Every paragraph has a link to the source, in the original, same as above.
"Did this man predict Sept. 11?: While jet fighters drop bombs on Afghanistan in the wake of the World Trade Center tragedy and FBI agents search for the source of anthrax letters, an incredible tale has been unfolding in a Toronto courtroom. This Toronto Star story by Nick Pron from October 23/2001 was the first mention of Vreeland's allegations in the mainstream press. Apparently the governments involved are sceptical of Vreeland's claims, which Vreeland's lawyers say is absurd. Nick Pron told us that he regrets having written this article.
U.S. looks into inmate's story: "We're aware of what he has been saying and we will be looking into his story," a spokesperson for the American consulate in Toronto said yesterday about the continuing saga of Delmart Edward Vreeland. In his October 25/2001 Toronto Star article, Nick Pron finds someone at the US consulate in Toronto who is willing to say Vreeland's name.
'Plot' to murder judge may never have existed: Were Toronto detectives duped by a man described by Detroit police as a con artist? In this October 31/2001 Toronto Star article, Nick Pron explores the links, or lack thereof, between Vreeland and Nestor Fonseca.
Spy Case In Canadian Courts Suggests US Naval Officer Had Foreknowledge Of 9/11: Mike Vreeland is one man who, in a rational world, could totally expose the complicity of the US government in the attacks of September 11th. This article from January 28/2002 by Michael C. Ruppert offers the most biased and factually inaccurate reporting of Vreeland's court appearances.
When 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Go Bad: Ruppert fails to note that the Star did not confirm the man's account, that the paper reported some observers "wonder if it isn't just the ravings of a lunatic," and that the Star subsequently reported the judge said the tale had "no air of reality." David Corn, Washington editor of The Nation examines Ruppert's post 9/11 reporting in this March 1/2002 article.
Ruppert Defends His Work: Rational people will want to know how this man knew of the attacks and why the U.S. government and The Nation are trying so hard to kill this story. Ruppert's March 3/2002 reply to the David Corn article linked above.
Vreeland Attacked In Canadian Jail: Vreeland has been subject to physical attacks while behind bars, indicating that the certain death he fears if he is returned to the US, might become a reality behind the jailhouse walls in Toronto. This March 3/2002 article by Greta Knutzen continues the reporting of Vreeland's trial. A Canadian judge felt that Vreeland had not provided credible evidence to support this claim.
Vreeland in Safe House, All Canadian Charges Dropped, Temporary Refugee Status Granted: All Canadian charges connected to Vreeland’s December 2000 arrest have been dropped and Vreeland, who is seeking permanent political refugee status in Canada, has been granted temporary refugee status until February 2003, or until his extradition case has been resolved in Canadian courts. A March 15/2002 update on Mr. Vreeland's status by Michael C. Ruppert.
The Balance of Terror and the Red Mercury Nightmare: Vreeland maintains that he cannot return to the United States because the Russian mafia would assassinate him and because an important American official would assure Vreeland's death or imprisonment upon his return. This March 26/2002 article by J.R. Nyquist discusses the details of one of the documents which Mr. Vreeland is in possesion of.
Red Mercury and The Strange Case of Delmart Vreeland Part 2: Last week I interviewed Vreeland, who claims to possess official Russian documents stolen from Moscow that link the Kremlin to the Sept. 11 terrorist assault and to a planned Iraqi nuclear attack against U.S. cities using Russian red mercury fusion devices. J.R. Nyquist continues his look at Mr. Vreeland in this April 1/2002 article. Since writing these articles Mr. Nyquist has dismissed many of Vreeland's claims.
“Mike” Vreeland Speaks – 35 Questions and Answers: The letter said that Bastien and Vreeland would be dealt with "in a manner suitable to us." The letter specifically stated on page two, "Our American official guarantees this." Michael C. Ruppert interviews Delmart Vreeland who explains how he learned of the impending attacks on the USA. April 4/2002.
Canadian Exile Speaks Out About Possible 9-11 Cover-up: In September of 2000 Vreeland was sent to Moscow to work with a Canadian systems analyst named Marc Bastien. They worked together closely for three months analyzing weapons systems. In this April 18/2002 article from the Sierra Times Andrew Wilt writes about Vreeland's story based on his conversations with him. Vreeland said in another interview 3 days earlier that he didn't travel to Moscow until the end of November 2000.
Media and the Hazards of Political Faith: Vreeland's notations, introduced into evidence in a Toronto court last October, amount to an ambiguous mish-mash. In this April 25/2002 article by noted media analyst Norman Solomon the validity of the "warning note" is examined.
The September 11 X-Files: Ruppert and Vreeland assert that Canadian court records back up Vreeland. But court decisions in his case have questioned his credibility. David Corn of The Nation compares Vreeland's story with reality in this May 30/2002 article.
To Protect and to Spin: To believe that, one must believe Vreeland is a victim of a massive disinformation campaign involving his family, law-enforcement officers and defense lawyers across the country, two state corrections departments, county-clerk offices in 10 or so counties, the Canadian justice system, and various parts of the U.S. government. This June 15/2002 LA Weekly article by David Corn continues his examination of Ruppert and Vreeland.
Wildcard: While in prison, during the summer of 2001, Vreeland says he repeatedly attempted to warn the world about imminent terrorist attacks. Down the rabbit hole with the man who says he tried to warn the world about 9/11 from the point of view of Sander Hicks.
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/w ... d_gnn.html
Vreeland Captured in Iowa: On October 20, 2004 Vreeland is captured using a stolen credit card. Turns out he's not dead after all. Part One - Part Two
And The Rest...: A collection of other articles not listed above. Vreeland steals a boat, etc."
Based on this info, looks a lot like a con artist.
This also from above links, the alleged warning note:
Damned if I can read that scribbling. Any pharmacists here?
