they only happen when you don't want cases acknowledged?
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10616
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby drstrangelove » Tue Mar 15, 2022 4:36 am





drstrangelove
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby drstrangelove » Tue Mar 15, 2022 5:10 am

China Locks Down Shenzhen, Province of 24 Million Over Covid
(Bloomberg) -- China placed the 17.5 million residents of Shenzhen into lockdown for at least a week and forbade people from leaving Jilin, the first time the government has sealed off an entire province since the area surrounding Wuhan was isolated in early 2020.

- https://finance.yahoo.com/news/china-pl ... 52380.html

This could probably go in supply chain, or market crash, or any number of threads. Everything's converging. But will they really do covid round 3 AND war with Russia at the same time?

I don't think the news cycle can handle a double-narrative. Maybe they'll segment it like packet switching. One week of covid, then one week of war. Maybe one day of covid, one day of war. Covid. War. Covid. War. Faster and faster like a strobe light until you either submit into mindlessness or have a seizure.
drstrangelove
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby drstrangelove » Tue Mar 15, 2022 6:22 am

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... eek-10.pdf

They are struggling to keep the hospitalization and death rates in younger demographics lower amongst the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. They modified vaccinated to mean "at least three doses" and have lumped everything else into "not vaccinated", or possibly worse, they are just leaving out anyone who has had one or two doses.

Even still, hospitalization rate is now worse for 18-29 year olds who have had 3 doses than those unvaccinated. Death rate is the same.

Official UK data now indicates that if you have had three doses of the vaccine, and are between the ages 18 and 29, you are three times more likely to test positive for covid, and if you do test positive then you are more likely to be hospitalized, than if you were unvaccinated.
drstrangelove
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests