tazmic wrote:American Dream wrote:You are missing and/or avoiding the point- faith in things unseen in and of itself can be corrosive to critical thinking
And faith that things are not unseen can be corrosive to critical thinking too.
Of course.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
tazmic wrote:American Dream wrote:You are missing and/or avoiding the point- faith in things unseen in and of itself can be corrosive to critical thinking
And faith that things are not unseen can be corrosive to critical thinking too.
When you follow the desires of your sinful nature, your lives will produce these evil results: sexual immorality, impure thoughts, eagerness for lustful pleasure, idolatry, participation in demonic activities, hostility, quarreling, jealousy, outbursts of anger, selfish ambition, divisions, the feeling that everyone is wrong except those in your own little group, envy, drunkenness, wild parties, and other kinds of sin. Let me tell you again, as I have before, that anyone living that sort of life will not inherit the Kingdom of God. But when the Holy Spirit controls our lives, He will produce this kind of fruit in us: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. - Galatians 5:19-23 NLT
Laodicean wrote:Wow. Now I realize that Albert Einstein was a complete idiot. His critical thinking and faith in understanding the unseen and the seen was a complete waste of time and space. You're right, Cuda. Thanks so much for showing me the light of never trusting people of faith or having faith in anything, period. RI kicks ass.
American Dream wrote:What I am saying is that believing unquesioningly in the dogmas of authority figures and self-appointed "experts" regarding the nature of the spiritual and/or metaphysical has led to a lot of problems throughout our history as a species and is still doing so to this day.
Perelandra wrote:The author of the initial article posted is pretty muddled or lazy, in giving this inaccurate definition of the word in order to find a hook to hang his "theory" on.what I will call “Theophobia” – the academic’s irrational fear of, or intense discomfort around, theist and, in particular, Christian, beliefs.
Theophobia means "fear of God", which could be said by some to be a characteristic of a true believer.
American Dream wrote:Searcher08 wrote:American Dream wrote:Canadian_watcher wrote:American Dream wrote:Ok, but what about the part where faith supports Racism or Fascism?
in my opinion that is abhorrent to any real faith. I know it happens.. does it ever. But as sunny said, above, there are people of faith that would never ever support racism or fascism. Most of them, probably. As I see it it's the nutty ones that get all the press and dominate political movements because they are the ones motivated by control and power over.
Here we get into the part where faith can conflict with critical thinking, as faith does often lead well-intentioned people into congress with problematic people and ideas, don't you think?
You dont get the irony that you approach 'critical thinking' with the same degree of faith that you so consider in others the first step down The Road to Perdition.
Your language is full of patronising weasel words such as "well-intentioned people" "problematic people and ideas" "dont you think?" .
For someone who is so concerned about fascism, you are not exactly a pluralist when it comes to thinking.
Reductionist so called 'critical' thinking - you sound like the missionary bringing the news to the unenlightened, except you NEVER examine the foundations of your 'critical thinking' faith.
How about doing that? Are you up for it? Or do we move along, because we can question anything except THAT?
Searcher, what a bogus representation of my thoughts!
This is your straw man..
ORLY?![]()
Firstly, I don't have blind faith in critical thinking- certainly not as the be all and end all of human activity.
First - so by what standard /principles have you assessed critical thinking?
Secondly, "spiritual people" who claim the best of intentions have got themselves wrapped up in all kinds of bad things throughout history. Do you dispute this?
Referring to "problematic people and ideas" in this sort of context is merely trying to not be too inflammatory- the core concept is quite valid.
Second -yes, I do dispute this.
The statement is so vague as to be meaningless. You can remove "spiritual" and the meaning doesnt change. All you are describing is "the road to hell is paved with good intentions"
Regarding the next point, I DO see it as very inflamatory, because it comes down to the issue of
WHO or WHAT decides a person or idea is PROBLEMATIC?
That is a very non-trivial question,
whether it be the Inquisition or the Khemer Rouge deciding teachers were 'problematic'. Mainstream scientists who find people who contest evolution 'problematic'.
Thirdly, I'm not endorsing a reductionist approach to critical thinking, though I do think critical thinking is essential.
Third -so where is your evidence that critical thinking is essential? and essential for what?
Critical thinking IS reductionist. Saying you are not endorsing a reductionist approach to critical thinking makes no sense. Critical thinking is analytical, not holistic.The Delphi Project of the American Philosophical Association
In the late 1980's a subcommittee of the the American Philosophical Association assembled 46 experts to reach consensus on a definition of critical thinking and how to assess it. The result is the Delphi Report (Facione, 1990);
interpretation; subskills: categorization decoding significance clarifying meaning
analysis; subskills: examining ideas identifying arguments analyzing arguments
evaluation; subskills: assessing claims assessing arguments
inference; subskills: querying evidence conjecturing alternatives drawing conclusions
explanation; subskills: stating results justifying procedures presenting arguments
self-regulation; subskills: self-examination self-correction
Affective dispositions to critical thinking were divided into two categories (1) approaches to life and living in general, and include such traits as inquisitiveness, trust in reason, and fairmindedness, and (2) approaches to specific issues, questions or problems, and include such traits as clarity in stating the question, diligence in seeking relevant information, and persistence although difficulties are encountered.
This is the type of thinking which has got this planet into a huge mess. It comes with Orthodoxy built in.
What is missing?? LOADS!!
Design Thinking Constructive Thinking Operational Thinking
Creative Thinking Lateral Thinking Scenario Thinking Systemic Thinking
Anyway, does your support for David Icke include his Reptilian Theory?
Because either way, here we have a great example to look at regarding the particulars of faith and/or critical thinking...
American Dream wrote:Anyway, does your support for David Icke include his Reptilian Theory?
Because either way, here we have a great example to look at regarding the particulars of faith and/or critical thinking...
If you mean I think there are four dimensional astral entities from Draconis at the top of the NWO pyramid, then err.. no. OTOH, I would suggest to you that the systemic principle that
Systems in general tend to be subject to much more influence from external systems into which they embed than may at first appear to be the case from inside their viewpoint.
Does your support for David Icke include his Reptilian Theory?
American Dream wrote:I consider your response to be pretty much of a non-answer. Here is a relatively simple question, please do me the courtesy of providing a simple- and clear- answer:Does your support for David Icke include his Reptilian Theory?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 171 guests