Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby stickdog99 » Sat Apr 30, 2022 5:52 pm

WSJ: Democrats Blew Covid’s Politics

Biden and the party’s progressives think spending money will earn voter gratitude. Not this time.

The dictionary’s second definition of “landslide” is a torrent of votes for one party over its competition. But the original, more to-the-point definition is a destructive mass of rocks, mud, trees and debris hurtling down a mountain. There must be a New Yorker cartoon somewhere of a politician standing below a landslide’s leading edge and remarking, “They’re predicting sunshine tomorrow.” Say hello to the Democrats—while they’re still standing.

Congress came back to the Washington mother ship this week, and the buzz was that the Democrats will move heaven and earth to give the American public a reason to vote for them in November’s midterm elections. Maybe enact another $10 billion in Covid relief or wave a wand that erases student-loan debt. Normally I’d say good luck with that, but the party is beyond luck.

It’s time for a premortem on the Democrats’ House debacle and very possible loss of Senate control.

Barack Obama, now the party’s main oracle, said during his recent visit to the Biden White House: “You’ve got a story to tell—just got to tell it.” No, their story is the problem.

From the day Joe Biden entered office, the Democrats have displayed a misreading of how the Covid-19 pandemic had altered the country’s normal political and social alignments.

Obvious to everyone now, the pandemic forced millions to rethink everything in their lives—their jobs, children, schools, where they lived, care for elderly relatives, the routines of daily life.

This was a complex political and cultural event to which the Democratic response was Pavlovian: Throw money and expect gratitude.

What the Democrats did—first the $2 trillion 2021 Covid relief bill followed by the attempt to pass $4.6 trillion more with Build Back Better—was an exercise in political grandiosity wholly out of sync with a public that had turned inward. Even now, as the pandemic ebbs in an election year, people are preoccupied with either rebuilding their lives or restructuring careers.

Democrats might say that Mr. Biden simply replayed FDR’s Great Depression playbook of patching holes in the social fabric. Maybe, but the Depression didn’t include lockdowns, school closings and masking policies.

Democrats can also argue, in retirement, how they only “followed the science.” Whatever the justification, Democrats displayed little understanding or sympathy for how much the pandemic restrictions were disrupting people’s lives.

The White House anointed Anthony Fauci and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as arbiters of pandemic policy. Last week, Dr. Fauci confirmed that he considered himself answerable to no one outside his circle. How could the White House have seen so little peril in abdicating control of the politics amid the evolving mysteries of Covid? On Wednesday, Dr. Fauci announced we are “out of the pandemic phase.” Better late than never for Democrats.

Joe Biden promised a return to normality. But that was about Donald Trump. There was nothing normal about the America over which Mr. Biden presided. The pandemic’s social dislocations increased. Schools closed, then sort-of opened, with masking policies micromanaged into incomprehensibility. Parents were overwhelmed. The schools mess alone has baked in Democratic losses, notably in states such as New Jersey, a tinderbox of rage over closed schools.

Masking became a left-right issue. But the Democrats’ lockstep support for masking hurt them. Covering half one’s face with cloth is an apolitical hassle, which in time wore down many people who wanted out. Instead the Biden CDC, supported by the Justice Department, insisted in the pandemic’s last hour on extending the travel mask mandate. Is this what the Democrats mean by getting their message out?

At every level of government, the Democratic Party defended restrictions by aligning with the authority of science. Result: After living for two years under that authority’s thumb, people are looking for respite from government, which by definition means the Democrats.

President Biden’s claim that his economic recovery is unprecedented also mischaracterizes the public’s understanding of the pandemic experience. People know the lockdowns suspended a strong economy. One day they had a job. Then they didn’t. The U.S. rebound from this mandated downturn is natural, not a Biden miracle. Some aid helped some people, but there’s no reason that should translate into a wellspring of support for the party.

The Washington Democrats wasted their political capital in 2021 trying to create a once-and-for-all U.S. entitlement state with Build Back Better. That became a spectacle of political failure. So Sen. Elizabeth Warren, another progressive oracle, argued last weekend that the party’s survival depends on passing legislation to regulate drug prices and leaning on Mr. Biden to issue a long list of executive orders. Likely political resonance: about zero.

Six months before Election Day, this is the political landscape: Most voters see House and Senate Democrats as largely irrelevant to their lives, which today consist of climbing out of a pandemic amid rising inflation, crime and illegal border crossings.

That the Democrats are about to tumble down the mountain has nothing to do with their unheard message and everything to do with conscious policy choices.
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby stickdog99 » Sat Apr 30, 2022 6:03 pm

stickdog99
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby stickdog99 » Sat Apr 30, 2022 6:20 pm

Vaccine Rollout in Israel Correlates With 25% Spike in Cardiac Arrest Emergency Calls for Young Adults, Study Finds

Image

The main finding of this study concerns with increases of over 25% in both the number of CA [cardiac arrest] calls and ACS [acute coronary syndrome] calls of people in the 16-39 age group during the COVID-19 vaccination rollout in Israel (January-May, 2021), compared with the same period of time in prior years (2019 and 2020). Moreover, there is a robust and statistically significant association between the weekly CA and ACS call counts, and the rates of first and second vaccine doses administered to this age group. At the same time there is no observed statistically significant association between COVID-19 infection rates and the CA and ACS call counts. This result is aligned with previous findings which show increases in overall CA incidence were not always associated with higher COVID-19 infections rates at a population level, as well as the stability of hospitalisation rates related to myocardial infarction throughout the initial COVID-19 wave compared to pre-pandemic baselines in Israel. These results also are mirrored by a report of increased emergency department visits with cardiovascular complaints during the vaccination rollout in Germany as well as increased EMS calls for cardiac incidents in Scotland.

...

Myocarditis is a particularly insidious disease with multiple reported manifestations. There is vast literature that highlights asymptomatic cases of myocarditis, which are often underdiagnosed, as well as cases in which myocarditis can possibly be misdiagnosed as acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Moreover, several comprehensive studies demonstrate that myocarditis is a major cause of sudden, unexpected deaths in adults less than 40 years of age, and assess that it is responsible for 12-20% of these deaths. Thus, it is a plausible concern that increased rates of myocarditis among young people could lead to an increase in other severe cardiovascular adverse events, such as cardiac arrest (CA) and ACS. Anecdotal evidence suggests that this might not be only a theoretical concern


Image

Image

Image
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sun May 01, 2022 2:01 pm

.
It's increasingly surreal to observe the extent collective pathology has taken hold. I'd like to believe there will be accountability, a Nuremberg 2.0, but the cynic in me says it won't happen for years, and when it does, it'll be well after the 'Great Reset' agenda eventually fails in its experiment, and many of us will be gone. Let's hope I'm wrong.

A sampling of observations; a mix of pessimism and optimism:

@AmateurEnginee1
·
Unfortunately, this proposal goes to show, how mediocre, moronic and feeble-minded some inventors can be.

Image

@ApertaAria
Replying to @AmateurEnginee1

..and yet such a contraption would likely make someone wealthy today. 'Idiocracy' playing out now, in 2022, not hundreds of years into the future as the screenwriter indicated in his work of fiction. Unbridled fear and inability to discern leads to this.

@AmateurEnginee1
Replying to @ApertaAria

Very disappointing.

https://twitter.com/AmateurEnginee1/sta ... sx1BNtwmFg

@EthicalSkeptic

Being an employee, just following orders - will not work as a defense in human rights trials.

Millions died from information sequestration... get ready.

@Not_Muaddib
Replying to @EthicalSkeptic

There won’t be human rights trials unless there’s a revolution first.

@anidra1984
Replying to @EthicalSkeptic

In a fair and just courtroom.
Now where's one of those?

@Y0L0cholo
Replying to @EthicalSkeptic

Sadly, this wont be happening. The ppl are too apathetic, cowardly & enjoy their cognitive dissonance too much.....

@DonNewmeyer
Replying to @EthicalSkeptic

Think of how many people were caught up in this. I think the only defense would be to say you were part of a mass formation psychosis.

