Fuck Obama

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby Nordic » Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:03 am

"Phantom Jobs"

http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2010/11 ... ntom-jobs/

By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS | CounterPunch | November 8, 2010

If we cannot trust what the government tells us about weapons of mass destruction, terrorist events, and the reasons for its wars and bailouts, can we trust the government’s statement last Friday that the US economy gained 151,000 payroll jobs during October?

Apparently not. After examining the government’s report, statistician John Williams (shadowstats.com) reported that the jobs were “phantom jobs” created by “concurrent seasonal factor adjustments.” In other words, the 151,000 jobs cannot be found in the unadjusted underlying data. The jobs were the product of seasonal adjustments concocted by the BLS.

As usual, the financial press did no investigation and simply reported the number handed to the media by the government.

The relevant information, the information that you need to know, is that the level of payroll employment today is below the level of 10 years ago. A smaller number of Americans are employed right now than were employed a decade ago.

Think about what that means. We have had a decade of work force growth from youngsters reaching working age and from immigration, legal and illegal, but there are fewer jobs available to accommodate a decade of work force entrants than before the decade began.

During two years from December 2007 – December 2009, the US economy lost 8,363,000 jobs, according to the payroll jobs data. As of October 2010, payroll jobs purportedly have increased by 874,000, an insufficient amount to keep up with labor force growth. However, John Williams reports that 874,000 is an overestimate of jobs as a result of the faulty “birth-death model,” which overestimates new business start-ups during recessions and underestimates business failures. Williams says that the next benchmark revision due out next February will show a reduction in current employment by almost 600,000 jobs. This assumes, of course, that the BLS does not gimmick the benchmark revision. If Williams is correct, it is more evidence that the hyped recovery is non-existent.

Discounting the war production shutdown at the end of World War II, which was not a recession in the usual sense, Williams reports that “the current annual decline [in employment] remains the worst since the Great Depression, and should deepen further.”

In short, there is no employment data, and none in the works, unless gimmicked, that supports the recovery myth. The US rate of unemployment, if measured according to the methodology used in 1980, is 22.5%. Even the government’s broader measure of unemployment stands at 17%. The 9.6% reported rate is a concocted measure that does not include discouraged workers who have been unable to find a job after 6 months and workers who who want full time jobs but can only find part-time work.

Another fact that is seldom, if ever, reported, is that the payroll jobs data reports the number of jobs, not the number of people with jobs. Some people hold two jobs; thus, the payroll report does not give the number of employed people.

The BLS household survey measures the number of people with jobs. The same October that reported 151,000 new payroll jobs reported, according to the household survey, a loss of 330,000 jobs.

The American working class has been destroyed. The American middle class is in its final stages of destruction. Soon the bottom rungs of the rich themselves will be destroyed.

The entire way through this process the government will lie and the media will lie.

The United States of America has become the country of the Big Lie. Those who facilitate government and corporate lies are well rewarded, but anyone who tells any truth or expresses an impermissible opinion is excoriated and driven away.

But we “have freedom and democracy.” We are the virtuous, indispensable nation, the salt of the earth, the light unto the world.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby Nordic » Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:07 am

US Drone Attacks Kill 14 in North Waziristan

Missiles Destroy Home, Vehicles in Tribal Area

by Jason Ditz, November 07, 2010
Email This | Print This | Share This | Antiwar Forum

US drone strikes killed at least 14 people today in the North Waziristan Agency and, as usual, Pakistani security officials termed everyone slain a “suspected militant” though they conceded, again as usual, that they had no idea who any of the people were.

The first drone strike destroyed a home and a vehicle north of Miramshah, killing nine. An hour later another strike hit Datta Khel, killing five others. The Datta Khel strike destroyed a vehicle and officials said all those killed were “foreigners,” not uncommon as North Waziristan borders Afghanistan and has been a haven for Pashtun refugees from the north.

Earlier in the day, locals in Miramshah reported that militants had dumped the bodies of three people on the roadside. The three were suspected of being US spies, again not an uncommon situation in the region.

US drone strikes have become an almost daily occurrance in North Waziristan, as the Obama Administration has pressured the Pakistani government to launch a military offensive against the tribal area. Pakistan’s government has been reluctant, however, owing to the large number of other offensives they are already engaged in around the tribal areas.



You know, it's really amazing what a high percentage of news stories fit comfortably under the "Fuck Obama" tag.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby Jeff » Tue Nov 09, 2010 1:32 pm

Bush: “I probably won’t even vote for McCain”

November 9, 2010 3:51pm

George W. Bush’s bombastic return to the world stage has reminded me of my favourite Bush anecdote, which for various reasons we couldn’t publish at the time. Some of the witnesses still dine out on it.

The venue was the Oval Office. A group of British dignitaries, including Gordon Brown, were paying a visit. It was at the height of the 2008 presidential election campaign, not long after Bush publicly endorsed John McCain as his successor.

Naturally the election came up in conversation. Trying to be even-handed and polite, the Brits said something diplomatic about McCain’s campaign, expecting Bush to express some warm words of support for the Republican candidate.

Not a chance. “I probably won’t even vote for the guy,” Bush told the group, according to two people present.“I had to endorse him. But I’d have endorsed Obama if they’d asked me.”

Endorse Obama? Cue dumbfounded look from British officials, followed by some awkward remarks about the Washington weather. Even Gordon Brown’s poker face gave way to a flash of astonishment.

...


http://blogs.ft.com/westminster/2010/11 ... or-mccain/
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby Simulist » Tue Nov 09, 2010 1:48 pm

For Bush to admit that he would have endorsed Obama is a surprise somewhat, but that he would feel that way is (unreservedly) not a surprise.

The Obama Administration is the best friend the former Bush Administration could have hoped for.
"The most strongly enforced of all known taboos is the taboo against knowing who or what you really are behind the mask of your apparently separate, independent, and isolated ego."
    — Alan Watts
User avatar
Simulist
 
Posts: 4713
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: Here, and now.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby Nordic » Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:03 pm

Jeff wrote:
Bush: “I probably won’t even vote for McCain”

November 9, 2010 3:51pm

George W. Bush’s bombastic return to the world stage has reminded me of my favourite Bush anecdote, which for various reasons we couldn’t publish at the time. Some of the witnesses still dine out on it.

The venue was the Oval Office. A group of British dignitaries, including Gordon Brown, were paying a visit. It was at the height of the 2008 presidential election campaign, not long after Bush publicly endorsed John McCain as his successor.

Naturally the election came up in conversation. Trying to be even-handed and polite, the Brits said something diplomatic about McCain’s campaign, expecting Bush to express some warm words of support for the Republican candidate.

Not a chance. “I probably won’t even vote for the guy,” Bush told the group, according to two people present.“I had to endorse him. But I’d have endorsed Obama if they’d asked me.”

Endorse Obama? Cue dumbfounded look from British officials, followed by some awkward remarks about the Washington weather. Even Gordon Brown’s poker face gave way to a flash of astonishment.

...


http://blogs.ft.com/westminster/2010/11 ... or-mccain/



That's a great find.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby AlicetheKurious » Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:10 pm

Jeff wrote:“I probably won’t even vote for the guy,” Bush told the group, according to two people present.“I had to endorse him. But I’d have endorsed Obama if they’d asked me.”


Who's "they"?
"If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby Nordic » Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:13 pm

AlicetheKurious wrote:
Jeff wrote:“I probably won’t even vote for the guy,” Bush told the group, according to two people present.“I had to endorse him. But I’d have endorsed Obama if they’d asked me.”


Who's "they"?



Probably his Dad. And friends.

Image
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby Montag » Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:25 pm

Editorial: Obama and Muslims
http://arabnews.com/opinion/editorial/article185617.ece

We want some plain, honest action on Palestine, not fine words

So President Barack Obama thinks that more works needs to be done to end Muslim mistrust of the US but that he is making progress on reducing misunderstanding between the two.

The US president is either living in an ivory tower, totally divorced from reality, or he is being thoroughly dishonest, hoping that Muslims can be fobbed off with fine words.

As far as Muslims are concerned, nothing of any importance has been done by him to change attitudes. Muslim mistrust of the US is as great as ever. It is also painfully evident that, for all its denials, American mistrust of Muslims is massive. The furor over the planned mosque near New York’s 9/11 site; an opinion poll in September showing that 35 percent of Americans believe that Islam encourages violence; the seizure only this week of a package containing nothing more deadly than the passports of a number of American Muslims planning to leave for Haj by US Customs & Border Control with the result that the 17 would-be Hajis missed their flight: All stand as damning evidence of towering American Islamophobia and a paranoia about anything connected with Muslims.

We are tired of Obama’s fine rhetoric. We have heard it before. In Cairo 17 months ago, he promised to hit the restart button in relations between the Muslim world and the US. It has not happened. Yes, there were promises in Cairo about US/Muslim world school exchange programs, help to boost entrepreneurship, science and technology in Muslim countries and increased aid for Pakistan. That was easy; it was just a matter of money. But we do not want American money; we do not need it. We do not want American words. We want some plain, honest American action on Palestine. That is the proving ground for the health of Muslim-American relations.

Obama says he is earnest in his efforts to improve the relationship. He may be earnest, but where are his efforts? In Cairo, he condemned Israeli settlements. He has done it again in Jakarta. But he has done absolutely nothing about them. When Israel ended its moratorium on settlement expansion, what did the US do? It expressed its “disappointment”. It was shameful.

Hope dashed is more poisonous than no hope ever given. It creates lasting bitterness. That is what Obama is doing. The contempt for him in the Arab and Muslim worlds is reaching Bush proportions. If he went to Israel and publicly declared that the settlements had to end, that might at least impress. But he does not even do that. Yet in the meantime, this administration continues to give Israel billions of dollars every year — with never a suggestion that it might be cut if Israel does not do as Washington wishes.

Obama had the chance to deliver after Cairo. The Muslims world wanted to believe in him. He has blown it with his inaction. He had failed totally to deliver. Muslim patience with him has now run out. Fresh fine rhetoric will not change that because Obama has shown himself not to be a man of his word.

We would love to be proved wrong. We do not think we are.
User avatar
Montag
 
Posts: 1259
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:32 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby justdrew » Wed Nov 10, 2010 8:41 pm

ok. ok. ok. Let me say it clearly.... FUCK OBAMA

FUCK HIS BULLSHIT debt commission and their bullshit recommendations. It's time to politically destroy these people.

Of course this is retarded America, so most like I can just fucking forget about SS existing. I'm sure they'll cut it such that anyone over 55 get's their full benefits. Do they intended to just default all SS's t-bills then? This country is as good as DEAD. Gawd help the poor little moronic Americans, most of them have no fucking idea what they're in store for.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby Nordic » Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:22 pm

Any talk of "debt reduction" without talk of seriously slashing the military budget and is just an excuse to drown the government in the bathtub.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby freemason9 » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:12 pm

goddam that obama sucks so
The real issue is that there is extremely low likelihood that the speculations of the untrained, on a topic almost pathologically riddled by dynamic considerations and feedback effects, will offer anything new.
User avatar
freemason9
 
Posts: 1701
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby Nordic » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:34 pm

Whoa. Obama has lost Freemason9!
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby justdrew » Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:49 pm

at this point it's impossible to support these fools. they clearly intend to gut this nation. no one who's been paying attention can even be mildly surprised by these recommendations - it's pathetic but I think we all knew exactly what they'd come up with.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby Nordic » Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:33 am

Well if you think about it, if the goal, as Obama just said whilst in India, is to "compete" on a global scale, then yes, indeed, the American economy, and specifically the American worker, is gonna have to be basically destroyed, until everybody is making the same lowest-common-denominator poverty wages, and living in cinderblock shacks and eating .... what exactly?

While people like Obama make their millions per year and live in their mansions behind the razor wire with their armed security guards.

That seems to be their goal, they are well on their way, and nobody is doing anything to stop them. Nothing at all.


The recently announced Quantitative Easing 2 policy of the Federal Reserve has had and will have a profound effect on the dollar—and a profound effect on the American people: Especially the bottom 80%. In a word, QE2 will make four fifths of the American people poorer. Bernanke’s stated purpose in QE2 is to spark consumer spending, and thereby reignite the economy. But QE2 will have the paradoxical effect of making basic necessities—food, housing, clothing, transportation—more expensive for everyone. This will mean that basic necessities will take a bigger bite out of household incomes, reducing consumption, rather than stimulating it. So like a frog dropped in a pot of cold water that's had the heat turned up, the American people—especially the bottom 60% to 80% of the population—will slowly be boiled to death in the stew of QE2. —Gonzalo Lira


http://www.zerohedge.com/article/gonzal ... population
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Fuck Obama

Postby Nordic » Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:50 am

One of the main guys on Obama's "deficit commission" is a billionaire who wants to loot your social security and raise your retirement age:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 06850.html

The leaders of President Obama's deficit commission sparked criticism from both sides of the political aisle Wednesday for proposing broad cuts to federal programs.

THIS STORY

Deficit panel leaders propose curbs on Social Security, major cuts in spending, tax breaks

But the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform has also come under attack for its unusual approach to staffing: Many of its employees aren't employed by the panel at all.

Instead, about one in four commission staffers is paid by outside entities, many of which have strong ideological points of view about how to tackle the deficit.

For example, the salaries of two senior staffers, Marc Goldwein and Ed Lorenzen, are paid by private groups that have previously advocated cuts to entitlement programs. Lorenzen is paid by the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, while Goldwein is paid by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which is also partly funded by the Peterson group.

The outsourcing has come under sharp criticism from seniors' organizations and liberal activists, who say the strategy is part of a broader conservative bias favoring painful entitlement cuts over other solutions. The fears of some liberal groups appeared to come true on Wednesday, when the commission's two leaders recommended significant reductions for Social Security and other social-welfare programs.

Bruce Reed, the panel's executive director, defended the staffing arrangement as fiscally responsible and said the staff includes a broad range of views. Other staffers paid by outside entities include an analyst from the liberal-leaning Economic Policy Institute and a Clinton administration official who now teaches at Johns Hopkins University, he said.

"We've got wonks from across the spectrum who have been working on this issue for years," Reed said. "Every possible voice from left, right or center has a voice on the commission."

But Barbara B. Kennelly, a former Democratic House member from Connecticut who heads the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, said the commission's staffing structure is "unprecedented" and casts further doubt on its fairness.

"Taxpayers fund the commission and they should work independently of Washington lobbyists and power brokers," Kennelly said. "This is the type of shenanigans that average Americans are so upset about right now - that money talks and everyone else is left out."

The debate comes as the bipartisan commission nears a Dec. 1 deadline to recommend a plan for lowering the deficit. The panel's two co-chairmen, former Bill Clinton adviser Erskine Bowles and former senator Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.), issued their own recommendations on Wednesday calling for a reduction in Social Security benefits and broad spending cuts for many federal operations.

From the beginning, liberals have complained that the Obama-created commission is tilted in a conservative direction, meaning that it is likely to favor cuts to social programs. (Many conservatives disagree, arguing that Bowles-Simpson proposals to close tax loopholes would result in major tax increases.)

Simpson didn't help relations with liberal groups when he sent an e-mail this summer complaining that the government is "like a milk cow with 310 million tits!" He later apologized for the remark amid demands for his resignation.

Kennelly and other liberal-leaning critics say they are particularly troubled by the influence of Peterson, a billionaire and former investment banker who began a $6 million campaign this week urging lawmakers to cut the deficit. Peterson, co-founder of the Blackstone Group investment fund, paid for a series of town hall meetings this year that included participation by deficit commission members. He also funds the Fiscal Times, a digital news organization that focuses on federal debt issues



And did any of these rich fucks mention that the deficit could be cut by closing American bases around the world, ending wars, and getting rid of, oh, 80% of "military" spending (corporate welfare).

No. Of course not.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 162 guests