Alien Abductions and the Monarch Project

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby Jewels1 » Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:07 pm

WBR--I was joking/tongue-in-cheek. I thought my smilies would portray that.
I am a bit of a smarty-pants at times. No offense was meant...
Jewels-A Diamond in the Rough
Jewels1
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: Michigan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Priming

Postby professorpan » Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:13 pm

If you want your intentions to be better understood, try just posting exactly how you feel about the subject matter and don't "beat around the bush" so much, K? Just say, "Hey, I find this Patru broad offensive and sickening! Why did you put her garbage on your sight?" Wink Then I will know EXACTLY what you mean!! Cool


Point taken. The reason I was a bit cagey is because I've seen multiple attempts by new members to ingratiate themselves subtly, only to go fore-bore into the antisemitic garbage later on.

Sorry about the suspicion, but I felt those questions had to be asked to clear the air.
User avatar
professorpan
 
Posts: 3592
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 12:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Jewels1 » Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:51 pm

Sorry about the suspicion, but I felt those questions had to be asked to clear the air.


Understood. No problemo... :)

I am not anti-Semetic. I am anti-Plutocratic!!!! :!:
Jewels-A Diamond in the Rough
Jewels1
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: Michigan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Shawnna » Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:14 am

Attack Ships on Fire wrote:I had thought about posting a new thread with this info, but since I made mention of John Lear and ATS earlier this afternoon, I'll lump it in with this thread. If someone wants to continue it, they can decide if it deserves its own thread or should remain in here.

Two things I'd like to mention:

1. After my post earlier today, I dropped by the ATS forum to see what was new...I usually check on it once every week or so. I found out that John Lear has been suspended posting privledges, at least according to someone that posted this in the moon photo thread I refer to above.

2. I stumbled across another interesting thread that started off as a discussion about the possibility that ATS (and other para websites) are being used in some kind of disinformation game by the government or by mind control groups. Here's the thread where it starts: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread235196/pg1

There are some interesting things in there including the reveal that Dr. Christopher "Kit" Green is now a consultant to ATS. One of the ATS posters named Shawnna found out about Green's background, including his work for the CIA and interest in paranormal/UFO subjects. He's a neurophysiologist with a specialty in electrophysiology. He may also be one of the men that was in the Aviary group mentioned by Moore and Shandera in the late 1980s, and that some UFOlogists claim are a disinformation group seeding untruths amongst the UFO community.

For their part, one of the ATS mods chimed in and debated Shawnna, defending the integrity of Green, and that his employment by the DIA or CIA, or his name being linked to the purpored Aviary group isn't by any means confirmation that he is not to be trusted by ATS members. Green even sent an email to the ATS mod stating some of this, and the ATS mod downplayed that any sinister motives were behind the involvement of Green with the website.



Actually - the individual challenging me known as "springer" is one of the owners of ATS. And he bases his opinion on a few emails and phone conversations. Let's just say "springer" is not exactly the sharpest pencil in the box.

He is also much more interested in driving membership to ATS than anything else.


Attack Ships on Fire wrote:Reading on further, Shawnna claims that Green has ties with several people whose involvement with the UFO community are under suspicion including those involved with the release of the SERPO documents.

So what you're left with is the direct involvement of a scientist that has an extensive career with DIA and CIA, an expert at the wiring of the brain, an interest in paranormal and UFOs, and who has some kind of connection with the MJ-12 team of Moore/Shandera and the team behind the SERPO documents, the authenticies of both (especially the SERPO docs) are under suspicion. The Shawnna person has even linked to a PDF file that links the social connections Green has with the UFO community and his similarity with ties to those shared by Uri Geller.

http://home.comcast.net/~shawnna141/Soc ... HERKIT.pdf

I'm not entirely sure what to make of all of it yet, but one fascinating idea is that there may be people out there with strong ties to the military or alphabet agencies that are trying hard to make a case that UFOs are alien spacecraft. So if that's the case, why is the government so focused on spending monies on secret experiments with remote viewing, mind control and psychic phenomena?

What if the simplest answer -- that these things are aliens coming from space -- isn't the best answer? And what if there are some people that don't want the best answer to start building momentum amongst the UFO community?

I know this isn't fun to do, and it creates more headaches than offers solutions, but I thought it would be fun to share what's happening on this small corner of it right now on another site.


I have quite a bit of circumstantial evidence that Kit Green is, in fact, deeply involved behind the scenes with respect to the Serpo saga. He has a long-standing and deep personal relationship with Rick Doty. In addition to Doty and Kit, Hal Puthoff was also involved. Kit and Hal have a long history that goes back to their days at SRI where Uri Geller was tested.

My sense is that Kit and Hal have some deep seated beliefs based on their own personal experience which explains to a certain extent their involvement in all of this. Ron Pandolfi and Dan Smith are also very involved.

Once you begin to follow the tunnels of this rabbit hole - they all seem to eventually lead back to Kit, Doty, The NINE and SRI.

:roll:
Shawnna
 

Postby Attack Ships on Fire » Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:09 pm

Wow, what a surprise it was to see someone I mentioned reading about on ATS here at RigInt! I followed that thread on for quite a bit and while I'm not as well versed in the intricacies of the whole story, I thought too that Springer was being starstruck by his association with the scientist in question. I definitely got the impression that certain high profile visitors and participants at ATS were given an unnecessary degree of authority over the regular posters because there was a cult of personality going on, intentional or otherwise. The rebuttals of John Lear in his thread about moonbases is a perfect example of this.

I had actually thought about extending an invite to you to come visit Rigorous Intuition because I thought your skeptical nature might find this community interesting, but in the end I couldn't think of a way to do it where I didn't feel silly about bringing it up in polite conversation. I've seen how they like to ban or moderate discussion about other websites on ATS. I'm really glad that you managed to find this place on your own and I hope that you will stick around. I think your skepticism is very well founded and was refreshing to see in that ATS thread.

Shawnna wrote:Actually - the individual challenging me known as "springer" is one of the owners of ATS. And he bases his opinion on a few emails and phone conversations. Let's just say "springer" is not exactly the sharpest pencil in the box.

He is also much more interested in driving membership to ATS than anything else.


Mmmhmm, you may be right and definitely know more about things going on over there than I do. From my vantage point I see ATS as a step or two above the National Enquirer. That place has incredibly active forums, a large membership base and an array of active threads all the time but I don't see a lot of rigorous intuition displayed over there (although the recent O'Hare UFO photo analysis done by the members lifted my standings of the ATS crowd a little). Knowing a little about what it's like managing popular forums I know the ATS owners are probably spread thin, but with a large community comes the pitfalls of maintaining a reasonable sense of order. It's even more crucial for ATS to maintain an open-minded perseverence because of the subject matter they focus on, but by allowing people to post whatever made up story they might have about aliens the discussion and atmosphere of the place loses credibility.

You took your lumps in that thread and I think you managed to remain civil and clear in your presentation of what you believe. From someone that felt they learned something from what you had to say, thanks!

This whole area of Doty and SRI is fascinating and leads down some dark rabbit holes. There's a thread on here about Greer and his CSETI organization sharing an address and an interest with UFOs with someone that has connections to big oil business. You may find it of interest: http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board/v ... er&start=0

I hope you decide to stick around and post more often.
Attack Ships on Fire
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 2:24 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby streeb » Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:25 pm

Hi Shawnna and Attack Ships on Fire - would you mind elaborating on this for those of us (me) who are a little behind on all this stuff? Specifically, how do you think Puthoff, Doty, Kit, SRI, and the Nine are all connected, what the hell does it mean in your opinion, and what's the nature of the "deep seated beliefs based on their own personal experience" that Shawnna mentions. A tall order I know, but I'm all ears (and eyes).

Thanks!
User avatar
streeb
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: Zona, BC
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby philipacentaur » Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:26 pm

streeb wrote:Hi Shawnna and Attack Ships on Fire - would you mind elaborating on this for those of us (me) who are a little behind on all this stuff? Specifically, how do you think Puthoff, Doty, Kit, SRI, and the Nine are all connected, what the hell does it mean in your opinion, and what's the nature of the "deep seated beliefs based on their own personal experience" that Shawnna mentions. A tall order I know, but I'm all ears (and eyes).

Thanks!

I'll hop on that bandwagon.
philipacentaur
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:45 pm
Location: Gone to Maser
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Attack Ships on Fire » Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:00 pm

** Sorry for the double post everyone but I tried to post my above message earlier in the day and the board burped and exceeded its CPU quota...thought it was lost and I kept the page open to repost and then when I checked the thread, well, you know...
Attack Ships on Fire
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 2:24 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Donovan » Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:57 pm

Quote from first thread in post (Osculum Infame) re ‘abductions’:

“….There are consistent patterns that have been shown to be universals in these events despite the split between those who believe that these are positive life-enhancing experiences and those who hold the extreme opposite perspective. Exploring these patterns and the common denominators from the known aspects of human behavior and psychology can be helpful in opening up a whole new panorama of exploration into the alien abduction mystery. This involves being willing to look at the secrets hidden within secrets, and that can be dangerous; in some cases life-threatening. The big secret is not who the aliens are that are engaging in these abductions, the biggest secret of all is who we are.” (unquote from One Smart Rat as posted by Osculum Infame)

I agree with this is spades. I think I have had both types of abductions, a military fake and real. The real was the most terrifying. After- I cried after for two solid weeks. Could not stop crying. I would think I would be ‘cried out’ after crying for hours, go out, and start crying all over again at, (one instance), a Friendly’s Icecream, and had to leave. But during this I felt physically wonderful. Like the afterglow of sex times a thousand. Even my fingernails felt like the most wonderful thing in the world. But there was something else: I had no fear. All fear had left me. And I realized how much of a sea of fear we live in. Later I saw a movie, Fearless, and realized that I was reacting in a known way to severe trauma. In the movie the guy survived an Airline crash, he walked around for weeks with no fear. He even ate food he was highly allergic to. When he eventually ‘got better’, the food again made him very ill.

That was some many years ago. It has not happened since. I have been in contact with many others which has helped put things in perspective. One thing I have come to realize is that I am not my personality or ego, that is just a front ‘program’ used to deal with physical reality, it is not that important. And the ‘looser’ it is worn the better. Though scary, don't see 'Grays' as evil or such.

The ‘abductors’ were the standard ‘Grays’. They are massively interested that we change our views of mathematics…. A main program. These experiences are old, they are very much (jing) a part of Islam. Now the rage is ‘orbs’. These started to be seen on camera as digital cameras came out. And those getting them in pictures, many progress to seeing them. So the UFO phenomena is getting more widely ‘personal’.

Monarch programming is very old. Richard the Lionhearted (The first, the Black Prince) tarried a year on Cyprus after his defeat by Saladin. He was shown demonstrations: soldiers who would march right off of castle walls when ordered. But such programming can turn, the programmed can become what is called ‘clear eyes’, choosing one of the personalities to function but with knowledge of all of them. Multiple personalities heal quicker, live longer.

But we are all going in that direction, glimpses of ‘past lives’ the usual start. The personality we wear seems to loosen up after these ‘others that are us’ appear.

“I propose that we become religious engineers." By - William Sims Bainbridge was above.

That is what we are becoming, ‘religious engineers’. It does not matter that we have limited knowledge. We know that there is an antithesis of this program. It is just there. I see little value of putting too much emphasis (besides spreading knowledge) of combating that program directly, more to just explore fearlessly our inner nature. We are learning that we don’t know who we are. That realization is a big step.
Donovan
Donovan
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:27 pm
Location: Camden, ME
Blog: View Blog (0)

Drugs, hypnosis, rape.

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:05 am

Since my posts at the beginning of this thread I have had the enlightening displeasure to read David M. Jacobs' 1992 book, 'Secret Life: Firsthand Documented Accounts of UFO Abductions.' The preface is by the infamous Harvard psychiatry professor John E. Mack.

Jacobs, an associate professor of history at Temple University,"takes us into the private world of those abducted by aliens, letting them describe in their own words what it is like to be abducted. Bse on interviews with sixty individuals and more than 300 independently corroborated accounts, Secret Life presents the most complete and accurate picture of alien abductions ever compiled."

Bullshit. I read accounts of people drugged, hypnotised, molested, raped, women forced to interact with infants and children, even given abortions after being impregnated.

Once you know about the CIA's fascination with hypnosis and LSD there isn't any account in the book that doesn't sound exactly like those experiences.

Keyword hijacking: Majestic 12, Greys, Reptilians

Majestic 12 is, I firmly believe, a keyword hijacking of the Hotel Majestic where the meeting was held in Paris that formed the Council on Foreign Relations in May, 1919.

Greys: Aliens were all types until 1973 when Lt. Col L. Fletcher Prouty exposed the CIA in his book, 'The Secret Team.' Prouty used a common expression for the unnamed beaurocrats who made policy, "the Grey Men." Ta da.

Reptilians: The part of the brain that responds to fear and trauma, the amygdala, is in the oldest part of the brain that deals with basic survival fight or flight, also called "the Reptilian brain." Ta da.

That's where the disinfo terms "Majestic, Greys, and Reptiles" come from. I'm pretty damn sure.

I'm firmly convinced that pretty much all mystery is the work of deceitful men.
Atleast, the mysteries that we discuss here.
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Drugs, hypnosis, rape.

Postby Attack Ships on Fire » Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:58 am

It's late, I'm tired and I shouldn't be cruising RigInt but I needed to say to Hugh that he's wrong about two of his three assumptions.

1. People have seen small, large-eyed creatures that are now referred to as Grays since well before 1973. There's enough literature out there to support this but I'll point to the best well known case, the Hill Abduction in 1961. I'll also make note that many people report seeing variations on the standard Gray creature such as differences in skin color (bleached white to ruddy tan), different size eyes, eyes with or without pupils, more pronounced facial features (lines, sagging of skin, ridges), build differences (some are rake-thin, others have a pronounced stomach bulge) and different hands. Witnesses from the 1955 Kentucky sighting claimed small, big-eyed aliens but with large ears tried to attack their house.

I'm not sure when the reports of the alleged EBEs from Roswell entered the popular culture so I'll stay away from that 1947 incident.

Trying to build a case that reports of the now well-known Gray alien didn't come into vogue until a military officer made a slang term for government men is very flimsy, Hugh. You are dismissing a huge body of work from many investigators, doctors and scientists that have come forward with abduction reports including the ones from skeptical professionals. Not only that, you're also ignoring circumstantial stories about the hag syndrome, so-called succubus dreams and other abduction-like reports that don't include Gray creatures from before the 1950s. Build a case if you like that they aren't aliens abducting people but to claim that it all began in 1973 is ludicrous.


2. I've read before that the creatures that are reported by abductees seem to clump in different groups depending upon where in the world you look at. For example, in North America there seems to be far more many reports of Gray-like creatures from abductees; in Africa, it's reptillian creatures. Even if this is all part of the human subconscious and not real, then there must be a social aspect why different people living in different parts of the world are reporting, generally speaking, different creatures taking them away. I think your theory would be stronger if the majority of North American abductees had been reporting reptillian creatures over Gray-like creatures, but they're not.

Some skeptics have a theory that the large-eyed Grays are the most reported because the general populace had been exposed to large-eyed space creatures in movies from the 1940s onward. Critics of the BEM theory counter that if that were the case, why aren't more abductees reporting robot creatures during their abductions since pop culture science fiction films have included them as well. Surprisingly there are reports of robot-like creatures during some abduction reports just as there are cases where abductees claim to have seen human-like beings working side-by-side with Grays.

Hugh, I think you can be a skeptic of the abduction phenomena but to dismiss these two aspects with the examples you provided is like telling a witness to a UFO that all they saw was Venus or swamp gas.

To Streeb and Philip, I saw your posts asking for some background on the ATS discussion. I'll chime back in tomorrow once I get some rest (unless Shawnna beats me to it.)
Attack Ships on Fire
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 2:24 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Donovan » Fri Feb 02, 2007 1:07 pm

Hugh,
I think Jacobs’ book is one of the worst in that area. He is very fearful and it shows.
You are a very reasonable person, Hugh, and frankly I don’t blame your skepticism. I did not believe in these things until they happened. My two experiences were about six months apart. The first had physical wounds, a large hole in my leg. It was about seven millimeters around and about that deep, well into the meat. It did not bleed. The local newspaper at the time was the CIA little flagship (or used to be) Cape Cod Times owned by Dow Jones through a Canadian straw. Just after my experience there was a front page article in that paper, which I regularly read. (Front page, mind you) ! The article very supportive of real alien abductions on Dr. Mack. I was then led by ‘new friends’, both in the Israeli army, to ‘abduction support groups’ by someone associated with another investigator (name escaping me, but in the aliens-are-evil vein) Intruders Foundation? At any rate I had in prior months been rescued by the now defunct Association of National Security Alumni. (Julianne McKinney). She was convinced that the entire experience was a mind control op. EDOM, electronic desolution of memory, the hole in my leg done with laser, something poured in to cauterize etc. Reluctantly I had to see her view, and that was scarier than an abduction, a mil abduction. (but with this there was no memory, just woke up that way in a field. There were helicopters about, heard but never saw.

