"Earth Getting Mysteriously Windier"

[vanlose kid]

http://www.flickr.com/photos/woe1/5634802013/

*

[norton ash]

Thanks, Vanlose, will be watching Dallas and Billlings. Going to find out more about this fellow and his site.

What I've most noticed is the 'pop-up' storm phenomenon of the past 5 years or so, sudden severe temperature changes which bring on a rapid storm like one would expect from an occluded front or fronts colliding... when there weren't any significant fronts in these areas only a few hours before.

I'm 48, have always been a weather-watcher, and this shit is new... my Occam's assumption was that more atmospheric heat and energy made for more rapidly-cycling weather (which it probably would) so the old patterns were changing.

Meanwhile, my observation of contrails and clouds-- and the new quick- change nature of air and humidity which I FEEL, as do others -- makes me also suspect manipulation.

[tazmic]

"Global Tropical Cyclone Accumulated Cyclone Energy remains lowest in at least three decades, and expected to decrease even further..."



http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/

[justdrew]

[DrVolin]

In september, Earth getting mysteriously Windier and Fieryer.

[battleshipkropotkin]

Texas is on fire

I live out in West Texas, and the drought conditions combined with high winds have been wreaking havoc for a couple of weeks.

Since Jan. 1, Texas Forest Service has responded to 810 fires that have burned 1.4 million acres. More than 5,570 structures have been saved; 370 structures have been lost this year. via

[Bruce Dazzling]

As per weather.com, the next three days in NYC:

20 mph
20 mph
17 mph

It's almost never NOT windy any more.

I said this up thread, but I'll say it again. Now I know what it must be like to live in Chicago.

[eyeno]

dutchsinse was right again at his youtube channel. he said that the Rapid City and Billings Montana Area would get storms. He said that about 24 hours ago or so. He also said where you see squares on the radar when you blow up the radar there will most likely be bad storms. About 36 hours ago there was a perfect square in south arkansas and now a reallyyy bad storm. dutch is trippin me out with this stuff. If he keeps nailing it like this I may have to throw my hat in the ring on this at some point.

http://www.intellicast.com/Local/WxMapFull.aspx

[battleshipkropotkin]

Looks like the weatherman is relying on dutchsinse too!

Another significant tornado outbreak will endanger many lives and property across the Arklatex and South later today.

http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/news/story/48808/significant-tornado-outbreak-a.asp

That sounds pretty confident!

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/

How do you forecast tornadoes? This is a very simple question with no simple answer! Here is a very generalized view from the perspective of a severe weather forecaster: When predicting severe weather (including tornadoes) a day or two in advance, we look for the development of temperature and wind flow patterns in the atmosphere which can cause enough moisture, instability, lift, and wind shear for tornadic thunderstorms. Those are the four needed ingredients. But it is not as easy as it sounds. "How much is enough" of those is not a hard fast number, but varies a lot from situation to situation, and sometimes is unknown! A large variety of weather patterns can lead to tornadoes; and often, similar patterns may produce no severe weather at all. To further complicate it, the various computer models we use days in advance can have major biases and flaws when the forecaster tries to interpret them on the scale of thunderstorms. As the event gets closer, the forecast usually (but not always) loses some uncertainty and narrows down to a more precise threat area. [At SPC, this is the transition from outlook to mesoscale discussion to watch.] Real-time weather observations--from satellites, weather stations, balloon packages, airplanes, wind profilers and radar-derived winds--become more and more critical the sooner the thunderstorms are expected; and the models become less important. To figure out where the thunderstorms will form, we must do some hard, short-fuse detective work: Find out the location, strength and movement of the fronts, drylines, outflows, and other boundaries between air masses which tend to provide lift. Figure out the moisture and temperatures, both near ground and aloft, which will help storms form and stay alive in this situation. Find the wind structures in the atmosphere which can make a thunderstorm rotate as a supercell, then produce tornadoes. [Many supercells never spawn a tornado!] Make an educated guess where the most favorable combination of ingredients will be and when; then draw the areas and type the forecast.

[The Consul]

Oh shit, how can we advance, let alone defend, an ecological calamity such as global blowing?

[Burnt Hill]

My weather service just alerted me to a tornado warning here in upstate New York.
First time in my memory.
Did the dutchsinse guy forecast this at all?
I will look into it.

[justdrew]

gonna be major tornado storms this evening/night down there...

[eyeno]

Dutchsinse believes that radar installations at airports, and other places, are equipped with technology that follows the HAARP model. He looks for certain types of rings and squares in the radar signature. He believes that when the free television market went all digital that the antenna system once used for free television was converted to a HAARP type usage, and or, usage for government use of other types. This seems to make sense considering that it is doubtful the antenna systems were changed for the sole benefit of the public and that the desire of government use would not outweigh the public good.

I have been following his theory and at this point, unless it becomes otherwise, he seems to be fairly accurate in his forecasts. His general theory is that there will be rough weather following these patterns due to heating of the ionosphere.

Having studied HAARP lately it appears as if HAARP can heat the ionosphere enough to manipulate weather. There are official documents that indicate this is true.

HAARP has many capabilities and I suspect that affecting the weather is not always the intention of its use but is a byproduct of its use. It can be used for Tomography to analyze the contents of minerals deep into the surface of the earth. Manipulating the weather of course has obvious benefits though. There may be some weather manipulation going on in my opinion in an effort to steer some of this Fukushima radiation away from certain locations.

From what I have read HAARP may be able to vibrate or possibly heat oil, natural gas, etc...below the surface of the earth to make it easier to extract from the earth for human use. If true I find it conceivable that this could cause earthquake activity and weather storms.

My take on this at the present time is that these storms are not being created for "disaster capitalism" uses because the storms are not destroying enough property to make is useful for such an activity, and that 'if' these storms are a by product of HAARP it 'may' have something to do with natural gas or oil deposits in the New Madrid fault zone.

Who knows, there may also be some playing into the 2012 end of times scenario.

And then of course I could be completely wrong.

[The Consul]

My weather service just alerted me to a tornado warning here in upstate New York.
First time in my memory.
Did the dutchsinse guy forecast this at all?
I will look into it.

Just like the twisters they had in Brooklyn not long ago....

[Burnt Hill]

^^^Thats right Consul, I had forgotten those Brooklyn storms.
And to follow up on eyenos HAARP scenario, this area is over a major natural gas deposit,
in the Marcellus Shale. Also an area with consistently patterned emissions left by high altitude jets,
that appear to form spreading cloud cover..