@EthicalSkeptic
Replying to @DonNewmeyer

They have already floated the litmus inside the DGB (Data Governance Board) charter:
'actions based upon the best available information at the time' -
which is a circular appeal, but umbrellas a lot of employees.

@Chris_Carson_
Replying to @EthicalSkeptic and @DonNewmeyer

Who determines what the “best available information” is?

@dustincorkern

The same people who have been caught suppressing information.

@nixk33
Replying to @EthicalSkeptic and @DonNewmeyer

So they will be exempt. It’s the best info we have they will say.

https://twitter.com/EthicalSkeptic/stat ... sx1BNtwmFg


@JeffWellsRigInt

The modellers are never held accountable because their purpose is not to forecast accurately, but to keep the public afraid and to incite governments to severe overreaction.
@rupasubramanya

How is this April 14 projection for April 30/May 1 of hospital and ICU occupancy by OST holding up.

Hospital occupancy:
Forecast: best case scenario:> 2,500
Reality: 1,676
Forecast: ICU occupancy: Nearly 400.
Reality: 184
Why are these scenarios so off the mark from reality?
https://twitter.com/COVIDSciOntario/sta ... sx1BNtwmFg


https://twitter.com/JeffWellsRigInt/sta ... sx1BNtwmFg
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5572
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sun May 01, 2022 6:51 pm

A couple quick links, one as an addendum to an earlier post above:



CDC censored science due to political pressure, GAO concludes

Whistleblower says employees feared 'retaliation' if they spoke up

May 1, 2022

The watchdog Government Accountability Office concluded in an investigation that CDC and FDA officials "suppressed" scientific findings related to the COVID-19 pandemic due to political pressure.

Whistleblowers who spoke with GAO investigators said they did not speak up prior to the investigation because they feared retaliation. They said they were unsure how to report the alleged politicizing of science or believed leaders already knew about it, DailyMail.com reported.

The 37-page report found that both the CDC and the FDA did not have a system in place for employees to report allegations of political interference. And the agencies, the GAO said, failed to train staff how to spot political interference and report it.

"A few respondents from CDC and FDA stated they felt that the potential political interference they observed resulted in the alteration or suppression of scientific findings," the report said.

"Some of these respondents believed that this potential political interference may have resulted in the politically motivated alteration of public health guidance or delayed publication of Covid-related scientific findings."

In February, unnamed CDC officials told the New York Times that the agency had withheld most of its data regarding COVID-19 for fear it would be misinterpreted by critics.

Last summer, two top FDA scientists resigned amid charges the agency was being pressured by the Biden administration to made decisions based on politics.

The GAO, in a separate report published in February, said the CDC, the FDA, the National Institutes of Health and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response were all at "high risk" for fraud, mismanagement and abuse, citing a "lack of leadership and preparedness" during the COVID pandemic and other crises.


https://www.wnd.com/2022/05/cdc-censore ... concludes/

This one may have been shared earlier.

Pfizer drops India vaccine application after regulator seeks local trial


NEW DELHI, Feb 5 (Reuters) - Pfizer Inc (PFE.N) said on Friday it had withdrawn an application for emergency-use authorisation of its COVID-19 vaccine in India, after failing to meet the drug regulator's demand for a local safety and immunogenicity study.

The decision means the vaccine will not be available for sale in the world's two most populous countries, India and China, in the near future. Both countries are running their immunisation campaigns using other products.

Unlike other companies conducting small studies in India for foreign-developed vaccines, Pfizer had sought an exception citing approvals it had received elsewhere based on trials done in countries such as the United States and Germany.


The U.S. company, which was the first drugmaker to seek emergency approval in India for its vaccine developed with Germany's BioNTech (22UAy.DE), made the withdrawal decision after a meeting with India's Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) on Wednesday.

The drug regulator said on its website its experts did not recommend the vaccine because of side effects reported abroad were still being investigated. It also said Pfizer had not proposed any plan to generate safety and immunogenicity data in India.

https://www.reuters.com/world/india/exc ... 021-02-05/
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5572
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby MacCruiskeen » Sun May 01, 2022 7:20 pm

^^ So much of this brutal fiasco is fully explicable in one sentence: People fear to admit (or even notice) that the Emperor is naked, because they know that the Emperor has the power to damage, destroy or even end their lives.

