And, regarding the Walt Disney topic itself, Slomo said it pretty well, as far as I am concerned:
slomo wrote:As for Disney, who gives a fuck, the guy's dead; this is a problem only if they succeed in reanimating his frozen head.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
slomo wrote:As for Disney, who gives a fuck, the guy's dead; this is a problem only if they succeed in reanimating his frozen head.
82_28 wrote:How can you say Idiocracy was "rubbish"? WTF ever. The film was brilliant and needed to be made. It was made.
What was wrong with Idiocracy?
82_28 wrote:How can you say Idiocracy was "rubbish"? WTF ever. The film was brilliant and needed to be made. It was made.
What was wrong with Idiocracy?
brekin wrote: Britney Spears, Justin Timberlake, Christina Agulieura, etc may just be the most recent victims of his legacy and may play into a greater system in which Walt Disney was just a part. I don't need to remind people on the forum about MK Ultra, Monarch, etc. Seems a high placed person like Walt with a huge cultural influence on the hearts and minds of children would be a great asset.
brekin wrote:
Britney Spears, Justin Timberlake, Christina Agulieura, etc may just be the most recent victims of his legacy and may play into a greater system in which Walt Disney was just a part. I don't need to remind people on the forum about MK Ultra, Monarch, etc. Seems a high placed person like Walt with a huge cultural influence on the hearts and minds of children would be a great asset.
Just, wow.
..........
I have a few suggestions.
Instead of speculating about celebrities, you might remember that you are directly addressing real, not supposed, survivors of MK ULTRA related experimentation. Consider we may have other priorities than Britney Spears, not to mention the numerous ethical problems with, oh nevermind.
Speculating about celebrities is a game-like activity encouraged by conspirotainment sites that promulgate disinformation to cover-up the real crimes and human rights abuses of MKULTRA, and profit from the suffering of others, including us survivors on this board, consider that it might not be the best idea to encourage it here.
Also, there is no evidence that any of the CIA, DOD, or other governmental agency-sponsored experiment programs into behavior control was named Monarch. In fact, the evidence suggests that project name was introduced as deliberate disinformation.
There absolutely are connections to Disney businesses in MC and child trafficking accounts, but there's no way I am going to discuss them in this thread. We've reviewed some of them in past threads I am fairly certain, if anyone wants to track them down.
bks wrote:So can I ask you, Wombaticus, did you consider placing quotation marks around "gay pedophile" before deleting "gay"? Curious to know. And to others: would you have objected to quotes being placed around the offending phrase in the title?
Wombaticus Rex wrote:I recently burned most of my possessions because I no longer wanted to deal with their existence.
His war propaganda films alone illustrated his alliance with extremist mind invaders.
To dismiss or limit discussion of that facet of this analysis of recent revelations about the man and his legacy would be ridiculous at best and coercive censorship at its worst.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests