TRUMP is seriously dangerous

[seemslikeadream]

http://usuncut.com/politics/neo-nazis-trump-supporters/

[82_28]

I found this:

https://books.google.com/books?id=MagCA ... an&f=false

PDF or whatever the hell Google calls it.

[Luther Blissett]

http://usuncut.com/politics/neo-nazis-trump-supporters/
…

Oh yeah, this too. That is just ridiculous.

While it's just anecdotal, it's pretty insane that the network didn't catch it…or wanted to let it slide for some reason.

[Nordic]

http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop- ... ler-220934

This is actually kind of funny. In a very dark way.

David Duke: Comparing Trump to Hitler is great for Hitler

By ELIZA COLLINS 03/17/16 02:57 PM EDT

David Duke believes that comparisons of Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler “might be rehabilitating that fellow with the mustache back there in Germany.”

“They might be rehabilitating that fellow with the mustache back there in Germany, because I saw a commercial against Donald Trump, a really vicious commercial,” the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan said on his radio show Tuesday, as first reported by Right Wing Watch on Wednesday.

The commercial, Duke said, compared “what Donald Trump said about preserving America and making America great again to Hitler in Germany preserving Germany and making Germany great again and free again and not beholden to these Communists on one side, politically who were trying to destroy their land and their freedom, and the Jewish capitalists on the other, who were ripping off the nation through the banking system.”

“We have the same thing going on here with Goldman Sachs,” Duke continued. "And it was a commercial, I saw that this morning and I was amazed by that commercial. It was a commercial against Trump but I don’t think it’s having the effect that they want it to have."

Duke has been praising Trump dating back to the summer, when he hailed his candidacy as a "great thing" and lauded Trump's calls to deport millions of immigrants and build a wall along the Mexican border. In February, Duke told his listeners that voting against Trump would be "treason to your heritage."

Shortly afterward, CNN’s Jake Tapper asked Trump whether he would denounce Duke and white supremacist groups like the KKK — and Trump avoided the question, saying he needed to do more research. He later blamed it on a faulty earpiece and disavowed Duke after being pilloried by fellow Republicans, including 2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney.

Duke, however, has been undeterred.

“This war that’s going on against Donald Trump is really a war going on against America, it’s a war going on against the European-American majority,” he said this week, using a common euphemism white supremacists employ to describe Caucasians. “If you’re a European person, the government is purposefully wiping you out and your families and your children and your future. They are purposefully transforming this country into a Third World nation.”

POLITICO was unable to identify which commercial Duke was referencing.

With a little more hair he would look exactly like Hillary.

[82_28]

Sorry Duke and sorry Trump, not on my watch. While I have no power to do much of anything other than oppose you and gearing up for the inevitable "protest mode" is it. The racist right created this shit and made it possible to even be a topic. How can it be they are even wondering why?

We have spent our lives monitoring your asses you fucks. We didn't fucking do it for fun. We should all fucking sue anything right wing related and litigate the fuck out of them with the remaining funds in Sanders' "war chest".

The thing that flummoxes me is how I began so rationally liberal. I am seriously untouchable when it comes to militancy, racism, blah blah blah. Didn't get me nowhere. I am sick of these terms.

Liberals are the "new" conservatives. Fuck you all. Not you, RI people. Just fuck these people. Can we come up with a stronger word/meme to impart our disgust? All are motherfucking equal in every sense of the word and all deserve their nature they are born into. No entity ever asked to be born. Gah.

[tapitsbo]

That's exactly what they did in places like anglo canada, germany, and sweden (among other places). White identity politics can be legislated into utter obscurity and since only white people can be racist I think you'll find it solves a lot of problems. Don't give up on your dreams.

[Joe Hillshoist]

That's exactly what they did in places like anglo canada, germany, and sweden (among other places). White identity politics can be legislated into utter obscurity and since only white people can be racist I think you'll find it solves a lot of problems. Don't give up on your dreams.

In anglo countries esp the "new world ones" (Including ANZ) white people are the only ones who can be racist in a way that actually uses real instituational power to back it up.

Everything else is just words - ultimately powerless name calling.

Saying "white identity politics can be legislated into obscurity" in a society that is by definition "white identity politics" - Where everything is framed thru the lens of "white identity politics", where all the real power and control of most of the resources rests with people who practise "white identity politics" - is surely taking the piss.

So do you know about Australian polemicist Andrew Bolt and his interaction with our Racial Discrimination Act? I'm sure you'd enjoy that story if you haven't happened across it already.

[tapitsbo]

I am familiar with that argument and it is a stretch. Real power and control of resources often rests with groups who are not white or who do not consider themselves white despite white skin privilege as its called. Other societies grant explicit political rights to the majority and minority. Groups that are more prosperous and enjoy other advantages includkng institutionally organize explicitly and legitimately around race and ethnicity while "white privilege" is practiced covertly and opposed by the frantic activity or highly motivated and richly rewarded white or white passing people. Of course if whites had the sort of power you are suggesting they would be practicing identity politics AS an exercise of institutional power, censoring and firing opponents and not being censored or fired, for instance. There would be real conseauences fot encouraging violence against us and other ritual displays of hostility. You're being disingenuous anyways or counting on me subscribing to a belief system which I reject and which depends on radical inconsistency in any case.

I don't care about someone in Australia or their interactions with institutional whatever. Feel free to type the story out if you are bored though.

[RocketMan]

I find fascinating these few posters who only seem to participate in threads that involve gender or race and seem to specialize in vague, disgruntled, meandering posts which end up implying that white heterosexual men may be the most oppressed and at risk group in the world right now and that racism and sexism are really very nuanced things (which they of course are), and that some facets of them may in fact be justified.

[jakell]

I find fascinating these few posters who only seem to participate in threads that involve gender or race and seem to specialize in vague, disgruntled, meandering posts which end up implying that white heterosexual men may be the most oppressed and at risk group in the world right now and that racism and sexism are really very nuanced things (which they of course are), and that some facets of them may in fact be justified.

Careful with that fascination business, you wouldn't want folks thinking you may (oops) be one of the few, that's how it all starts you know, by taking an interest in things.

At least your own post here is solid and direct and a breath of fresh air.

[JackRiddler]

I find fascinating these few posters who only seem to participate in threads that involve gender or race and seem to specialize in vague, disgruntled, meandering posts which end up implying that white heterosexual men may be the most oppressed and at risk group in the world right now and that racism and sexism are really very nuanced things (which they of course are), and that some facets of them may in fact be justified.

Yes. Fascinating is one word for it. So are obvious and tiring.

[jakell]

I find fascinating these few posters who only seem to participate in threads that involve gender or race and seem to specialize in vague, disgruntled, meandering posts which end up implying that white heterosexual men may be the most oppressed and at risk group in the world right now and that racism and sexism are really very nuanced things (which they of course are), and that some facets of them may in fact be justified.

Yes. Fascinating is one word for it. So are obvious and tiring.

and somewhere in between obsessive and dismissive, we may find a place where constructive thought can prosper.

[vince]

I'm surprised the phrase:
"Shut the fuck up, Donnie!" from "The Big Lebowski"
hasn't gotten popular yet!

[RocketMan]

I find fascinating these few posters who only seem to participate in threads that involve gender or race and seem to specialize in vague, disgruntled, meandering posts which end up implying that white heterosexual men may be the most oppressed and at risk group in the world right now and that racism and sexism are really very nuanced things (which they of course are), and that some facets of them may in fact be justified.

Careful with that fascination business, you wouldn't want folks thinking you may (oops) be one of the few, that's how it all starts you know, by taking an interest in things.

At least your own post here is solid and direct and a breath of fresh air.

Well, George Lewis told the Englishman, the Italian and the Jew
“You can’t open your mind, boys
To every conceivable point of view”

[jakell]

Well, George Lewis told the Englishman, the Italian and the Jew
“You can’t open your mind, boys
To every conceivable point of view”

Yeah, I know, but one can at least open one's mind to those that present themselves or are topical, that number being conveniently finite until we attain the singularity. If things are looking dicey, we can always call it a 'thought experiment'.

(green because I don't really believe that transhumanist hogwash)