Ask Gary Webb or Julian Assange, just for instance.

Image
https://external-preview.redd.it/LBzXaxfVLZfI0c27FeZkeeE2QcaWspSMLp8vvGdjYAc.jpg?auto=webp&s=6b981713d995e41108e624ed14c90d461b2d955a
A real poster in London, 2002 (a full twenty years ago, just after 9/11, the Enabling Act).
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Mon May 02, 2022 11:15 am

cross-post for 'posterity' in this thread as well:

Belligerent Savant » Mon May 02, 2022 10:13 am wrote:
Moderna Knew Vaccinated People Will Never Acquire Proper Immunity After Breakthrough Infections

Original Antigenic Sin was hidden from us until Apr 19, 2022

`Ever wondered why some vaccinated people seem to be having endless Covid? An interesting study came out.

Image

This study looked at two sides of the Moderna Phase 3 vaccine trial: the vaccinated group and the control group. They looked at unvaccinated people having Covid, versus vaccinated people having so called “break-through Covid infections”.

The question that they asked, was: do the vaccinated acquire the same full-spectrum immunity as the unvaccinated?

Image

The answer was no. Vaccinated people were much LESS likely to develop broad natural immunity, compared to unvaccinated people.

Image

Broad Natural Immunity and Nucleocapsid Antibodies

I discuss the definition of broad spectrum immunity and explain nucleocapsid antibodies in my Nov 18 article “UK Week 42-45”. I am going to plagiarize myself and copy the text right here to make it easy for my readers:

What are these N antibodies and why am I talking about them? What’s so important?

The Covid coronavirus presents numerous “epitopes” to our immune system. Those are similar to body parts in people, those are things that the virus presents to our body just as we “present” our eyes, mouths and nose.

Image

After defeating an infection, our immune system learns to recognize these “epitopes” and reacts later, when the pathogen is reintroduced, fighting it off easier than the first time. This is the whole point of immunity.

Skipping some details, our natural, unvaccinated immunity learns to recognize the “spikes” (S-protein), the “nucleocapsid” (N-Protein) and other pieces of the virus, and develops antibodies and immune memory reacting to all of those.

This multifaceted memory also provides broader protection against “variants”.

In contrast, vaccination with any existing Covid vaccine, floods our cells with only S-protein (the “spike protein”) from a virus that only existed around January 2020. As an aside, this spike protein is extremely toxic (https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/10/2056/htm), it causes numerous side effects that we have heard about. Its effects depend on many things such as how exactly you were jabbed and how much of the vaccine entered the blood stream. S-protein can also penetrate cell nuclei and interfere with DNA repair.

Continuing, the point of “Covid vaccine” is that our immunity learns to recognize this S-protein and develops antibodies. This allows the vaccinated to fight off Covid-19 infection in the first few months post-vaccination. Then these S-antibodies decline, immunity wanes, and we end up with no immunity in the vaccinated.

What is important is that vaccine immunity ONLY creates antibodies for S-protein, but not for other proteins of the real virus, such as the N-protein. This is what the Roche N test is about: it detects presence of N-antibodies, which can only appear in survivors of actual Covid-19, which has N protein, which Covid vaccine lacks.

Thus, unvaccinated survivors of Covid19 develop a variety of antibodies, including S-antibodies (like the vaxxed), N-antibodies (never seen in vaxxed who did not have covid), etc.

The Moderna Trial

During the original Moderna Phase 3 trial, even before Delta and Omicron, scientists found the same effect: the vaccinated are much less likely to “seroconvert” and develop the above described N antibodies. The difference between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated is FIVE TIMES, which is huge. The unvaccinated are five times more likely than the vaccinated to develop broad immunity including N antibodies.

Image

It gets even worse: for those vaccinated persons whose breakthrough infection occurred after the second dose, (illness detected on Day 29), their ability to develop N antibodies was 13 TIMES worse than that of the unvaccinated:

Image

This inability to obtain broader natural immunity is the reason for endless covids: a covid infection in the vaccinated does not result in lasting immunity and acts similarly to an almost-worthless booster shot. A “breakthrough infection” adds a large number of temporary S-antibodies to the obsolete Wuhan virus. Whereas, the unvaccinated obtain numerous antibodies to all sorts of facets (epitopes) of the virus that infected them.