But the second abduction I believe real. At the time I did not even believe in UFOs, thought way too far out. I also don’t give as much emphasis to the concept of if or not ‘physically taken’ as opposed to ‘taken in dream’. There were no physical marks after the second event. (but long time marks on my leg that I cannot explain). If your ‘ego’, person-hood, is ‘taken in dream’ it had the profound effect, (no fear, crying for weeks etc as above). In other words that distinction more important to those who have not accepted other reality fields.
The second event was in the political sense the opposite of the first, giving me very specific warnings and such.
Therefore I was given a quick, harsh education wherein I had to accept that both types of events were happening. Military produced events and the real thing.
How can I possibly combat your sensible skepticism when prior to my experiences I felt the same way?
But I also go back to about seven years prior to those events when the ‘powers-that-be’ were asking about my connection with UFOs when I did not believe in them. Very strange.
And this is odd, Hugh. (Very strange).
Right smack in the middle of the ‘surprise Soviet naval maneuvers’ (or more correctly during the ‘fallout period’ I was writing a cover letter to a small publication I wrote in regard the maneuvers- The Sour Grape, published on Martha’s Vineyard.

Let me flash forward a bit for perspective: The morning of the christening of the USS Ronald Reagan (forget 2000 I think) I attended an unadvertised but open to public ‘Security’ speakers meeting in Hampton. Speaking were Jean Kirkpatrick, John Lehman, and Edwin Meese. ALL the speakers mentioned ‘Chernenko’s warning’ (surprise Soviet naval maneuvers) as the “big turning point of modern history”. How many even know what happened? Or why it was important?

At any rate, back 1985, I am trying to write this cover letter for The Sour Grape during the fallout period after (and during period where I am under surveillance). I had received a letter from the navy and handwritten under the official address in red was another return address “Box 5000” Pentagon with the zip. So in my cover I was writing, (it is dug away here someplace) either naval intel or the Times (Max Frankel editorial page editor NYTime) but the other copied. It was to be a simple one-sentence cover letter to read, “Who is responsible for naval intelligence?” The Sour Grape was enclosed, so that one sentence all that was needed. And with the Sour Grape very funny! But I could not do it!!!!!!!

About a week went by while I pondered over that one simple (and under the circumstances funny in a very dark sort of way) letter. Something in me wanted to change one word but I thought it would sound nuts. Something in me wanted to change ‘naval’ to ‘native’. This was so strong that after a week I relented to that impulse and sent it as ‘native’: “Who is responsible for native intelligence?”.

I can’t explain that.

I am seeing the most remarkable conversation in main stream media that I have seen in years. Yesterday’s New York Times editorial, lead editorain !, to the tune that the neo-cons’ posturing toward Iran is getting out of hand- they had better back off. What????
The New York Times???? But I posted my note to Gorbachev and letter to the French Ambassador here in the general discussion and it was not even read. There is a falling out at the higher levels of secret government over possible attack on Iran and few are noticing. (For sure plans of attack are posted on such as Rense but the discussion at top is missed). A discussion of nuclear war right in major media, no notice, even by the ‘alternative Internet’ !!!

Why? Well, for one thing, the nuclear issue is dead in the mass mind. The powers that be have used that fear so often that the mass mind has rejected it. Fallout shelters are not a hot item. Even many of the ‘new age’ types will say such nonsense as “Not to worry, the aliens won’t let it happen?” That is a common reaction. What? Were not so many of the encounters showing the contactees visions of nuclear holocaust??? Therefore, even the NYTimes editorial would in the mass mind be taken as some sort of academic discussion, not a real present situation tearing the secret government into factions

At any rate, Hugh, your skepticism is just fine. What can I say as prior to my experiences I had fairly much the same thoughts as you?
Donovan
Donovan
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:27 pm
Location: Camden, ME
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:37 pm

Reptilians: The part of the brain that responds to fear and trauma, the amygdala, is in the oldest part of the brain that deals with basic survival fight or flight, also called "the Reptilian brain." Ta da.


if you think about the behaviour of humans in power, calling them shape shifting reptillians is a good metaphor for their behaviour.


If people are thinking with "that part of their brain" how reptile like will their behaviour be?

How "cold blooded" will they be? Will they speak with a "forked tongue"?

Crawl up your legas and chest cos you startled them and they hink you might be a tree? (Sorry thats a myth about Goanna behaviour here in Australia).

I think that reptillian shapeshifter thing could be a great metaphor.

A way of saying "Your behaviour is so inhuman that you lack all basic compassion."

"You are a reptile! And I will never trust you again."


Etc etc


What about "little green men".

They have been arounbd pre 1973. Where did that idea come from?



I had an experience I would describe as an attempted abduction. All the "creatures" or glosses I experienced were kind of like the alien grey archetype, in that they had big eyes, no hair and were humanoid.

But one was a giant mantis and the others had pink wrinkly skin.

And the entire experience took place in my bedroom, while falling asleep and continued after I had woken up and was moving around the room doing stuff, and talking to my wife.

I imagine that if that experience could be repeated or induced in a situation where RA or MC of some sort was practised the effect would be powerful and scary.

BTW Although I call the experience an attempted abduction, thats the best metaphor I have, I really have no idea what was going on, and don't really care. 10 years ago this June and its never happened again.
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10616
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

The eyes have it.

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:24 am

Hmm, "greys with big eyes." Now how on Earth could that be?

Image

Image

Image

Image
CIA runs mainstream media since WWII:
news rooms, movies/TV, publishing
...
Disney is CIA for kidz!
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Shawnna » Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:57 am

streeb wrote:Hi Shawnna and Attack Ships on Fire - would you mind elaborating on this for those of us (me) who are a little behind on all this stuff? Specifically, how do you think Puthoff, Doty, Kit, SRI, and the Nine are all connected, what the hell does it mean in your opinion, and what's the nature of the "deep seated beliefs based on their own personal experience" that Shawnna mentions. A tall order I know, but I'm all ears (and eyes).

Thanks!


I've been researching Andrija Puharich - here's a biography that includes a chapter on his involvement with The NINE.

He was instrumental in bringing URI Geller to SRI for testing - that testing involved Hal Puthoff and Kit Green (using the pseudonym Richard Kennett). You can read more about that here.

Kit Green has a long-standing personal relationship with Rick Doty.

And here's a post I recently did at eaglesdisobey.org (now wyzwyrld.com) that may shed some light on the rabbit hole I've been exploring.

What in the world do Nazis, NASA and The Nine have to do with each other?

I hope that when you are done reading this, you will see enough of a connection to allow for the possibility that all is not as it seems.

This is not an exhaustive exploration of this topic. Rather, I am hoping to pique your interest to further explore.


NAZIs and Operation Paperclip

Operation Paperclip (also known as Project Paperclip) involved the secret removal of Nazi scientists from Germany by the US intelligence and military during the last stage of World War II.

The Nazi scientists had amassed an extraordinary amount of research, as well as results, related to rocketry, aerodynamics, chemical weapons, technology and medicine. Of course, much of their research was conducted on human subjects in the Nazi concentration camps, but that is for another post.

Because these individuals and their families were either members of the National Socialist German Workers Party or the SS, and/or considered war criminals or security threats, they would have been denied visas by the US State Department, but the military wasn't about to let that interfere with anything.

Besides, we could not let the Soviets get their hands on the Nazi research now could we?

In addition to the production of the V-1 and V-2 missiles, the German Nazis had designs for jet and "flying saucer" type craft.

One interesting report shows that on August 5, 1947, Guido Bernardy wanted to warn the US Army in Frankfurt about the Nazi secret weapons, including the development of flying saucers by Hitler's scientists, as well as the appearance of two gentlemen, with no special talent in their lives, [who] discovered they did have extraordinary powers and capabilities which made it possible for them to communicate and contact the spirit world. Mr. Bernardy was interviewed by Albert Goldstein who noted in his report that "subject seemed entirely sincere, and the strong possibility that he is merely a crackpot is not apparent."



NAZIs and the Occult

After reading the above subtitle, I am sure most of you want to stop reading. I understand this reaction for it is one I would have had previously as well.

For those of us growing up in the US and beginning in kindergarten, we pledged allegiance to a nation under God. With 78% of the US involved in some form of Christianity, our history and culture is steeped in religion and the word occult denotes evil for most of us.

What I am asking you to do is let go of all you have heard or read about relating to the occult. Doing this ha even for this brief moment while you read this will allow you to perhaps think about things in a little different way. Exploring our reality with an open mind and heart is fundamental to the evolution of our species.

To be sure we are all on the same page going forward, here is the definition of the word occult as used here.

The word occult comes from the Latin occultus (clandestine, hidden, secret). It refers to the 'knowledge of the secret' or 'knowledge of the hidden' and may also be thought of as 'knowledge of the supernatural' (as opposed to knowledge that can be explained through science). The term is sometimes taken to mean 'knowledge meant only for certain people' or 'knowledge that must be kept hidden', but for most practicing occultists it is simply the study of a deeper spiritual "reality" that extends beyond pure reason and the physical sciences. The terms esoteric and arcane can have a very similar meaning, and the three terms are often interchangeable.

The term occult is also used as a label given to a number of organizations or orders, and the teachings and practices as taught by them. The name also extends to a large body of literature and spiritual philosophy.


Now that we have that as our foundation, let's move on to explore NAZIs and the Occult.

Guido Karl Anton List, aka Guido von List, was most noted as an occult and volkisch author and is considered one of the most important figures in Germanic revivalism, Germanic mysticism, Runic Revivalism and Runosophy.

The Thule Society or Study Group for Germanic Antiquity was a German occultist and volkisch group in Munich. It is the organization that sponsored the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei which Adolf Hitler transformed into the Nazi Party.

The Thule Society, which derived elements of its ideology and members from earlier occult groups founded by Guido von List included men who became high Nazi Party officials including Rudolf Hess, Alfred Rosenberg, Dietrich Eckart and Hans Frank, among others. Some sources state Hitler was an associate member or visiting brother. Allegedly dentist Dr. Friedrich Krohn, a member of the Thule Society, chose the swastika symbol for the Nazi party.

It is reported that Dietrich Eckart had the most significant Thule influence on Hitler. Mr. Eckart was a committed occultist as well as a member of the Thule Society's inner circle. He was the wealthy publisher of the newspaper In Plain German, and it is believed that he taught Hitler a number of persuasive techniques. Hitler's book “ Mein Kampf “ was dedicated to Eckart.

It is clear, at least to me, that the German Nazis were experts in rocket science and aeronautics, as well as deeply involved and influenced by the occult.



History of US Space Research

Beginning in the fall of 1945, the first group of German Nazi researchers, including Wernher von Braun, arrived in the US. This influx of Nazi rocket scientists marked the beginning of the US rocket program ultimately culminating in the first US launch of a V-2 rocket from the White Sands Proving Ground in New Mexico on April 16, 1946.

And so began what has been called the Cold War Space Race.

Leading the US effort is Nazi scientist Wernher von Braun who in the fall of 1954 presents a paper to a joint Army-Navy team that results in the Army submitting plans to the Office of Naval Research and Jet Propulsion Laboratory for analysis of Project Orbiter. Project Orbiter's production and launch schedule includes a series of four scientific satellites with the first slated for launch no earlier than September 1956.

However, in typical US fashion, a competition involving the Orbiter, Viking and Atlas satellite programs is in play resulting in the 1955 formation of an eight-member Advisory Group on Special Capabilities to settle the issue. This group consists of two Secretary of Defense selectees, two Army, two Navy and two Air Force selectees. Homer J. Stewart of JPL is the appointed head of what becomes known as the Stewart Committee. In August of 1955, this committee selects the Navy Research Laboratory (NRL) Viking-based plan to launch the first U.S. satellites. The vote is 5 to 2, with one member absent. Stewart himself votes in favor of Project Orbiter.

Project Orbiter is rejected primarily because the program is considered to offer a poor tracking system and inferior scientific value. In addition, Project Orbiter employed Redstone and Sergeant military rockets, violating the desire of President Eisenhower that U.S. scientific satellite research be distanced from the military.

Scientific management of the NRL program is subsequently assigned to the National Academy of Sciences, with funding through the National Science Foundation. The Navy is assigned the role of developing the Viking-based carrier vehicle. NRL and civilian managers are forbidden from soliciting scientific data from existing military ballistic missile programs.

Branches of the US Military are competitive and their specific interests do not die easily. In August of 1995, the Army issues a memo critical of the NRL Satellite program with NRL quickly rebutting this memo. A month later the Army, Navy & Air Force are formally notified that the Stewart Committee approved the NRL program, now named Project Vanguard. Project Orbiter is killed and the Army is forbidden from attempting to launch satellites. It is reported that not long after this Homer Stewart of JPL tells Wernher von Braun "We have pulled a great boner!"

Just days after the death of Project Orbiter, the Army is given a chance to develop their four-stage version of the Redstone, not to launch satellites, but to support Jupiter nosecone high-speed re-entry tests. The first Jupiter C is launched in September, 1956 and breaks all altitude and range records. Interestingly the Jupiter C carries a dummy payload and the fourth stage motor is filled with sand ballast instead of solid fuel. This is to prevent the "accidental" launching of a satellite prior to officially sanctioned Project Vanguard.

Now of course the Soviets were also working diligently and in fact, on October 4, 1957, Sputnik I, the first artificial Earth satellite is launched. The Soviets beat the US to space!

Obviously having the evil empire beat the US in the Space Race fuels public fears that the Soviets possess ballistic missiles. To put the American public at ease, President Eisenhower states in the effect of Sputnik does not raise my apprehension one iota at a news conference.

With Project Vanguard managers not planning to launch an instrumented satellite until early 1958, and insiders acknowledging that orbiting of a small tracking satellite on the first attempt using an untested rocket is a possible windfall only, President Eisenhower agrees with Defense Secretary Neil McElrov that an Army Ballistic Missile Agency (ABMA) satellite program should be officially considered as a backup to Vanguard.

In the meantime, the Soviets continue to push forward and on November 3, 1957, successfully launches Sputnik II with the first living creature, a female dog named Laika. Of course a windstorm of domestic criticism of U.S. satellite efforts immediately follows.

Five days later, the US Department of Defense issues a press release stating that the Army is authorized to launch a series of instrumented satellites aboard Jupiter C rockets as a supplement to Project Vanguard. However, this press release is issued even before ABMA Major General Medaris receives his official orders. And when he does, they only authorize ABMA to "prepare" for launching satellites. Within hours, Wernher von Braun, William Pickering and Medaris tender their resignations to Army Secretary Wilber Brucker pending an official authorization to proceed with satellite launches, regardless of the outcome of Project Vanguard.

Later that month, Medaris receives late word that ABMA would be allowed to launch regardless of the outcome of Project Vanguard and he informs his staff. Specifically he states that ABMA is not in competition with any other agency, and that ABMA satellite development is officially assigned to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL).

In mid-December 1957 - ABMA, based largely on projections from Wernher von Braun, predicts 2,000 pound Earth-satellites and an unmanned soft lunar landing by the end of 1960 as well as 5,000-pound Earth-satellites before the close of 1961 to a selected number of scientists and military leaders. The report also predicts unmanned circumnavigation of the Moon with complete photographic coverage and a two-man Earth-satellite by the close of 1962. It predicts 20,000-pound Earth-satellites and a manned expedition to circumnavigate the Moon before the close of 1963. Before the close of 1965, a 20-man Earth-orbiting space station is predicted, as well as a three-man lunar landing by the close of 1967. ABMA also predicts the establishment of a 50-man permanent lunar outpost before the close of 1971. Cost of these programs is estimated at $1.5 billion per year.

Finally at the end of January, 1958 ABMA launches the first US satellite from Cape Canaveral. Shortly after launch, the satellite is given the name "Explorer" and President Eisenhower makes a radio announcement that "Explorer I has reached orbit from his vacation home in Augusta, Georgia. At 2:00 a.m. EST in Washington, D.C. a press conference is held featuring Wernher von Braun, William Pickering, James Van Allen and Army Secretary Wilber Brucker.



So what can we see from this brief Cold War Space Race timeline of events?

What is clear is that contrary to what Eisenhower appeared to want, virtually all US space research prior to October 1, 1958 was in the hands of the military and military contractors like the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

JPL was central and I do mean central to the eventual successful launch of a US satellite.



So how does this connect to the occult?

Let's look at the background of one of the founders of JPL “Jack Parsons. To appreciate the importance of Parsons in the Space Race, it is reported that Wernher von Braun remarked that Parsons, and not he, should be regarded as the father of the American space program.

Born in 1914, John Whiteside Parsons ("Jack) has been described as a dedicated occultist, writer, visionary and chemist genius. All of this is either outright documented or alluded to in JPL101 “ the official history of JPL. "

Now if you're anything like me, your eyebrows went up as you thought with a shocked expression "founder of the world-renowned Jet Propulsion Lab - an occultist?"? What exactly does that mean?

Let's look briefly at the information related to how deeply Jack was involved in the occult.

Jack was deeply devoted to occult practices. Specifically, it is reported that before each test launch, he invoked Aleister Crowley's Hymn to Pan, the wild horned god of fertility. He was chosen by Aleister Crowley to lead Agape Lodge, the Thelemic Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O.) in California in 1942 after Crowley expelled Wilfred Smith from the position.

Okay, the next few paragraphs are going to seem like they were taken from a soap opera script but I've read all of this in more than one place so I feel pretty confident of it's accuracy.

Sarah Elizabeth Northrup (AKA 'Betty'), began living with Parsons after his wife (Sarah's sister) Helen Northrup left with Wilfred Smith. Sarah Elizabeth Northrup later married L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology and sometime magickal partner of Parsons. Parsons and Hubbard participated in a ritual known as the Babalon Working which is famous in occult circles and loosely, it was an attempt to summon a living goddess and change the course of history.

In January of 1946, Parsons, Betty, and Hubbard started a boat dealing company named Allied Enterprises. Parsons put in a large sum of approximately $21,000, Hubbard put in $1,200, and Betty nothing. Parsons was very jealous of Betty and Hubbard's relationship and so when she devoted herself entirely to Hubbard, Parsons set out to find another partner, his so called "scarlet woman", a magical partner with whom he could sire a "Moonchild." The Moonchild is traditionally the incarnation of a God, as prophesied in Crowley's channeled script 'The Book of the Law' (The creation of this Moonchild was covered in Crowley's novel of the same name).

When Parsons met artist and poet Marjorie Cameron, he regarded her as the fulfilment of his magical rituals. This same year he resigned his leadership of the O.T.O.

The Hubbard/Allied relationship lasted until 1947, when Hubbard defrauded Parsons of a sum of money and ran off with Sarah Northrup. Hubbard used much of this money from Allied Enterprises to promulgate and publish his book Dianetics, which later evolved into and was superseded by Scientology.

Whew..... wasn't that an amazing tale?



What do we have now?

We have one of the founders of JPL and the US Space Program - deeply involved in the occult.



NASA

On October 1, 1958, President Eisenhower signed the National Aeronautics and Space Act, resulting in the creation of the National Aeronautics and Space Association or "NASA". Central to this new agency are the Nazi rocket scientists brought over after WWII within "Operation Paperclip"?. JPL, who we now know was founded in part by an individual deeply involved in the occult - was quickly absorbed in to the NASA organization.

During this same period of time, the military and intelligence agencies dominated UFO research and investigation. Unfortunately, they also kept the majority of sightings, investigations, recovered "evidence" and eyewitness reports classified and hidden from civilian groups.

What else was going on within the military and intelligence communities at this time?



PSI Research

Science today is incomplete in many respects. We lack a unified theory of the physical forces. We lack a theory of consciousness itself. Our ability to integrate psi (if it exists) into our scientific worldview is extremely limited until we can develop adequate theories of these fundamental constituents of the universe.



The US government has a long history of PSI research

During 1954, the year that Whitley Strieber, author of "Communion", describes as the first year he was brought to the "secret school"?, 17 MK-ULTRA contracts were signed, including research on hypnosis (Projects 25 and 29), drugs (Projects 26, 27, 28, 37 & 38) and even stage magic (John Mulholland's projects 15 and 19). These projects included the testing of known hallucinogens and narcotics on human subjects - most without their consent and knowledge.

In 1955 the Ionia State Hospital program involving the massive dosing of prisoners with LSD began as well as the use of hypnosis in interrogations (Project 39).

In 1956, Louis Jolyon West's experiments in "dissociated states"? under the University of Oklahoma (Project 43).

Little is known of the military research taking place at the same time. What is known is the result of four boxes of MK-ULTRA files escaping the shredding effort of Richard Helms and Sidney Gottlieb and includes:

1959 - Air Force contracts with the CIA to study the "Nature and Uses of Hypnosis as a Control Technique" (contract AF 49(638)-72B)

1964 - Navy has similar contracts (contract Nonr-4731(00))

1964-1971 - Air Force contracts with CIA to study relation between sleep and hypnosis (contract AF-AFOSR-707-67).

Using drugs, hypnosis and occult techniques, it is clear that the government of the US had a vice-like-grip on research into the nature of consciousness, memory, deception and manipulation.

While at the very same time as one of the founders of JPL was head of an Aleister Crowley OTO lodge, leading military and other authorities were doing damage control with respect to UFOs.

Okay, now things are going to get a little weird so try to keep an open mind and I'm hoping you'll see the connection.



The NINE

No, I'm not referring to the current television show.

A Reality Uncovered researcher has shared this explanation of "The Nine" that was quite helpful for me.


The Nine are an ancient archetypal concept. Most familiar within Egyptian mythology colloquially known as the Ennead: the nine great Osirian gods: Atum, Shu, Tefnut, Geb, Nut, Osiris, Isis, Set, and Nephthys - the great council of the gods as well as a collective term for all the gods.

Atum was the first who created himself arising out of Nu, the primal nothingness. He created Shu and Tefnut from either his spittle or his blood. From their union came Geb and Nut. Their children were the first gods of earth: Osiris and Isis, and Set and Nephthys. The pharaohs and many of the Egyptian lesser gods descended from these four
.




In 1948, Andrija Puharich (aka Henry K. Puharich) set up a private, paranormal research laboratory called the Round Table Foundation. Some of the noted psychics who were studied at the Foundation include Eileen Garrett, a famous Irish medium and Peter Hurkos, a noted Dutch clairvoyant. The Foundation members included Arthur M. Young an influential philosopher and inventor and the socialite Alice Bouverie (nee Astor).

The end of 1952 brought a startling development to Puharich's research. It was at this time that Dr. Vinod (reportedly an Indian mystic), began to channel The Nine or "the Nine Principles". In the months before Vinod returned to India, a group met regularly to hear The Nine's channeled wisdom. Never known for their modesty, The Nine proclaimed themselves to be God, stating, "God is nobody else than we together, the Nine Principles of God."

Just three years later, what some view as independent confirmation of The Nine's existence took place. It was during a trip to Mexico that Puharich and Young met Charles and Lillian Laughead, former Christian missionaries involved in the UFO contactee movement.

After returning to the US a few weeks later, Puharich received a letter from the Laugheads containing messages received by their group's channeler. This message also claimed to come from the Nine, and to everyones amazement, included references to the earlier communications transmitted through Dr Vinod!

Is it possible "The Nine"? are real???

Perhaps the answer is embedded in the career of Puharich himself.



Who is Andrija Puharich?

It is reported that he served in the Army in the early 1950s, and in 1952, presented a paper entitled 'An Evaluation of the Possible Uses of Extrasensory Perception in Psychological Warfare' at a secret Pentagon meeting. In 1953, he lectured senior US Air Force officers on telepathy, and the staff of the Army Chemical Center on 'The Biological Foundations of Extrasensory Perception.' Back in civilian life, he starred in a Perry Mason episode as a scientist on the track of some paranormal phenomenon. A TV documentary, which appeared in an ABC TV series called One Step Beyond in 1961, followed his expedition to a remote village in Mexico to investigate a local mushroom which was rumoured by the Chatino Indians to induce extrasensory perception in those who consumed it. The fungus had been the subject of Puharich's first book, The Sacred Mushroom.

After disbanding the Round Table Foundation in 1958, he worked for 10 years as an inventor of medical devices and achieved international recognition as a parapsychologist, most famously studying the Brazilian psychic surgeon, Arigo (José Pedro de Freitas). But all that was to pale into insignificance because, in 1971, Puharich discovered Uri Geller. At their first meetings in Tel Aviv in 1971, Puharich hypnotized Geller in an attempt to find out where his abilities came from. As a result, the young Israeli started to channel "Spectra" an entity which claimed to be a conscious super-computer aboard a spaceship.

However, Puharich suggested to him that there might be a connection with the Nine Principles, and Spectra readily agreed that there was. The Nine claimed that they had programmed Geller with his powers as a young child.??Through Geller, The Nine alerted Puharich to his life's mission, which was to use Geller's talents to alert the world to an imminent mass landing of spaceships that would bring representatives of The Nine.

As I've ventured down this particular tunnel of the rabbit hole, I've only tapped the surface of what appears to be a long and involved history of individuals exploring the nature of their existence using what we call occult techniques. These include individuals like Andrija Puharich and Jacque Vallee, but many, many others as well.

The most fundamental questions of humanity that most of us never bother asking in public have been, and are, being explored by those who refuse to go with the "status quo" for whatever reason.


.Like many more sober investigators I have come to take seriously the notion that there are discrete intelligences at hand other than those housed in fleshly bodies, and that they interact with us in quite complex ways. The Puharich/Geller story is kin to a number of other fairly independent accounts that represent a sudden apocalyptic edge to this spreading belief; and though they arise in the context of a society that is slowly tearing apart, their flamboyance can't he dismissed simply on this account. We are in for an age of increasingly strange social phenomena (and scientific ones as well), and our beliefs about what is are already in the process of being shattered. Weird things are abrew -- perhaps as odd as Puharich's intimations, if not quite the same -- and I think it is much the better part of intellectual humility to recognize what we have no way of knowing, and to confess our guesses as projections of our wishes.

Peter Levenda



By the way, this is explained in greater detail within the following books - all of which I highly recommend.

The Stargate Conspiracy by Lynn Picknett & Clive Prince (has nothing to do with the movie and TV show of the same name)

Sinister Forces
by Peter Levenda (all 3 books)


My own search for answers stems from my spiritual understanding that we are all connected.

What is most important to remember as you explore the nature of reality is that no one group - be it religious, societal or otherwise - has THE answer to the nature of your/our existence.

The truth is within you.

Always,
Shawnna
Shawnna
 

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests