Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Harvey » Wed Aug 24, 2022 7:29 pm

Counter points:

Hydroxychloroquine was judged unsafe because WHO trials deliberately over prescribed the drug, effectively testing lethal doses from early in the Covid saga - WHO and UK trials use potentially lethal hydroxychloroquine dose--according to WHO consultant

Although Trump is the gift that keeps on giving, the problem is widespread... How a false hydroxychloroquine narrative was created, and more

In the US, "Never Trump" morphed into "Never Hydroxychloroquine," and the result for the pandemic is "Never Over." But while anti-Trump spin is what characterized suppression strategies in the US, the frauds perpetrated about hydroxychloroquine and the pandemic include most western countries.


...the results of the UK Recovery study, which overdosed patients. Of course the Recovery results showed more deaths in the hydroxychloroquine arm, since they gave patients 2.4 g in the first 24 hours, 800 mg/day thereafter. Furthermore, the UK has the 2nd highest death rate in the world for Covid-19 (Belgium is 1st), so simply conducting the trial in the UK may have contributed to the poor results.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4201
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Mon Aug 29, 2022 9:45 pm

^^^^^
I didn't reply sooner merely because I strongly co-sign the above, along with other off-label treatments that have demonstratively aided in curbing severe symptoms. Even if they did NOTHING AT ALL they'd still be better than currently available -- and still mandated, in a number of instances -- mRNA products.

On the latter point:

@robbystarbuck

After receiving 4,000+ responses with stories about side effects post COVID vax. These are critical takeaways:

• Pharmaceutical companies must have their immunity from lawsuits stripped from them immediately. Victims deserve to sue and be compensated.

• Nearly all of them felt they didn’t receive true informed consent from their medical provider. Providers need to get over the rampant God complex in their line of work to do what’s needed to make major changes ensuring this never happens again.

• The medical industrial complex, the CDC, the FDA and Big Pharma must all be held accountable for their failures. Top down firings must happen in the next administration and Congress/the DOJ must investigate companies involved with intent to prosecute those who broke the law.

Aug 28, 2022

https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/statu ... fxJmhXE4hA

There are an increasing count of forums, blogs, social media postings, and even mainstream articles that are beginning to acknowledge, to varying degrees, the above. This will only increase in the months ahead.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Wed Aug 31, 2022 10:30 am

.

2 worthwhile anecdotes from medical professionals.



I am a board certified Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeon in private practice in California.

To become an Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeon you must graduate from a Dental school in the very top 2% of your class, then match to a 4-7 year Oral & Maxillofacial residency program where you will be trained in a broad variety of standard medical specialties (Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Pulmonology, Anesthesia, etc.) & medical surgical specialties (General Surgery, Neurosurgery, Emergency & trauma surgery, etc.). You work in hospitals interfacing with all the other doctors and their specialties. You get a vast, deep, medical & surgical educational base which bridges the gap between medicine and dentistry. You then focus your final 2 years of residency on Oral & Maxillofacial surgery training to become proficient. When an Oral & Maxillofacial surgeon graduates, they are arguably the top of the very top of all specialties in the dental world and are contenders for the top of medical specialties as well. In Dental & Medical school we were the ones who routinely got high score on all academic tests in all classes including immunology, toxicology, pharmacology, & virology. We were "pimped" daily on journal articles from all journals and became adept at reading, reviewing and determining if studies were valid or not and their strengths and shortcomings. We were taught to think critically in the extreme.

That's the way I have lived my life since completing my training.

When the pandemic hit, my first thought was, "We need an antiviral, a repurposed drug or combination thereof or a vaccine and we need it now". We were told that this was a novel virus, never before seen and that no one had immunity to it. No one knew how virulent this virus was but a high death rate was anticipated. The public needed protection. The pharmaceutical companies went to work and I immediately felt a sense of relief they would come through for us. That's when things started getting strange and everything began to deviate from scientific protocol and the scientific theory that had been burned into my brain all those years - all protocol was being violated. The first thing that was odd to me was that there were at least 5 companies gunning for the big covid vaccine to save humanity from this lethal respiratory virus... It could wipe out mankind. I read every journal article and everything I could get my hands on to try to get a handle on what we were dealing with. Initially there seemed to be some sort of rhyme or reason to it. But then I discovered that ALL of the pharmaceutical vaccine contenders were ONLY targeting the spike protein to stimulate the body's immune response. Excuse me, but if this is going to be the end of mankind, there is no way the FDA or WHO should allow only 1 target...all 5 companies going after the same single target? I realize that the spike protein is what binds to the ACE2 respiratory cell protein and is the pathway to infection, but if mankind's very existence depends on a winning vaccine to save the species there is no way in hell any ethical scientific body (anyone with a brain for that matter) would put all it's eggs in one basket and allow pharmaceutical companies to target the same protein. Our own immune systems always target multiple epitopes creating multiple different varied antibodies to hit the pathogenic entity in multiple ways. This almost always ensures a win for the host. It's very difficult for any organism to outmaneuver our immune system because if one antibody type doesn't hit it and knock it out, there are many other types that will. Even in a mutating organism, the varied diverse antibodies from natural immunity make it extremely difficult for any organism to mutate around it. But one single epitope? Excuse me, there is no acceptable scientific reason any sound scientific organization would accept doing that. So much for diversity huh? Nope the FDA, WHO, etc etc - didn't even question their decision to all go after the same spike protein....just slightly different ways to go after it. It hit me in the middle of the night and shocked me awake. "What the hell are we doing all going after the same single epitope on an organism that no one has any immunity to and could take out mankind? This thing is one major mutation away from evading our single epitope vaccines rendering them all useless" It made no scientific sense - even though the spike allows entry into the cell - it still made no sense. That was quite literally my wake-up call. That's when I began to question everything.

The more I looked critically the more shocked I became. I remembered years ago asking a question to my immunology professor, I said, "...why don't we have a vaccine for the common cold". His answer was amazing. First he said, whenever we have done trials in animal models none of the vaccines worked and often caused excessive mortality due to antibody dependent enhancement. Other times we would see an out of control response leading to a run-away cytokine storm which killed the animals. He then said that respiratory viruses are virtually impossible to vaccinate against due to the fact that the very act of breathing results in immediate exposure. You are hit, the virus immediately invades nasal & oral mucosal cells, it replicates rapidly before any significant antibody immune response occurs and you get sick. It simply can't be done. I said why don't we make something to bind to and block the receptors on the mucosal cells in a competitive binding way to prevent the cell binding sites from exposure to respiratory viruses? He then tried to recruit me into research and I politely declined. I wanted to work directly with the community and render care.

Then I watched in horror while the medical establishment dismissed repurposed drugs which had been shown to be effective in early treatment. If the dismissal fell on deaf medical doctor ears and they prescribed the meds, they were completely belittled and destroyed in the media as well as medical boards in various states. Doctors who used repurposed drugs were ridiculed, shut down and some even lost their licenses. Nurses who spoke up were fired.

Then came the vaccines. By the time they were released, the high risk cohorts were readily known. Those were the populations that should have been offered the vaccine. OFFERED is the keyword. The vaccines were instead pushed onto the public - everyone had to have a vaccine regardless. What??? A brand new technology of not fully tested vaccines against a virus family with a long history for problematic vaccine animal trials with dismal results in all trials and we were going to make everyone on the planet take it? This was against everything I had been taught. Then vaccine passports and mandates came. At this point we knew that healthy people under 70 had a less than 1% chance of dying from the infection yet it was being forced on everyone. There was no informed consent. Informed consent forms the very backbone of medicine and it was being tossed to the wayside. Something was very, very wrong here. Then they found virtually anyone and everyone they could to administer injections and pushed them into action. Pharmacists who have virtually zero training in administering injections were allowed to give them. This was unconscionable - does their license and malpractice insurance cover them. Do they all have AED's, Oxygen and rescussication drugs, know how to run codes, and are they BLS & ACLS certified? If they aren't and don't have everything mentioned above and more at the ready, then that is malpractice and they have no business administering injections. Most Pharmacists had never given a shot in their businesses - yet here they were doing it with the blessing of state and federal agencies. Yes something was definitely wrong big-time. I will not speculate what it is, but it was a global event and the shots were simultaneously pushed onto the entire world - in every country all around the globe with the same unified messaging, "safe & effective". The exact verbiage was being parroted around the world regarding extremely safe repurposed drugs being harmful - even potentially deadly. Huge numbers of my colleagues were completely sold on all of this and I could not talk any sort of sense into them. I was seen as the crazy one.

I decided to warn my family about what I was seeing, after-all I had the medical background no one else in the family had. I recommended against taking the vaccines for 2 years until we could see some sort of outcome to determine the real efficacy and safety of them. I was immediately ostracized by half of my family - some still won't talk to me.

...............................................
...............................................

I am board certified in Anesthesia as well as Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. I put people to sleep every day in my practice to perform surgery on them. I've been in private practice for over 25 years. My staff & I take vital signs continuously throughout (before, during and after) on every patient on every procedure. Before the pandemic, virtually every single healthy person with no underlying respiratory condition had a pre-op Oxygen saturation of 98-100% - that was almost everyone. It was extremely rare to have a young, healthy person with an O2 saturation under 98%. Then the masks were mandated and those mask mandates were nearly universally enforced and stayed in effect for over a year. Now when healthy people come into my office, their pre-op O2 sat is 96% across the board. We never see a patient on room air with an O2 Saturation of 99% anymore - not even 98%. Without exception everyone now is 96%. That is a drop of 3-4%. I saw this occurring and thought it would likely go away over time and we'd see a return to normal. Well it's been about 6 months now and those Oxygen sat levels are not returning to the pre-pandemic level of 98-99%. Not in my practice. We may be looking at permanent lung damage or maybe we just need more time to recover respiratory function, only time will tell. Also I'm seeing that the Oxygen Saturation finger monitor is almost always alarming now, because the machine is having a harder time detecting a pulse and showing a waveform on the monitor (we have set the machines to alarm now at 92% so it's not the range causing the alarm). Patients' hands are ice cold now in the middle of Summer and the finger probe is having a hard time picking up the signal... why?

Now for the big one. I extract teeth and do surgery in a privileged area of the body where the blood supply is usually excellent. Prior to the vaccinations, everyone bled and usually a lot. Since the vaccinations almost no one bleeds much anymore. You'd think that would be a good thing, but I developed a technique in my practice where I draw the patient's blood directly from the extraction socket to add to my bone graft material (obtained from a bone bank) for that patient. It's the ultimate, readily available, accelerator for healing and it improves the handling of the graft materially tremendously, forming almost a clot graft which you can cut, pack & form to the site. The patient's blood when added to the graft material gets into the nooks and crannies of the particulated bone granules and when you pack it into whatever defect you need to reconstruct, you get a complete and quick rapid healing. The patient's body does not recognize the graft as foreign because the patient's own cells are in it so it heals fast and beautifully. But now I can't get enough blood for my grafts from the surgical sites anymore. A very few patients still bleed normally so I decided to start asking all patients if they were vaxxed or not. The patients who bleed normally are unvaxed. The patients with vastly reduced bleeding are vaccinated. My staff and I noticed this and it has become a problem. Now, to obtain the blood I need in a vaxxed patient, I have to draw blood from the patient's arm, and that blood is venous blood and doesn't clot like blood obtained from the surgical site, so the handling of the graft material is no good. Not only that but the very small amount of blood from vaxxed people obtained from the surgical site just looks and behaves very differently from unvaxed blood - it is watery, thin and doesn't form a normal clot. It's almost useless for adding to bone graft material.

Again, I do not know for sure why this is occurring, but micro-capillary occlusion would explain some of it...certainly the lack of bleeding I'm seeing.

END OF EXCERPT


Read the complete report # 134 at

https://airtable.com/shrLRYtA0I3SNW1Xf/ ... BdpfHStEi0
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Wed Aug 31, 2022 10:59 am

Apologies if this has already been posted, but a remarkable read:

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47/80

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna

Franco Giovannini, MD1, Riccardo Benzi Cipelli, MD,DDS2, and Gianpaolo Pisano, MD,OHNS

ABSTRACT

The use of dark-field microscopic analysis of fresh peripheral blood on a slide was once widespread in medicine, allowing a first and immediate assessment of the state of health of the corpuscular components of the blood. In the present study we analyzed with a dark-field optical microscope the peripheral blood drop from 1,006 symptomatic subjects after inoculation with an mRNA injection (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), starting from March 2021. There were 948 subjects (94%of the total sample) whose bloodshowed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation. In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.


It is one thing to simply be skeptical of the corporations and technologies that were involved in this lucrative fiasco but quite another to contemplate the scale of the tragedy here and the impacts that this will have on an already suffering globalization economy and the West's health care system as a whole. Reset, indeed.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby drstrangelove » Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:54 am

^ Perhaps they have put external controls inside the body. Think A Clockwork Orange. While we don't know much, we can understand all this, everything that is happening, is about control. Whether it be population or behavior.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_teleportation
drstrangelove
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Thu Sep 01, 2022 12:47 pm

.

Control, indeed. Coupled with the dogma/zeal of all those fully captured by this new covid religion. It will take some time for the trance to subside, and unfortunately, far too many of these zealots are in positions of authority and influence (school administrators, school boards, HR/Compliance depts in many companies/orgs, bureaucrats and politicians, healthcare administrators and self-appointed "experts", etc..), to the detriment of the rest of us.

Then we add the current/looming energy crises/austerity measures in the EU and elsewhere (manufactured or otherwise) and it appears the 'Great Reset' is well underway. If we collectively allow it continue unabated, that is.

Another anecdote from a health professional worth sharing here:

Report #139

https://airtable.com/shrLRYtA0I3SNW1Xf/ ... BdpfHStEi0

I am a hospital pharmacist at Citizens Hospital in Victoria, TX. I am not vaccinated and thus was subjected to HR meetings in regards to exemptions. The first meeting was private but then with the daunting task of so many private meetings, HR asked us to attend a group meeting. At the group meeting this past February 2022, an administrator told us that 90% of the patients admitted in the hospital were unvaccinated. I let her know in front of everyone that she was very misinformed. Myself and another pharmacist proceeded to tell the administrator and HR they were only making us go though all this because of money and not science.

Needless to say, I was quite angered at how far off she was. I was also angered about being segregated from eating with my coworkers as well as wearing an n95 like a "scarlet letter."( I am still segregated as of August 2022) Anyways, vaccines began to be given out in our community around November/December 2020. However, it was very difficult to find this information on admitted COVID patients. I had asked for access to Immtrac but was of course denied. It was not until October of 2021 that they began actually putting the vaccine status in the patient's profile. We did not have many COVID patients October-November 2021. However, by December, we started having quite a few COVID patients. By then I had learned how to run reports. During the Omicron wave from December 2021 through February 2022, we had 221 COVID patients admitted to my hospital. Of those 105 were vaccinated...my administrator was definitely off!!! 6 of those patients said that they had only received 1 of 2 doses. We had a total of 19 COVID patients die during that time frame. 10 of those COVID deaths were vaccinated. We had 7 vaccinated patients end up in the ICU and all 7 of them died. Out of the 105 patients, 65 had Moderna vaccine, 33 had Pfizer, and 7 had the J&J vaccine. I spoke with other pharmacists in our community and I think the most prevalent vaccine was the Moderna (our local health department dispensed that brand at big community clinics) followed by Pfizer. Our local paper, The Victoria Advocate put out an article at the end of March stating that only 53% of Victoria County was vaccinated.... Thus in my opinion, I think the vaccine is garbage.

I also ran reports on other medications. In 2020, we used Remdesivir on 129 patients and 28 of them died. In 2021, we used Remdesivir on 234 patients and 48 died. In 2020 before Hydroxychloroquine was outlawed, we were able to treat 38 patients. Many of those also received either oral or IV Zithromax. Of those 38 patients, only 2 died. One of those patients that died using HCQ also received a round of Remdesivir. My numbers are small but still, in my little part of the world, you are 4 times more likely to die using Remdesivir than you are using HCQ.

After I ran these reports, I spent 30 minutes to an hour informing my director of my reports and begging him to take it to administration. His response was that the pandemic was ending and to let it go. I had my report in my hand ready to hand to him. He would not even take it. I can not judge why he made that decision but I was heartbroken. A couple months later, there were "updates" to our software and coincidently, I can no longer run these reports. I am the only one I know of that looked at any of this information... I know I am not perfect, but I did the best I could to be accurate.

I began writing every politician who represents me. Lois Kolkhurst's office was the most responsive and they invited me to do a public testimony. June 27th I publicly testified at the Health and Human Services Committee meeting fo the Texas Senate along with many of my heroes such as Dr Malone and Dr McCullough. Out of CEOs and other hospital administrators, I was the only one I know of to have any sort of numbers on vaccinated hospitalized patients or Remdesivir use. I have reached out after the committee meeting to several of the Senators that were present but have not heard back since.

I also want to share of the censorship that has occurred at my hospital. In the beginning of the pandemic in 2020, Dr Miguel Sierra Hoffman(MSH) was doing weekly webinars and updates on what treatments were being used for COVID. After a couple of webinars, they stopped. It wasn't until this past April, I learned why. I was listening to a FLCCC webinar and they talked about the success of repurposed drugs in Honduras. I knew MSH practiced in Honduras as well as here locally so I reached out to him. As it turns out, MSH has been a big part of 8 publications about successful COVID treatment protocols using repurposed drugs such as ivermectin, fluvoxamine, etc. One of those papers was with Dr. McCullough! He works at my hospital but I had no clue!!! His webinars were stopped right before he was going to do a lecture against Remdesivir use. Administration stopped him. MSH is an infectious disease specialist and yet was not ever consulted on COVID patients. I was discussing this censorship with 2 of my coworkers and one coworker admitted that back in August of 2021, they attended a "secret" meeting on an empty hospital floor where our chairman of medicine said not to consult MSH on COVID patients. A man with all these credentials and successful research, not consulted while our death toll during delta steadily climbed. There have been a couple COVID patients lately where the physicians have thrown up their hands on a dying patient... MSH finally gets consulted and they are discharged not in a body bag, but ALIVE!!

Now here it is August 2022, most all COVID patients that come in are vaccinated. I can no longer run reports as stated earlier so I have no idea what the numbers look like. Somewhat often, these vaccinated patients are what I call "hidden"... Their diagnosis are things such as "unspecified pneumonia," abnormal cardiac enzymes" or "fever unspecified." It would be very hard to have accurate reports without a COVID 19 diagnosis.

In closing, I hope you find this information helpful. As I say in many of my social media posts, I want to be a healer, not a dealer. I am always open to questions so please contact me if you wish! Thank you for taking the time to read my COVID story.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby drstrangelove » Thu Sep 01, 2022 10:06 pm

Belligerent Savant » Thu Sep 01, 2022 12:47 pm wrote:.

Control, indeed. Coupled with the dogma/zeal of all those fully captured by this new covid religion.


I feel transcendental religion has become ever more important now that it has become clear people will seek to fulfill spiritual needs in areas they absolutely shouldn't without it.

You could say people just need better education. But the people who make this argument, generally speaking, mean a better education in the sciences to 'correct' religious belief. And it is these people who lack a general understanding of the separate roles science and religion play, and could use a better education in both. Which they won't receive. So it would be better if these people didn't believe that their beliefs were facts and instead had faith.

Real issue is the legitimisation of power though. That is, the destruction of both religious and scientific principles to increase the quantity of control over people. How do you get those with power to feel they have enough of it? So you could also say the issue is growth. Luckily, all things growing only grow towards death.
drstrangelove
 
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby DrEvil » Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:47 pm

Wombaticus Rex » Wed Aug 31, 2022 4:59 pm wrote:Apologies if this has already been posted, but a remarkable read:

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47/80

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna

Franco Giovannini, MD1, Riccardo Benzi Cipelli, MD,DDS2, and Gianpaolo Pisano, MD,OHNS

ABSTRACT

The use of dark-field microscopic analysis of fresh peripheral blood on a slide was once widespread in medicine, allowing a first and immediate assessment of the state of health of the corpuscular components of the blood. In the present study we analyzed with a dark-field optical microscope the peripheral blood drop from 1,006 symptomatic subjects after inoculation with an mRNA injection (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), starting from March 2021. There were 948 subjects (94%of the total sample) whose bloodshowed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation. In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.


It is one thing to simply be skeptical of the corporations and technologies that were involved in this lucrative fiasco but quite another to contemplate the scale of the tragedy here and the impacts that this will have on an already suffering globalization economy and the West's health care system as a whole. Reset, indeed.


Using just a single drop of blood from each person sounds a little dubious. Theranos tried that and went to shit (and jail), because one drop wasn't enough to get good results. Viral particles aren't evenly distributed in the bloodstream, so you need more than a drop to get a representative sample.
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 4150
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sat Sep 03, 2022 5:20 pm

.
The key issue on the Theranos matter was not the sample size, but the claim that wide-scale analysis can be performed on portable/compact equipment (equipment that didn't actually exist) with only a small sampling of blood. The comparison is wholly inapplicable here, as the process described in the study shared by WRex above is entirely different than anything Theranos claimed.

Do better, so that the likes of me won't need to (be compelled to) waste time typing a needed correction.

Here's a primer on Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis, which again, has absolutely no relation to whatever Theranos claimed to offer:

https://www.bioenergymedicalcenter.com/ ... d-analysis

What is a Darkfield Microscopy test?

A Darkfield Microscopy is a blood test in which we take a drop of blood and look at it immediately using a special form of lighting that allows us to see living cells without staining. It provides a look at overall health, microorganisms may be detected, distortions of red blood cells (can reflect nutritional status), and possibly undesirable bacterial or fungal life.

What can a Darkfield tell you?

Interpretation of the Darkfield can detect early signs of illness from the forms on the slide. Specifically, Darkfield Microscopy reveals distortions of red blood cells, possible undesirable bacterial/fungal/parasitic life forms, inflammation, and immune activity. The general pattern of findings is most revealing of a person’s imbalances. Certain findings or combination of findings may indicate: nutritional deficiency (vitamins/minerals), digestive disorders, infections, hormonal imbalances, immune dysfunction, environmental toxicity, internal toxicity, and/or altered blood pH. The findings in the blood can be seen early in diseases/conditions, sometimes before symptoms appear or before the disease is diagnosable. Early intervention and changes in health habits can alter the course of a person’s health. Darkfield testing can be used to reassess for changes after treatments and/or changes in lifestyle are implemented to monitor progress as well. Repeat testing is based on individual condition and/or results from previous testing.

What is special about the Darkfield?

A special microscope is used that is designed to permit diversion of light rays that results in illumination of the slide from the side, so that details, appear light against a dark background (as opposed to light passing straight through the specimen). If bright lights from the microscope pass directly through the specimen, the heat from the light source will kill the red blood cells (RBC) faster. Also, by diverting the light rays, a greater amount of depth and detail can be viewed. Where standard laboratory tests are generally quantitative (how many cells are there?), Darkfield microscopy is qualitative (what is the condition of the cells and the quality of the surrounding fluids). One can have the right number of cells; but the function of those cells could be impaired due to factors such as over-acidification of the blood and tissues or the excessive presence of bacteria, mold, toxins, fungus and yeast resulting in useless cells.

User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby DrEvil » Sat Sep 03, 2022 7:23 pm

Belligerent Savant » Sat Sep 03, 2022 11:20 pm wrote:.
The key issue on the Theranos matter was not the sample size, but the claim that wide-scale analysis can be performed on portable/compact equipment (equipment that didn't actually exist) with only a small sampling of blood. The comparison is wholly inapplicable here, as the process described in the study shared by WRex above is entirely different than anything Theranos claimed.

Do better, so that the likes of me won't need to (be compelled to) waste time typing a needed correction.



"Do better"? That's rich coming from you. I'm still waiting for you to back up your claims over in the ecofascism thread.

Anyway, the Theranos machine did exist, it just didn't work, which is why they started using regular lab tests on the sly.

But ignoring that - the above study only has a sample size of twelve:

In 12 subjects,blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution.


And yes, I know they looked at over a thousand people, but they only compared before and after for twelve, and then picked four of those for an in-depth look, so they have no idea what the blood of the other roughly thousand people looked like before the vaccine. Then there's also the possibility of contamination from the finger-prick method.

And if you look at the language of the paper it's pretty obvious that the researchers are highly biased (no surprise there, considering the journal).

Finally, I'm not saying they're wrong, just that this particular study has issues and I wouldn't put much faith in it.
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 4150
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby stickdog99 » Sun Sep 04, 2022 3:18 am

Image
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6578
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sun Sep 04, 2022 1:25 pm

DrEvil » Sat Sep 03, 2022 6:23 pm wrote:
Belligerent Savant » Sat Sep 03, 2022 11:20 pm wrote:.
The key issue on the Theranos matter was not the sample size, but the claim that wide-scale analysis can be performed on portable/compact equipment (equipment that didn't actually exist) with only a small sampling of blood. The comparison is wholly inapplicable here, as the process described in the study shared by WRex above is entirely different than anything Theranos claimed.

Do better, so that the likes of me won't need to (be compelled to) waste time typing a needed correction.



"Do better"? That's rich coming from you. I'm still waiting for you to back up your claims over in the ecofascism thread.


They are not "my" claims as much as the claims of a growing count of scientists. Last I checked, you have yet to counter any of their claims directly, though I haven't looked at your most recent response in the Ecofascism thread because it's clearly a waste of energy at this point. You have no interest in challenging your belief system(s), and the point of my commentary is not to address your counters, but to raise added points of consideration. Time will tell, as it does with most of the topics we discuss here. What you or I think or type about the topics in this forum are largely moot, or otherwise vanity exercises.

Let's see how things look in about a ~couple years or so, when I expect there'll be a measure of clarity on some of the topics/sub-points currently in contention. I won't be looking at or replying to the 'Ecofascism' thread anytime soon, and should also apply the same principle for this and other threads here.


Anyway, the Theranos machine did exist, it just didn't work, which is why they started using regular lab tests on the sly.


Now you're attempting to play semantics. If it didn't "work" as they claimed, it didn't exist, right? [the machine] didn't do what it claimed to do, which is why [in part], as you yourself typed above, she went to jail.


NO one here is claiming that study is a gold standard, or that there isn't potential for bias -- as is the case with any study, though broadly speaking, the bias and incentives to push current dominant narratives and dogma Re: covid is far more prominent than the incentives to COUNTER the dominant narratives (though that's clearly changing as more data comes out exposing so much of the fraud and lies of the past ~2 years).


The point of my message is that your comparison to Theranos was not only inaccurate, but in a number of key respects an outright misrepresentation of the methodology of the above [Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis] study. I never claimed the study itself was without potential for certain flaws. That wasn't the point of my reply.
Last edited by Belligerent Savant on Sun Sep 04, 2022 5:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sun Sep 04, 2022 1:43 pm

.
For the dwindling herd that remain in doubt, or for those that continue to downplay its benefits... another recent study of note:

Ivermectin reduces COVID death risk by 92%, peer-reviewed study finds

A new peer-reviewed study found that regular use of ivermectin reduced the risk of dying from COVID-19 by 92%.

The large study was conducted by Flávio A. Cadegiani, MD, MSc, PhD. Cadegiani is a board-certified endocrinologist with a master's degree and doctorate degree in clinical endocrinology.

The peer-reviewed study was published on Wednesday by the online medical journal Cureus. The study was conducted on a strictly controlled population of 88,012 people from the city of Itajaí in Brazil.

Individuals who used ivermectin as prophylaxis or took the medication before being infected by COVID experienced significant reductions in death and hospitalization.

According to the study, those who took ivermectin regularly had a 92% reduction in their COVID death risk compared to non-users and 84% less than irregular users.

"The hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in regular users compared to both irregular users and non-users," the study stated.

The impressive reduction for regular ivermectin users was evident despite the regular users being at a higher risk for COVID deaths. The regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users.
...


https://www.theblaze.com/news/ivermecti ... um=twitter

https://www.cureus.com/articles/111851- ... modal=true
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Mon Sep 05, 2022 12:42 am

People Are Dying. Don’t Ask. Don’t Tell.

Censorship has ruled covid. But emerging data on injury and death may be too big to ignore.

Mary Beth Pfeiffer
I am an investigative journalist who is outraged by the government's abject failure to stop COVID-19 by treating it early. Censorship and greed have fueled this pandemic. My articles: https://www.thefirstepidemic.com/new-index

After months of skirting YouTube censors, the ax fell on medical educator Dr. John Campbell when he spent fourteen minutes on August 20 parsing figures on two disturbing trends in the United Kingdom. First, UK deaths in 2022 were an alarming 14 percent higher than the prior five years, with 1,480 excess deaths—not attributed to covid-19—in the week ending August 5 alone.

Second, figures on deaths after covid vaccinations were wildly uninformative. One government document put them as low as 10—“incredulous,” Campbell said—while another official report put them as high as 21,000 when underreporting was considered.

A careful, evidence-based analyst with 2.4 million subscribers, Campbell wanted to know: “Why is no one talking about this in the UK?”

YouTube provided an answer: “This video has been removed for violating YouTube’s Community Guidelines.”

Indeed, but for a small cadre of brave doctors and researchers, few dare discuss the aftermath of covid management in the UK, US, and elsewhere—and chiefly the wisdom of repeated vaccinations. Instead, the questionable “safe and effective” mantra infuses media reports and, remarkably, science publishing that sometimes indicates quite the opposite.

“We have a million injuries and all these deaths,” Dr. Meryl Nass said in reference to figures from the US vaccine reporting system, “and there’s a combination of hiding information and misinterpreting data in the public domain by the CDC and FDA.”

Nass, a Maine doctor and anthrax vaccine expert, knows the toll of challenging covid dogma. Her medical license was suspended last January over charges she did not support covid vaccines and used treatments that—while legal and off-label—were “not authorized or approved” for covid-19.

“I prescribed ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine”—shown in many studies to save lives—“and advised against the vaccine,” she told me. In return, Maine’s medical board ordered a neuropsychological exam—essentially a test, she said, of her mental stability—for disseminating “misinformation regarding the SARS CoV2 pandemic and the official public health response calling for vaccinations.” A hearing will be held in coming months.

Even as people like Campbell and Nass remain in the crosshairs, prominent experts in the alt-vaccine world have told me recently of a groundswell of movement. This view is not based on a distinct shift in the public perception or fixed official dogma. As a headline in the Wall Street Journal on August 28 stated: Latest Covid Boosters Are Set to Roll Out Before Human Testing Is Completed.

Still, experts say the evidence of post-covid damage—from a vaccine-centered pandemic response that rejected early treatment—is becoming too big to ignore.

“The dam wall is cracking,” said Dr. Paul Marik, a critical care expert and chairman of the Front Line Covid Critical Care Alliance. “The data is coming out,” he told me.

“The excess mortality data, miscarriage data, and dropping birth rates are accumulating from numerous places around the world. All data timed in relation to vaccine rollouts,” agreed FLCCC’s president, Dr. Pierre Kory, when I asked his view on these trends. “It is an unmitigated humanitarian catastrophe that is being systematically censored.”

Now, as covid recedes, these experts see vaccines as issue number one.

“No sane person vaccinates the entire country with an experimental vaccine without trials,” Dr. Nass said. “Particularly since the whole country already has some immunity; the virulence is low, and”—the focus of this article—“the evidence supports higher all-cause mortality with an increasing number of vaccine doses.”

More are dying, still

As the Omicron chapter closes and covid deaths decline, another ominous trend, many months in the making, is coming into stark relief. People in the prime of life are dying in unexpected numbers.

The trend was noticed in the third quarter of 2021, as I wrote last January, when the OneAmerica group of insurance companies reported a 40 percent increase in deaths in 18- to 64-year-olds. “Our data,” the company told me then, “shows an increase in death rates in our business across the U.S., which aligns with what we’re seeing in national industry data.” Of 250,000 deaths in that age group, the company statement said, just 20 percent, 50,600, were attributed to covid. The company refused to answer follow-up questions.

What happened in Germany a month later may explain why.

Image

In February 2022, the insurance giant BKK ProVita reported startling findings in a study of 10.9 million client records from the first seven months of 2021. Nearly 217,000 patients had sought medical attention after vaccination against covid, the study found, putting the company’s vaccine-injured figure more than ten times above official estimates and translating into a national rate of 4 to 5 percent of vaccinees.

Company Director Andreas Schöfbeck wrote in a letter that the data indicated “significant underreporting of suspected side effects following Corona vaccinations” in the government tracking system.

“We regard this as a significantly alarming signal that must be taken into account in the further use of vaccines,” he wrote.

Nine days later, Schöfbeck was fired, amid assertions he was seeking attention and showed “embarrassing ignorance or insidious intent to deceive.” This is what happens when 11 million records come up with an answer that defies the vaccine narrative. “Danger to human life cannot be ruled out,” the disgraced official had warned in his missive.

Some see that danger being realized.

Dr. Eyal Shahar, a physician and retired public health professor at the University of Arizona, recently analyzed three datasets of United States deaths, including two from the Centers for Disease Control and one from Our World in Data.

He observed that the share of excess deaths, above what would be considered normal and not accounted for by covid, grew over time, even as the nation’s supposed best method of controlling the pandemic—vaccines—was being rolled out. From April to December 2020, non-covid excess deaths ranged across the datasets from 11 percent to 27 percent of all excess deaths; by June to September 2021, they roughly doubled, to 26 percent to 43 percent, Shahar found. Some 47,000 to 82,000 unexplained, non-covid excess deaths occurred in those four months alone, he estimated.

Shahar was so disturbed by his findings that he examined death statistics in his home state of Arizona. The trend was the same. Twenty-two percent of excess deaths in the eighteen months through September 2021—more than 5,000 Arizonans—were not from covid, he found. Asked why non-covid excess deaths were soaring, he told me, “I wish I knew.”

Theories for the increase focus on two complex dynamics:

- Lockdown effects related to untreated disease, economic deprivation, violence, suicide, and overdose.

- The role of covid vaccines.

While the first dynamic is generally recognized, the second has been minimized and dismissed. It cries out for more honest scientific study. Indicative, perhaps, of a turning tide, a new peer-reviewed study in Vaccine journal analyzed the aftermath of jabs, finding serious and under-studied injuries: “These results raise concerns that mRNA vaccines are associated with more harm than initially estimated at the time of emergency authorization.”

Lives lost too soon—and in utero

In perhaps the most exhaustive analysis yet, posted online on August 18, researchers at two German universities found disturbing trends in death data. “Something must have happened in April 2021 that led to a sudden and sustained increase in mortality in the age groups below 80 years,” the study states. “[N]o such effects on mortality had been observed during the COVID-19 pandemic so far.”

Unlike covid, which disproportionately kills older people, the explosion of non-covid deaths in Germany was across the board—“almost entirely due to an increase in deaths in the age groups between 15 and 79,” the report said. The group with the largest share of unexplained excess deaths, 9.3 percent above expected, was 40- to 49-year-olds; but even 15- to 29-year-olds had 3.5 percent more unexplained deaths.

When the researchers charted the numbers, they saw eerie parallels, called “covaries,” between four covid inoculation campaigns and tandem surges in deaths. As they put it, “the strong increase in mortality in April 2021 and the further development of the excess deaths covaries [correlates] with the strong increase of the number of vaccinations.” In other words, more shots aligned with more deaths.

Image

If this wasn’t bad enough, the study, performed by an actuary-mathematician and psychologist, picked up a 10.9 percent increase in stillborn babies from 2020 to the second quarter of 2021. The uptick, also “sudden and sustained,” the study said, continued through the first quarter of 2022, when 9.9 percent more stillbirths were recorded as a share of births. “In the year 2021, starting in April, a striking excess [stillbirth] mortality is observed,” they wrote.

Study author Matthias Reitzner, a widely published mathematician based at University of Osnabrück, told me he was surprised by the dearth of research on excess deaths using standard actuarial models long employed by insurance companies and pension funds.

“Maybe the outcome of the computations does not fit into the official COVID19-narrative,” he wrote in an email. “In all major German media this issue is totally ignored as it does not fit into the storytelling-line the government wants to be published.”

Uncounted, underreported

Although the problem is not acknowledged, many analysts, physicians and scientists are expressing growing alarm over the effects of covid vaccines on pregnancy.

Pfizer documents released under a judge’s order showed an astronomical 87.5 percent fetal and neonate death rate after maternal vaccination: In 32 pregnancies, there were 25 miscarriages and three neonatal deaths. The documents were inscrutable, perhaps intentionally so, stating that “no outcome was provided” for another 238 pregnancies, according to an article by FLCCC’s Dr. Kory.

It’s tempting to dismiss such figures, as an AP “fact-check” did, as lacking context. Based on its own study, the CDC calls vaccination in pregnancy “safe and effective.” But that “preliminary” study used data tracked through online surveillance systems in selective ways, researchers found.

Among 827 women vaccinated during pregnancy, rates of miscarriage were comparable to pre-pandemic levels, the CDC study said. But among 127 women vaccinated before 20 weeks gestation, 104 pregnancies—82 percent—ended in spontaneous abortion, according to a critique in Science, Public Policy and the Law.

“Our re-analysis indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion 7 to 8 times higher than the original authors’ results,” the November 2021 study concluded.

As of August 19, 2022, Vaccines Adverse Events Reporting System listed 1,769 miscarriages in the United States and its territories, among a total of 4,963 including foreign reports.

Government and media routinely dismiss these figures as anecdotal and lacking foundation.

In reality, public reporting systems were widely acknowledged before covid to suffer from vast undercounting of harm. A 2009 US study estimated that just 1 percent of vaccine injuries were reported, while in the UK “only 10% of serious reactions, and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported,” a 2018 government report found.

This suggests that those 1,769 doomed pregnancies reported in the US are but the tip of the iceberg.

Image

“The reasons behind these horrific numbers [of overall excess deaths] are complicated and none of us fully understand them,” London GP Charles Levinson said in a rare UK media report. “That is exactly why there should be an urgent and comprehensive government inquiry.” Instead, he saw “total silence” on the issue.

The German scientists, similarly, called for “a reassessment of the mortality burden brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic.”

That, of course, is the point. Find out what is going on. Instead, Dr. Campbell asked the question on YouTube and was censored. As a journalist, I espoused early covid treatment and was suspended for life from Twitter—for tweeting on Nobel Prize-winning ivermectin, which could have saved hundreds of thousands from covid death.

One singular study

Leave it to researchers in Thailand to do what the United States and others countries have not: Follow a group of healthy adolescents double-vaccinated for Covid-19 and see how they fared. Dr. Marik said their effort is the first prospective study since the vaccine rollout on anyone, let alone youngsters. “It’s really important,” he said.

The Thai study, of 301 adolescents from 13 to 18 years old, found significant cardiac and other anomalies after getting the Pfizer vaccine. Nearly 18 percent had abnormal electrocardiograms; 7.6 percent suffered tachycardia; 4 percent had high blood pressure, and 4.3 percent each had palpitations and chest pain. Moreover, chemical markers of heart inflammation were found in 2.3 percent, among them one teenager who suffered myocarditis; two with suspected pericarditis, and four with likely “subclinical myocarditis.”

In a comment posted on the study’s preprint, Dr. Rosamund Jones, a British pediatrician and critic of covid vaccines for children, called the findings “hugely concerning” and challenged the weak conclusion, as did others, that teens be monitored after covid vaccination. That’s typical of the concessions such studies make to get published.

“In normal times, the conclusion would have been to withdraw this drug urgently,” Dr. Jones wrote.

Another physician, Dr. Paul Spradbery said the study’s characterization of myopericarditis cases as “usually mild,” was “dangerous.” The condition “leads to cardiac tissue scarring and hence impaired ability to pump blood,” he wrote.

While other studies have found post-vaccination heart injury in adolescents—one reported a 133-fold higher rate of myocarditis in vaccinated teenage boys—the Thai research suggests the damage may be far more common than retrospective studies found.

One among many

On August 22, a 37-year-old Scottish mountain biker, Rab Wardell, went into cardiac arrest while lying in bed with his partner, Olympic cyclist Katie Archibald. She tried desperately to revive him. The athlete’s death came two days after Wardell won Scotland’s national senior cross-country biking championship, having won the junior title two decades earlier. “Stoked to be able to take the win,” he wrote on Instagram, where, just hours before his death, he posted a photograph of his appearance on The Nine, a Scottish BBC sports program.

Statistically, Wardell most certainly fits into the category of the moment: unexplained, early, non-covid death.

Of note, the Scottish Parliament launched an inquiry last January into a growing trend of above-average deaths that emerged in mid-2021. Last May, the nation’s health secretary issued a response to the concerns of the COVID-19 Recovery Committee of The Scottish Parliament that revealed little about why Scots were dying.

“We have recently reviewed the content and frequency of all COVID-19 data reporting, working in partnership with Public Health Scotland and National Records of Scotland,” Humza Yousef wrote, “and will continue to closely monitor excess deaths.”

The word vaccine was not mentioned.

https://rescue.substack.com/p/people-ar ... medium=web
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Coronavirus Crisis: Main Thread

Postby Belligerent Savant » Mon Sep 05, 2022 11:55 am

User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 170 guests