Authors also acknowledge importance of this finding and mention other studies showing the same effect:


Image

N-Antibody Prevalence was Used for Questionable “Vaccine Effectiveness” Claims

It turns out that certain, perhaps intentionally misleading studies were using low N-antibody prevalence among the vaccinated, to falsely “prove” vaccine effectiveness. They would say “look how low is N antibody prevalence among the vaccinated!” as a proof that they do not get sick. But, as the above shows, it is not proof that they do not get sick! Sick or not, the vaccinees would NOT develop N antibodies.

What are those potentially misleading studies?

Image

The authors mention studies 29-31. Here they are:

Image

If you are a substack writer, take a look at them and see if you can find methodological flaws in them, based on incorrect use of N-antibody tests.

Brian Mowrey

If you like healthy disagreement, without cancel culture, note that a respected Substack writer, Brian Mowrey, does not agree with those who bring up evidence of OAS (Original Antigenic Sin). Brian is very articulate and wrote two interesting articles on the topic. I do not happen to agree with his opinion on OAS, however I respect Brian and want my readers to be exposed to his opposing point of view. Click on the above two links if you are interested. Let us know what you think.

Implications

The implications of the failure of vaccinated people to acquire full immunity are enormous. As a result of haphazardly tested vaccines, the vaccinated cannot become naturally immune after first, second, or any further infection.

Thus, any kind of herd immunity, successfully reached by low-vaccination countries, is impossible in the highly-vaccinated countries.

Endless Covid infections are NOT harmless, because Sars-Cov-2 infects immune cells and acts as a battering ram against our immune systems. Repeated blows of this “battering ram” are extremely deleterious to the immune systems of the vaccinated.

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/sars- ... medium=web

The UK is a bit ahead of other highly vaccinated countries and has statistics exposing the depth of the problem.

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/aids- ... medium=web

AIDS-Like "Chronic Covid" is Taking Over Europe, Australia and NZ
The Boosted Cannot Clear Covid Easily and Keep Getting Reinfected


And:

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/uk-co ... medium=web

Timing of Events

The timing of events suggests that Moderna had access to the N antibody data a very long time ago. In my opinion, a well-intentioned person who had this data, would quickly conclude that the general public deserves to be informed about OAS concerns. However, this was not done.

The data was available in or around March, 2021:

Image

However, that study was only published now. I am NOT aware of Moderna alerting the public to this issue before. And the public had to know this, right? Please correct me if I am mistaken.

Update: Todd Zywicki mentioned that he also found some (less granular) information in Moderna’s publication of Phase 3 results, in his article dates March 10 2022. The data that he cites is very important, but it is based on a publication from Moderna that barely provided any details for N antibodies, however Todd very astutely took a note of it and reported it. I would not count that as a proper disclosure.

What do you think? Let us know in comments!


https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/moder ... e-will?s=r
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5572
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Tue May 03, 2022 11:41 pm

.
The most recent Pfizer dump is quite damning, reportedly.

@teresa59420516
·
BREAKING! Pfizer data released today. 80,000 pages. Pfizer knew vaccine harmed the fetus in pregnant women, and that the vaccine was not 95% effective, Pfizer data shows it having a 12% efficacy rate.

https://twitter.com/teresa59420516/stat ... lsqe-BMU4Q

Veracity of the above claims -- at least within the latest 'production' of documents -- is TBD as I haven't yet dug into the latest dump of data, or have yet to see corroboration of the above, but others are welcome to add any noteworthy findings.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5572
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Wed May 04, 2022 11:17 am

If not already known:

Covid vaccine trials do not test for severe symptoms or transmission:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhas ... 3ed6565247

Covid-19 Vaccine Protocols Reveal That Trials Are Designed To Succeed

Excerpts :

Prevention of infection must be a critical endpoint.
Any vaccine trial should include regular antigen testing every three days to test contagiousness to pick up early signs of infection and PCR testing once a week to confirm infection by SARS-CoV-2 test the ability of the vaccines to stave off infection. Prevention of infection is not a criterion for success for any of these vaccines. In fact, their endpoints all require confirmed infections and all those they will include in the analysis for success, the only difference being the severity of symptoms between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Measuring differences amongst only those infected by SARS-CoV-2 underscores the implicit conclusion that the vaccines are not expected to prevent infection, only modify symptoms of those infected.

