JackRiddler wrote:.
charlie meadows, before I would take this up again with you, I would prefer that you expand on that answer (including dealing with some of the questions I posed in return) and make clear your own views. Thanks.
My
opinion?
Is breastfeeding obscene in itself?Breastfeeding is not obscene. All four of my babies were breastfed, for as long as three years, often in public, without any public reaction.
Is Facebook an inappropriate venue for its display?That is not for me to decide. Why anyone would pay any attention to Facebook is a mystery to me.
At this time in history?My
insinuation here is that there is a
process unfolding.
How much has the public display of the human body changed in the past century?Somewhat rhetorical but open to interpretation. My tentative conclusion, subject to change, is that attitudes in the West toward the human body, and sexuality of almost all kinds are increasingly liberal (if I can use that word). And exponentially so. Herein lies the qi.
Is there any reason why the acceptability of the public display of the human body has changed in that time?Less and less rhetorical. My opinion, Jack?
It has to do with supply and demand of available resources. Among other things. Excellent subject matter IMO.
I focus my attention here.At the current rate of change, what is the likely outcome of that change?IMO, breastfeeding will become increasingly tolerated, and even expected as time goes by, despite increasingly strident but diminishing propaganda to do otherwise.
If the display of breastfeeding should be acceptable on Facebook or other public venues, why not stills of sexual acts, or videos with sound? Sexual intercourse, after all, is a beautiful act to watch and even more beautiful to participate in.This statement should have made my attitude toward breastfeeding obvious. I have concerns however with having such a laissez-faire attitude toward public display of sexuality (as in the
sexual act), especially where children are the audience. You may feel otherwise. My belief, probably not subject to change, is that
children need time to be children. That's just me.
Why not soft porn, if it's artistic, and doesn't demean any of the actors or the audience, and it's done tastefully?See the above answer. You might interject that you are certainly not advocating children watching soft porn online. I did it for you.
Is there a consciousness, a conspiracy if you must, at work--other than something like the zeitgeist--guiding this transition, pushing these boundaries?Not at all rhetorical. I imagine the zeitgeist and any number of conspiracies at work. Is there a
single overriding worldwide conspiracy at work? Dunno, can't say. Who cares? Does it matter?
If there is, what is its purpose? Is it titillation? Is it inurement?To what end? I leave that to others. I'm somewhat more interested in the process than the outcome? Is it
titillation? Yes. Is it
inurement? Yes. IMO inurement is another excellent topic of conversation.
Now that I have answered your (my) questions...
Should it matter what I think the answers to the questions are? My opinion: No.
Don't the questions rest on their own merit? My opinion: Yes.
Isn't it enough to ask the questions for others to discuss? My opinion: Yes.