JackRiddler wrote:Should probably cross-post this:http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=30362&p=457857#p457857
Thanks.
“Critics should come to terms with the fact that the network is biased but yet it does produce segments that provide necessary and sharp critiques of the US government that typically do not appear on mainstream US networks.” In other words, like Assange, they engage in real adversarial journalism with regard to American political power. And they are thus scorned and ridiculed by those who pretend to do that but never actually do.
Or by those who're afraid of being labeled "nuts" by their perceived domestic adversaries.