We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols—Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca—do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache.
...
Vaccine efficacy is typically proved by large clinical trials over several years. The pharmaceutical companies intend to do trials ranging from thirty thousand to sixty thousand participants. This scale of study would be sufficient for testing vaccine efficacy. The first surprise found upon a closer reading of the protocols reveals that each study intends to complete interim and primary analyses that at most include 164 participants.

These companies likely intend to apply for an emergency use authorization (EUA) from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with just their limited preliminary results.

Interim analysis success requires a seventy percent efficacy. The vaccine or placebo will be given to thousands of people in each trial. For Moderna, the initial interim analysis will be based on the results of infection of only 53 people. The judgment reached in interim analysis is dependent upon the difference in the number of people with symptoms, which may be mild, in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated group.

Moderna’s success margin is for 13 or less of those 53 to develop symptoms compared to 40 or more in their control group. For Johnson & Johnson, their interim analysis includes 77 vaccine recipients, with a success margin of 18 or less developing symptoms compared to 59 in the control group. For AstraZeneca, their interim analysis includes 50 vaccine recipients, with a success margin of 12 or less developing symptoms compared to 19 in the 25 person control group. Pfizer is even smaller in its success requirements. Their initial group includes 32 vaccine recipients, with a success margin of 7 or less developing symptoms compared to 25 in the control group.

The second surprise from these protocols is how mild the requirements for contracted Covid-19 symptoms are. A careful reading reveals that the minimum qualification for a case of Covid-19 is a positive PCR test and one or two mild symptoms. These include headache, fever, cough, or mild nausea. This is far from adequate. These vaccine trials are testing to prevent common cold symptoms.

These trials certainly do not give assurance that the vaccine will protect from the serious consequences of Covid-19. Johnson & Johnson is the only trial that requires the inclusion of severe Covid-19 cases, at least 5 for the 75 participant interim analysis.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5572
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Wed May 04, 2022 5:25 pm

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE.

No disclaimers, caveats or qualifiers were provided to the public. Only: SAFE AND EFFECTIVE. FOR EVERYONE.

Image

https://twitter.com/DrLoupis/status/152 ... 70Jk3zD8Pw
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5572
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby stickdog99 » Thu May 05, 2022 4:40 pm

https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/healt ... n-nov-2020

Image

https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/healt ... 0-dec-2021

Image

Why was Australia's all cause mortality so much higher in 2021 compared to 2020? According to official statistics, there were just 359 COVID deaths in the first 8 months of 2021 compared to 682 COVID deaths in the first 8 months of 2020. So why the far higher OVERALL 2021 mortality rate compared to that of 2020?

And why am I the only one on Earth asking this question?
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby stickdog99 » Thu May 05, 2022 5:29 pm

Image
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby stickdog99 » Thu May 05, 2022 5:57 pm

Image
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Thu May 05, 2022 7:21 pm

stickdog99 » 06 May 2022 06:40 wrote:https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/provisional-mortality-statistics/jan-nov-2020

Image

https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/healt ... 0-dec-2021

Image

Why was Australia's all cause mortality so much higher in 2021 compared to 2020? According to official statistics, there were just 359 COVID deaths in the first 8 months of 2021 compared to 682 COVID deaths in the first 8 months of 2020. So why the far higher OVERALL 2021 mortality rate compared to that of 2020?

And why am I the only one on Earth asking this question?


Probably because it wasn't "so much higher". In a couple of instances it was nearly 10% outside the range for a week or two, thats about it tho.

Did you also notice that while we were in lockdown throughout 2020 our "all cause mortality rate" dropped significantly? Probably cos lockdowns save lives lol.
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10616
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests