Ian, a Masonic open house in Boston????
Dude, why didn't you invite me, lol.
I'm not sure if I understand your definition of weird and whether you consider this on a different plane than the christian sacrement in its weirdness and symbolism. what makes it weird, in your context?
I don't consider it a different plane of weirdness, but the cognitive experience of the participants is profoundly different. People (I know) go to mass automatically, uncritically, habitually. They become blind to the weirdness all around them, the weirdness underlying their rituals. I mean, again: "symbolically" (as if that makes it any less weird a concept) eating the flesh and drinking the blood of a savior. Constantly looking at and even bowing before figurines of a tortured, suffocated murder victim who claimed he was God. The people I grew up around never really bothered to dwell on all that much. But freemasons are very deliberately following their rituals, acutely aware of each and every symbological relationship, each and every time they perform. What's being sealed and re-sealed in those rituals is a pact between secret-sharers. Listen to a freemason talk about what kind of worldview freemasonry provides the freemason. It's all a bunch of kitschy pseudo-humanist bullshit. Look at the fucking costumes. Ridiculous. Kitschy, the humanist bullshit and the costumes one would expect some middle-aged pompous farts to invent whimsically. But what doesn't seem very kitschy, at all, are the rituals which expressly deal with the punishments awaiting those who spill the fucking beans, whatever the beans are. I don't catch any kitsch stink there. *Sniff* Yeah, nothing kitschy. Those threats seem very real. And considering the caliber of status and material power of those participating at the levels higher than the basic initiate bottom rung, I don't expect oaths-of-secrecy-not-to-be-betrayed-on-penalty-of-death among those participants to be so "metaphorical" or "juvenile" or "symbological". I expect them, I think quite logically, to carry some serious fucking real world weight.
what makes people in powerful positions participating these rituals different, or similar, to powerful people participating in other religious rituals?
Do you really think Mitt Romney believes anything about Mormonism?
what is the true meaning of the rituals?
I think they're just stages of security clearance, in effect.
(a hurdle to that question is the secrecy of the group makes it hard to really know, eh)
Eh. ABC Syllogism:
A. Intelligent worldly grown men don't believe in bullshit.
B. Remove the bullshit from masonry, and all you have are secrecy oaths.
C. Intelligent worldly grown men swear to secrets with each other.
C = the secret of Freemasonry's secrets.
we can only know what is in the public eye, and people like Pike say that the symbols of freemasonry are meant to deceive the uninitiated, if I understand correctly.
Makes sense to me.
freemason9 wrote:
I don't mean to be evasive, but much of the stuff you hear about masons is somewhat dramatized. I was not given the material that you refer to, but I have come across it. There is a good deal of reading material and treatises in lodge libraries. There was no letter about "free will;" they (or anyone else) cannot give me free will, because they never took it. I am a free man.
"You don't mean to be evasive"...
If you are free, then reveal all
your Freemason secrets.
Oh...wait...they're not
yours?
And what in the fuck are you doing wearing an ornamental apron.
Free men don't wear ornamental aprons.
At least you're not Mormons?
Not all Freemasons were LDS founders.
But IIRC, all LDS founders were Freemasons.
And yes, you're as bad as Mormons, intellectually.
Worse, morally.
Someone earlier asked how a person can follow a path, not knowing the destination. The reason is a deep, intuitive belief that the path has meaning, and that it approximates truth. That's the best that I can put it. It feels right.
Pfffffffffffffffff...........HHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA.
It approximates bullshit. Very, very closely.
It is accepted in freemasonry that we all have free will, and that we do not make literal interpretations of alleghory and ritual. We all must grow, and we have brothers that help should we need it.
You do not make literal interpretations of alleghory and ritual? So praytell, what would happen if you revealed every single Freemason secret that you know, to as wide an audience as possible? Just, what, like, dirty looks at the next meeting?
Are you that naive? No. Right?
You're either a sucker at the bottom or a P.R. plant.
I'll take a guess...sucker at the bottom?
If I'm wrong then you're a P.R. plant.
Choose wisely!
8bit, I'm sure that Freemasonry recruits a buffer zone of upstanding but naive community somebodies, and that the Freemason environment is just pleasing and patriotic and spiritual and fraternal and "challenging" and hallowed to those deluded fools in the buffer zone. But above that buffer zone, beyond the next stage of security clearance, I bet the real world players are separated from the mere somebodies in search of personal affirmation. If it were 300 years ago, I could envision a cadre of Freemasons all -- from top to bottom -- being noble men, freethinkers, nothing corrupt. Today, and for quite some time, I think that scenario is inconceivable. I think today the ultimate function of Freemasonry, especially for those who advance, is one of multiple equivalent gauntlets a material player must clear in order to enter the "circle of trust".
I don't think it serves anyone to listen to a self-proclaimed Freemason.